Sunday, December 16, 2007

Quotes+Questions


4LAKids: Sunday, Dec 16, 2007
In This Issue:
LAUSD PARENTS PASS UP THE VOTE: Low turnout in the recent vote on school reform shows the apathy the mayor is up against
A SHAKY START ON A HUGE AGENDA
LAUSD PAYS FOR FLIERS BACKING MAYOR'S PLAN + LAUSD USED EDUCATION MONEY FOR POLITICAL SUPPORT OF REFORM
SCHOOLING ANTONIO: The mayor learns to settle for less than a total takeover of L.A. Unified
Hi-lites, Lo-lites & The News That Doesn't Fit: K-8 SCHOOL WINS OUT IN WILMINGTON + LAUSD PAYROLL SYSTEM PRICE TAG BALLOONS + HIGH STANDARDS FOR ALL
EVENTS: Coming up next week...
What can YOU do?


Featured Links:
4LAKids Anthology: All the Past Issues, solved, resolved and unsolved!
4LAKidsNews: a compendium of recent items of interest - news stories, scurrilous rumors, links, academic papers, rants and amusing anecdotes, etc.
• Mayor Villaraigosa in the LA Times: "We've got to have the vote first; you can't put the cart before the horse."

• A Roosevelt HS Parent in KPCC radio: "I'm voting for his plan because his wife - his ex-wife - whatever - is a teacher and he knows from pillow talk and experience how to change things".


Leaving the Beaudry Building Friday night with another parent activist we ran into a central office staffer we both know. Our mutual friend is an outspoken fellow activist/curmudgeon, an insider to our outsider. During the elevator ride she tore into us at the lack of parent turnout in the parent part of the mayor's partnership elections - where the partnership will take over a couple of schools in a demonstration project to prove not exactly what I'm sure.

Perhaps that an influx of charisma, a place in the media spotlight and an infusion of outside money can make a difference in public education? Or that a small group with a small focus is better at the small picture than a big one at the big one? Duh and double duh.

Parents did not turn out en masse to validate or repudiate the mayor's plan - that's for sure. It would have been a more authentic vote had more parents voted - but that doesn't mean that parents don't care; it means they didn't get the word that it was important that they do vote. Because there was no requirement - as there was with the teachers - that a certain number of parents vote no number was too few. So it wasn't in anyone's interest to get out the vote. And it's very hard to get out the vote when - if as alleged - both LAUSD and the partnership were encouraging a YES vote.

Our friend's argument is echoed in the Times Editorial ("Parents pass up the vote" -immediately following) - though one could suggest that the "apathy" was engineered.

Steve Lopez ("A shaky start on a huge agenda" - also following) points out that only 10% of eligible parents voted. But let's put that statistic in perspective: Only 1% of registered Iowa voters - all of whom are entitled and welcomed - will attend that State's caucuses next month …an event of cosmic significance.

Other questions remain.

• The first are what exactly were the rules for the election, who made them up and were they ever agreed to by everyone?

Boardmember Korenstein says the Board of Education wasn't involved in the decision "…we never had that discussion."

The last time I looked the BdofEd is the governing authority of the District. If the Daily News has it right and the voting was "for divorcing the governance of the schools from the LAUSD and putting the schools under the control of Villaraigosa's education-reform initiative" it seems to me that the state constitution as affirmed by LAUSD v. Villaraigosa prohibits exactly that. UTLA disputes what the rules are in the teacher's election and how they are counted and what the outcome was. Those are pretty basic differences.

• Who decided that all teachers must vote but that only those parents who would/could or knew-to-show-up-on-the-day would vote?

Good grief - neighborhood councils, the most local of local government - mail ballots to stakeholders.

• Did parents of 12th graders (who have no interest in the outcome) get a vote? Did 5th grade parents - who have more of an interest than anyone in the outcome because their kids will be in the program longest - have a vote?

• Whatever happened to the mayor's partnership taking over "clusters" or "families of schools" - K-12 - including elementary schools?

The current thinking holds that the low performance of middle and high school students is attributable to the fact they didn't learn to read at grade level and the other basic skills (multiplication tables anyone?) in elementary. You read it here: Is the mayors partnership being short-changed?

That no one could foretell that ⅓ of Santee High School teachers - C Track at a year 'round school - would be off-track boggles the mind!

• Did the mailings, fliers, phone calls and get-out-the vote information sent to parents favor one side or the other in the election? Did anyone from any side electioneer at the polls? The wrong answers here would seem to invalidate everything.

• And who ran the election?

The answer here seems to be the LAUSD Innovation Division with assistance from the Facilities Division Community Outreach Department. Herein lies the appearance of a conflict of interest. And I note: The appearance-of and an actual C-of-I are two different things!

The I-Division - which apparently made up the rules for the election and administered it - has an interest in the outcome: If the partnership efforts - whether from the mayor or Loyola Marymount or anyone else aren't accepted by teachers and parents the I-Division loses its very reason for existence. Complicating matters: Both the I-Division and the Community Outreach Dept receive funding from the school construction bonds -- but this election is far, far outside that purview and all costs MUST be accounted for in the district's general budget.

The Daily News suggests that the Partnerships should be paying for the elections - and the I-Division says that future elections will be run by the League of Women Voters.

The last question becomes: "When exactly is it too late?"

¡Onward/Hasta adelante! - smf
___________________________________________

▲Unquestionably the Best News of the Week:

JUDGE: LAUSD CAN CONSIDER ETHNICITY FOR MAGNET SCHOOL ADMISSION

From knbc.com

December 12, 2007 -- LOS ANGELES -- A Superior Court judge has ruled that Los Angeles Unified School District administrators do not violate state law by considering the ethnic backgrounds of students when selecting them for admission to magnet schools.

The American Civil Rights Foundation sued the district in October 2005, alleging the district policy is unconstitutional and violates Proposition 209, which forbids racial preferences in government hiring and public school admissions.

But Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Paul Gutman says the district's practices are in line with a 26-year-old court order to desegregate the school district.


MORE QUESTIONS about the role of mayors in schools: The EdWeek Chat on the Book: THE EDUCATION MAYOR: Improving America's Schools



LAUSD PARENTS PASS UP THE VOTE: Low turnout in the recent vote on school reform shows the apathy the mayor is up against
LA Times Editorial

December 15, 2007 — If the votes at seven Los Angeles campuses are an indication, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa will have his work cut out for him as he attempts to revamp a group of low-performing schools. A strong majority of the teachers and parents who voted Tuesday favored having the mayor and his partnership run the three high schools and four middle schools. (The teacher vote at Santee Education Complex might need to be redone, though, in part because a large number of teachers at the multitrack school were on vacation.) With the mayor behind them -- his skill at raising money and hiring smart leaders, his ability to pull community and city resources together -- these schools stand their best chance in years of a real turnaround.

But a strong majority of a very small minority is an even smaller minority. After more than two months of outreach through schools, churches and community groups, less than 10% of parents voted in the advisory ballot. Let's face it, voter turnout in the last school board election was just about as bad. But the school board is remote, its reach amorphous and the likelihood for imminent change small. In this case, parents had the chance to speak out on transforming their children's schools, bringing in new management, new financial resources and even new teachers. Instead, they stayed home in droves.

The implication is that the task of getting parents involved in education might be tougher than foreseen, even for a mayor with a legendary ability to galvanize grass-roots excitement. Villaraigosa's school team plans to require, as most charter schools do, that parents sign contracts promising to be active in their children's schooling, from volunteering to making sure the kids attend. His commitment to bringing parents into the mix is unwavering and praiseworthy, but he also might have new insight into what teachers have been struggling with all along.

Parents whose children attend low-achieving schools cannot just fume and hope things will get better. They have to be part of the transformation. That's a lesson we hope they learn the easy way.


A SHAKY START ON A HUGE AGENDA
by Steve Lopez | LATimes columnist

December 16, 2007 - Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa says he's trying to fix public education, and for that, he deserves a pat on the back.

But his attempts so far don't always inspire confidence. And I'm not just talking about his sloppy legislative power grab that was laughed out of the courts earlier this year. The latest example was last week's banana republic-style elections at seven campuses the mayor wants to control.

Roughly 90% of the parents at the schools skipped the election. And that was despite enticements that included raffle tickets for Jordan High parents who came to hear the mayor speak. Hizzoner himself picked the winning tickets for a TV, a camera and a Target gift certificate.

It's not clear whether the low turnout was due to all the usual reasons for parental disengagement, or if parents simply couldn't tell exactly what the mayor was trying to sell. But either way, the numbers are a little scary.

Meanwhile, some teachers were still contesting the voting rules days after last Tuesday's elections, and results were in dispute at more than one school. By week's end, the mayor's claim of a clean sweep was shakier than his assertion that he knows how to make low-performing schools better.

To give him his due, he seems to have won clear control of at least five schools that were desperate to get out from under the control of the Los Angeles Unified School District. That's amazing when you consider that the mayor never explained what he'd do differently, other than vague promises of more autonomy and resources.

"It's all these wonderful things about doing more for the children," said Jordan High's Miranda Manners, who teaches English as a second language. "But there are no nuts and bolts involved."

I spoke to Manners in the classroom of art history and French teacher Audrey O'Keefe, another veteran who thought the pitch by the mayor and his team deserved a grade of Incomplete.

They voted against Villaraigosa's Partnership for Schools, a nonprofit that would take over management of Jordan and the six other schools from L.A. Unified. Although Villaraigosa eked out a 54-51 win at Jordan, the teachers union is crying foul. It claims more than 50% of all certificated employees had to vote yes, not just 50% of those who voted.

Conveniently enough for the mayor, there doesn't appear to be any provision in the election rules for contesting the results. Jeez, even Florida had an appeals process.

Manners and O'Keefe say the campaign at their Watts school seemed all but rigged, with the mayor's minions bringing free Starbucks and pastries to pitch meetings and pro-mayor paraphernalia adorning the polling place on election day.

"I was furious," O'Keefe said of the shenanigans.

But her bigger concern was the absence of a clear plan to help teachers overcome disengaged parents, students who aren't up to snuff after years of social promotion and gang violence so prevalent that the high school is occasionally in lockdown.

Allowing teachers to help manage their own school is intriguing, they said.

"But who will do all that work, and how do you decide who's directing it?" asked O'Keefe.

On Friday morning I went to Roosevelt High in Boyle Heights to get some answers. I was hoping to meet with the mayor, but his office sent me Marshall Tuck, executive director of the partnership.

Tuck, a bright young do-gooder with a Harvard MBA, spoke passionately about the shameful mediocrity of urban public education in America. At Roosevelt in 2003, he said, there were 1,800 freshmen and 786 seniors, meaning the dropout rate was astronomical.

Understood, but how's the mayor going to change that?

Tuck answered in generalities for the most part. Being vague was part of the mayor's political strategy all along, because a specific plan might have alienated those whose support was needed. And besides, the mayor was selling the fuzzy idea that each school would design its own plan.

Sounds good in theory. But when Tuck talked about handing control over to a council of teachers, parents and administrators, I found myself wondering how they'd ever reach consensus on anything. It's an exciting proposition, but frankly a terrifying one, as well, given the different agenda each party will bring to the table, not to mention the possibility of opposition to specific reforms by the teachers union.

But let's say they get it together at Roosevelt, where faculty and staff voted 152-62 in favor of the mayor. How will the school change?

Hopefully, Tuck said, the energy level will get a boost when beaten-down teachers and parents who've lost faith become reengaged. Maybe a few of the small-learning centers at Roosevelt can be moved off campus to ease overcrowding. There could be more money for teacher training and computers, and with stronger connections to businesses and service agencies in the area, Roosevelt students might find new ways to prosper.

"We don't pretend to have all the answers," Tuck admitted. But it is time for a bold change, he said, and any success the mayor's team achieves can be a model for the rest of the district.

It could also help Villaraigosa in his lust for higher office, and don't think that isn't part of the calculation. Get a few benefactors to pour money and resources into a handful of schools, bump up test scores a bit and take your bows.

Meanwhile, students at roughly 1,000 other schools in the district will be looking on like kids whose house got missed by Santa.

For one Roosevelt teacher, voting for a new direction was a no-brainer.

"I don't trust the district," he said flatly, giving me his frustration, his logic and everything but his name.

The teacher wanted a say in what to teach his students. And the bureaucracy is a nightmare in every way, he said, telling the story of his broken classroom door. It took weeks to get someone to look at it, he said, and it'll take weeks for a second person to come and actually fix it.

In the meantime, he waited so long for someone to fix a broken window, a second window was broken. A repairman showed up, fixed the first window and left without fixing the second one. He said he didn't have a requisition order for two windows.

The teacher said the mayor's team didn't do a very good job of explaining its plan, but he voted for "the lesser of two evils" because he saw nothing to lose.

It would have been better all around, I think, if teachers and parents voted for something new and specific rather than against something old and broken. For the sake of the kids, though, let's hope the mayor's promised improvements materialize someday.

In the Roosevelt courtyard, Tuck spotted a supportive teacher named Jorge Lopez and they shook hands to celebrate the victory. Lopez then said something the mayor should take to heart.

"Now comes the hard work."


LAUSD PAYS FOR FLIERS BACKING MAYOR'S PLAN + LAUSD USED EDUCATION MONEY FOR POLITICAL SUPPORT OF REFORM
►LAUSD PAYS FOR FLIERS BACKING MAYOR'S PLAN
by Naush Boghossian, Staff Writer, LA Daily News

Los Angeles Unified officials have sent thousands of fliers urging parents and teachers to let Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa manage some district schools in what critics decried Monday as a biased campaign that misuses taxpayer funds.

The district paid for the fliers and automated calls to remind parents about today's vote at seven schools, but critics say the information is essentially an advocacy campaign for the mayor's Partnership for Los Angeles Schools.

One flier obtained by the Daily News from the district's innovation division lists the benefits of a yes vote to join the partnership but makes no mention of any potential drawbacks.

"Any time a government official or the government itself has a stake in the outcome of an election, it's unfair to use public money to influence that election," said Tim Bittle, director of legal affairs for the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.

"It sure sounds like the mayor has a stake in the outcome of this election, because if he can persuade the parents and the teachers to approve this plan and then he pulls off some positive reform, it's going to be a publicity opportunity for him and his quest perhaps for higher office."

But Kathi Littmann, executive director of the LAUSD's innovation division, said her office is working with the mayor to develop the reform effort and did a thorough job informing communities about the issues in a limited amount of time.

The district and the mayor's nonprofit partnership will tally costs of the campaign later this month, but Littmann said district funds are being used appropriately because students - not the mayor - will ultimately benefit.

"I think what would have been irresponsible was to ask the community to make a decision without having the information," Littmann said. "It's an LAUSD initiative and to not put out that information would have violated everything the (innovation) division is about - which is informed decision-making at the school-site level.

"We put lots of information out there of what this is and what it's not."

Littmann said each school was responsible for generating the content of the automated calls to parents, so what some may have said is unclear.

Officials at the Mayor's Office said the partnership had no connection to the fliers that were issued, and that the $200,000 in community outreach efforts was funded by grants.

School board member Julie Korenstein said she has not seen the fliers, and that the board has not been involved in decisions with the mayor's partnership.

But she said voters should know all the facts - including that the mayor's schools will not be under the local district's jurisdiction anymore.

"I'm not exactly sure why L.A. Unified is putting up the money to sell this," she said. "I don't know if this board ... would have been wanting the superintendent to spend taxpayer money this way because we never had that discussion.

"I might want my money to go to books and supplies for the classroom rather than putting out fliers trying to sell an unknown entity to people."

The push comes as the partnership and the district have agreed to give Villaraigosa a role overseeing at least two groups of underperforming schools starting in the 2008-09 school year.

But teachers and parents at the school have to agree, so today those at Santee, Jordan and Roosevelt high schools will vote on the plan. Teachers and parents at Hollenbeck, Stevenson, Gompers and Markam middle schools also will vote.

The district hopes to announce the results Wednesday, assessing support for the mayor's plan through a majority vote - 50percent plus one - of parents and certificated staffers.

_________________________

►LAUSD USED EDUCATION MONEY FOR POLITICAL SUPPORT OF REFORM
Daily News Editorial

Dec. 11, 2007 -- Officials in the Los Angeles Unified School District are right to want to support Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's reform plan for L.A.'s worst-performing schools. But in their zeal to get the word out to parents voting on the reform plan Tuesday, they misused district money.

The district paid for thousands of fliers and automated calls to urge parents at seven schools to support the mayor's initiative. Officials defended this action, saying they were merely trying to inform people of Tuesday's vote. But their efforts went beyond merely disseminating information and into electioneering.

A majority of teachers and parents at Santee, Jordan and Roosevelt high schools and Hollenbeck, Stevenson, Gompers and Markam middle schools must agree before the mayor's reform plan can be launched. That means voting for divorcing the governance of the schools from the LAUSD and putting the schools under the control of Villaraigosa's education-reform initiative.

And support the plan they should. The district has failed these schools. An infusion of attention and money from the mayor's supporters can only help students, teachers and parents build a better learning community.

But the LAUSD has no business spending education money on blatantly political purposes - worthy or not.

Ironically, this inappropriate financial support points to what's wrong with the LAUSD: It's an essentially political entity that uses too many resources on noneducational
Advertisement
purposes.

Besides, the mayor's initiative hardly needs financial support from the LAUSD; Villaraigosa has raised millions from supporters who share his vision.

Even though Villaraigosa didn't sanction this expenditure on his behalf, it would be the gentlemanly thing for him to have his reform fund reimburse the district's expenses.

_________________________

▲LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Re "LAUSD pays for fliers backing mayor's plan," and "$4.7 million more may go to fixes of payroll system" (Dec. 11):

Many weeks ago, the LAUSD spent millions fighting the mayor's takeover of the L.A. schools. Now, it is helping him do it?

Does anyone in the Los Angeles Unified School District know what they are doing, except spending money? Were not the teachers getting paid before LAUSD decided to spend $21million on a new payroll system?

The LAUSD is too big and is just wasting our kids' money? All you have to do is look at the above and Belmont High School to see that! Whatever happened to Belmont, by the way? Are we still wasting money there?

- William Conroy, Northridge


SCHOOLING ANTONIO: The mayor learns to settle for less than a total takeover of L.A. Unified
TKO: MAYOR V DISSES ROMER
by Ayse Arf | LA City Beat

Dec 12, 2007 - Teachers and parents of students from one Los Angeles high school and its feeder campuses voted Tuesday to join Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s Partnership for Excellence in L.A. Schools.

The Partnership – the latest iteration of the mayor’s push for school reform – calls for the takeover of low-performing Roosevelt high school and the web of middle and elementary schools that feed it. In beating the drum for the Partnership, both Villaraigosa and community groups stressed the idea of autonomy for parents and teachers. The vote itself made a marked statement on self-determination, allowing parents of students at the schools in question to vote alongside teachers regardless of immigration or voter-registration status.

Maria Brenes, executive director of the Boyle Heights education non-profit Inner City Struggle, agrees with the mayor’s oft-repeated claim that one of the biggest problems these schools face is L.A. Unified itself: “They feel that this partnership is a way to really cut the bureaucracy and get the most resources and funding to our local schools.”

That Villaraigosa can bring in the dollars is not in question. But details on how schools will be run under the Partnership are vague at best, and intentionally so. Under the banner of autonomy, teachers, school administrators, and parents will be responsible for any detailed plans for school governance and budgeting, the rationale being that local stakeholders can better determine what’s best for their students. With hundreds of teachers and staff and thousands of students at each of the schools in question – several thousand at Roosevelt and Santee – developing a cohesive plan could present some serious bureaucratic challenges in and of itself.

As bold as this plan may be, it was originally to be even bolder.

Honeymoon Cut Short

Villaraigosa took office July 2005 with all the fanfare of a 4th of July block party – complete with a personal theme song (inspirational chorus: “Villaraigosa!”) – and the adoration of a city ready for action. And the first priority was public schools. As a former United Teachers Los Angeles union organizer, the spouse of a public school teacher, and with his own history as an almost-led-astray L.A. Unified success story, his credibility on the issue was sterling.

Despite the campaign bluster, Villaraigosa’s first mayoral forays into education were relatively benign – he even balked at supporting an early version of legislation (introduced by state Senate ally Gloria Romero) that would have opened the door to mayoral control of L.A. Unified. The new mayor instead chose to focus on social issues closely related to student success, such as school safety and health care.

But Villaraigosa soon made good on his broader campaign promises. His initial volley in a string of escalating City Hall-School Board hostilities came shortly after his first 100 days in office, formally asking for an audit of L.A. Unified management to “root out inefficiencies.” The Board responded in-kind, sending City Controller Laura Chick a gift basket of hundreds of previous audits and studies of school district operations.

Round One

Villaraigosa pushed the issue with friends in Sacramento, particularly Sen. Romero and Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez – demanding a state audit of L.A. Unified on the basis of Chick’s assertion that “millions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted.”

Weeks later, another Villaraigosa-state legislature joint venture was introduced – Assembly Bill 1381. The final version of the contentious bill, passed in August 2006 and signed into law by a glowing Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, gave the mayor less direct control than originally sought, but handed him a Council of Mayors in which Villaraigosa’s vote alone would count for 80 percent. Villaraigosa theoretically could have exerted significant pressure on future superintendents.

Skeptics asserted the law’s division of power would make the superintendent’s job more complicated and politicized, not less. Mike Kirst, professor emeritus of education at Stanford University, has recommended mayoral takeover in Oakland, but remains unsure about L.A. “It’s not as clear cut,” Kirst says. “All of the other cities that have mayor control have contiguous boundaries between the school district and the city. Not one of them gets into even more than one school entity, let alone 26,” referring to the 27 cities served by L.A. Unified. He also notes that unlike AB 1381, the plan in Oakland required a citywide vote, and then-Mayor Jerry Brown couldn’t get the bill past City Council and onto a ballot.

Villaraigosa bypassed city-level politics for similar reasons, and eroded much of the goodwill from district educators and parents, with the notable exception of School Board member Monica Garcia, a staunch Villaraigosa ally. Even longtime friends at UTLA were faced with an embarrassing dilemma when union membership voted to repudiate AB 1381 in a blatant contradiction to statements of support from union leaders.

In his rush to push through reforms in education, which Villaraigosa calls “the civil rights issue of our time,” according to press secretary Janelle Erickson, the mayor neglected the need for local political finesse: He failed to give the School Board and outgoing Superintendent Roy Romer enough credit for improving elementary test scores and what Claremont Graduate University Education professor Charles Kerchner called a “political tour de force” by Romer in raising construction dollars for the district.

Round Two

Rumblings of a legal challenge began almost immediately. The constitutionality of the bill had been brought into question even before it was passed, and Villaraigosa’s push to assert his new authority in the search for Romer’s replacement months before the law took effect did little to placate school board members.

Days after the mayor left on a trade mission to Asia, L.A. Unified filed a challenge to the constitutionality of the bill in Superior Court. The board also took advantage of the mayor’s absence to announce the appointment of former Admiral David L. Brewer III as superintendent. Villaraigosa responded with a statement reiterating displeasure at being excluded from the superintendent search, and subtly questioned Brewer’s qualifications in a jab at a selection process he had previously insinuated was rushed and secretive.

One appeal and two hostile rulings later, Villaraigosa finally conceded defeat on AB 1381. The mayor had already turned his attention to another potential inroad for school district influence – school board elections.

Villaraigosa’s endorsements pitted him against an old ally, the teachers union, in almost all of the races, with the exception of District 1, where he shied away from endorsing Marguerite LaMotte’s opponent for fear of alienating South L.A.’s black voters, even though LaMotte was a vocal opponent of AB 1381. Of four Board seats in contention, three went to candidates endorsed by Villaraigosa after extensive stumping and fundraising by the mayor – pushing the price tag on two of the most contentious races above $1 million.

The Bell Rings

While the mayor touts his takeover of the cluster of schools as an issue of accountability, some parents have expressed skepticism about the plan, calling it little more than a political ploy and worrying that students under the plan will suffer if the mayor loses reelection in 2009 or runs for governor in 2010. Villaraigosa press secretary Janelle Erickson insists the mayor took his term limits into consideration: “That’s why the Partnership has been designed to go beyond his tenure and that’s why he stresses the importance of local control and accountability.”


Hi-lites, Lo-lites & The News That Doesn't Fit: K-8 SCHOOL WINS OUT IN WILMINGTON + LAUSD PAYROLL SYSTEM PRICE TAG BALLOONS + HIGH STANDARDS FOR ALL
► K-8 SCHOOL WINS OUT IN WILMINGTON
by Paul Clinton, Staff Writer, Daily Breeze

Dec 12, 2007 -- In a rare override, the Los Angeles school board on Tuesday rejected board member Richard Vladovic's attempt to reduce the size of a planned K-8 Wilmington school.

Board members said Vladovic's plan - which would instead erect an elementary school on the site - would imperil $37 million in matching state funds and fail to relieve crowding at Wilmington Middle School.

Altering the plan would also cause a two-year delay, pushing the opening of the school to the fall of 2014.

After a two-hour discussion, the board voted 5-2 in favor of the K-8 span school.

"As much as I'm interested in looking out for the community, I'm more interested in making sure Wilmington has a school," trustee Yolie Flores Aguilar said.

Vladovic and President Monica Garcia said they favored reducing the scope of the project to help save a bank and Latino market at the site.

After the vote was taken, Vladovic said the board ignored community protests.

"This is another example of bureaucracy winning out over community," he said.

In October, a board majority gave Vladovic a two-month window to get more community input on the controversial project. The district hosted two subsequent meetings.

Vladovic was asking the district's Bond Oversight Committee, which oversees LAUSD's $20 billion building program, to further research the change.

Connie Rice, the committee's chairwoman, said overturning the current plan would
threaten "the integrity of the school construction program."

In July 2006, the district approved a 1,278-seat school for a commercial block at Avalon Boulevard and L Street.

Building the school would return the 1,385-student Gulf Avenue Elementary to a traditional calendar from a year-round schedule. It would also relieve crowding at Fries Avenue and Hawaiian Avenue elementary schools, as well as Wilmington Middle School.

The district spent $4.3 million on the project and hosted 20 community meetings.
___________________________

► LAUSD PAYROLL SYSTEM PRICE TAG BALLOONS
By Naush Boghossian, Staff Writer

Dec. 15, 2007 — Ten months after installing a new computerized payroll process that has been roiled by glitches, Los Angeles Unified officials now say costs for fixing the system and completing its rollout could top $210 million.

The system, with an original price tag of $95 million, has underpaid or overpaid thousands of employees, and last week district officials said hiring consultants to fix it has already ballooned the cost to $132.5 million.

And some officials are questioning the district's transparency on all the costs associated with the system, noting that at least $6 million will be forfeited by allowing some overpaid teachers to keep the money.

Some are also questioning why the district has not yet sued the company that rolled out the system. The state Legislature has begun to lean on school officials to recover at least $10 million that Deloitte Consulting has spent to hire a consultant to address the problems.

"There's going to be a Judgment Day when all of this is over," school board member Richard Vladovic said.

"There's been more spent than we know, and I'm sure there are other ancillary costs such as the overtime, the additional processing and the communications.

"It's bigger than we all believe. We need to look at it totally. I want an accounting of everything - every nook and cranny," Vladovic added.

Some say many of the school board's closed sessions in recent months have been dominated by discussions trying to get to the bottom of who is to blame for the fiasco.

It's "imperative that the district seek cost recovery against this vendor," Assemblyman Kevin de Le n wrote in a letter to Superintendent David Brewer III last week.

De Le n urged LAUSD officials to "aggressively pursue compensation from Deloitte Consulting," which was paid $55 million to roll out the system smoothly.

Officials at de Le n's office could not be reached for comment.

United Teachers Los Angeles President A.J. Duffy said he thinks it's the "nature of a dysfunctional organization that prevents (LAUSD) from moving forward."

Under terms of the various contracts for the payroll system, third parties, including teachers, cannot sue Deloitte directly for breach of contract. Instead, UTLA sued the district over the problems, but the case was thrown out of court. Arguments in an appeal are to be heard next month, Duffy said.

Some members of the LAUSD's police officers association have also filed a suit that's still pending against the district.

"Even if the case gets thrown out, you make the attempt on behalf of the organization and on behalf of the employees. You do it because it's the right thing to do," Duffy said.

"The district is foolish if they're not going ahead with the suit because they hold the strongest chip in the game: They can destroy Deloitte & Touche in the court of public opinion, and they should because Deloitte has destroyed lives and hasn't delivered what it promised to deliver - accurate checks on time."

But LAUSD general counsel Kevin Reed said district officials are working with Deloitte to resolve the issues and have not yet reached the point of suing.

A lawsuit could tie up the process in court for years without any immediate resolution to the problem, officials have said.

"We have not reached a moment in which it's become clear we have to sue them to get the problem fixed," Reed said. "We're still at a moment where we're entitled to presume the good will of the folks at Deloitte and try to make sure the district is going to be made whole and given the benefit of the bargain we have in the contract."

Meanwhile, however, costs for the payroll system are continuing to balloon, and the school board continues to approve consulting contracts to fix the problem.

LAUSD's new chief information officer, Tony Tortorice, who rolled out the same type of electronic system for his former employer, the Los Angeles Community College District, predicted hiring consultants will not stop "for a while."

Tortorice had told the board last week that LAUSD's original budget was underestimated for implementing a system of such size and complexity.

As a general rule, he said, an organization should expect to spend 1 percent to 1.5 percent of its annual budget for each year of implementation.

"Over a three-year period, $300 million is not unusual for these types of organizations to experience," he said. "You can try to spend below that."

The district still has to roll out the third phase of the system, which involves computerized purchase orders.

"Much of the problem you're facing right now is you're underbudget(ing). Quite frankly, you need to spend this money to have these people on board for remediation. They need these resources," he told the board last week.

But board members questioned the efficiency of spending money for consultants with no stake in the project, no loyalty to the LAUSD and no assurances that they're doing a good job.

"I'm really worried. I'm not an expert, but I think we can do it for less. I can't agree to $300 million for three years. I'm not sold on that just because someone tells me I need to be," Vladovic said.

"This is supposed to support instruction, not drain it."

School board member Tamar Galatzan said the district has taken a piecemeal approach, reacting to each problem with a "never-ending stream of these contracts" and no way to measure success.

"I keep questioning all of these costs," Galatzan said. "I've never seen a plan that included all of the consultants, all of the costs, who's responsible for what, where the money's coming from, how long it's going to take.

"Nothing exists that resembles a transparent, cohesive plan."

But district administrators maintain the system will be stabilized in January. They say errors related to flaws in the system have been worked out and now just human errors remain as employees adjust to the system.

The overall district error rate in October was 5.91 percent, which dropped to 1.27 percent in December.

A good indicator of progress is a drop in the number of people going to assistance centers about their checks, administrators said.

In early November, 759 people went to a help center, but the number in early December was 237, and most of them did not claim system-generated problems, said Dave Holmquist, LAUSD's interim chief operating officer.

"That's a good sign that things are well on the road to recovery," he said.

Errors on other employees' checks have been less than 1 percent for months, but problems remain for teachers and other certificated personnel.

But Tortorice said the district will not be able to reach its error-rate goal of about 0.5 percent on the certificated payroll if it does not simplify the process - namely by eliminating annualized pay.

The district is still negotiating with the union to eliminate the process in which LAUSD spreads teachers' pay for 10 months of work over 12 months so they receive a check year-round.

"We know what the defects are, and we continue to work on them, but we need that simplification (of eliminating annualized pay) to have the long-term health of payroll," Tortorice said.

"We'll never get it to sub-0.5 percent without simplification."

The teachers union fought for annualized pay for 25 years, and the district made the decision to roll it out in February along with the new system.

"They never should have instituted annualized pay the very moment they brought on a new system," Duffy said.

District administrators also insist that the production of end-of-year tax forms, or W-2s, will go smoothly.

They claim LAUSD's gross overpayment is about $53 million, with about $15 million currently outstanding.

About 60 percent of people contacted for overpayment have either paid back the district or agreed to pay it back, totaling about $14 million.

But the district has already lost about $6 million in waiving payment for employees who owed $250 or less because it would cost the district that amount to recoup the money, Tortorice said.

And LAUSD officials are also scrambling to correct faulty reports to the California State Teachers' Retirement System so there is no negative effect on the retirement accounts of current and retired employees.

Holmquist said the district has learned it "rolled this out too fast."

"We didn't spend enough time preparing for (the) rollout," Holmquist said.

"We did it too quickly, and we risked a lot, and we went live all at once, and we've been playing catch-up ever since."
____________________________

► HIGH STANDARDS FOR ALL

By Susan Sandler | Opinion in the San Francisco Chronicle

Thursday, December 13, 2007 - What grade would you give a student who has all the knowledge he or she needs to succeed but repeatedly fails to act on that knowledge? California's government is that kind of student when it comes to making our school system work for students of color. The knowledge is there, but policy makers don't act on it.

Now is the right time to issue grades on the job our policy makers are doing in serving students of color. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has dubbed 2008 the Year of Education. Major studies have been completed, and the governor's Committee for Education Excellence will soon be issuing recommendations for how to fix our broken school system.

We actually know what it takes to provide a high quality education to students of color that enables their success in college, career, and community leadership. Some schools are already doing it. Justice Matters, a research and policy organization focused on racial justice in education, recently collaborated with the Stanford University School Redesign Network on a study of such schools. High Schools for Equity: Policy Supports for Student Learning in Communities of Color examines five California high schools that successfully provide students of color with high quality learning. In the words of a student at one of these schools, they are learning "how to learn, not just what is in the textbook." "I developed into an intellectual at this school," explained another student. These schools provide students with an engaging, relevant learning experience that is intellectually rigorous, and they give students the support they need to succeed. They send more than 80 percent of their students to college, more than twice the state average.

Unfortunately, there are very few such schools. Our research sheds light on the reason why. Educators in the High Schools for Equity schools have to contend with a policy environment that provides them with little support and creates many obstacles to the kind of work they are doing. The state's uneven teacher preparation system turns out too few teachers with the skills to carry out these school's sophisticated teaching practices. Once teachers get to a school, they are not given the time to do the kind of quality planning and ongoing learning that is needed to provide learning that is exciting, challenging, and supports the success of all students. The standardized high-stakes tests do not get at the more challenging skills the schools are teaching, and preparing for the tests takes a lot of time away from quality learning. The schools do not have enough funding to implement the practices they know will make the most difference for their students. And on and on.

The discussion of California policy needs to be informed by knowledge of what it takes to provide high quality learning. This is a general issue for California schools, and it is also a racial justice issue. When policy makers talk about the education of students of color, they often set the bar especially low - if students of color develop minimum competency in basic skills, that is good enough. It is thought to be too much to ask that students of color have an opportunity to think deeply, find the connections between academic subject matter and relevance to their lives, or learn the problem-solving skills that will make a difference in addressing the complex challenges our society faces.

Justice Matters has developed a Racial Justice Report Card on California Education Policy based on the High Schools for Equity study. We will be issuing grades for the recommendations of the Governor's Committee on Education Excellence. We will also be grading what both the governor and state Superintendent Jack O'Connell propose to do in 2008. We need to see whether their rhetoric about improving education translates into the kind of bold action that we need to give California students of color the education they deserve but have not had.

• Susan Sandler is president of Justice Matters.


C MINUS - Racial Justice Report Card on California Education Policy



EVENTS: Coming up next week...
Tuesday Dec 18, 2007
SOUTH REGION MIDDLE SCHOOL #3: Project Update Meeting
6:00 p.m.
Walnut Park Elementary School
2642 Olive St.
Huntington Park, CA 90255

*Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________
• SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
http://www.laschools.org/bond/
Phone: 213-241-5183
____________________________________________________
• LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
Phone: 213-893-6800


• LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION & COMMITTEES MEETING CALENDAR



What can YOU do?
• E-mail, call or write your school board member:
Yolie.Flores.Aguilar@lausd.net • 213-241-6383
Marlene.Canter@lausd.net • 213-241-6387
Tamar.Galatzan@lausd.net • 213-241-6386
Monica.Garcia@lausd.net • 213-241-6180
Julie.Korenstein@lausd.net • 213-241-6388
Marguerite.LaMotte@lausd.net • 213-241-6382
Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net • 213-241-6385

...or your city councilperson, mayor, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think! • There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org • 213.978.0600
• Call or e-mail Governor Schwarzenegger: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
• Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
• Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
• Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
• Register.
• Vote.


Who are your elected federal & state representatives? How do you contact them?




Scott Folsom is a parent and parent leader in LAUSD. He is immediate past President of Los Angeles 10th District PTSA and represents PTA as Vice-chair the LAUSD Construction Bond Citizen's Oversight Committee. He serves on various school district advisory and policy committees and is a PTA officer and/or governance council member at three LAUSD schools. He is also the elected Youth & Education boardmember on the Arroyo Seco Neighborhood Council.
• In this forum his opinions are his own and your opinions and feedback are invited. Quoted and/or cited content copyright © the original author and/or publisher. All other material copyright © 4LAKids.
• FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 4LAKids makes such material available in an effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to parents, teachers, students and community members in a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
• To SUBSCRIBE e-mail: 4LAKids-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com - or -TO ADD YOUR OR ANOTHER'S NAME TO THE 4LAKids SUBCRIPTION LIST E-MAIL smfolsom@aol.com with "SUBSCRIBE" AS THE SUBJECT. Thank you.

Saturday, December 08, 2007

To you who least need reminding


4LAKids: Sunday, Dec 9, 2007
In This Issue:
$25,000 Apples: ENGINEER LEFT INDUSTRY AND TOOK UP CHALLENGE OF TEACHING IN THE LAUSD + ROSEMEAD TEACHER GETS NATIONAL AWARD
STILL ACTING UP FOR THE DRAMA TEACHER: Ex-Fairfax High students salute Marilyn Moody with a big birthday bash.
High Performance Schools: THE NEW JEWELS OF LOS ANGELES
SAN MARINO'S TOUGH ASSIGNMENT: SETTLE HOMEWORK BEEF
MAGNET YENTAS REDUX: SOOTHING THE MAGNET PANIC
EVENTS: Coming up next week...
What can YOU do?


Featured Links:
4LAKids Anthology: All the Past Issues, solved, resolved and unsolved!
4LAKidsNews: a compendium of recent items of interest - news stories, scurrilous rumors, links, academic papers, rants and amusing anecdotes, etc.
"AMERICA'S GREATEST ASSET sits bored, seven hours a day, five days a week."

— Michael Winters, Career Tech teacher @ San Gabrielino High School on receiving a teaching award in Pasadena last week.

You can bet that Mr. Winters' students aren't bored, or kids in Sakhalin Finnie's classes in Wilmington or Aaron Chung's classes in Rosemead. No one was bored in Marilyn Moody's classes at Fairfax, back in the day. We all know one or two or more teachers where Excellence calls for a capital "E" …if they were our teacher we benefited from their excellence. Until every teacher is life changing their won't be enough of them — but thank you to the ones who work at it and are. We know who you are ….and you do too!

_____

On Monday I went to the ribbon cutting for a classroom addition to Alta Loma School. The new building was being dedicated to a teacher, recently retired, who had made a difference to every child she ever taught at Alta Loma over forty plus years. When you meet Aladean Markham even now you feel the fire and her passion for education; when her students - young and old - speak of her you feel the love her passion has engendered.

Mrs. Markham spoke quietly and eloquently of lighting small fires in young people for forty years - and ended with the stark New England poetic landscape of Robert Frost:

TWO ROADS DIVERGED in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;

As she spoke there came a quiet murmur from the fifth graders in the audience - kids not old enough to have had Mrs Markham for a teacher ….but whose teachers had Mrs. Markham as a teacher and a mentor…

Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the same,

….building as all the fifth graders joined in full voice - and those of us who had Mrs. Markham - or a Mrs. Markham - of our own in the past joined in — the words themselves unlocked from forgotten synapses:

And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.

…until every voice in the crowd joined in, standing, reciting the words taught by a teacher, found in a book - "Learn this - it's important" - recalled for this moment:

I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.

Thank you Mrs. Markham for keeping the promise - and Mr. Schaffer and Miss Robinson and all the other teachers who make all the difference. — smf


Frost, Robert. Mountain Interval. New York: Henry Holt and Company, ©1920; Bartleby.com, 1999. www.bartleby.com/119/. [2007]


CLICK HERE to read about THE PAYROLL CRISIS. THE NEW CHARTER SCHOOLS CZAR, BAD PHYS ED SCORES or CURBING GLOBAL WARMING BY UNLEASHING STUDENT ENERGY



$25,000 Apples: ENGINEER LEFT INDUSTRY AND TOOK UP CHALLENGE OF TEACHING IN THE LAUSD + ROSEMEAD TEACHER GETS NATIONAL AWARD
►A $25,000 APPLE: ENGINEER LEFT INDUSTRY AND TOOK UP CHALLENGE OF TEACHING IN THE LAUSD.

By Paul Clinton, Staff Writer | Daily Breeze

Friday, December 7, 2007 - Sakhalin Finnie offers classes in a bungalow that doesn't have running water. So when she teaches high school science lessons that require it, she's forced to improvise.

"I use buckets and try to do it smaller," Finnie said of her physics and chemistry lessons at Harbor Teacher Preparatory Academy, a magnet high school in Wilmington. "We have a lot of paper towels."

Finnie's dedication paid dividends Thursday, as the Milken Family Foundation honored her as a top educator and handed her a $25,000 check at the Harbor College campus where she teaches her classes.

She hasn't decided how she'll spend the funds, which carry no strings.

The group presented Finnie the award and cash at an assembly in the student union. Aaron Chung, a mathematics teacher at Rosemead's Temple Intermediate School, was also honored by the group.

With education dignitaries addressing the packed room and former NFL lineman Rosey Grier urging students to believe in their potential, Lowell Milken emphasized the importance of quality teaching.

Milken attended LAUSD schools and graduated from Birmingham High in Van Nuys.

"I believe teachers and principals have the most important jobs in our country," Milken said. "Good teachers really do make a difference."

The group surprised Finnie, who gasped and held back tears as she headed to receive her honor.

Since 2005, Finnie has taught at Harbor Teacher Prep, a 330-student school for high achievers nominated for a federal Blue Ribbon award in November.

Students earn a diploma and associate degree upon graduation.

The former chemical engineer switched careers in July of 1999, taking a job with Los Angeles Unified teaching science at Huntington Park High School.

Later that year, she transferred to Banning High School, where she started an African-American Student Union.

While at the academy-style high school in Wilmington, the Long Beach resident has been credited with raising the test scores of her lowest achieving students by 10 percent.

"She engages students," said Principal Mattie Adams-Robertson. "She has a very rigorous classroom and high expectations for students."

And she does it with a gentle touch, her students said.

"She cares a lot if you succeed," said Danielle Semira, 17, of Carson. "If she sees you're failing, she takes you aside."

Jessica Uwadia, 17, of Torrance, has similar praise.

"She's not a domineering tyrant," Jessica said. "She's a motherly figure."

The foundation has given more than 2,000 such awards across the country to teachers for their stellar talent and inspirational leadership, Milken said.
________________________

►ROSEMEAD TEACHER GETS NATIONAL AWARD

by Caroline An, Staff Writer | Pasadena Star News

December 7 - ROSEMEAD - When Aaron Chung became a teacher nine years ago, he fulfilled a personal goal.

Chung, a math teacher at Temple Intermediate School who immigrated to the United States from Vietnam with his family, said people were critical of his decision to give up dentistry to pursue teaching.

"I decided to major in biochemistry in college and then became a dentist," he said. "I did not like it."

On Thursday, the dentist-turned-math teacher, who devotes his after-school hours and Saturdays to tutoring students, received one of the highest education honors when he was named a Milken Family Foundation National Educator.

His selection as a new member of an elite group of high-achieving teachers came at a surprise ceremony at his school, where state Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell joined other dignitaries in awarding Chung a $25,000 cash prize that comes with the honor.

"I am very, very surprised. I never get anything, and I usually have to work hard, so I'm very, very surprised," Chung said.

Officials from the Milken Foundation travel throughout the nation awarding $25,000 to about 75 teachers every year. Teachers are nominated by their peers and do not go through an application process. A panel whose members are appointed by officials from the state Department of Education makes the final selections.

Chung's devotion is apparent in everything he does for his students, said Lowell Milken, chairman of the Milken Family Foundation.

"He believes that every student can succeed," he said.

Among Chung's accomplishments in his teaching career is helping more than 80 percent of his algebra students achieve proficiency on the math portion of the California Standards Test.

Additionally, the same percentage of his students have passed the California High School Exit Exam and are eligible to take college-level classes.

While his students are excelling, it is the hundreds of hours of tutoring help that has made the biggest impact, students and Chung's colleagues said.

"He is really helpful and he wants students to pass their classes and not to fail," said Jessica Campos, 12.

Chung began the tutoring sessions after noticing that some students were too shy to ask questions during class, he said.

Math is often a difficult subject and most students would say that they hate the subject, he acknowledged, so he tries to make math a positive experience.

"Kids have a lot of positive energy. You just have to get down to their level," he said.

Anthony Ha, a first-year teacher at Temple Intermediate, said he knew Chung would win the award because he is so dedicated to his students.

"No one has sacrificed more. He has a passion and a lot of heart," Ha said.

With his birthday coming up in less than a week, Chung said the $25,000 is a gift that he will put to good use.

He plans to use some of the money to fund a trip to China for his mother. He said he also plans to travel to Vietnam, where he'll give most of the money to orphanages and needy schools.


▲adding smf's 2¢ to the $25 Grand: The LATimes - which goes out of its way to not publish good news stories about LAUSD had a Four Column Color Photo - Above The Fold on Page One (!) - of Mrs. Finnie receiving her award a in Thursday's paper. No story, but a photo is worth 1000 words ….right? Neither the photo nor the non-story made the online edition …which says something about the Times, LAUSD's PR department - or both.

4LAKids Kudos to Sakhalin Finnie and also to Aaron Chun - teachers in the mold and tradition of Aladine Markham! And lest anyone missed the key line about Harbor Teachers Prep (beyond the part about teaching science w/o running water) let me repeat it here: "Students earn a diploma and associate degree upon graduation."


STILL ACTING UP FOR THE DRAMA TEACHER: Ex-Fairfax High students salute Marilyn Moody with a big birthday bash.
By Mitchell Landsberg, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

December 3, 2007 - Students at Fairfax High School can be forgiven if they don't know the name of drama teacher Marilyn Moody. She last taught at the school in the 1970s, more than a decade before any of today's students were born.

But good teachers cast long shadows, and Moody's former students -- the ones who took drama classes at Fairfax from 1959 to 1971 -- remember her as if it were yesterday.

Which, for many of them, it was.

Some 160 Fairfax alumni turned out Sunday to pay tribute to Moody, a teacher whom many credit with shaping their adult lives. They came from as far as Switzerland, New York and Michigan, and, for a few hours packed with love, nostalgia and musical comedy, were again eager students trying to please the best teacher they ever had.

To the tune of "Anything Goes," they sang:

"She'd make us each the best, cause she'd teach the best,
Made our plays the best, and our days the best.
We learned skills to make our resumes the best,
In that building on old Melrose. . . . "

"She changed my life forever," said Celia Celnik Taite, an actress and acting teacher who was one of the organizers of Sunday's event. "She was the most unbelievable inspiration -- my teacher, my coach, my guide."

Taite (Class of '73) and Judy Rich (Class of '60) came up with the idea for the tribute when they realized a few months ago that Moody was about to turn 80. What began as a plan for a fairly small surprise birthday party quickly snowballed as word spread among Moody's former students, many of whom have stayed in touch.

By the time Sunday rolled around, it was a full-fledged production.

The party itself was no longer a surprise -- as the event grew, that idea no longer seemed prudent. But Moody, long retired and living in Woodland Hills, still seemed bowled over.

"As Mike Myers would say, I'm verklempt," she told the brunch crowd at the Sportsmen's Lodge in Studio City. As the accolades flowed, she waved her hands frantically in embarrassment.

Most people can recall a favorite teacher, someone who excited them about learning and perhaps inspired them enough to set the course of their lives and careers. But by all yardsticks, Moody appears to have been especially gifted, and the outpouring Sunday reflected the lifelong passions she incited in her students.

"It's interesting how one teacher can change not just all these people's lives, but the face of show business," observed Cynthia Szigeti (Class of '67), who went on to become a successful actress and improvisational acting teacher, whose own students have included Conan O'Brien and Lisa Kudrow.

Many of those at Sunday's event have had successful entertainment careers, not only as actors but as dancers, musicians, set designers, producers and, in several cases, drama teachers -- the gamut of show business jobs.

Anita Mann, a dancer and dance producer, said that throughout her career, she has "heard Mrs. Moody in my ears every day."

Russ Titelman, a 1962 Fairfax graduate who went on to become a successful musician, songwriter and Grammy-winning record producer, wrote in a tribute to Moody that she "was the guardian of the door that opened onto a universe of infinite possibilities."

"Plus," he added Sunday, "she was so funny and so tough. . . . We were constantly living in fear of the wrath of Moody, and at the same time, you knew she loved you."

Her former students were almost uniformly consistent about what made Moody a great teacher: She set expectations higher than many thought they could achieve, then pushed them to realize those goals. She demanded and instilled discipline in her students -- and sometimes scared the daylights out of them. In ways large and small, she showed that she cared deeply about each of them and understood their abilities and idiosyncrasies -- sometimes better than they did. She bristled with passion, energy and unbridled, irreverent fun.

Sometimes, she just bristled.

Her students all remember what she called them. It was always their last name, only their last name, usually delivered with several exclamation points, as in, "Bernstein!!!!" or "Burke!!!!!!" Students, for the most part, called her Moody, and still do.

"Hi, Moody, it's Bob Steinberg, '64," one of them announced from the stage of the banquet hall Sunday. Without explanation, he added: "Here's something you never thought would happen. Here's that $5 I owed you from 1964. I want you to know that changed my life for that night." She laughed.

For her part, Moody was self-deprecating about her role in students' lives. Asked the secret of her success, she said, "They were such eager students. I loved every one of them." She added: "Whether they had private problems at home or they just wanted to be part of a group, they needed drama, and I think I fulfilled that."

Darrell Walker (Class of '72), who became a lawyer and executive vice president of the black-oriented BET television network, regaled the crowd with his recollections of "the Moody walk, which was somewhere between a drill sergeant and Marty Feldman in 'Young Frankenstein,' " and "the Moody voice," which, he said, could often be heard as far away as the football field.

He hadn't been especially interested in acting, Walker said, but Moody pushed him and along the way taught him valuable lessons about himself. "What I've learned in the years since is that that wasn't an acting lesson," he said. "That was a lesson in life."

During the years Moody was there, Fairfax High was a school very much shaped by its time and place. The students were overwhelmingly Jewish, academic strivers who were either the children or grandchildren of immigrants struggling to make ends meet. It was also, by the late 1960s, a turbulent place that was fully swept up by the passions of the antiwar movement and the counterculture.

Moody's biography might suggest she didn't quite belong there.

Born in Blue Earth, Minn., she had studied economics and drama in college before taking a job as a teacher in the theatrical mecca of Bemidji, Minn. One morning, she recalled, "they said on the news that it was 40 degrees below zero and the trees were cracking. I said, 'California, here I come.' "

After attending graduate school at UCLA, she took a job teaching drama at San Pedro High School in 1952. She taught there for five years and then briefly at John Burroughs Junior High before landing at Fairfax in 1959. That was the point, she said, "when a Missouri Synod Lutheran Gentile became an honorary Jew."

Her first year, she produced Fairfax's first student musical, "The Boyfriend." She went on to direct numerous other dramatic and musical productions, many of them award-winners, before a back injury in the early 1970s prompted her to scale back on stage work and teach other subjects. She retired in 1979.

Although her health has declined in recent years and she does not walk easily without help, Moody on Sunday looked decades younger than 80, and she showed some of the wit her students remember so fondly.

Though they insisted she was anything but a sentimentalist, she appeared deeply moved as she told them, "All of you here gave me the best part of my life. . . . It was my pleasure to have helped you along the way, and I got more from you than you'll ever know."

The day ended, appropriately, with a musical production -- for which, according to co-organizer Debbie Wenner Green, 25 people rehearsed every weekend for six weeks, determined to craft something that would be up to Moody's exacting standards.

It was. "Well done!" she yelled after one number. Others brought her to her feet for standing ovations.

They ended with "We Love You, Moody," rewritten by actor and writer Stuart K. Robinson (Class of '73) to the tune of "We Love You, Birdie" from "Bye Bye Birdie."

"We love you, Moody,
Oh, yes we do.
We're better people
Because of you
One high school class,
Who knew?
Oh, Moody,
We love you."

Moody proclaimed it "Oscar-caliber."

Then they sang "Happy Birthday" and presented her with a cake. "These aren't trick candles, are they?" Moody asked. Then she blew. And blew. And blew.

Kids. Sometimes they just never grow up.


High Performance Schools: THE NEW JEWELS OF LOS ANGELES
by Racquel Palmese - Green Technology Magazine

Fall '07: THE LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT spreads across 710 square miles of inner cities, deserts, rolling hills and suburbs. Running from the endless vistas of tract homes to the northern horizon of the San Fernando Valley, then south and east through the ethnic enclaves of East LA, Boyle Heights, Chinatown, Koreatown, Leimert Park Village, Little Tokyo, Filipinotown, Koreatown, Little Armenia, Little Ethiopia, Little Persia, Little India and Thai Town to the Towers of Watts, it finally it ends at the canals and harbors of Long Beach, California.

The second largest school district in the United States, it has been called a behemoth, top heavy and inefficient, controversial and downright impossible to manage. Maligned and magnificent, its numbers alone evoke both wonder and disbelief. Of the District’s 708,000 students, 73 percent are Hispanic, 11.4 percent are Black, 3.8 percent are Asian and 8.8 percent are Caucasian. It teaches the English language to almost half - 315,400 students - who speak 88 different languages. Many of its 13,000 buildings (1,059 schools) are in disrepair. Most of them, built over a half century ago, have had little or no renovation.

Almost daily, news stories recount the District’s travails, but its achievements are rarely noted. Perhaps the most unanticipated and impactful of its activities – one which only a school district of the size of LAUSD could undertake – is its school construction and renovation program. This multi-year endeavor, valued at almost $20 billion, is by far the largest ever undertaken by a school district. By 2012 it will deliver approximately 180,000 new seats in 145 new schools. Some 20,000 renovation projects will be completed.

The program came to life in 1997, when voters allocated $2.4 billion for modernization of facilities and addition of classroom space. New bond measures were passed in 1998 ($4 billion), 2002 ($3.5 billion from the city and a portion of a $13.05 billion statewide bond), 2004 ($9.2 billion), 2005 ($3.985 billion).

Adding to that, in November 2006, a statewide K-12 and university facilities bond act was passed providing an additional $10.41 billion (see related article on Proposition 1D), which includes $100 million for high performance (green) school construction statewide.

So far, 186 projects have been completed, including 65 new schools that provide 2,650 classrooms; 64 schools are being designed or in approval processes.

Let Them be Green!

To appreciate what Joseph “Guy” Mehula, LAUSD’s chief facilities executive, and the 5,000 people who work at the Facilities Support Division, are trying to accomplish is to not only embrace the enormity of the construction project, but to grasp that in the midst of this building boom LAUSD decided that all its new schools must be high performance schools. The District mandated that every school designed after the year 2003, about 64 schools, will be designed to meet the tough sustainability standards set forth by the Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS). [Click here for related story.] LAUSD was the first district to make such a declaration, to set such a mandate for its new school construction. Since then a host of others have followed its lead.

At this writing, two CHPS “demonstration” schools have opened in Los Angeles: Charles H. Kim Elementary School in Los Angeles and Maywood Academy High School in Maywood. Most new projects are in the design stages, with about 10 nearing construction. “Every one of these schools,” Mehula told an audience at a recent Global Green schools conference, “is built to represent its community, both by its unique design and by creating indoor and outdoor spaces that are open to the community.” This includes meeting rooms, theaters, athletic fields, swimming pools.

“We call this joint use,” he said, “and it’s a central part of our planning for all the new schools. To create such healthy and beautiful schools has had the effect of raising up the neighborhoods they’re located in. People take pride in them and know they are special.

“The biggest problem we have is getting the word out about all these terrific new schools that are each a jewel in their communities.”

Designing a Green School

Ying Wang heads up the high performance schools program at LAUSD, reporting to Mehula. An architect who is passionate about green schools, she helped structure the CHPS point system that leads to school certification. “The best part of CHPS,” she says, “is that if you integrate it very early (in the design phase) it won’t necessarily cost extra money.”

As an example she cites Central Region Elementary School (CRES) #18, which has been approved by the Division of State Architect and is going out to bid with completion expected in about 15 months. The design architect was able to meet the school’s budget without requiring any additional funding to meet the CHPS requirements. On a typical project, the architect will be able to reach at least 28 CHPS points, which was the minimum required to be certified as a CHPS school since 2002 out of a maximum of 81. A new points system raises the minimum to 32 and maximum to 85. Most projects currently average at least 33 points.

This particular school got 45 points. Wang explains that this was accomplished not only by complying with all the points the District required, but by adding extras right from the beginning. The building was oriented for optimal sun exposure, achieving energy efficiency that was 37 percent greater than California Energy Commission standards. Recycled materials were used as much as possible and construction waste was recycled – again adding points to their score.

“The building is well located and uses the site,” Wang says. “They designed it with an overhang which becomes a covered walkway. With a lot of our buildings that are not built to sustainable standards, the architect will design it the way he or she likes and then we’ll have to add on features for energy efficiency or other sustainable things, and those become additional costs.”

“These high performance schools provide a great opportunity for the school itself to be an instructional tool,” says Kevin Tyrrell, principal of Quatro, the architectural firm that designed CRES #18. “As an example, all the classrooms have cross ventilation; they all have lots of natural light. There are things that are incorporated into the building that show students how to work with the natural environment to do things that are much more beneficial. These are all things that can be taught for science and other classes.”

CRES #18 is a 575 seat neighborhood elementary school that includes 23 classrooms, a library, administration, food services and a multi-purpose room. Says Tyrrell, “Building it green not only didn’t cost anything extra, it probably saved money. For example, there are several ways you can handle site drainage. You can have different areas collecting water that are connected to a drain connected to a storm system. That’s pretty expensive. We have our site configured so we’re using a combination of a natural and created slope, so all water drains to our turf area on our site which is used as a retention area. If there’s a major rain event, the water percolates down to the aquifer. We’re reducing runoff, and we’re not adding to the storm water runoff demand.

Overall, use of abundant natural light reduced the energy load for lighting considerably and natural ventilation reduces the amount and size of mechanical equipment needed for air conditioning. In traditional schools, interior hallways have classrooms on each side, limiting air flow and light. CRES 18 has an exterior walkway which eliminates almost all the need for light or ventilation during the day and also reduces the volume (hallway) that needs to be ventilated. This reduces energy consumption and provides a more healthful air supply. Tyrrell says the building interacts with the environment.

The Visual and Performing Arts Center on Grand Avenue will be a $100 million high performance high school that contains four small learning academies. Gary Gidcumb, of HMC Architects, is the lead architect on the project. He has been working on green buildings for the past 17 years. Since 2002, he’s been designing green schools and says that green building is a “growing emphasis of the firm.” “Growing” is the operative word; Gidcumb acknowledges that once you start designing green, “what it comes down to is you can always do more.”

At Grand Avenue, Gidcumb and his staff faced enormous challenges when it came to energy efficiency. The theatrical academy, for example, has an 11,0000 square foot lobby and a 950 seat theater, plus a black box experimental theater in the round. “These are large, open spaces,” he says, “difficult to air condition. There are also a lot of large classroom spaces, like dance studios and the library. But we feel good about meeting the challenges. We succeeded within a difficult arrangement.”

As with CRES #18, the architect and the District accomplished the 45 point CHPS score by incorporating many sustainability features directly into the original design plan. The library, for example, with a 50 foot high ceiling, utilizes glazed windows to stop solar heat gain.

The challenges that Gidcumb and his staff faced included working through the many levels of such a large school district. “You’re always going to have folks that think the right way to do things is different from the way you want to do it,” he says. “What we’ve been able to do is work with all of those camps to build consensus on what the right approach is.” The architect now gives talks to LAUSD design staff so they can communicate with architects and emphasize the importance of initiating green design from the earliest stages.

“For most of architects we hire, it’s their first time encountering a CHPS school,” says Ying Wang. “They may have experience with sustainable design, so we join the pre-design meetings and present written documents with our requirements for things like energy, water and sound. We provide the architects with a scorecard that has rating requirements they must meet for these high performance schools.”

Gidcumb feels that when it comes to building green schools, architects are not getting up to speed as quickly as they should. “It’s extremely important,” he says. “There’s so much at stake and so much that architects can do to make an impact. And that’s on every project, no matter what the budget is. The Visual and Performing Arts Center is on budget. It’s not a “showcase” project where grants or special funds have been allocated specifically to get a high CHPS score, and we still managed it. Every project should be a showcase project, and you shouldn’t have to sacrifice design quality or break the bank to do it. It’s a real challenge to the profession.”

He says that the ultimate goal is to build schools that are carbon neutral (emitting no net carbon dioxide into the atmosphere) and net zero (producing as much energy as they consume). “That would be a fantastic step forward for communities to see that. When I see the school as a center of community and the things that happen there and kids who can grow up in that sort of environment and then go home to their families who see that they are part of the solution – that’s a terrific thing.”

Building a Green School

The process of building a new school can take as much as five years, sometimes more. It begins with LAUSD’s Real Estate Department. “The biggest problem we have with LAUSD is we don’t have that much land available, so we have to use eminent domain to buy properties,” says Wang, “The nice thing is the newer schools cause real estate values to go up for the local community.”

Selecting a location for a new school takes into account district needs including relieving overcrowding in existing schools, eliminating the need for year-around schools and involuntary busing. The Real Estate Department assesses where a new school needs to be situated based on these factors and then acquires the necessary properties. It relocates private and commercial residents when necessary. The more families that need to be relocated, the more time the project can take. Thus far, over 1,200 parcels of land have been acquired, and 2,200 households and businesses have been relocated to make way for school construction.

After a site has been selected, the Community Outreach Department is activated. Visits are made with residents and business owners, and community meetings are held. (See sidebar: Warming a Neighborhood to a New School). Site selection also includes an assessment by the Office of Environmental and Health Services (OEHS) and the production of an Environmental Impact Report before the site is claimed. That starts the funding and approval stage.

The California Department of Education decides how much state funding will go to the District. “Not everything can qualify for funds,” says Vincent Coffeen, LAUSD director of design management . “The rest is paid for by local bonds. The state, in theory, is supposed to fund 50 percent of construction, but now it’s really more like 35 percent because of escalation of construction costs.”

Construction costs escalated 20 percent in 2006, causing some projects to trim their budgets. The state is encouraging the building of CHPS schools by the creation of a special unit within the Division of State Architect (DSA) to handle high performance schools projects.

“We work with DSA on a plan check,” explains Coffeen. “It can take a very long time to work through that. It’s always about 12-15 months for architects to finish their drawings before we even get to the DSA, and then we can have a project sitting there for another 10 months. But we have an agreement with them now that is shortening the process. Our goal is a six-month review at DSA.”

Since the LAUSD loses $1 million for each month delay on a $60 million high school, this new partnership agreement with DSA means significant savings. The accelerated review period saved the LAUSD $6 million in 2006. The staff shortfall at the DSA created by the explosion of LAUSD building plan approvals is being addressed by a partnership agreement. The PA, as it’s called, created a team of mostly outside consultant reviewers for LAUSD projects. LA now issues “look ahead” reports that include project profiles sent to the DSA in advance, so the agency can be ready with review teams waiting the submissions arrive. As of January, 2007, a new law allows for “concurrent review,” which means that DSA reviewers can work throughout the design process, instead of waiting until plans are drawn up and submitted. This is expected to shorten the process even more, setting a efficient system in place for other districts as well.

“DSA is in major collaborating mode right now,” says Mahendra Mehta, transition manager at the DSA. “We are partnering with LAUSD. The key to it is managing the timeline in planning and communications, getting started early in the process and staying in communication all the way through to approval.” Wang agrees, “We can save five percent of regular costs for a CHPS school by starting early with the state agencies. That’s very exciting, because after about five years of payback, these schools start making money with energy savings.”

During the DSA approval process, final drawings are also sent to CDE one last time to verify square footage for a determination of state funding for the project. Then the bidding process begins. Unlike many commercial buildings that utilize design teams made up of architects and construction contractors who work together from the onset of the design process, LAUSD calls for a separation of the design and building processes. The award goes to the contractor who submits the lowest bid.

Right now there are 16 green school projects in the pipeline, all of them almost through the DSA process. In two years, says Wang, there will be 40. What does all this mean for other districts? “It means their standards will change,” says Wang. “Other districts can use our experience.” The inexhaustible Wang also spends time giving presentations at conferences and districts considering building green schools.

“We have all our information on our (LAUSD) website,” she says. “I would say to those districts, ‘go grab it as much as you can. You are always welcome to call me. There are a lot of paybacks in building green schools.”


SAN MARINO'S TOUGH ASSIGNMENT: SETTLE HOMEWORK BEEF
A CAMPAIGN TO LIGHTEN STUDENTS' WORKLOAD ALSO POINTS UP AN ETHNIC RIFT.

By Sandy Banks - Los Angeles Times Columnist

December 8, 2007 - The grumbling reaches fever pitch at many schools this time of year. The semester is nearing its end and homework assignments are piling up -- just as the winter break is about to begin. Parents of school kids know what that means:

Their children will be lugging loaded backpacks on ski vacations and ditching family dinners to finish school projects. Not even on holiday, it seems, can a kid escape the homework demons.

But in upscale San Marino, the private commiseration of some parents has become an aggressive public campaign, mounted by a mother obsessed with the notion that homework is wrecking family relationships and turning children into automatons.

"They're making me out to be a homework-hater," said Tracy Mason, a former accountant, now stay-at-home mom of a Huntington Middle School sixth-grader. "All I'm saying is, this is a big burden on families. We want [the district] to justify it."

Mason has spent months poring over studies, interviewing experts and bombarding parents and school officials with research that suggests that homework contributes little to students' academic prowess.

She wants San Marino district officials to study the issue and consider limiting the amount of work teachers can give.

Her aggressive effort has inspired some parents and annoyed others. And it has revealed an uncomfortable cultural breach in one of the state's most successful school districts, where 70% of the students are Asian American and high test scores are considered a ticket to the Ivy League.

"They're willing to make everybody miserable with hours of homework," Mason said, "and as long as test scores are going up, nobody cares."

When I spoke with Mason this week, she was in the car, hustling her daughter to an after-school grammar tutoring session. Twice a week, $50 an hour. She winces every time she writes a check.

Tutoring has become a lightning rod in the brewing homework debate, stoking resentment among parents, who say it reflects an unhealthy fixation on grades and handicaps students who do their homework the old-fashioned way.

In my conversations with middle-school moms -- almost all of them white -- it was clear where many place the blame: Hyper-competitive Chinese parents are raising the bar too high, to ensure that their children succeed, they said.

Few will say that for the record, of course. Never mind the racial sensitivity; no one wants their kid deemed a slacker in a high-flying district like this.

The ethnic rift is not surprising in a system pushed into overdrive by waves of immigrants from Hong Kong and Taiwan, whose nose-to-the-grindstone academic focus has helped San Marino High rank among the nation's top 100 high schools, according to U.S. News and World Report.

Asian parents have been quiet during the homework debate, but don't like being cast as villains, said Dora Liang, the mother of a high school student.

"To say Asians dictate the policy is not true," Liang said. She acknowledged that many Chinese parents hire tutors, some because they don't understand English well enough to help their children with homework and others because "the curriculum is not challenging enough. They do it to have a competitive edge.

"People come to San Marino because of the quality of the schools and how it affects the property values, whether they're Asian or non-Asian," Liang said. "If you feel strongly that the homework is too much, you have the option of telling your kids not to do it."

Of course, it's not that simple. Parents may believe that the homework grind is producing stressed-out, joyless, uncreative kids, but they don't want theirs to be left behind.

Still, it's no surprise to me that concerns emerge in middle school, where the homework load increases and children must adjust to a procession of teachers.

I don't envy San Marino officials, caught between competing perceptions and value systems.

Supt. Gary Woods said parent surveys make the dilemma clear: "Fifty percent of parents here think we give too much homework," he said. "And 50% think we give too little. . . . This is a conversation that has gone on since my days as a high school English teacher 21 years ago."

But it does no good to haul out the "back in my day . . ." speech in this debate. Schools live and die by test scores today. "We have to get all our students to an advanced level," Woods said. "And we only have so much class time to do it."

Even those parents who are grumbling admit that San Marino's academic success has paid dividends, keeping their property values high and the real estate market strong, even in today's slowdown.

Still, some told me they are quietly checking out private schools -- including Mason, who moved to San Marino from Irvine in part because the schools were good.

"I'm lobbying my husband now . . . If it's not going to be fixed in my daughter's school years, let's just bail," she said.

The irony is impossible to miss. People move to San Marino because the schools are so good, then leave the school district because the homework is so hard.
_____________________________________

▲ORSON SCOTT CARD - the prize-winning best-selling young adult novelist (Ender's Game) has written a series of essays - complete with acatual schorly references - about the mind numbing evils of homework, based on the following premise:

• What if you had a really lousy job?
• You're only employed for seven hours a day, but you have to ride the bus for half an hour each way.
• While you're there, they only let you go to the bathroom at certain times. You only have ten minutes to get from one work station to another
• If you do anything wrong, you aren't allowed to talk to anybody during lunch.
• Even when you go home, it's not over. A job supervisor also lives in your house, and makes you do two or three more hours of the same work you did on the job. The at-home supervisor is even harsher than the one at work and has more power to inflict annoying punishments if you fail to comply.
• Not only that, but you can't quit this lousy job. It's the law -- the government requires you to stick with it for at least ten years.

That's a fair description of the lives of far too many of our school-age children.


• Homework, Part I: THE WORST JOB IN THE WORLD by Orson Scott Card
First appeared in print September 17, 2006 in The Rhinoceros Times, Greensboro, NC
http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2006-09-17-1.html

• Homework, Part II: WHY DO WE STILL GET HOMEWORK? by Orson Scott Card
First appeared in print September 24, 2006in The Rhinoceros Times, Greensboro, NC
http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2006-09-24-1.html



MAGNET YENTAS REDUX: SOOTHING THE MAGNET PANIC
by Mary MacVean, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

Dec. 5 - It's December, and the pressure is mounting. Not from the presents or the cooking or the relatives. Those are a piece of cake -- a fruitcake, perhaps. It's the agony of choice. Or, more accurately, CHOICES.

For L.A. parents who want their children to go to a magnet school or want a permit to send them to a school other than their home school, December can be full of angst: visiting campuses, deciding which one suits best, then playing the odds in a system that has many more students than places for them.

The worry season officially begins when the L.A. Unified CHOICES booklet arrives in the mail. Right there on the cover it says, "Please open at once." Why wait to ramp up the anxiety?

The booklet, much improved in the last several years, explains the possibilities clearly. It includes an application (no copies accepted), due by 5 p.m. Jan. 11, and an envelope to mail it – though plenty of faithless parents carry it by hand downtown to the district offices. Anyone who needs a booklet can get one at any LAUSD school.

Last year, The Times played host to the Magnet Yentas, writer Sandra Tsing Loh and other moms who answered readers' questions about the system. In the links [following], we're repeating excerpts of their advice. Information also is available at www.lausd.net.

smf's 2¢ - This article marks the debut of a new byline in 4LATimes, welcome Mary MacVean. I wrote my very first piece for publication about the Choices brochure process. Last year Sandra Tsing Loh and Co. - under the guise of The Magnet Yentas wrote some very good, funny and informative stuff for the late, lamented School Me! blog in LATimes. The Times in their infinite wisdom - demonstrating the viability of reruns on the Internet to prove the Writers Guild point - has republished online.

Links to that "all that 'right stuff'" is presented below. One piece of advice to "'ye of little' faithless parents" from my original advice: DON'T hand carry your application downtown! You will get neither satisfaction nor a receipt!

1. Make and save a copy.
2. Mail your application and all correspondence in, certified mail, return receipt requested.


THE MAGNET YENTAS REDUX …Return …Rerun …Recycled …Resurrected



EVENTS: Coming up next week...
• Monday Dec 10, 2007
WASHINGTON PREPARATORY HIGH SCHOOL: Open House
Please join us at an Open House to showcase Washington Preparatory High School's new Physical Training Facility!
11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
Washington Preparatory High School
10860 S. Denker Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90047

• Monday Dec 10, 2007
SOUTH REGION HIGH SCHOOL #15: Pre-Design & Project Update Community Meeting
6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
San Pedro High School
1001 W 15th Street
San Pedro, CA 90731


• Monday Dec 10, 2007
VALLEY REGION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #13: Site Selection Update Meeting
6:30 p.m.
Vista Middle School - Multipurpose Room
15040 Roscoe Blvd.
Panorama City, CA 91402

• Thursday Dec 13, 2007
CENTRAL REGION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #18: Pre-Construction Meeting
6:00 p.m.
Adams Middle School - Auditorium
151 W. 30th St.
Los Angeles, CA 90007

*Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________
• SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
http://www.laschools.org/bond/
Phone: 213-241-5183
____________________________________________________
• LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
Phone: 213-893-6800


• LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION & COMMITTEES MEETING CALENDAR



What can YOU do?
• E-mail, call or write your school board member:
Yolie.Flores.Aguilar@lausd.net • 213-241-6383
Marlene.Canter@lausd.net • 213-241-6387
Tamar.Galatzan@lausd.net • 213-241-6386
Monica.Garcia@lausd.net • 213-241-6180
Julie.Korenstein@lausd.net • 213-241-6388
Marguerite.LaMotte@lausd.net • 213-241-6382
Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net • 213-241-6385

...or your city councilperson, mayor, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think! • There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org • 213.978.0600
• Call or e-mail Governor Schwarzenegger: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
• Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
• Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
• Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
• Register.
• Vote.


Who are your elected federal & state representatives? How do you contact them?




Scott Folsom is a parent and parent leader in LAUSD. He is immediate past President of Los Angeles 10th District PTSA and represents PTA as Vice-chair the LAUSD Construction Bond Citizen's Oversight Committee. He serves on various school district advisory and policy committees and is a PTA officer and/or governance council member at three LAUSD schools. He is also the elected Youth & Education boardmember on the Arroyo Seco Neighborhood Council.
• In this forum his opinions are his own and your opinions and feedback are invited. Quoted and/or cited content copyright © the original author and/or publisher. All other material copyright © 4LAKids.
• FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 4LAKids makes such material available in an effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to parents, teachers, students and community members in a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
• To SUBSCRIBE e-mail: 4LAKids-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com - or -TO ADD YOUR OR ANOTHER'S NAME TO THE 4LAKids SUBCRIPTION LIST E-MAIL smfolsom@aol.com with "SUBSCRIBE" AS THE SUBJECT. Thank you.