Saturday, October 13, 2007

2CIO's Missing/Inaction


4LAKids: Oct 14, 2007 ¡Los Lobos para Garfield!
In This Issue:
BREWER HAS YET TO MAKE HIS IMPRINT: The L.A. schools superintendent has gotten off to an uneven start and faces doubts about his leadership.
Monday's Reforms: LAUSD TRIES REACHING OUT TO DROPOUTS IN HIP NEW WAYS + LA SCHOOLS TURN TO THE INTERNET IN EFFORT TO REDUCE HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT RATE
Tuesday's Reforms: PLAN WOULD GROUP AND REFORM 44 TROUBLED LAUSD SCHOOLS
Thursday's Reforms: MIDDLE SCHOOL KIDS TAKE CENTER STAGE IN LAUSD REFORM PLANS + BREWER FILLS KEY L.A SCHOOL DISTRICT POSTS
HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest of the Stories from Other Sources
EVENTS: Coming up next week...
What can YOU do?


Featured Links:
4LAKids Anthology: All the Past Issues, solved, resolved and unsolved!
4LAKidsNews: a compendium of recent items of interest - news stories, scurrilous rumors, links, academic papers, rants and amusing anecdotes, etc.
This week's theme at LAUSD seems to be directed at or by Supt. Brewer. Monday's Times bemoaned that he hadn't done enough soon enough; by Friday the Times and the Daily News report too much reform, too soon.

ON MONDAY the Superintendent announced his dropout initiative.

TUESDAY Brewer actually put some meat on the bones of the Innovation Division with his plan to overhaul LA's lowest performing schools – in part reinventing-for-LA Superintendent Crew's School Improvement Zone [http://thezone.dadeschools.net/] in Dade County Florida. In so doing Brewer got out in front of the team he's asked to help design this reform. But after all, the job of leaders is to lead.

THURSDAY Brewer announced the anticipated Middle School Reform piece, again out in front of the team.

But read between the lines: Supt. Brewer is being hammered by the press and the mayor and the school board for not doing enough/fast enough while the school board is standing in the way of him appointing his own team. The big reform announcements made this week – and they have been in the making for a long time – are structural reforms. But ultimately they are about instructional reform. The Superintendent admits that he lacks a background in instruction – and yet the board won't approve his selection of a Chief Instructional Officer. That's CIO #1.

Similarly the Board of Education is reluctant to give Brewer a Chief Information Officer (CIO #2) in charge of lobbying, legislative, public relations and parent outreach — and this is especially telling. That CIO will craft and control the message – and that's a role the board and the mayor are not about to relinquish. "The message" isn't all spin and PR. It's not "wag the dog" – it's about informing parents, the public, the community – and yes the politicos and the media about what's going on at and in our schools.

Information is the key to accountability. La información es la clave para la rendición de cuentas. It's something that LAUSD has historically done – and please excuse the colloquialism – a piss-poor job of.

¡Onward/Hasta adelante! –smf


BREWER HAS YET TO MAKE HIS IMPRINT: The L.A. schools superintendent has gotten off to an uneven start and faces doubts about his leadership.
by Howard Blume and Joel Rubin | Los Angeles Times Staff Writers

October 8, 2007 -- Several months into his job as superintendent of the Los Angeles school system, David L. Brewer held court before students at Millikan Middle School in Sherman Oaks.

Barrel-chested and ramrod straight, he showered them with platitudes, perfectly at home as a schoolhouse version of a tent revival preacher.

"Repeat after me: If I read, I will succeed," the call and response began.

Students reacted a little sluggishly but gamely.

"A goal is a dream plus a deadline," Brewer continued. Students again repeated after him, a little louder.

"Mountain, mountain," he concluded, "get out of my way, because I have mind power!"

It was a telling morning, one that captured Brewer's style and enthusiasm, his comfort with students, his ease in the public eye. But, in the end, it was a one-off motivational talk that led to nothing in particular. And that, critics fear, all too well characterizes Brewer's superintendency to date.

Self-assured and eloquent, Brewer, in his first 11 months, has made clear his unabashed belief in his own ability to bring fundamental progress, or "transformation," as he puts it, to a deeply inefficient and bureaucratic Los Angeles Unified School District.

But critics and supporters alike worry that the 61-year-old retired Navy admiral, who has no experience in public education, has not yet altered much of anything. They fear he will -- or already has -- become a prisoner of politics and bureaucracy, rather than a liberator of ideas and a change agent.

"There are those who expected more from him by this point, and there are realists who know how hard it is getting anything done in this district," said Ted Mitchell, an education advisor to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger who recently agreed to help Brewer as well. "Now is the time for Supt. Brewer to establish his leadership, articulate his vision and move the district forward. The next three or four months will be absolutely critical."

Brewer has landed a few victories: helping to nail down a short-term teachers contract and getting a budget passed. He deftly sidestepped the long-running power struggle between the school board and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who has pushed for more say over L.A. Unified. And last month, civic leaders praised him for cutting through bureaucratic lethargy holding up a long-planned pilot project at a group of downtown schools.

"Supt. Brewer is digging in as deeply as he can given the immensity of the task before him," said state Sen. Mark Ridley-Thomas (D-Los Angeles), a member of the search committee that delivered Brewer. "The politics that have swirled around his superintendency since his arrival have been daunting, to put it mildly."

Whatever the reason, Brewer has gotten off to an uneven start.

An "innovation division," which aims to create and replicate effective reform, has been slow to get off the ground. Separately, Brewer is assembling a task force to address the district's lowest-achieving schools.

Touted as an outsider who could tame the district bureaucracy, Brewer missed an opportunity to demonstrate his leadership abilities with his early handling of a poorly functioning new payroll system. To some, Brewer did not quickly grasp the scope of the problem, which has resulted in overpayment or underpayment to tens of thousands of teachers and other employees.

Now, months later, he remains mired in its fallout, trying to recoup $53 million in overpayments and dealing with combative union leaders. Staff and outside consultants, meanwhile, are scrambling to address the mangled paydays; Brewer warned last week that it could take months more to fix the system.

On some crucial issues, he has seemingly been unable to make sure that his view prevails. Last month, the school board debated whether to extend health benefits to part-time cafeteria workers, at an annual estimated cost of $35.5 million. Brewer had endorsed a staff analysis that opposed the blanket extension as too costly. But at an August meeting with the recently elected board majority that supported the idea, Brewer retreated into near silence. Board members had to draw him out, finally getting him to briefly reaffirm his stance. They approved the benefits anyway.

Was this a lack of leadership or simply a leader shrewd enough to pick his battles?

Another saga has been the battle to control Locke High School, one of the district's poorest-performing. Brewer had offered early assurances to charter school operator Steve Barr that a deal was doable to allow his group to take over the campus. But Brewer backpedaled when leaders of United Teachers Los Angeles, the teachers union, rose in opposition.

The superintendent was left to insist that he wanted to work something out but that Barr and the union would not negotiate a compromise.

It was a far cry from the quick retort he'd made a few months before about what he'd do if the union opposed his reform efforts. "I'll just go around them if they don't want to work with me," he said at the time. The Locke episode was an early lesson for Brewer that in L.A. Unified, rhetoric comes easily, but results do not.

An impatient Barr successfully pressed the new board majority to approve converting Locke into several small charter schools that he would oversee.

As much as anything else, Brewer's inability to fill top-level posts -- and to create his own team -- has caused concern.

In June, he failed to persuade his choice for chief academic officer, Gregory E. Thornton, to take the job. Ostensibly, negotiations fell apart over salary, but by the time Thornton walked away, Brewer understood that his selection of Thornton, who like Brewer is black, troubled some board members.

In a heavily Latino district in which nearly 40% of its 708,000 students struggle to speak English, board President Monica Garcia questioned whether Thornton embodied the experience and skills to revamp instruction for these students. Aware of this criticism, Brewer has since promised to convene what he called a nationwide summit on helping English learners.

Brewer stumbled again when a background check on his choice for chief technology officer turned up a personal bankruptcy and alleged gambling debts. Moreover, the district's top financial and communications posts, as well as the chief operating officer job, all are staffed with interim appointments.

"That is probably my biggest frustration, getting the team in place," Brewer said. "I'll be very frank with you. As we are going out nationwide looking for this talent to come in here, some people don't want to come here because it costs too much."

Brewer also has been ambivalent about the long-term senior staff he inherited from his predecessor, former Colorado Gov. Roy Romer. But Brewer recently tapped Ronni Ephraim, who headed elementary instruction, to fill a newly created top post, overseeing training for all district employees. The school board resisted, agreeing recently to only a one-year contract, a signal that the board doesn't trust its schools chief or that ethnic politics is at play. (Ephraim is white.)

"Half the battle is believing he can get the job done, and he does," said Arlene Ackerman, former superintendent of schools in San Francisco and Washington, D.C., and now a Columbia University professor. Ackerman has been an informal advisor to Brewer along with Rudy Crew, superintendent of the Miami-Dade County Public Schools. "I think if he can get a good team around him, he'll be all right."

Broadly speaking, Brewer frequently talks about improving how the mammoth district is managed. He draws often from his favorite management tomes, noting a need for every administrator to receive "executive leadership training" and to reshape the underlying culture.

"I am not this messianic leader coming over the hill that's gonna save the . . . day," Brewer said. "I've got to go out there and make sure that everyone understands that making music is not necessarily the opera. And the only way the opera is going to play is if the French horns, violins and all those people are in sync."

He invoked this theme in an August address to administrators with the image of Jaime Escalante, the Garfield High School calculus teacher who left the district amid tension and jealousy after the film "Stand and Deliver" was made about his work.

"What'd we do to him?" Brewer asked the assembled administrators. "We moved him out.

"In this culture," he added, "we kill our savants. We have to stop that. That is part of the cultural revolution that is going to happen under Dave Brewer."

Brewer acknowledges, however, that it will take several years even for successful initiatives to demonstrate significant progress, a point that is almost universally accepted by veteran reformers, including the mayor's top education advisor, Ramon C. Cortines. Still, with three years left on Brewer's contract, pressure is mounting in a city that is short on patience.

No major local figures are willing to criticize the superintendent on the record, but skeptics abound.

"He said to all of us, 'I'm going to put an A-team in, make things happen. Watch me.' And he hasn't put anybody on first base yet," said one businessman, who declined to be named because, he said, "I want Adm. Brewer to succeed so much. The cost to the kids of turnover -- having to find someone else -- is really high."

The superintendent is aware of the whispered doubts.

"I hear the voices. There is no question about that," he said in a recent interview. "But I resist that because I know that if you're going to make a long-term and sustainable change, you can't go for the flavor of the month.

"I've got to convince the public and those voices: 'Look, stick with me on this. In fact, partner with me on this, so you know what the vision is.' "

Brewer's own hiring, amid the battle between Villaraigosa and the former school board, set the stage for a challenging first few months. The political bickering ended in July, when the new board majority, closely aligned with the mayor, took office.

The relative calm, observers say, gave Brewer a fresh opportunity. But it was the board that commandeered the agenda, forcing issues that could potentially conflict with Brewer's efforts.

Garcia, the new board president, pushed through several unusually detailed directives -- on dropouts, English learners, staff training and more -- that require Brewer to meet numerous tight deadlines.

"My reaction was, initially, 'What the hell is this all about?' " Brewer said. "And then when we got into them . . . [I] realized that many are in line with my vision and goals. So I wasn't offended by them."

There's precedent, however, for Brewer to be concerned. The last time a "reform board" backed by an L.A. mayor took over was in 1999, during Richard Riordan's tenure. It wasn't long before Riordan's majority removed incumbent Supt. Ruben Zacarias.

Brewer could well be wondering what the board majority will judge as success. Will it want independent, assertive leadership or fealty to the priorities and prerogatives of the mayor and his allied board?

Garcia's praise of Brewer suggests some of both.

"He has brought energy around leadership, around accountability," she said. "And he has brought community engagement we did not have."

Looking forward, she added, the expectations will be demanding: "I definitely expect to see a year of action."


Monday's Reforms: LAUSD TRIES REACHING OUT TO DROPOUTS IN HIP NEW WAYS + LA SCHOOLS TURN TO THE INTERNET IN EFFORT TO REDUCE HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT RATE
►LAUSD TRIES REACHING OUT TO DROPOUTS IN HIP NEW WAYS

by Naush Boghossian, Staff Writer | LA Daily News

October 9, 2007 - More than a year after rolling out a $10 million effort to keep at-risk students in school and re-enroll those who have left, Los Angeles Unified's dropout rate has seen little improvement.

But the nation's second-largest school district announced Monday that it will expand its anti-dropout efforts to the Internet and radio airwaves and send even more counselors door-to-door.

The new program - "My Future, My Decision" - is a broad effort that includes spots on KPWR-FM (105.9), a text-messaging campaign and interaction through popular social networking Web sites MySpace and Facebook.

While district officials said they are still waiting for full-year dropout data to be released, the most recent numbers - which include two months under the anti-dropout campaign - show a dropout rate of 25.5 percent or about 1.4 percentage points higher than the year before.

"We're getting a lot of good information from principals and local district superintendents so I would expect to see the (dropout) numbers come down," said Debra Duardo, the LAUSD's director of dropout prevention and recovery.

"We don't have the statistics for this year to report to measure how successful it's been. ... We'll see in a couple of months ... the impact of their work."

Duardo said the dropout rate increased in the most recent measures because it was the first year in which the state's Exit Exam was a requirement for graduation, so 12th-grade performance brought down the total average.

The ninth, 10th and 11th grades all experienced significant improvements in the dropout rate, but 12th-graders had 52 percent more dropouts compared with the year before.

District officials on Monday said they did not know how much the new efforts would cost, but said it would come out of the $10 million already allocated to the program.

When the LAUSD rolled out its Diploma Project in August 2006, the goal was to track about 20,000 at-risk students - even so far as going to their homes to get acquainted with the kids and their parents.

This year, district officials said they were able to reduce that to about 17,000 students.

Ultimately, district officials hope to reduce the LAUSD's dropout rate every year, including by 5 percent this year.

District dropout rates have been estimated at anywhere from 23 percent to more than 50 percent.

Under the program, the LAUSD has 80 Diploma Project advisers at 45 high schools and 34 middle schools to work with teachers and at-risk students to determine how to keep them in school - including through independent study, adult education classes or off-campus learning centers.

"The message is come back. Come back to school," Superintendent David Brewer III said. "Do not stay out there and become a statistic in our society."

At Watts' Jordan High School, where the district held the press conference Monday morning, there were about 20 students that the dropout counselor was able to bring back to school.

Rene Ahal, a diploma project adviser at Reseda High School, said the biggest challenge is that most at-risk students are so far behind in credits by the time they reach high school they feel helpless.

But Ahal said most also don't know about the options available to them - including making up credits at community college or adult school.

And Ahal said she also talks to them about how much money they can make and what kinds of jobs they can aspire to with high-school degrees.

"We expect to see changes, but the program's only been in effect for the past year," Ahal said. "Over time it's going to make a big difference."

Saul Hernandez, 19, said that although he had trouble with drugs in the ninth and 10th grades, he realized he needed to graduate from high school to have a better future.

Now, he said, he hopes to tell his story through the Internet to help others who aren't sure whether they want to get a high school diploma.

"I knew that if I wasn't going to get a good education, I wasn't going to make it in life," said Hernandez, a father-to-be who wants to work at a body shop and will graduate in June.

"It could make a change for other students. They can see us as an example to not be a dropout."


►L.A. SCHOOLS TURN TO THE INTERNET IN NEW EFFORT TO REDUCE HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT RATE

by Joel Rubin, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

October 9, 2007 - A new campaign to lower the dropout rate in Los Angeles schools will rely heavily on popular Internet websites such as YouTube and MySpace, as well as radio spots aimed at vulnerable teens, school officials announced Monday.

The Los Angeles Unified School District initiative also features a new website, www.MyFutureMyDecision.com. The site highlights alternative ways of earning a diploma and describes the district's many continuation schools and community college programs.

"For all of those young people out there who have dropped out, the message is very clear: Come back. Come back to school. We have resources for you," Supt. David L. Brewer told a news conference at a South L.A. school. "Do not stay out there and become a statistic in our society. . . . We believe in second chances."

Educators hope to attract teens to the district's website by posting student videos on YouTube, as well as testimonials from former dropouts on the social networking website MySpace.

According to state data from 2006, more than 1in every 4 of the district's roughly 200,000 high school students dropped out.

L.A. Unified has set a goal of reducing the district's dropout rate by 5% this school year.


Tuesday's Reforms: PLAN WOULD GROUP AND REFORM 44 TROUBLED LAUSD SCHOOLS
by Naush Boghossian | Daily News Staff Writer

Wednesday, October 10, 2007- Aiming to overhaul Los Angeles Unified's lowest-performing schools, Superintendent David Brewer announced a plan Tuesday to essentially carve out a separate, targeted district for 44 of the neediest schools.

Brewer's senior staff and local superintendents are still developing details, but the new district would be made up of middle and high schools and would have its own rules of governance and separate curriculum and instructional planning.

Brewer hopes to launch the district next fall and said schools in the group would be candidates for drastic reforms such as all-boys' academies and neighborhood literacy centers for parents.

The plan is the latest designed to create separate, smaller groups of schools out of the massive bureaucracy of the LAUSD system.

"We're looking to try to reduce the size of the current local eight districts and bring these middle schools and high schools into one supervisory structure so that focused attention can be placed on these schools for improvement," said Robert Schiller, a consultant hired by Brewer to help develop the plan.

Brewer's plan comes in addition to a previously announced plan under which Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa will manage more than 30,000 students in two groups of schools designated as among the district's lowest-performing.

On top of that plan, Brewer's proposal would pull at least 105,000 additional students out of the district's 708,000 population into a separate governance structure.

"It sure looks like the start of a breakup, which I think is something that is a long time in coming," said Assemblyman Cameron Smyth, R-Santa Clarita, who submitted legislation proposing breaking LAUSD into smaller districts.

But Brewer emphasized Tuesday that his plan is not necessarily to create a permanent structure. Instead, after schools improve they would return to governance under the general district.

The 17 middle schools and 27 high schools in the special district would have their own superintendent and directors assigned to act as liaisons with central staff, Shiller said.

The new district would include a new set of core curriculum at the schools and outline specific training for teachers. It also will address boosted school safety, smaller schools and community and parent partnerships.

Under federal No Child Left Behind standards, LAUSD is in its third year of Program Improvement status, requiring LAUSD to develop a plan to help the lowest-performing schools.

Brewer said a detailed plan is expected to be finished by Nov. 1 and presented to the board for approval by Nov. 13.

Still, the plan drew concern from some that it is creating a fragmented district with even more bureaucracy and challenges.

"I am worried the district is getting fragmented, and that does not necessarily mean it's going to fix the problem," 20-year school board member Julie Korenstein said.


Thursday's Reforms: MIDDLE SCHOOL KIDS TAKE CENTER STAGE IN LAUSD REFORM PLANS + BREWER FILLS KEY L.A SCHOOL DISTRICT POSTS
MIDDLE SCHOOL KIDS TAKE CENTER STAGE IN LAUSD REFORM PLANS

by Naush Boghossian | Staff Writer LA Daily News

October 12, 2007 - Just days after unveiling an overhaul plan for dozens of Los Angeles' lowest-performing schools, Superintendent David Brewer III on Thursday targeted nearly 100 underachieving and long-neglected middle schools for reform.

Brewer said he hopes to roll out "personalized learning environments" at all 92 of the district's middle schools by the 2009-10 school year to raise achievement and retention rates.

The move is significant for Los Angeles Unified School District middle schools, overlooked for years as the district focused on improving elementary schools, then high schools.

"It's our way to try to create more smallness out of largeness, so we can do something more immediate," said Michelle King, deputy chief instructional officer at the LAUSD.

"There's a fear there about sending youngsters to the middle school campus.

So it's critical that we look at those needs and be able to address the concerns and allay the fears of our students and of our parents and the communities." Until the district can reduce the number of students per campus, the reform plan is the answer to make middle schools seem more intimate, King said.

Seventeen of the middle schools would be "fast-tracked," with improvements started in the 2008-09 school year.

MORE OPTIONS OFFERED

Much like charter schools, middle schools could adopt eight-period days or other schedule variations to have more time for intervention during the school day and more elective choices.

The schools would also focus on English and on preparing all students to meet the college-prep graduation requirements.

King said each middle school will develop its own particular plan with input from teachers, parents, students and administrators.

The goal is to create greater parental engagement and student-teacher connections at middle schools, where students are in their critical years of preparing for high school and college-prep courses.

School board member Marlene Canter said she looks forward to rolling out the efforts at middle schools.

"We need to know the student and make that student know that somebody will miss them tomorrow if they're not in their classroom," Canter said.

But Linda Guthrie, a teachers union official and a member of the Curriculum, Instruction And Educational-Equity Committee, said she was disappointed with the plan.

She said it does not call for parent centers, violence-prevention efforts and a psychologist or a social worker at each school to address students' psychological and emotional needs.

"I see nothing exciting about this. This is not what I think this district needs to do to turn around its middle schools," she said.

"You really have to get radical, think outside the box," suggested Guthrie, a United Teachers Los Angeles vice president who said a focus group spent 18 months developing a report on the problem.

Elementary schools have improved steadily and dramatically over the past five years on the state standardized tests.

That upswing was followed by improvements in high schools this year.

But middle schools have languished, and early in his tenure Brewer promised to make their reform a priority.

While test scores released in August showed elementary and high schools gained on the Academic Performance Index and outpaced California as a whole, scores at middle schools leveled off.

Middle school reform is the latest overhaul plan unleashed by Brewer, approaching his one-year anniversary - Nov 13 - as superintendent.

On Thursday, he announced that he had filled four key leadership posts with executives who will play a pivotal role in his transformation agenda.

REFORM AGENDA

Earlier this week, he unveiled plans to create a separate district with 44 of the lowest-performing middle and high schools - and more than 105,000 students - targeted for reforms.

And that came just weeks after he announced a partnership in which Brewer said Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa would manage two groups of the district's lowest-performing schools.

School board member Julie Korenstein, representing part of the San Fernando Valley, said she's encouraged that Brewer proposes planning periods.

And she said she worries that too many reform efforts will falter.

"Any one of those things would have been a big piece to bite off," she said.

"I would have preferred doing one of the above and see how that turned out.

I feel like we're jumping from limb to limb, and I don't know how successful we can be if we do it that way." New board member Tamar Galatzan, who also represents the Valley, said that despite the risks, some changes must happen: "This district is certainly large enough that we need to try innovative strategies at different schools.

I truly feel that we need to start experimenting and bring a little innovation and reform into the district.".


BREWER FILLS KEY L.A SCHOOL DISTRICT POSTS: Board approves two of his latest candidates for major positions. One of them has experience dealing with a faulty payroll system.

by Joel Rubin and Howard Blume | Los Angeles Times Staff Writers.

October 12, 2007 - Nearly a year after being hired to run the Los Angeles public school system, Supt. David L Brewer filled some key cabinet-level posts this week and added to the stable of outside consultants trying to fix a faulty payroll system that has underpaid and overpaid thousands of employees.

To find the district's chief financial officer, Brewer, a retired Navy admiral, tapped the financial manager of the Navy's postgraduate college.

Brewer's choice for chief technology officer, meanwhile, currently holds the same job in the Los Angeles Community College District, where he helped address a payroll debacle similar to the one facing the Los Angeles Unified School District.

The moves, Brewer said, "are extremely important. To find the right people, sometimes you have to be a little patient." The district's elected Board of Education approved the two hires at a closed session Tuesday.

But the board resisted approving the person Brewer wants as the head of lobbying, legislative, public relations and parent outreach because of questions about his qualifications.

The board previously declined to give two other top deputies the two-year contracts that Brewer wanted.

Brewer has yet to bring on a chief academic officer, a position he has characterized as crucial.

The new chief financial officer is former Navy financial manager Megan K.

Reilly, who was given a two-year contract at $222,000 annually.

Reilly, 42, is the latest in a string of naval officers to join L.A.

Unified.

Aside from Brewer, former Navy engineers have run the district's $20-billion school construction and modernization effort over the last seven years.

Tony Tortorice, 55, will leave his job at the community college district to take over technology matters.

He received a two-year offer that will pay nearly $213,000 a year.

Tortorice will oversee ongoing efforts to fix a computerized payroll system plagued by intractable problems since its launch early this year.

Tortorice joined the community college district in 2002, shortly after it had purchased a similar payroll system.

Brewer said he went after Tortorice precisely because of his previous experiences, saying, "You want somebody who has been through the war, and he has." Tortorice was hired the same week that board members raised questions about the small army of technical and human relations consultants brought on to help the district's under-qualified staff remedy the payroll crisis.

During an open session at Tuesday's meeting, member Tamar Galatzan expressed deep concern over Brewer's request that the board approve payment of up to $585,000 for two more consultants, who together charge more than $43,000 each month.

Brewer's team also includes two top hires from within the district, for whom Brewer failed to win two-year contracts.

Ronni Ephraim, 56, an instructional officer who oversaw the substantial rise in L.A.

Unified's elementary school test scores, will now oversee the training of all employees, a position Brewer has cited as crucial.

She will earn $225,000.

His other internal promotion went to Julie Slayton, 41, who will lead accountability and strategic planning efforts.

She had been Brewer's assistant chief staff and has an extensive background in program evaluation inside and outside the school system.

She will earn about $145,000.

Both Ephraim and Slayton received contracts that expire at the end of June 2008.



HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest of the Stories from Other Sources
►THE MYTH OF THE UNFIREABLE DEADBEAT: Lies About Teachers and Unions
A former union leader takes on the conventional wisdom that the Teacher's Unions Are What's Wrong with Public Education in general and LAUSD in specific. Maybe it's the conventional wisdom that's wrong?

►Rearranging the Deck Chairs | IT Project Failures: TURNAROUND STRATEGY FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOL DISTRICT PAYROLL FAILURE
The nerds, techies and bloggers at ZDNet weigh in on everyone's favorite IT Project Disaster. The writer obviously went to public school, addressing the Superintendent/Admiral as: "Dude". But why not? These are the dudes who'll have to fix the mess.

►Commentary from Canada: EXPAND EDUCATIONAL FREEDOM OF CHOICE FOR ALL PARENTS
Preston Manning in the Toronto Globe and Mail thinks that Alberta's educational grass is greener than Ontario's. It's an old story in a new setting – and when conservatives are for "Choice" they mean "Vouchers"!

►Commentary from Las Virgines: FUNDING FINESSE - CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EDUCATION STILL ON A FISCAL 'ROLLER COASTER'
Speaking of the "greener grass": As LAUSD slips further and further down the political slippery slope and deeper and deeper into the educational quicksand – and some dream about how much better/simpler/whatever it would be if we only broke up LAUSD into more manageable parts – there might be some value into looking at how the next school district up the 101 is faring.

►HOW HIGHER ED CAN FIX K-12 from Inside Higher Ed
A UCI assistant professor writes that the Ivied Halls of Academe have the answer: The grass is greenest in Texas! Texas - those wonderful folks who brought us NCLB! Some folks are best locked in their ivory tower and the key conveniently tossed.

►Podcast - BREAKING UP IS HARD TO DO: Sub-Districts in the LAUSD
From Patt Morrsion | KPCC | Wednesday October 10
School Board Member Emeritus David Tokofsky holds forth on the Superintendent's New Clothes …er: Reforms – and Jaime Regalado, executive director of Cal State L.A.'s Edmund G. Brown Institute holds forth on what David said!

►THAT EASTSIDE SOUND

October 11 - Garfield High School, best known to the outside world as the setting for the 1988 film Stand and Deliver – starring Edward James Olmos as real-life math teacher and tough-love mentor Jaime Escalante – has always been an integral part of the East L.A. community. “It is the only high school in the unincorporated territory of East Los Angeles,” says Garfield Principal Omar Del Cueto. “So in this neighborhood, when you say old school, the only old school that comes to mind is Garfield High School.”

GARFIELD BENEFIT CONCERT FEATURING LOS LOBOS. Gibson Amphitheatre at Universal CityWalk, 100 Universal City Plaza, Universal City, (818) 626-4440. Sun. at 5:45 p.m. Tickets from $39.75. Info: Ticketmaster.com or Garfieldhs.org.




All of this week's news that didn't fit!



EVENTS: Coming up next week...
• Wednesday Oct 17, 2007
LAUSD BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MEETING
10AM - LAUSD Boardroom | 333 S. Beaudry Ave, LA

• Wednesday Oct 17, 2007
Central Los Angeles High School #9 (HIGH SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS): Construction Update Meeting
6:00 p.m.
Castelar Elementary School
840 Yale St.
Los Angeles, CA 90012

• Thursday Oct 18, 2007
San Pascual Elementary School: Community Meeting
6:00 p.m.
San Pascual Elementary School
815 San Pascual Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90042

► SAVE THE DATE: SATURDAY, OCTOBER 20th from 9am to 1pm
Assemblymember Anthony Portantino's CHILDREN'S HEALTH FORUM: CHILDHOOD OBESITY & DIABETES @ Washington Elementary School, 1520 Raymond, Pasadena

The Assemblymember (AD 44) invites you to join him for a health forum to obtain information surrounding the prevention and treatment of Childhood Obesity and Diabetes. Presentations and demonstrations will be offered. For more information or to RSVP, please contact Jarvis Emerson in his district office (626) 577-9944

*Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________
• SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
http://www.laschools.org/bond/
Phone: 213-241-5183
____________________________________________________
• LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
Phone: 213-893-6800


• LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION & COMMITTEES MEETING CALENDAR



What can YOU do?
• E-mail, call or write your school board member:
Yolie.Flores.Aguilar@lausd.net • 213-241-6383
Marlene.Canter@lausd.net • 213-241-6387
Tamar.Galatzan@lausd.net • 213-241-6386
Monica.Garcia@lausd.net • 213-241-6180
Julie.Korenstein@lausd.net • 213-241-6388
Marguerite.LaMotte@lausd.net • 213-241-6382
Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net • 213-241-6385

...or your city councilperson, mayor, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think! • There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org • 213.978.0600
• Call or e-mail Governor Schwarzenegger: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
• Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
• Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
• Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
• Register.
• Vote.


Who are your elected federal & state representatives? How do you contact them?




Scott Folsom is a parent and parent leader in LAUSD. He is immediate past President of Los Angeles 10th District PTSA and represents PTA as Vice-chair the LAUSD Construction Bond Citizen's Oversight Committee. He serves on various school district advisory and policy committees and is a PTA officer and/or governance council member at three LAUSD schools. He is also the elected Youth & Education boardmember on the Arroyo Seco Neighborhood Council.
• In this forum his opinions are his own and your opinions and feedback are invited. Quoted and/or cited content copyright © the original author and/or publisher. All other material copyright © 4LAKids.
• FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 4LAKids makes such material available in an effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to parents, teachers, students and community members in a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
• To SUBSCRIBE e-mail: 4LAKids-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com - or -TO ADD YOUR OR ANOTHER'S NAME TO THE 4LAKids SUBCRIPTION LIST E-MAIL smfolsom@aol.com with "SUBSCRIBE" AS THE SUBJECT. Thank you.

Saturday, October 06, 2007

Sputnik redux.


4LAKids: Sunday, Oct 7, 2007
In This Issue:
SPUTNIK REDUX: What's Changed for K-12?
PAYCHECK MISTAKES CONTINUE IN L.A. UNIFIED + TEACHERS UNION IS WARNED AGAINST PAYROLL PROTESTS
NCLB: CALIFORNIA ACHIEVEMENT TESTS HARDER THAN MOST OTHERS', STUDY FINDS
THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT
JON LAURITZEN 1938 - 2007
EVENTS: Coming up next week...
What can YOU do?


Featured Links:
4LAKids Anthology: All the Past Issues, solved, resolved and unsolved!
4LAKidsNews: a compendium of recent items of interest - news stories, scurrilous rumors, links, academic papers, rants and amusing anecdotes, etc.
ON OCTOBER 4th, 1957 (…it might have been 10/5 or even 10/6) I remember standing in the middle of Kirkwood Drive and looking up into the northern night sky - and seeing that faint moving star moving right-to-left (how ideologically correct!) across the sky. Sputnik, billed as the "artificial moon" was up there, beeping in Marxist-Leninist triumph. The Space Race was on! Davy Crockett was the past; Space was the Final Frontier.

And America was tragically behind the Soviet Union in Math and Science - and unless we turned it around the godless communists would win and McDonalds would be serving blinis instead of burgers. The future was in fallout shelters. The Soviets got the first dog in space soon thereafter. And the first man. And the first woman. We invented Tang and Velcro and got the first man and our flag on the moon in '69. We won. Cue the music.

But along the way we never caught up in teaching Math and Science - not in K-12 anyway.

In 1990 The National Education Goal on Math and Science was that U.S. students would be first in the world in mathematics and science achievement by 2000. But the Berlin Wall had fallen in '89; if we even tried for that goal we never came close.

ON OCTOBER 4th 2007 - fifty years after sputnik - I sat in a discussion with what passes for the best and brightest thinkers in LA on educational policy and we bemoaned the sorry state of Math and Science education in LAUSD - and admitted that the good and the bad news is that the sorry state of Math and Science instruction is a national phenomenon! It's not our problem exclusively and if we are to fix it in LA -- and we should and must -- we will have figure out how to do it all by ourselves because there are no best practices and/or lessons learned to emulate.

• Schools of Education in the US don't know how to teach teachers how to teach math.
• We Americans don't teach or understand the vocabulary of mathematics; we don't transmit the relevance - we do not show today's youngsters - bright and curious and questioning - WHY they need to know algebra and geometry and trigonometry.
• …not beyond the tired argument that it is the 'gatekeeper to higher education'.
• So the teacher - whether in the late fifties or fifty years further on - solves two problems on the board. I doesn't matter whether the board is black, green, white or smart. Then the kiddos need to solve fifty from the book. "Your teachers and your parents and your grandparents took algebra and barely passed …you need to do the same!"


The National Education Goal for 2000 was missed by a mile; we don't stand much of a chance to meet the NCLB National Educational Goal for 2014 either- every child proficient in reading, math and science. But we need to start somewhere …and promisingly enough - that's exactly where we are.
______________

And that was the good meeting of the day! Earlier a special committee of the school board, the LAUSD Innovation Division and the Mayor's Partnership had what was billed as the long anticipated discussion of the partnership of the school district and the mayor's office. What was discussed was a whole lot of vision and goals and not one iota of plans or specifics for the future.

Two highlights:

• Stephen Rochelle, school principal and ex-officio member of the committee to Kathi Littman, the head of the Innovation Division: "What do see as the role of the principal in these new partnerships?"

• Marlene Canter, the chair of the committee, interrupting: "That's a good question … but we don't have time for an answer right now!"

Followed soon thereafter by a heated discussion over whether it's the "Mayor's Partnership for LA Schools" or just "The Partnership for LA Schools" …with Ms. Canter ruling unequivocally that it's not The Mayor's Partnership - and never was!" Even though the blueprint for the partnership is "The Schoolhouse Framework" - of which the mayor is the credited author. Or that that very meeting's official agenda agendized the item as The "Mayor's Partnership." And if you watch the rebroadcast this Sunday morning 8AM on KLCS you will see the words "Mayor's Partnership" as the title under Ms. Canter while she denies it was ever so.

Lest I be accused of raising the rhetoric let me say this, not an original thought ...but apropos:

• In a substantive debate the audience to the debate learns something about the issues and about the debaters.
• It a really good debate the debaters learn something about the issues and themselves and their audience.

If we don't try to get there we will get nowhere at all.

Onward! - smf


For more about the Partnership for LA Schools visit their website. Note who the named partners in the Statement of Intent are.



SPUTNIK REDUX: What's Changed for K-12?
by Karen Symms Gallagher | Forbes.com | Education

10.03.07 - Los Angeles - Fifty years ago, on Oct. 4, 1957, the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, the world's first satellite. It is not an exaggeration to say that this event shook the world, and we still feel its reverberations today.

Sputnik was a dramatic wake-up call to the United States, communicating in stark terms that the U.S. was not entitled to the position of world leader in science and technology that it had enjoyed since the Industrial Revolution, and that a free market economy alone would not be enough to maintain a competitive edge in the Space Age. Sputnik sparked the creation of NASA and an unprecedented boom of U.S. government investment in research and, perhaps even more important, math and science education and high-tech workforce development. These investments assured several decades of world leadership in science and technology.

And yet, if you close your eyes and listen, Oct. 4, 2007, is not so different from the day Sputnik was launched. Once again, U.S. policy circles are buzzing worriedly about our nation's place in the world, concerned over a growing challenge to our present dominance from a huge communist competitor--in this case, China, coupled with fellow burgeoning Asian economic power India.

Once again, our nation's educational system has been called into question, as international assessments indicate that our K-12 students lag far behind their peers from dozens of other nations in science and mathematics.

Furthermore, the impending retirement of baby-boom scientists and engineers trained during the post-Sputnik era has led to concerns over potential high-tech workforce shortages. Only 4.7% of undergraduate degrees awarded in the U.S. are in the field of engineering, compared to a staggering 38.6% of those awarded in China. Clearly, our national commitment to engineering and other high-tech fields has waned. As these jobs are playing a larger and larger part in the world economy, our timing is particularly bad.

This is not demagoguery intended to inspire fear of China, India or other emerging competitors. After all, those nations are doing the right thing for their populations by investing aggressively in education and workforce development and moving their economies beyond lower-wage manufacturing jobs.

Furthermore, their success does not spell doom for the U.S. economy as long as we react accordingly: with public investments that allow our students and workers to compete with their international counterparts. By building a solid bedrock of science and math education in grades K-12, we can assure a problem-solving, technically adroit workforce that will keep the U.S. in a position of global leadership.

A recent report from the National Science Board Commission on 21st Century Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education (STEM) serves as a strong call to action in this regard, which all relevant federal, state and local policymakers should read. The report urges robust federal investment in such education programs at the National Science Foundation and the establishment of a nonfederal National Council on STEM Education to facilitate collaboration between federal, state and local initiatives--a crucial consideration in the American system of K-12 education, for which control resides at the local district level. If we are to match our international competitors' singular focus on preparing students to succeed in STEM disciplines, we will need a mechanism like this Council to lead the way.

Thankfully, we are already seeing meaningful steps in this direction. The America Competes Act, signed into law by the president in August of this year, makes important steps by expanding U.S. investments in science, technology, engineering and mathematics education programs, particularly those aimed at preparing more and better teachers of these critical disciplines. Additionally, the budgets of key science agencies like NSF and the Department of Energy Office of Science have already begun to expand thanks to the combined efforts of President Bush and Congress.

Fifty years ago, the U.S. was quite lucky, in a way, to receive a wake-up call as clear and unequivocal as Sputnik. Responding decisively to the challenge was not easy, but it was fairly straightforward. Today, we don't have the benefit of such a dramatic event, which makes the task harder.

It will take vision and sacrifice for the public and our leaders at the federal, state and local levels to respond to the challenge laid out in the National Science Board Commission report in a sustained and meaningful way.

It will be important to keep the salient lesson of Sputnik in our minds--the U.S. can maintain its leadership in science and technology if it has the will to do so.

• Karen Symms Gallagher is dean of the University of Southern California's Rossier School of Education and served as a member of the National Science Board's Commission on 21st Century Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.


PAYCHECK MISTAKES CONTINUE IN L.A. UNIFIED + TEACHERS UNION IS WARNED AGAINST PAYROLL PROTESTS
PAYCHECK MISTAKES CONTINUE IN L.A. UNIFIED:
ABOUT 5,000 EMPLOYEES ARE AFFECTED AS PROBLEMS WITH A NEW COMPUTER SYSTEM CONTINUE. SO FAR DISTRICT WORKERS HAVE BEEN OVERPAID BY $53 MILLION.

by Joel Rubin, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

October 5, 2007 - About 5,000 Los Angeles teachers and other employees are expected to receive inaccurate paychecks today, marking another month of persistent problems with a new computerized payroll system.

Supt. David L. Brewer cautioned employees, who have so far been overpaid by $53 million, not to spend the money as the Los Angeles Unified School District prepares to recoup it.

"My job is very simple: get people paid correctly and on time," Brewer said, speaking at a morning news conference. "And that's what I am trying to achieve. We clearly, clearly understand the frustration out there. . . . We are very close to getting this system corrected."

As in past months, the vast majority of the mistakes are overpayments; about 300 others are underpayments, school district officials said. The number of errors this month showed no decline from the last two paydays.

Brewer also vowed that by next month the district would reconcile how much money each of the tens of thousands of employees who have been overpaid owe the district. Amid widespread confusion and distrust over the amounts being tallied by the flawed computer system, district officials have been holding off on recouping those funds. At least 1,500 employees have been overpaid by more than $5,000, district documents show.

With the end of the year approaching, Brewer and school board members have been under increasing pressure to rectify the overpayments before the district issues inaccurate income tax forms that would wreak havoc as employees try to file their state and federal taxes.

To buy more time, the district is considering a plan to designate overpayments as no-interest loans that would not be counted as income, said David Holmquist, the district's interim chief operational officer.

Brewer urged people who believe they have received too much pay: "Don't spend the money! Put it in an interest-bearing account, but don't spend the money."

He added that district officials were continuing to work with union leaders to settle on how and when the money would be recouped.

Brewer said he anticipated that the technological glitch at the root of the problem would be fixed before the next payday in November, but left open the possibility that it could take longer. Teachers and most all of the nearly 100,000 district employees are paid monthly.

A key part of a comprehensive, $95-million technology upgrade, the payroll system has been hampered since it launched at the beginning of the year.

As the scope of the problems became apparent, district officials acknowledged that the system had not been properly programmed to handle all the various assignments and pay scales in the district and that it had been rushed into operation without proper training for clerks and timekeepers.

District leaders were caught unprepared. They scrambled to open emergency hotlines and help centers that were immediately overwhelmed with angry employees, while also struggling to identify the bugs in the complex software programs.

"We didn't roll it out right," Brewer said. "Bottom line, we just didn't roll it out right."

The repair efforts and delays to the next phase of the upgrade are expected to cost about $45 million.

In recent months, the district has appeared to make headway on fixing some of the computer snafus and in improving how effectively it responds to the monthly wave of bad checks. Teacher union leaders, however, have continued to rail against Brewer and his staff for not acting more quickly. They have called on teachers to boycott some after-school meetings and threatened widespread walkouts during class time.

Brewer declined to comment on the ongoing negotiations with Deloitte Consulting, the international firm hired to implement each part of the computer grade, over what, if any, blame the firm deserves for the breakdown.

________________

TEACHERS UNION IS WARNED AGAINST PAYROLL PROTESTS:
L.A. UNIFIED'S LEGAL COUNSEL SAYS A SUGGESTED BOYCOTT OF FACULTY MEETINGS WOULD VIOLATE THE GROUP'S CONTRACT.

by Joel Rubin, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

October 4, 2007 - The top attorney for the Los Angeles Unified School District has put the president of the teachers union on notice, warning Wednesday that the union's protests against the district's faulty payroll system could violate labor agreements.

The message, in a letter from district Counsel Kevin Reed to union President A.J. Duffy, is the latest jab in the escalating, but still largely rhetorical, battle over the district's lumbering efforts to correct the pay problems.

It is the second such letter Reed has sent Duffy in recent weeks challenging the United Teachers Los Angeles' call late last month for its members to boycott after-school faculty meetings. Such boycotts, Reed said, are prohibited by the teachers' contract with the district, which states that union leaders cannot "cause, encourage, condone or participate in any strike, slowdown or other work stoppage."

In a previous case between L.A. Unified and the union, a state labor agency ruled that school faculty meetings fall under this clause, Reed said.

Reed said it would be up to the school board whether to take action against the union.

Reed, in the letter, also demanded that Duffy stop threatening large-scale teacher "walk-outs" during the school day. While testifying at a public hearing last week organized by state Sen. Gloria Romero (D-Los Angeles), Duffy angrily denounced the district's response to the payroll problems and promised to cripple the district with walkouts if fixes were not made. But, in an interview afterward, the union president said there were no immediate plans for teachers to leave their classrooms.

"Superintendent Reed needs to calm down," Duffy said, when told about the lawyer's latest missive, mockingly referring to Reed as the district's top official.


NCLB: CALIFORNIA ACHIEVEMENT TESTS HARDER THAN MOST OTHERS', STUDY FINDS
by Nanette Asimov, Dan Francisco Chronicle Staff Writer

Thursday, October 4, 2007 - For years, California's top educators have claimed that their statewide achievement tests were harder than almost any other state's - an easy explanation, perhaps, for why fewer than half of students score "proficient" in English and math.

Now a new study comparing statewide exams in 26 states reaches this conclusion: California's top educators were right.

"It's harder to pass California's tests than those of most other states," according to the study by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, an education think tank in Washington.

California, South Carolina and Massachusetts give the toughest English and math tests in the country, the study concludes. Easiest to pass are those in Colorado, Wisconsin and Michigan.

State exams are the engines of No Child Left Behind, the controversial federal education act that requires all students to score at grade level - "proficient" - on English and math tests by 2014.

But it's up to each state to define "proficiency." So a child who is considered a good reader in Colorado because she scored at grade level would be given remedial help in California for scoring low.

"The Proficiency Illusion," as the Fordham study is called, skewers this part of No Child Left Behind. It says states define proficiency "erratically, almost randomly," which makes a mockery of true proficiency.

The study calls for a common set of standards for all states.

"It's crazy not to have some form of national standards for educational achievement - stable, reliable, cumulative and comparable," wrote Fordham's president, Chester Finn Jr., former assistant secretary of education under President Ronald Reagan.

_______________________________________

• from the Report - "POLICY IMPLICATIONS: California’s proficiency cut scores are very challenging when compared with the other 25 states in this study, ranking near the top. This finding is relatively consistent with the recent National Center for Education Statistics report, Mapping 2005 State Proficiency Standards Onto the NAEP Scales, which also found California’s cut scores to be near the top of the distribution of all states studied. Yet California’s cut scores have changed over the past several years—making them generally less challenging, in some cases dramatically so, though not in all grades.

"As a result, California’s expectations are not smoothly calibrated across grades; students who are proficient in third-grade math, for example, are not necessarily on track to be proficient in the eighth grade. California policymakers might consider adjusting their mathematics cut scores across grades so that parents and schools can be assured that elementary school students scoring at the proficient level are truly prepared for success later in their educational careers."
_______________________________________

NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND is under a national microscope as Congress prepares for its reauthorization. And no aspect of it - including the state tests themselves now - has escaped scrutiny.

Finn said he isn't asking the federal government to prescribe proficiency levels, but says No Child Left Behind should encourage states to agree on what they should be.

The idea, however, is lacking momentum as Congress debates how to reform the education law.

Rep. George Miller, the Martinez Democrat leading the reauthorization debate, has said he wants the federal government and other agencies to help states establish more rigorous proficiency levels. But he still wants states to decide individually what those should be.

"What we're hearing across the country is that No Child Left Behind is not flexible enough," said Tom Kiley, Miller's spokesman.

Meanwhile, even as the Fordham study confirmed the rigor of California's academic standards, it revived a long-standing mystery: why students have consistently improved their performance on the tough California Standards Test over the years, while performing poorly on national exams such as the National Assessment for Educational Progress.

The Fordham study found that California kids also did worse on a national test called the Measures of Academic Progress - even though the researchers had customized the test to evaluate the same material as the state's test.

"It's troubling," said Michael Petrilli, a vice president with the Fordham Institute. "If kids are learning reading and math, it should show up on other tests."

But California's testing director, Deb Sigman, disputed the findings. She said the two tests were not similar, and raised questions about the analysis, including whether the same students took both tests.


►THE EXTREMES IN A NUTSHELL: Comparing Wisconsin to Massachusetts is like comparing Cats & Dogs to Tolstoy
http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/proficiency_nutshell.pdf


The Fordham Report: THE PROFICIENCY ILLUSION/includes California Report



THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT

►Ed Week: PUSH TO REVAMP HIGH SCHOOLS OFF TRACK, SCHOLARS SAY - OVEREMPHASIS SEEN IN RATCHETING UP STANDARDS AT EXPENSE OF BROADER VIEW OF ACADEMIC ‘RIGOR'.

In a new arguing that the ongoing national push to dramatically improve American high schools has gotten off course, two University of California education professors take aim at what they see as an overemphasis on states’ adoption of higher standards for graduation and more-rigorous tests.

“The push to enhance rigor and standards behind the high school diploma is seriously flawed,” write W. Norton Grubb, an education professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and Jeannie Oakes, an education professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, in the paper. “Any gains come at the expense of other goals for high school reform, including equity, curricular relevance, and student interest.”

▼Follow link below for the entire EdWeek article, the Executive Summary of Grubb & Oakes report and a link to the entire report online

_________________________

►OUT OF THE TOWER AND INTO THE CLASSROOM: CONNECTING RESEARCH TO TEACHING THE KEY TO SUCCESS

• Why are we having so much difficulty increasing student learning in the U.S.?
• Do we lack knowledge about how to improve K-12 education,
• or are we failing to use what we know?

To be sure, we don't know everything. But many effective practices that are well known among researchers are rarely seen in K-12 schools.

The problem stems in part from a disconnect that exists between research and practice. Unlike other fields, where research is directly connected to production or implementation, educational research in the U.S. is done mostly in universities and by organizations completely separated from schools. As a consequence, many educational researchers are not well-informed of the real challenges practitioners face, which undermines the relevance of their research, writes Deborah Stipek in the Dallas Morning News

_________________________

►LOS ANGELES USD TRIES OUT MASS NOTIFICATIONS

Dave Nagel reports in THE Journal that LAUSD is giving up on the '70's era AllCall automated phone dialer telephone notification technology and is crossing the digital bridge into the 21st century … just when LATimes columnist Sandy Banks kicks automated notification around [LOGGING OFF E-MONITORING OF CHILD'S SCHOOLWORK] - and then embraces it as a friend! [RETHINKING E-MONITORING AFTER PROGRESS REPORT]
____________________

►And in BRITISH STUDENTS SPURN NUTRITIOUS MEALS the LATimes - and every newspaper in Britain - reports that celebrity chef Jamie Oliver, who single handedly has turned around nutrition in British public schools - finds himself in a bit of bother. It turns out kids like junk food! Who knew? Whatever happened to gruel? - and "Please sir, may I have some more?"


▲The stories above in 4LAKidsNews - All the news that doesn't fit!



JON LAURITZEN 1938 - 2007
The importance of a life, it is said, is not measured in the date of birth or the date of passing …but in the dash the separates the two.

That "through" spans a awful lot. Jon attended school in a one room schoolhouse in Arizona and taught in multiple thousand seat schools and helped run a 747,000 student school district. He was a history teacher who volunteered to teach math because they needed math teachers - and then went on to pretty much invent the teaching of computer science in this school district.

He was a classroom teacher who during his carrier never aspired to the front office - as if any job is more important than classroom teacher!

He was also a father and a parent and brought that sensibility along with his teacher's perspective to the Board of Education when he was lured out of retirement to serve.

Jon was also always a gentleman in the highest form of that art.

When he ran for school board I worked for his opponent because she was a colleague and a friend to our program at Walter Reed Middle School. I had my picture taken for her ads and my voice recorded on her phone messages.

He trounced us handily - and then, within days, approached me and asked how he could help with our program at Reed? He went on to support us at Reed …and to support every schoolchild in his district.

Jon got it: He never lost track of the kids, he measured every decision and vote and policy against the only rule that matters: WHAT'S BEST FOR KIDS?

Another adversary of Jon's, Mayor Villaraigosa - Jon opposed the mayor's takeover even when his staunchest supporters at UTLA championed it - summed it up second best: calling Jon a "first-rate educator, public servant and neighborhood leader. Jon Lauritzen worked tirelessly to fulfill the promise of a public education: that hard work in our classrooms will lead to success in life."

But the headline in Tuesday's Daily News editorial had it best: "Jon Lauritzen was a teacher's teacher."

Join me and fill your glass and raise it a job well done, a life well lived.

Godspeed Jon Lauritzen.

- smf


EVENTS: Coming up next week...
►Wednesday Oct 10, 2007 | 6:00 p.m.
SOUTH REGION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #6:CEQA Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Meeting. LAUSD has completed a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for South Region Elementary School #6. This report evaluates the potential impacts the project may have on the surrounding area.
The purpose of this meeting is to present the Draft EIR to the community, and receive comments and questions regarding the results of the Draft EIR. Your input is very valuable.

66th Street Elementary School
6600 S. San Pedro St.
Los Angeles, CA 90003
___________________________

► SAVE THE DATE: NEXT SUNDAY OCT. 14th, 6 p.m. GARFIELD HIGH SCHOOL BENEFIT CONCERT WITH LOS LOBOS - Gibson Amphitheatre, 100 Universal City Plaza, Universal City. Tickets, $39.75 to $69.75, available at Ticketmaster, (213) 480-3232 or www.ticketmaster.com.
__________________________

► SAVE THE DATE: SATURDAY, OCTOBER 20th from 9am to 1pm
Assemblymember Anthony Portantino's CHILDREN'S HEALTH FORUM: CHILDHOOD OBESITY & DIABETES @ Washington Elementary School, 1520 Raymond, Pasadena

The Assemblymember (AD 44) invites you to join him for a health forum to obtain information surrounding the prevention and treatment of Childhood Obesity and Diabetes. Presentations and demonstrations will be offered. For more information or to RSVP, please contact Jarvis Emerson in his district office (626) 577-9944

*Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________
• SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
http://www.laschools.org/bond/
Phone: 213-241-5183
____________________________________________________
• LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
Phone: 213-893-6800


• LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION & COMMITTEES MEETING CALENDAR



What can YOU do?
• E-mail, call or write your school board member:
Yolie.Flores.Aguilar@lausd.net • 213-241-6383
Marlene.Canter@lausd.net • 213-241-6387
Tamar.Galatzan@lausd.net • 213-241-6386
Monica.Garcia@lausd.net • 213-241-6180
Julie.Korenstein@lausd.net • 213-241-6388
Marguerite.LaMotte@lausd.net • 213-241-6382
Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net • 213-241-6385

...or your city councilperson, mayor, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think! • There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org • 213.978.0600
• Call or e-mail Governor Schwarzenegger: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
• Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
• Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
• Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
• Register.
• Vote.


Who are your elected federal & state representatives? How do you contact them?




Scott Folsom is a parent and parent leader in LAUSD. He is immediate past President of Los Angeles 10th District PTSA and represents PTA as Vice-chair the LAUSD Construction Bond Citizen's Oversight Committee. He serves on various school district advisory and policy committees and is a PTA officer and/or governance council member at three LAUSD schools. He is also the elected Youth & Education boardmember on the Arroyo Seco Neighborhood Council.
• In this forum his opinions are his own and your opinions and feedback are invited. Quoted and/or cited content copyright © the original author and/or publisher. All other material copyright © 4LAKids.
• FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 4LAKids makes such material available in an effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to parents, teachers, students and community members in a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
• To SUBSCRIBE e-mail: 4LAKids-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com - or -TO ADD YOUR OR ANOTHER'S NAME TO THE 4LAKids SUBCRIPTION LIST E-MAIL smfolsom@aol.com with "SUBSCRIBE" AS THE SUBJECT. Thank you.