| In This Issue:                  |  |                    | • | PUBLICATION OF TEACHER DATA DISTRACTS FROM REAL EVALUATION |  |  |                    | • | UNIONS' TACTICS DIVERGE IN ENGAGING OBAMA  AGENDA |  |  |                    | • | LEAKS DON’T KILL KIDS |  |  |                    | • | THE LITTLEST REDSHIRTS SIT OUT KINDERGARTEN |  |  |                    | • | HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest of the Stories from Other Sources |  |  |                    | • | EVENTS: Coming up next week... |  |  |                    | • | What can YOU do? |  |  |  
 Featured Links:
 |  |  |  | "No one suggests using value-added analysis as the  sole measure of a teacher. Many experts recommend that it count for half  or less of a teacher's overall evaluation." 
 – so it says in The LA Times.
 
 Except the 'no one' who suggests it is The Times –and - 'many experts'  notwithstanding -  they intend to suggest it about six thousand LAUSD  third, fourth and fifth grade teachers - ranking them from best-to-worst  - perhaps as soon as today.
 
 IN CASE YOU HAVE BEEN OUT THE LOOP THIS WEEK - perhaps visiting the moon  to observe the total eclipse of reason on Planet Earth: The LA Times  has published an investigative piece identifying and naming the names of  good and bad teachers in LAUSD - based on student test scores and  calculations founded upon a controversial statistical methodology called  "value-added".
 
 If value-added wasn't controversial before, it is now. And if they  called in "Bat's-Wing-Added" or "Eye-of-Newt-Added" it wouldn't have  gotten any respect whatsoever.
 
 In so doing The Gray Lady of Spring Street set off a brouhaha of epic  epicness - to steal some hyperbole from the marketing campaign of Scott  Pilgrim v. The World.
 
 The Times piece is described in the Newsweek 'Gaggle' Blog (Press, Politics & Absurdity) thus:
 
 "Do parents have the right to know which of their kids' teachers are the  most and least effective? That's the controversy roaring in California  this week with the publication of an investigative series by the Los  Angeles Times' Jason Song and Jason Felch, who used seven years of math  and English test data to publicly identify the best and the worst third-  to fifth-grade teachers in the Los Angeles Unified School District. The  newspaper's announcement of its plans to release data later this month  on all 6,000 of the city's elementary-school teachers has prompted the  local teachers' union to rally members to organize a boycott of the  newspaper."
 
 Public disclosure of information like this has no precedent. Many school  districts are prohibited by law from disclosing the names of  ineffective teachers. The teachers interviewed and profiled in last  Sunday's expose were interviewed, they met the reporters and posed for  the photographers. That can't be said for the 6000 teachers in the  database.
 
 The piece by the Two Jasons blew the City of Bell's municipal  shenanigans right off the front page. The Bell stories now are a distant  second place/below the fold/page 3 in the Times' "Who'll get a  Pulitzer?" sweepstakes.
 
 Diane Ravitch has said he methodology here isn’t value added, it's  "Blame and Shame -  blame and shame the teachers because system doesn't  work. Blame and Shame is scapegoating and humiliation, a holdover from  the hickory stick and the stocks and pillory. Can the ducking stool and  Trial by Ordeal be far behind?
 
 ●THE BELL STORIES are real investigative journalism - with wrongdoing  and digging and fact checking and muckraking and interviews and leads  and reporting.
 ●The LAUSD STORY is a rewrite of a scholarly report by an economist -  How Effective Are Los Angeles Elementary Teachers and Schools? by  Richard Buddin [http://bit.ly/azJ68d} - translated into the vernacular and published with 60 point finger-pointing headlines.
 ●THE STORY IN BELL is about bad politicians.
 ●THE STORY ABOUT LAUSD is more about the newspaper story and less about  teachers and schools; it's bad journalism and the unintended results  therefrom. (Though the 'un' in 'unintended' may be as deliberate as The  Times' corporate masters and editorial board and the City Hall Power  Brokers can make it.)
 
 Historically LA has always been about City Hall power brokers.  Historically the LA Times has always been on the power broker's side,  And the teachers' union in LA is as much a part of the problem at LAUSD  as the part-time power-broker wannabes who complain that the meetings  where they give away schools take up too much of their time. And it  isn't helpful that the UTLA President argues that teachers are only 10%  of the educational equation …though that's about the percentage of the  UTLA membership who actually voted for him
 
 Let's face it: Good Teachers make all the difference in the lives of the  fortunate students who have them. Poor, mediocre or poorly trained  teachers are a problem that needs addressing and solving. The Times  would have all teachers not in the top 25% wear distinctive badges, have  a stamp on their identity card or a stain on their permanent record.:  Bad Teacher. Never to get a job in Lake Woebegone USD - where all  teachers and the children are above average!
 
 Just maybe - when the consensus of opinion and the relevant indicators  among administrators, peers, students and parents say that a teacher is  excellent ....but the data crunched though value-added economic  methodology says otherwise ...then maybe the methodology or the data or  the theory is suspect. Maybe the value of value-added is subtractive.  Maybe economists and newspaper reporters shouldn't be determining  teacher performance.
 
 ONE MAY NEVER LEARN TO READ AT GRADE LEVEL (OR ALGEBRA) IN LAUSD  ...BUT CYNICISM COMES EASILY.
 
 In an "Informative" to the Board of Ed on Friday and an interview to  feed Saturday's Times, Deputy Superintendent Deasy announced that  valued-added teachers assessments were 'on-the-table' in union contract  negotiations.
 
 ● The interview was with Jason Song - one of the 'Two Jason' authors of  The Times value-added report - putting Song and The Times in the  position of covering news of their own making.
 ● This perpetuates the unfortunate reality that the UTLA Contract is the  overarching governing document of the District and that contract  negotiations is where policy is set.
 ● Deasy cynically (and he's only been here 20 days!) proposed that the  contract negotiations be resumed Friday and concluded immediately -  before The Times publishes their j'accuse list of suspect teachers -  even though UTLA leadership is having their long-scheduled annual  meeting in Palm Springs this weekend (in time for the 3.8 temblor  Saturday AM!).   And UCLA/IDEA predicts The Times will publish their  list today!
 ● 4LAKids' 50-plus years of LAUSD bred-cynicism is fed by the timing of  these LAT stories and resultant uproar, the arrival Dr. Deasy  fully-formed from the Gates Foundation, the UTLA contact negotiations,  the Board of Ed's traditional August Break and - what the heck - the  earthquake in PS!
 
 Let me pose a hypothetical, gentle readers - and this will require what  those in the entrainment profession call a Suspension of Disbelief ...as  I call into question Everything You've Ever Been Told. Make sure those  restraints are tightly fastened and keep your hands and arms inside the  vehicle at all times: MAYBE THE LA TIMES AND THE UNION AND THE SCHOOL  DISTRICT ARE ALL WRONG A LOT OF THE TIME. Or - spoiler alert - had you  already figured that out?
 
 Yet the Times is somewhat right.
 
 THERE SHOULD BE A METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING TEACHERS .....this just  ain't it. (Ironically, Richard Buddin The Times' hired-gun Value-Added  theorist/guru/consultant is working on one for his other employer: RAND -  employing fixed effects and multilevel modeling approaches to evaluate  teacher quality under a five-year Institute of Education Sciences study |  http://bit.ly/aTH22F.
 
 AND SOMEONE SHOULD BE IN CHARGE OF EVALUATING TEACHERS - someone we in  the parenthood business would call "a responsible adult". The current  Board of Ed don't seen up to the job. I sincerely doubt if it's the LA  Times and the two Jasons and a think-tank economist. Or Mayor Tony. Or  Arne Duncan. Or the Broad, Gates and Walton Family Foundations.
 
 Remember those first three words in the US Constitution? We the People? Maybe it's us who are accountable/responsible/in charge.
 
 ¡Onward/Adelante!  -smf
 
 PUBLICATION OF TEACHER DATA DISTRACTS FROM REAL EVALUATION
 By UCLA/IDEA staff - Themes in the News for the week of Aug. 16-20, 2010
 
 08-20-2010  -- The Los Angeles Times created an uproar in the education  community with the publication of a story—the first in a series—that  analyzed teacher effectiveness using a value-added model.  This weekend,  the Times plans to follow up by releasing information about 6,000  third- through fifth-grade teachers, ranking them on a scale from least  to most effective.
 
 Reactions of shock and deep concern are coming from many corners of the education community, even those rarely in agreement.
 
 Diane Ravitch, who opposes the use of standardized tests as single tools  for evaluation, called the public outing “disgraceful.” | http://bit.ly/d30bHo   In a blog post, Rick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute think  tank and a proponent of using data for teacher evaluations also said he  had serious problems (Education Week | http://bit.ly/aIfz2u).
 
 Value-added analysis measures the movement up or down on a student’s  test scores from one year to the next. According to the Times, the  higher the jump, the more effective the teacher.
 
 Most expert reports on this method, including one by the National Academy of Science | http://bit.ly/5LWz0,  point out that the value-added metric, alone, is insufficient in  evaluating teacher effectiveness. In agreement is Los Angeles Unified  School District Superintendent Ramon Cortines, who asked, “Would a  person be diagnosed with diabetes solely on the basis of a high blood  pressure reading? (Color Lines | http://bit.ly/cHHlSZ)
 
 Barnett Berry, president of the Center for Teaching Quality, offered  another medical analogy. It is “the equivalent of a newspaper  indiscriminately listing the names of doctors, in rank, based on  mortality rates, irrespective of the type of medicine they practice or  the context in which they practice” (Christian Science Monitor | http://bit.ly/bzAllQ).
 
 A Sacramento high school teacher distinguished between data-driven and  data-informed. “In schools that are data-informed, test results are just  one more piece of information that can be helpful in determining future  directions” (Washington Post | http://bit.ly/c63vAS).
 
 And the data the Times intends to publish is limited in several ways.   It purports to identify the value added by particular teachers, but does  not take into account student mobility, absenteeism, the role of tutors  or team teachers, summer school programs or after-school programs  (Christian Science Monitor, Washington Post).
 
 Parents are being invited to act on powerful conclusions they draw from  the teacher data, but it is difficult to find positive steps they can  take.  In the short term, parents might compete among themselves to win  their child a spot in the “most effective” teacher’s classroom. School  morale, already low after a season of pink slips, could receive another  blow. Teachers might do their best to avoid teaching grades 3, 4 and 5.   Or, turn inward and narrow their curriculum to teach solely to the  test.
 
 Public disclosure and a culture of blame could create a chilling effect  on teacher collaboration. It could also dry up the pool of people  willing to enter the teaching profession.
 People love rankings, sorting, and surveys; it’s hard to resist the  appeal of the “10 Best” or “10 Worst”.  But the facile display of  numbers and rankings can be misleading for a public that is not well  acquainted with nuanced statistical models or with critiques of how to  use that data.
 
 That is why the National Academy of Sciences worries about the  “considerable limitations to the transparency” of value-added analysis.
 
 The Times, by focusing on a narrow and underdeveloped measure of teacher  effectiveness, distracts attention from the real reform need: a  comprehensive teacher evaluation system that provides ample support to  improve student learning.
 
 
 UNIONS' TACTICS DIVERGE IN ENGAGING OBAMA  AGENDA
 By Stephen Sawchuk | Education Week | Vol. 30, Issue 01
 
 August 19, 2010 -- Forced into an uneasy balancing act between their  members and the president they helped elect, the national teachers’  unions are responding to the Obama administration’s  teacher-effectiveness agenda in notably different ways.
 
 Publicly at least, National Education Association President Dennis Van  Roekel has hewed closely to the union’s internal policy statements on  such matters as embedding student learning into policies on teacher  evaluation and pay. But the heads of the union's state affiliates have  taken sundry positions on initiatives such as the federal Race to the  Top competition, with some participating in the shape of their states’  bids for the $4 billion initiative and others opposing them outright.
 
 In contrast, the president of the 1.5 million-member American Federation  of Teachers, Randi Weingarten, has laid out—and helped local affiliates  adopt—an explicit agenda for her union that, for example, endorses a  new approach to teacher evaluations, including the consideration of test  scores alongside other factors.
 
 Those responses, say experts on teachers’ unions, are a complex product  molded significantly by the unions’ respective governance structures.  Among other differences, the structures make the national bully pulpit a  more powerful place at the AFT, but tilt NEA policy away from its  president and toward its state affiliates.
 
 “Philosophically, I don’t think [the unions’ leaders] are coming from  different places, but there is a difference in the extent to which  they’ve engaged in controversial discussions about evaluation and  teacher pay,” said Mark Simon, who served as a member of the NEA’s board  of directors while the president of its Montgomery County, Md.,  chapter. “The politics of the organizations allow Randi to be engaged  right now, ... while NEA is providing support on an  affiliate-by-affiliate basis, but is not able to articulate a message  for every affiliate.”
 
 ‘NO CONFIDENCE’
 
 After eight years of being largely shut out of policy discussions during  President George W. Bush’s administration, the teachers’ unions had  hoped for a president friendlier to their views on the teaching  profession. And while they’ve had more access to President Barack  Obama’s administration, its focus on the controversial area of teacher  performance has yielded some angry rank-and-file members.
 
 The differences in the unions’ responses were on stark display at their conventions, both held last month.
 
 Reforming teacher evaluations is arguably the centerpiece of the  administration’s teacher-effectiveness conversation. But discussion of  the issue was all but absent at the NEA’s Representative Assembly in New  Orleans.
 
 Instead, delegates narrowly approved a a position of “no confidence” in  the Race to the Top competition, which puts a premium on changing  teacher evaluation. The vote largely broke along state-affiliation  lines.
 
 “The debate, the closeness of the vote—what you saw was a microcosm of  experiences all over the map in terms of negative or positive  experiences different states had with the program,” said Ken Swanson,  the president of the Illinois Education Association.
 
 The teacher-effectiveness discussion has been pursued individually by  select NEA state affiliates rather than at the national level. Unions in  Delaware, Illinois, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Tennessee played a major  role in the crafting of their states’ applications for the Race to the  Top, while other states opposed the grant program altogether.
 
 “We are dead set against tying evaluations to teacher performance and  salary,” said David Sanchez, the president of the California Teachers  Association. “In my opinion, we are never going to agree to consider  that your salary is based on a single evaluative assessment.”
 
 In contrast, Illinois chose to move forward when state lawmakers  intentionally included policies reflecting some of the union’s internal  priorities in an education reform bill, Mr. Swanson said.
 
 Political realities influenced the Tennessee union’s participation, said  Earl Wiman, the past president of the Tennessee Education Association.  “We saw the legislative call sheets, and this became a runaway freight  train,” he said about a state law created to position the state to  compete in the Race to the Top program, which is using economic-stimulus  money to promote education improvements along the lines favored by the  Obama administration.
 
 Rather than oppose the legislation, the union worked to reduce the  percentage of a teacher’s evaluation based on test-score growth and to  add provisions to the state code allowing teachers to “grieve,” or  formally protest, procedural aspects of their evaluations, Mr. Wiman  said.
 
 The NEA did not respond to requests for an interview with Mr. Van Roekel.
 
 EVALUATION ENDORSED
 
 If evaluation was on the periphery of the NEA assembly, it was front and  center at the AFT’S biennial convention, held in Seattle. There, AFT  delegates formally endorsed a six-page, single-spaced resolution on  teacher evaluation codifying the vision Ms. Weingarten had laid out in a  speech six months earlier.
 
 In that address at the National Press Club, in Washington, Ms.  Weingarten said that under certain circumstances, unions could consider  using student achievement in teacher evaluations and align due process  procedures with such evaluations. The NEA does not endorse those  policies. ("AFT Chief Promises Due-Process Reform," Jan. 20, 2010.)
 
 Since then, Ms. Weingarten has provided crucial bargaining help to local  affiliates willing to experiment with evaluation or pay, resulting in a  number of high-profile contracts in such cities as New Haven, Conn.;  Philadelphia; Pittsburgh; and Washington.
 
 “While the conversation about teacher evaluation may have been started  by others, AFT is trying to assert our expertise and authority into that  conversation,” said Mary Cathryn Ricker, the president of the union’s  St. Paul, Minn., chapter and one of the local leaders Ms. Weingarten  tapped to craft the teacher-evaluation framework.
 
 PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
 
 The two national unions’ responses to the teacher-effectiveness issue  are not recent phenomena. Rather, they reflect long-standing differences  in how the unions are organized.
 
 Under the NEA’s structure, the largest state affiliates—California, New  Jersey, Michigan, and Florida, among others—have the most  representatives on the union’s board of directors and its resolutions  committee, which vets changes to formal NEA policy statements, as well  as the most delegates to its convention.
 
 As such, they exert a powerful influence over the national union’s  policy direction. The NEA’s resolutions are binding, and the union’s  president must abide by them. State affiliates, in theory, must do so to  tap their share of centrally allocated NEA funding.
 
 Before this year’s convention, the union’s resolutions committee  discussed amending its formal position on teacher evaluations, but it  did not advance anything to the delegates, according to the NEA’s  executive director, John I. Wilson. And doing so on a controversial  issue like teacher evaluations is no easy task.
 
 “To get a resolution to the floor, you really need strong support,” said  Keith B. Geiger, the union’s president from 1989 to 1996. “California,  New Jersey, Florida—those are states with a lot of resolutions-committee  members and ... would be more reticent to pass anything that smells of  merit pay, of single tests determining something.”
 
 A downside of the system is that it tethers the national leadership to  the traditional positions held by those states, said Julia Koppich, a  San Francisco-based consultant who has written extensively on teachers’  unions.
 
 “The organization is split, and it is predictable which states favor  some change and which ones don’t,” she said. “If, in fact, the national  NEA is more aligned with [the Illinois] positions, it should be out  there working with some state affiliates to help them see if they can  move a little more toward those positions.”
 
 That the largest 10 affiliates have significant control over policy has  complicated Mr. Van Roekel’s relationship with the Obama administration,  acknowledged Mr. Sanchez, the president of the California union.
 
 “He is in a very tough situation,” Mr. Sanchez said. “But when he is  directed by his board and state presidents, he’s got to go [to the  administration] and tell it like it is. It’s challenging for him, just  as it is for me to tell him that CTA is not on board with something.”
 
 SINGULAR OPPOSITION
 
 If the NEA structure gives state affiliates the primary role in  developing and overseeing policy among local unions, an inverse  situation exists within the AFT, where the central leadership actively  works to persuade locals to try out new ideas.
 
 The national AFT “treats local leaders as incubators of promising  education practices, and they are constantly scanning for things locals  are doing that should be scaled up,” said Ms. Ricker, who has worked  within both unions’ structures because Minnesota is a merged NEA-AFT  affiliate.
 
 That ethos has given Ms. Weingarten an advantage in setting an agenda  that goes against some traditionally held views, according to Ms.  Koppich. “I think AFT’s philosophy is quite different from the NEA’s,  that it’s the elected leadership’s job to maybe take the members to some  places they didn’t know they wanted to go,” she said.
 
 What’s more, Ms. Weingarten exerts considerable influence over the  union’s policy landscape partly because many of its vice presidents and  resolution-vetting committee members belong to the same internal  political coalition she supports, the Progressive Caucus. The group is  particularly powerful in New York City, the home of the union’s largest  affiliate.
 
 It is, in fact, so rare for the AFT’S Progressive Caucus-dominated  leadership to be challenged in elections that this year’s convention  marked the first time since 1974 that a full opposition slate of  candidates ran for office. The slate, which called itself “By Any Means  Necessary,” or BAMN, criticized current AFT leaders for considering  policy developments such as the Race to the Top competition and teacher  evaluations tied in part to student achievement, rather than opposing  them altogether. It won about 5 percent of the votes overall.
 
 “It was a message to Randi and a consequence of the risk she’s taken in  her leadership role,” said Mr. Simon, the former NEA board member, who  is now a policy analyst with the Economic Policy Institute, a think tank  in Washington.
 
 Teachers’ union watchers point to Karen Lewis, the new head of the  Chicago Teachers’ Union, the AFT’s third-largest affiliate, as a wild  card in future AFT policymaking. A newly elected national vice  president, she now sits on the union’s executive council.
 
 Though not affiliated with the BAMN slate, Ms. Lewis shares  philosophically similar views. She has called the Race to the Top  “misguided,” and she opposes many of the Obama administration’s policy  prescriptions, including school closures, charter schools, and the use  of standardized assessments for judging schools and teachers. Ms.  Weingarten has supported such policies, albeit cautiously and only in  certain contexts and situations.
 
 Ms. Lewis emerged from a Chicago group, the Caucus Of Rank and File  Educators, or CORE. Unlike the loosely affiliated BAMN group, CORE has  spent much of its time organizing, and it has already demonstrated its  ability to influence policy: At the AFT convention, CORE-affiliated  delegates successfully added language eschewing the use of test scores  for punitive purposes to a separate resolution on school closures.
 
 The message Ms. Lewis espouses appears to have resonated with the larger  AFT. In Seattle, she received the second-highest number of votes for a  position on the executive council.
 
 “You will never be heard if all you are doing is screaming and  hollering,” Ms. Lewis said, when asked about her new position in the AFT  governance. “This is an opportunity for Randi and other people to see  how detrimental [the Obama administration’s] policies are.”
 
 For her part, Ms. Weingarten said that she welcomes a variety of  opinions on the executive council. “Our council has lots of people with  different opinions,” she said. “Karen is about helping kids, and there’s  a huge connection there. We have different ideas about how, but our  value system is the same.”
 
 MOVING FORWARD
 
 The complicated landscape of the unions’ internal and external messaging  on the teacher-effectiveness agenda will continue to play out when  renewal of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act comes to the  forefront on Capitol Hill.
 
 Most of the NEA’s recent policy shifts on teacher effectiveness have  taken place quietly, apart from its slow, deliberative governance  structure.
 In a largely unnoticed development, Mr. Van Roekel has pledged to  support affiliates that take positions outside the union’s formal policy  resolutions.
 
 The union’s $6 million Priority Schools campaign, meanwhile, will work  with schools receiving grants under the federal School Improvement  Grants, even those using improvement models the NEA does not favor.
 
 But the NEA’s national position on teacher-evaluation procedures remains  in flux. At the convention, Mr. Van Roekel announced the creation of a  new body, the Commission on Effective Teaching, which will report back  to the Representative Assembly next year on such issues as teacher  evaluation, but its recommendations will not be binding unless they are  incorporated into a resolution.
 
 In the meantime, Mr. Van Roekel might try to put forward a more detailed  vision for the union in the coming year, his third as NEA president,  Mr. Geiger said.
 
 “I think he’s gained a lot of respect,” the former NEA president said.  “He’s highly regarded by state leaders. I think he is moving as fast as  he can knowing he has both sides of the issue to deal with.”
 For Ms. Weingarten of the AFT, the question is a different one: whether  the uneasiness she’s faced from limited quarters in response to her push  for affiliates to examine long-held ideas about the teaching profession  will translate into more-organized action.
 
 “It can grow, or it can die out,” Ms. Ricker of Minnesota said of that  pushback. “We are clearly ripe for some internal conversations.”
 
 
 
 LEAKS DON’T KILL KIDS
 IT IS DEPRESSINGLY UNSURPRISING THAT THE BOARD OF  SUPERVISORS WOULD SEE THE DEATHS OF CHILDREN IN THE CARE OF LOS ANGELES  COUNTY AS A PUBLICITY PROBLEM, NOT A FAILURE OF THE COUNTY'S MOST BASIC  OBLIGATION.
 
 LA Times Editorial
 
 August 21, 2010 -- Faced with a series of administrative lapses that  have contributed to the deaths of children in the care of Los Angeles  County, the county Board of Supervisors has responded with stern and  authoritative action — against the worker or workers who may have  brought the tragedies to light.
 
 It is depressingly unsurprising that the board would see these deaths as  a publicity problem, not a failure of the county's most basic  obligation. As Department of Children and Family Services Director Trish  Ploehn described it to the supervisors, the leaks of information  regarding child deaths have created a morale issue for her colleagues.  Boohoo.
 
 The response to a crisis in child protection might involve overhauling  the county's systems for safeguarding children's welfare; it might  require firing some inattentive social workers; it might suggest  upgrading technology to allow records from the field to be more readily  available. But the response to a PR problem suggests a different course:  This week, the board authorized a leak investigation.
 
 Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, the lone dissenter, aptly noted that "the  obsession with leaks … exceeds the obsession with child deaths." He's  right, and his colleagues are wrong as they continue to frame the  problems of their troubled department as bad press rather than bad  management. Moreover, the county's insistence on hushing up these  matters has led it to break the law: In contravention of the state law  that requires board members to hold their meetings in public, the  supervisors initially discussed the leak investigation in closed  session. They tried to remedy that this week by at least debating in  public, but secrecy is corroding this issue at every step.
 
 On June 8, 11-year-old Jorge Tarin hung himself with a jump-rope hours  after a county social worker interviewed him at home and then left him  there; this, even though Jorge that same day had told a school counselor  and a county worker that he was considering suicide. As the county  board considers that tragedy, it should ask itself this question: Who  did Jorge more harm? The worker who left him in a home where he  complained of being beaten and where his stepfather was residing in  defiance of a court order, or the county worker who may have brought  details of Jorge's death to light?
 ●●smf: Supervisor Yaroslavsky and The LA Times have this right. Children  are dying. This is a more important story than the malfeasance in Bell  or the LAUSD teacher assessments put together.
 
 Make a note:
 
 ● TO THE BOARD OF SUPES: Stop looking for scapegoats and  whistleblowers and do something. It may very well be that the current  Department of Children and Family Services is doing the best they can  with their limited staff and budget. If that is true the board bears  responsibility for the death of children and the bad press.
 ● TO THE PULITIZER COMMITTEE: This is what good investigative journalism and good editorial writing looks like.
 
 
 THE LITTLEST REDSHIRTS SIT OUT KINDERGARTEN
 By PAMELA PAUL | New York Times
 
 August 20, 2010 -- AFTER all those attentive early childhood rituals —  the flashcards, the Kumon, the Dora the Explorer, the mornings spent in  cutting-edge playgrounds — who wouldn’t want to give their children a  head start when it’s finally time to set off for school?
 
 Suzanne Collier, for one. Rather than send her 5-year-old son, John, to  kindergarten this year, the 36-year-old mother from Brea, Calif.,  enrolled him in a “transitional” kindergarten “without all the rigor.”  He’s an active child, Ms. Collier said, “and not quite ready to focus on  a full day of classroom work.” Citing a study from “The Tipping Point”  about Canadian hockey players, which found that the strongest players  were the oldest, she said, “If he’s older, he’ll have the strongest  chance to do the best.”
 
 Hers is a popular school of thought, and it is not new. “Redshirting” of  kindergartners — the term comes from the practice of postponing the  participation of college athletes in competitive games — became  increasingly widespread in the 1990s, and shows no signs of waning.
 
 In 2008, the most recent year for which census data is available, 17  percent of children were 6 or older when they entered the kindergarten  classroom. Sand tables have been replaced by worksheets to a degree  that’s surprising even by the standards of a decade ago. Blame it on No  Child Left Behind and the race to get children test-ready by third  grade: Kindergarten has steadily become, as many educators put it, “the  new first grade.”
 
 What once seemed like an aberration — something that sparked fierce  dinner party debates — has come to seem like the norm. But that doesn’t  make it any easier for parents.
 
 “We agonized over it all year,” said Rachel Tayse Baillieul, a food  educator in Columbus, Ohio, where the cutoff date is Oct. 1. Children  whose birthdates fall later must wait until the next year to start  school. But her daughter, Lillian, 4, was born five days before, on  Sept. 25, which would make her one of the youngest in the class.
 
 With the wide age spans in kindergarten classrooms, each new generation  of preschool parents must grapple with where exactly to slot their  children. Wiggly, easily distracted and less mature, boys are more  likely to be held back than girls, but delayed enrollment is now common  for both sexes.
 
 “Technically, Lillian could go to kindergarten,” Ms. Tayse Baillieul  said. Moving her up from part-time preschool would allow Ms. Tayse  Baillieul to return to work and earn income. But Lillian’s preschool  teachers counseled her to hold Lillian back. “They said staying in  preschool a year longer will probably never hurt and will probably  always help, especially with social and emotional development.”
 
 Regardless, a classroom with an 18-month age spread will create social  disparities. “Someone has to be the youngest in class,” pointed out  Susan Messina, a 46-year-old mother in Washington. “No matter how you  slice it.” When Clare, her daughter, who is now 9, entered kindergarten  at 4, Ms. Messina was aware of widespread redshirting.
 
 “I thought, I’m not breaking the rules, I’m not pushing her ahead, we’re  doing exactly what we’re supposed to do,” she said. “Then it dawned on  me that in this day and age, there’s a move to keep your brilliant angel  in preschool longer so they could be smarter and taller for the  basketball team. But my daughter doesn’t need a leg up. She’s fine.”
 
 Still, it bothers her that children in the same class are as much as a  year and a half older than Clare. “She has friends who are 11 who are  going to get their periods this year, and she’s still playing with  American Girl dolls.” Another mother complained that her 4-year-old  became hooked on Hannah Montana by her aspiring-tween classmates. A  6-year-old wielding a light saber can be awfully intimidating to a boy  who still sleeps with his teddy.
 
 At the other tip of the age span, parents who promote children to  kindergarten before 5 are often seen as pushy, “even ogre-ish,” Ms.  Messina said. But suppose your child is already reading at 4? Do you  hold her back where she may be bored to tears in preschool or send her  into a classroom of hulking 6-year-old boys? In 1970, 14.4 percent of  kindergartners started at age 4. That figure has dropped to less than 10  percent.
 
 The self-esteem movement has inspired parents to care as much about  emotional well-being as academic achievement, and with fragile  self-images still in the making, the worst fear for parents is setting  up their children for failure. One Connecticut mother in Fairfield  County sent her October-born son to kindergarten at 4, despite “the  informal rule of thumb that everyone holds back their September to  December boys.” Kindergarten seemed to go well, but when her son entered  first grade, she said, “I got hit over the head. They told me he was  way behind.”
 
 She watched in horror as her son’s self-confidence tanked. “He was  spinning his wheels just to keep up,” she recalled. “He even got pulled  out of class for poor handwriting.” At the end of a miserable  second-grade year, she withdrew him to repeat the grade at a private  school. “It’s been a long and difficult journey,” she said. “I totally  regret starting him on kindergarten at 4.”
 
 Many parents feel compelled to redshirt by what they see as unreasonable  academic demands for 4- and 5-year-olds. But keeping children in  preschool, according to both academic research and parental experience,  doesn’t necessarily offer every advantage. Jennifer Harrison, a mother  of two from Folsom, Calif., held her October-born son, Elliott, back so  he “wouldn’t get labeled as out of control.” Over all, she said, it was  the right decision. “But his math skills are far above those of his  classmates.”
 
 How to attend to a child’s myriad needs, and which should be the  priority? “There don’t seem to be any rules,” said Rebecca Meekma, a  mother of two from Laguna Beach, Calif. “People are saying, ‘I want him  to be big in high school for sports!’ What is that? You can’t know who  they’ll be in high school.”
 
 And what about children who aren’t Leo the Late Bloomer? “I have met mom  after mom who is intentionally holding her child back a year,” said  Jennifer Finke, a mother of two in Englewood, Colo. “They say they don’t  want their kids to be the youngest or shortest. Is that right? Is it  fair?”
 
 Ms. Finke’s son, Benjamin, is soon to start kindergarten at 5. “There  will be boys in his class who are a year or more older than him. They’ll  be bored in class and then the bar will be set higher, and the kids who  are the right age will find that they can’t keep up.” What will happen  in gym when the larger boys are picked first for brute force, leaving  the pipsqueaks languishing? “I’m afraid my children will feel inferior.”
 
 Not all parents can choose when their children begin kindergarten.  “Though redshirting is common in the suburbs, in Manhattan, it’s the  schools — not parents — who decide,” said Emily Glickman, whose company,  Abacus Guide Educational Consulting, advises parents on kindergarten  admissions. At New York City private schools, the cutoff date is Sept.  1; in practice, summer babies, particularly boys, generally enter  kindergarten at age 6. “It’s a ramped-up world,” Ms. Glickman said. “And  the easiest way for schools to assure that their kids do better is for  them to be older and more mature.”
 
 Meanwhile, New York City public schools have a firm age cutoff date of  Dec. 31. Kindergarten isn’t required by the state, so parents could keep  their children out, but then they would have to start the following  year at first grade. And not everyone can afford two to three years of  nursery school or day care.
 
 “Among parents here, there’s a tremendous demand for kindergarten  earlier,” said Eva Moskowitz, founder of the Harlem Success Academy  Charter School, which pushed its cutoff back to Dec. 1. “If these  parents could start their kids at 2, they would.” Not everyone, alas,  defines academic privilege the same way.
 
 HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T  FIT: The Rest of the Stories from Other Sources
 
 GOOD GRADES: Teachers must be held accountable for students' success - and failure: L.A. DAILY NEWS EDITORIAL 8/2... http://bit.ly/cS8EgR
 
 LEAKS DON’T KILL KIDS: LA Times Editorial It is depressingly unsurprising that the Board of Supervisors would see... http://bit.ly/ciFkbP
 
 L.A. UNIFIED PRESSES UNION ON TEST SCORES + UTLA HEAD SAYS HE’S OPEN TO NEW EVALUATION SYSTEM + smf's 2¢:: ●●smf's... http://bit.ly/dtU5BD
 
 EDUCATION EXPERTS SLAM LA TIMES TEACHER ASSESSMENTS: By Robert Cruickshank | Published on California Progress Repo... http://bit.ly/bALkSw
 
 
 LA TIMES STORY A GAME CHANGER: by Charles Kerchner  in HuffingtonPost.com , later (8-20)in CityWatch  8/16/201... http://bit.ly/cvs8hi
 
 THE IGUANA, THE GOAT AND THE PONY: A TALE OF COLLABORATION: MY TURN BY Diana L. Chapman | from CityWatch – an insi... http://bit.ly/deyxQb
 
 THE PROMISE OF EARLY COLLEGE: “The importance of collaboration between institutions of higher education and high s... http://bit.ly/9FscAS
 
 U.S. DEPT OF EDUCATION – OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL – Final Management Information Report: CHARTER SCHOOL VUL... http://bit.ly/bY59zf
 
 TEACHERS’ UNION LEADER SAYS PARENTS SHOULD KNOW TEACHERS’ RATINGS: But Randi Weingarten, president of the American... http://bit.ly/bC983J
 
 Education groups outraged: STATE COULD USE FEDERAL SCHOOL FUNDING TO HELP CLOSE BUDGET GAP. The $1.2 billion was s... http://bit.ly/9t4zcx
 
 Newsweek: L.A. TIMES RANKS CITY TEACHERS BY EFFECTIVENESS: from the Newsweek Gaggle Blog: Press, Politics & Absurd... http://bit.ly/dCqv5T
 
 Action Required: SUPPORT ACCESS TO FREE, FRESH DRINKING WATER IN SCHOOLS: from the California Center for Public He... http://bit.ly/bVfGN4
 
 LAUSD MAY HOLD OFF ON SPENDING FEDERAL “SAVE JOBS AID” …IN APPARENT VIOLATION OF ‘SUPPLEMENT v. SUPPLANT’ RULE.: (... http://bit.ly/aAIhP4
 
 CAMPUS UNDER LAUSD's SCHOOL CHOICE PLAN OPENS. EXPERIMENT: Camino Nuevo Academy to be closely watched test case ... http://bit.ly/cd6Ak5
 
 CONGRESS TO INVESTIGATE SCHOOL TURNAROUND COMPANIES + INEXPERIENCED COMPANIES CHASE U.S. SCHOOL FUNDS: Congress to... http://bit.ly/9PkVlX
 
 Willingham: BIG QUESTIONS ABOUT THE LA TIMES TEACHERS PROJECT: washingtonpost.com  >  Education   >   The Answer S... http://bit.ly/baEsnz
 
 LOS ANGELES TIMES PLANS TO PUBLISH DATABASE REVEALING INDIVIDUAL TEACHER PERFORMANCE IN LAUSD: Compiled by CityTow... http://bit.ly/cjnBjq
 
 THE LA TIMES AT ITS BEST(?): ●●There is more than one way to look at any  issue.  In the interest of total fairness this isn't one of them! http://bit.ly/cNqugl
 LA TIMES JOINS THE TEACHER-BASHING PARADE: by Julianne Hing| ColorLines: After 12 years as a print magazine, Color... http://bit.ly/akxeg9
 
 IS THIS AN INVITATION FOR TEACHER-SHOPPING?: EDITORIAL IN The Bakersfield Californian Tuesday, Aug 17 2010 03:51... http://bit.ly/aY3iJw
 
 SCHOOL FUNDING UPDATES: From The National Access Network at Teachers College, Columbia University 17 August 2010... http://bit.ly/b5nhmS
 
 THE CHARTER SCHOOL COMMUNITY THINKS THIS NEWS IS NEWSWORTHY….: from Education news bulletin of LAEdupreneurs Tue... http://bit.ly/aAvyv6
 
 from NPR: L.A. TIMES ANALYZING AND RANKING -or ‘NAMING AND SHAMING’ - LOS ANGELES TEACHERS: from national public r... http://bit.ly/bUxngg
 
 TEACHERS UNIONS /UNION RAGE: BY R.M. IN THE ECONOMIST American politics Democracy in America Aug 17th 2010,... http://bit.ly/cKvhxO
 
 ‘DREAM ACT’ WOULD NOT BE ENOUGH FOR MANY UNDOCUMENTED STUDENTS: photo: Jay Premack - Students gathered in Washingt... http://bit.ly/bZqWh4
 
 MONEY FOR CALIF. SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BE DELAYED: ABC7 Eyewitness News HD covering Los Angeles and Southern Californi... http://bit.ly/aL6DsH
 
 LAUSD STUDENTS IMPROVE PROFICIENCY ON STATEWIDE ENGLISH, MATH TESTS + NEW CA TEST SCORES SHOW SCHOOLS FARING BETTE... http://bit.ly/9drr5v
 
 EVENTS: Coming up next week...
 *Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________
 •  SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
 http://www.laschools.org/bond/
 Phone: 213-241-5183
 ____________________________________________________
 •  LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
 http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
 Phone: 213-241.8700
 
 
 
 
 What can YOU do?
 •  E-mail, call or write your school board member:
 Yolie.Flores.Aguilar@lausd.net •  213-241-6383
 Tamar.Galatzan@lausd.net •  213-241-6386
 Monica.Garcia@lausd.net  •  213-241-6180
 Marguerite.LaMotte@lausd.net •  213-241-6382
 Nury.Martinez@lausd.net •  213-241-6388
 Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net •  213-241-6385
 Steve.Zimmer@lausd.net •  213-241-6387
 ...or your city councilperson, mayor,  the governor, member of congress,  senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think!  •  Find  your state legislator based on your home address. Just go to: http://bit.ly/dqFdq2 •  There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org •   213.978.0600
 •  Call or e-mail Governor Schwarzenegger: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
 •  Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these  thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
 •  Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
 •  Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
 •  If you are eligible to become a citizen, BECOME ONE.
 •  If you a a citizen, REGISTER TO VOTE.
 •  If you are registered, VOTE LIKE THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT.
 
 
 
 
 
 |