Sunday, August 11, 2013

DODGING THE BULLET/WAIVING GOODBYE/BACK TO SCHOOL


Onward! 4LAKids
4LAKids: Sunday 11•Aug•2013
In This Issue:
 •  U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APPROVES WAIVER FOR LAUSD AND SEVEN OTHER CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS
 •  QUESTIONS REMAIN DESPITE WAIVERS FOR SCHOOLS : It ain’t over yet!
 •  A year of living testlessly: CALIFORNIA COULD FACE YEAR WITH NO MEANINGFUL TESTING DATA + smf’s 2¢
 •  CALLING THE IRONY POLICE
 •  HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources
 •  EVENTS: Coming up next week...
 •  What can YOU do?


Featured Links:
 •  Follow 4 LAKids on Twitter - or get instant updates via text message by texting
 •  4LAKids Anthology: All the Past Issues, solved, resolved and unsolved!
 •  4LAKidsNews: a compendium of recent items of interest - news stories, scurrilous rumors, links, academic papers, rants and amusing anecdotes, etc.
Thirty-nine states, the District of Columbia and 20% of California (including LAUSD) are now insulated from the Lake Woebegonian foolishness+folly of No Child Left Behind: By 2014 every child in every school in America was to score proficient-or-better in standardized testing.

Every child above average. No exceptions. As it is written, so it shall be.

…except in the 39 states and DC and the eight school districts in California exempted from the impossible dream by waivers granted by the U.S. Department of Education. Olly, olly oxen; get out of jail free. And collect $200. And spend it on anything you’d like.

The eleven other states and 80% of California? On their own. Left Behind. S.O.L.

But hey …LAUSD got our waiver! We are now governed+protected by a contract unapproved by the Board of Education, unregulated by the State of California, and unforeseen by Congress between the quasi-governmental California Office to ®eform Education and the U.S. Department of Ed.

Don’t be concerned about democracy; no elected officials were involved.


● Letter to 4LAKids from a distinguished public educator: “Several years ago I, among others, predicted that by the year 2013 every school in the country would be a "failing school" because of the unreachable requirement of NCLB.

“In addition, we would be producing a crop of graduates skilled in test taking but unable to write or demonstrate comprehensive knowledge in the social sciences.

“We have arrived, as predicted!!!”

● Letter to the Editor of the LA Times: “Why do California school districts have to agree that test scores are reliable indicators of teacher effectiveness, a premise that has been disproved, to receive a waiver from the federal No Child Left Behind law?

“From its inception, most teachers opposed NCLB’s impossible requirement that by 2014 all students must demonstrate proficiency in every educational standard as measured by one standardized test. Is there any reasonable person who believes that 100% of California's adult population could demonstrate complete mastery of even the fourth-grade curriculum?

“Of course, almost all schools are doomed to "fail" under these criteria, and public schools would eventually become for-profit charter schools.

“It's time for a more realistic version of NCLB written by those who understand what can reasonably be expected. No waivers necessary.” --Kurt Page, Laguna Niguel | http://lat.ms/19VFnf7


MEANWHILE- (and improbably coincidentally) - test scores are slightly down. And those to who test scores – whether the new Common Core State Standards scores or the old bog standardized ones – are all-important say not to be alarmed. A glitch. A hiccup. A statistical anomaly.

●Arne Duncan, the Secretary of Education: “’We should absolutely not be alarmed if these test scores drop,’ Duncan said today during a phone call with reporters.” http://bit.ly/1cDS1k8

● Photo caption in The Times: “Test scores at Jordan High School, which posted the largest gains among L.A. Unifier’s traditional high schools last year, fell across the board this year. Officials there attributed the setback to the midyear departure of the principal, two major outside reviews, a campus reconstruction project and other challenges”. http://lat.ms/1cWu6e5 ●●smf: A lovely adult apologia for adult failure – but Jordan is the poster child for ®eform/Takeover/Reconstitution [http://bit.ly/14A7vk9] the ‘challenges’ are the ®eform – and it’s NOT working!

●Another photo caption in the Times: “Los Angeles Unified School District Supt. John Deasy said he didn't know how to make sense of California's falling student test scores.” | http://bit.ly/19WSDQK

But peel back the data and look at the information it evidences. Consider academic progress over time: In the ten years between 2003 and 2013 – The Achievement Gap – the difference between the test scores of White and Asian students and their Counterparts of Color and of poverty. [http://bit.ly/18mrmTX | http://bit.ly/19lhONz. The gap has not significantly narrowed at all. No progress. None. Nada. Zilch.

As a matter of fact, it widened this year in New York testing .http://nydn.us/13bEH3i

“Narrowing the Gap” was the whole premise+promise and Holy Grail of No Child Left Behind; it was the WMD the troops were looking for!

Instead the carrot-and-stick of high stakes testing and disaggregated data tracking of the significant subgroups and A.Y.P. and "school improvement”, “corrective action” " and "restructuring" has produced the same result as “The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations” did. Another eminently quotable rhetorical flourish for the ash heap of history alongside “Whip Inflation Now”, “Just Say No” and “Nattering Nabobs of Negativism”.

[Random sixties musical flashback]:
Don't be concerned, it will not harm you
It's only me pursuing somethin' I'm not sure of
Across my dreams, with nets of wonder…


ADDITIONALLY THERE SEEMS TO BE SURPRISE IN THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION that some students – after literally millions of them were told officiously by self-serving fatuous authority figures (Did anyone ever encounter a “proctor’ in real life?):

“Whatever you do, DO NOT TAKE PICTURES of the meaningless-to-you-but all-important-to-us-adults test booklets and then post them on social media!”

Now the test police and proctor wranglers are horrified that some of those students actually did what they were told not to do! http://bit.ly/14A5IeN

WWT? 4LAKIds is shocked – ¡shocked! – that there is a strain of rebelliousness and willful defiance in adolescent youth!

TUESDAY AUG 14 IS THE FIRST INSTRUCTIONAL DAY OF THE NEW SCHOOL YEAR.

Welcome Back.
Back to School.
Back to Work.
Back to the most important work there is: Educating children.

Let's be safe out there.

¡Onward/Adelante! - smf


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APPROVES WAIVER FOR LAUSD AND SEVEN OTHER CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS

Associated Administrators of Los Angeles Update | Week of August 12, 2013 | http://bit.ly/19jRvqR

Aug 8, 2013 :: On Tuesday, August 6, 2013, eight of the districts which comprise CORE (California Office to Reform Education) were informed that the U.S. Department of Education had approved their waiver from certain provisions of the NCLB Act. The granting of the one-year waiver means that the CORE districts, LAUSD, Long Beach, Santa Ana, San Francisco, Oakland, Fresno, Sacramento City and Sanger, will have more flexibility in their spending of more than $150 million in Title I funds and no longer have to meet the NCLB requirement that all students meet proficiency in reading and math by 2014. Below is an excerpt from a letter sent to Dr. Judith Perez by Dr. John Deasy regarding the waiver:

I am writing to alert you of some remarkably positive news. The Secretary of Education has approved the NCLB Waiver for the CORE Districts, and as you know, Los Angeles is one of them. This provides a remarkable opportunity to immediately implement an alternative accountability system from NCLB that is more robust, more thoughtful and far less reliant on a single test score as we have today. As you know, the current system is 100% based on a single test measure. Our system is based 60% on measures of student achievement over time, and the remainder on social emotional and other culture and climate measures like graduation rates, discipline and suspension rates, special education identification rates, reclassification rates, parent survey feedback rates, etc. Among the immediate results, there will be a very different way of identifying schools that are underperforming… I know that there are a number of organizations that have not been in support of this for various reasons. As a group, and as an individual district, we look forward to reaching out to each and every one of them to invite them to participate in overseeing our work, and holding us accountable to this new process.

That accountability system mentioned in Dr. Deasy’s letter is called the School Quality Improvement System and is based on research conducted by Dr. Michael Fullan, a noted education researcher who has been credited with transforming the school system in the Canadian province of Ontario into a highly effective one. It also includes recommendations from Tom Torlakson’s Task Force on Educator Excellence. Districts participating in the School Quality Improvement System will fully implement the Common Core State Standards this year and transition to Common Core-aligned assessments by the 2014-15 school year. Although AALA was not part of the discussion to apply for the waiver, nor part of the development of the actual proposal, we are knowledgeable of and impressed with Dr. Fullan’s work and fully expect to be involved in the implementation of the new accountability system. As noted in previous Updates, the teachers’ unions in the nine districts (one has since dropped out) jointly sent a letter to CORE stating that they were not supportive of the waiver because they had no input in the writing of it.

Each district will be responsible for developing an educator evaluation system that incorporates student growth as a significant factor that must be fully implemented in the 2014-15 school year. Districts have two options for the evaluation system. The following is taken directly from CORE’s waiver application:
Option 1 - Student growth integrated through a "trigger" system: With this option, an evaluation will be conducted using multiple measures, not including student achievement. The results will be compared to student achievement results. Any misalignment between teacher/administrator professional practice and student performance will initiate a dialogue to identify why a discrepancy between scores exists, followed by district action in the interest of professional development of the teacher.

Option 2 - Student growth as a defined percentage: Student growth will represent a minimum of 20% of teacher and principal evaluation calculations. Student growth will be calculated using a growth model which will be developed by the CORE Board of Directors in the 2014-2015 school year. However, if a district currently uses or seeks to use another high quality student growth model, the district will have the opportunity to apply to the CORE Board for the option to use an alternative method, provided the district provides a strong research-based rationale.

Although the wording is somewhat convoluted, what is crystal clear is teacher and administrator evaluations are negotiated items. Therefore, AALA and UTLA must agree on the criteria this school year in order for it to be implemented in 2014-15. State Superintendent Tom Torlakson weighed in, saying, “I will encourage the districts involved to collaborate closely with teachers and other stakeholders in devising a workable system of accountability and oversight.” U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has said the waiver can be renewed next year only if the districts fully implement their school-rating system and teacher-evaluation plans.

For districts, the most important flexibility this waiver brings is financial. Dr. Deasy said that the waiver will enable districts to not hire vendors to provide supplemental educational/tutoring services and it will redirect $60 - $80 million back to LAUSD school sites. Another important component of the waiver is that the minimum number of students necessary to be recognized as a subgroup has been reduced from 100 to 20. However, with the Local Control Funding Formula, the Legislature had already lowered the statewide subgroup number to 30 students. With this change, more than 150,000 additional students will be included in the subgroup rankings.

The districts did create a new, separate oversight board, which will include a cross-section of stakeholders that will meet biannually to receive the districts’ self-evaluation reports and serve as an unbiased external compliance review of each district's progress. Board members will include representatives from ACSA, CSBA (California School Boards Association), CCSESA (California County Superintendents Educational Services Association), CTA, PTA, the Education Trust, CA Department of Education, CA State Board of Education and English learner, disabled students and civil rights communities.


QUESTIONS REMAIN DESPITE WAIVERS FOR SCHOOLS : It ain’t over yet!

Op-Ed in the Sacramento Bee By Peter Schrag | http://bit.ly/13QDg8W

August 9th, 2013 :: The waivers that eight large California school districts got this week from U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan are yet another measure of the power of the federal law they tried to escape from.

The law has been cumbersome and stupid enough to prompt them — and many states — to seek better ways to pursue the same, or better, goals. But the waivers are not the end of this odyssey; they’re barely the beginning.

The law, No Child Left Behind (NCLB), signed by President George W. Bush in 2002, was commendably designed to force local districts to pay as much attention to the education of poor, minority and immigrant kids as they paid to all other children.

To do that, it required schools receiving federal Title I funds to get all major subgroups of students to proficiency in math and English — all of them — by 2014, and imposed an increasingly severe set of sometimes mindless sanctions on schools not on track to that goal.

But since it allowed states to set their own standards, it was also an invitation to dumb down tests and curricula. It led in some states to cheating by teachers and administrators and to no end of public confusion when schools were rated excellent by state criteria and failing under the federal definitions.

It was therefore no wonder why nearly all states, and now the eight big California districts (grouped together as CORE (California Office to Reform Education), tried to craft programs with what Duncan called “rigorous expectations” that would allow them to get out from under the federal requirements. In addition to Sacramento, CORE, which comprises some one million students, includes the districts of Los Angeles, San Francisco, Long Beach, Oakland, Santa Ana, Fresno and Sanger.

Although 39 states got waivers from Duncan, California, which did not meet Duncan’s demands, wasn’t one of them. The biggest stumbling block was that teacher evaluations had to be based in part on student test scores.

And so the CORE districts created their own “School Quality Improvement System” (SQIS) which, in addition to academic preparedness, “values multiple measures of student success in social/emotional development, as well as the significant importance of a school’s culture and climate.”

When you screen out the jargon, you end up with a broad set of criteria and accountability measures that include not just test scores, but graduation rates, dropout rates, suspension and expulsion rates; the rate at which English learners are redesignated English proficient; parent, student and teacher surveys; and some, like student grit and determination, that may defy all measurement.

Those criteria, as some of the superintendents of the CORE districts pointed out, are closely aligned with the new criteria in Gov. Jerry Brown’s new Local Control Funding Formula and other new state laws — and with the broader national swing away from narrow test-based numbers.

But there are lot of blanks left to fill in — indeed, the whole scheme and the remarks made by the superintendents at two telephone press events this week give it the feel of a work in progress. The waiver is only for a year, hardly enough time to put in place new accountability systems, much less judge their viability.

More important, perhaps, is that all the evaluation plans, including the use of student test scores in judging teachers, have to be negotiated with local unions, few of which are warmly disposed toward this deal.

California Teachers Association President Dean Vogel called it “counterproductive and divisive.” Scott Smith, president of the Sacramento City Teachers Association, historically one of the most intransigent of all teachers unions, called it “a terrible distraction.” It’s not a good way to begin.

Rick Miller, the executive director of CORE, says he fully expects the waivers to be extended. And there’s always the chance, as Duncan said, that major revisions in the federal education law will make the whole issue moot. But given Washington’s political climate, that’s probably a vain hope.

And there are other questions. Again, who will rescue the kids in bad schools? Who can fix them? And while some recent legal rulings loosened the contractual knots requiring all teacher layoffs to begin with the most recent (and sometimes the best) hires, there’s still no certainty that the eight CORE districts, or any others, will be able to staff the most difficult schools with outstanding teachers.

NCLB’s requirement that all schools be taught by “highly qualified” teachers became a joke so long ago that it’s hardly ever mentioned anymore. In the meantime, it’s become an open secret that the least experienced, least competent teachers tend to cluster and churn in the schools with the highest concentrations of poor and minority kids.

It’s encouraging that eight big districts are working together in developing quality standards consistent with state requirements. But huge questions remain, not least, finally, questions about the further demands that federal bureaucrats — most of whom strongly oppose local waivers — are likely to make as the locals fill in those blanks.

●Peter Schrag is the former editorial page editor and columnist of the Sacramento Bee


A year of living testlessly: CALIFORNIA COULD FACE YEAR WITH NO MEANINGFUL TESTING DATA + smf’s 2¢

by Hillel Aron in LA Schools Report | http://bit.ly/1cWRecs

August 9, 2013 :: People are still scratching their heads over what happened with California students’ test scores, which went down for the first time in a decade, as the state reported on Thursday.

But the greater uncertainty could lie ahead.

The plan is for all students to be tested on a new curriculum — the Common Core State Standards — in 2015. Those tests will be administered on computers. But what about 2014? The State Assembly hasn’t quite made a decision on that front, but 2014 could be a lost year in terms of meaningful testing data.

Assembly Bill 484, which has been approved by the Assembly and is currently being debated in a state Senate committee, would eliminate all of the California Standardized Tests that high school students would have taken over the 2013-2014 academic year — tests in subjects like history, algebra, chemistry and physics. Some students will take the new Common Core tests, and students in grades 3 through 8 would still take the CSTs for Title 1 purposes.

“The tests will be irrelevant,” said John Mockler, an education consultant who served briefly as interim California Education Secretary and was one of the architects of Proposition 30. “Some kids are going to take these new Common Core tests, some kids are going to take the old STAR test. Either one of those or both will be invalid, because they test different things. They can’t be used for accountability purposes.”

If AB 484 doesn’t pass, most students would take the CSTs for one final year.

Either way, California testing will face, in 2015, the same sort of rocky results that New York is facing this year, when transition to the Common Core caused their scores to plummet.


●● smf’s 2¢: This ascendance of the summer sun of waiver+®eform will be made discontented winter when the eight CORE districts attempt to negotiate concessions with their labor partners concerning teacher and administrator assessments using the formulae they have already promised the US Dept of Ed they would use. This will be complicated further f there is little-or-no state testing this year. Re-read what John Mockler says above: Both tests are irrelevant. Neither can realistically be used for accountability.

LA School Report is a mouthpiece for ®eform, Inc. and interpreter of the meaning and truthiness and direction of the driven data. It is not curious that that they bemoan the potential lack of “meaningful testing data” (Was any of it ever meaningful?) – or the possible paucity of tests this year.

Remember: This is a one-year only waiver. It could just be the CORE superintendents picked a very bad year to start!


CALLING THE IRONY POLICE
By smf for LAKids News

August 8, 2013 :: L.A. Times Cinema Critic Kenneth Turan wrote of the city’s noir reputation:

“Los Angeles is the city of sunshine and light, the city that's like a day at the beach, the city that ... you get my drift. That line of chat may work with the suckers, the tourists and the rubes, but if you live here, you know there's a corrosive darkness lurking below the surface in perpetually sunlit L.A., a spiritual malaise that makes this town rotten to the core.

“Hardly the City of Angels, this is a place where bad people come to do worse things and live to tell the tale.” | http://lat.ms/19QUR4e

►News Story: LAUSD ADMINISTRATOR ARRESTED FOR ALLEGEDLY HAVING INAPPROPRIATE RELATIONSHIP WITH FORMER STUDENT | http://cbsloc.al/190Z2Hu

August 5, 2013 8:13 PM :: LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — A 48-year-old Los Angeles Unified School District administrator has been arrested for attempting to meet with a 15-year-old former student with the purpose of committing a lewd act.


During the course of the investigation, detectives with the Los Angeles Police Department’s Topanga Division learned that Robert Nagai, of Chatsworth, had an ongoing inappropriate relationship with the victim.

Nagai was an assistant principal at Hale Middle School in Woodland Hills. After he left the school in 2011, he began to work in operations at the district’s Educational Service Center West.

“We have been working with and cooperating fully with the Los Angeles Police Department since they brought these allegations to our attention late last Friday,” said Dave Holmquist, LAUSD’s general counsel. “Although we have every indication that this was an isolated incident, we have issued a notice to parents at Hale Middle School about the arrest. Our top priority is ensuring students are able to achieve academic success, which requires a safe learning environment. We are all impacted when these sorts of incidents occur.”

The suspect is currently free on $75,000 bail and was scheduled to be in court on Aug. 28.
No further details were available.

Anyone with additional information on Nagai was encouraged to contact Det. F. Avila at (818) 756-3375.

____________________

smf: THAT LAUSD ADMINISTRATOR, arrested for inappropriate conduct with a minor joins a growing rank of bad District employees allegedly doing bad things with students. He worked in the LAUSD Office of Operations – which is, among other things, in charge of student and employee discipline

(There is also The Office of Curriculum and Instruction and The Office of Parent and Family Engagement.)

He was assigned to one of the four Educational Service Centers – which is the newest name for what were once called Local Districts – downsized/rightsized from eleven to eight to four.

He was in charge of “housed employees’ at the ESC.

‘Housed Employees” are district staff excluded from classrooms and school sites – forbidden contact with children – for alleged misbehavior in places sometimes called ‘teacher jails’ or ‘rubber rooms’.

And so it is in the City of Angels, a place where bad people come to do worse things .


HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources
Letters: WHY ARE TEST SCORES FALLING?: Letters to the Editor of the LA Times. http://bit.ly/165MC2A

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN STATE, LOS ANGELES COUNTY DROPS FOR FIRST TIME IN YEARS: By Rob Kuznia, Staff Writer, ... http://bit.ly/15hV1cQ

SUPERINTENDENT JOHN DEASY URGES LAUSD STAFF TO ‘STAY CALM’ IN THE FACE OF CHANGE: By Dakota Smith, Staff Write... http://bit.ly/1cinPvD

CALLING THE IRONY POLICE: By smf for LAKids News August 8, 2013 :: L.A. Times Cinema Critic Kenneth Turan wr... http://bit.ly/14qe8W8

FLIPPED OUT: NEW SCHOOL – HOW THE DIGITAL REVOLUTION IS TURNING EDUCATION UPSIDE-DOWN: In the Digital Age, lea... http://bit.ly/15TiR52

The morning news on: THE LAUSD/CORE WAIVER FROM NCLB: L.A.'s among districts exempt from No Child Left Behi... http://bit.ly/15abSOJ

IN CASE U MISSED IT NCLB HAS FAILED.The Children left behind "The Unwaived" - live in 9 states ...or are the 5 million non-CORE CA students

WSJ: NAT'L TEST-SCORE DECLINES ARE LIKELY Drops in N.Y. Math+Reading Results Are Tied to New Nat'l Curriculum Standard | http://on.wsj.com/198xT9j

U P D A T E D:ONE YEAR ONLY CA/CORE NCLB WAIVER INCLUDES ‘UNIQUE’ OVERSIGHT PANEL (includes specifics+sordid details) http://bit.ly/1baum7H

CORE CA WAIVER: Local Educational Agencies’ Request for Waivers under Section 9401 of the ESEA of 1965 | Aug 5, 2013 | http://bit.ly/11KJ4PU

ONE YEAR ONLY CA/CORE NCLB WAIVER INCLUDES ‘UNIQUE’ OVERSIGHT PANEL: Posted on LA School Report by Brianna Sa... http://bit.ly/156LmG5

LAUSD included: U.S. DEPT OF EDUCATION GRANTS CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS’ NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND WAIVER: By Michele Mc... http://bit.ly/15H0aRY

EdWeek + Howard Blume report LAUSD/CA CORE waiver request APPROVED. Full details/analysis here: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2013/08/us_education_department_grants.html … …

LAUSD LAUNCHING (i)PADS /3 stories + additional reading: L.A. teachers give their new iPads a test drive L... http://bit.ly/13ZgwyR

CBS/LA: LAUSD Administrator Arrested For Allegedly Having Inappropriate Relationship With Former Student - http://cbsloc.al/190Z2Hu

UTLA URGED TO ALLAY PUBLIC DISTRUST: An L.A. school board member tells UTLA activists that the union must figh... http://bit.ly/14ZQRWW

CORRECTION TO 8/4 4LAKids: Lead misidentified Monica Ratliff's opponent in May election. Antonio Sanchez was the ®eform-endorsed candidate.


EVENTS: Coming up next week...
LAUSD Celebrates the Beginning of the 2013-14 Traditional School Year: TUESDAY AUG 13 IS THE FIRST DAY OF INSTRUCTION AT ALL SCHOOLS (Except Bell HS)
________________________________________
• SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:

MEETS TUESDAY AUG 14 IN THE BEAUDRY BOARD ROOM @ 10 AM
check http://www.laschools.org/bond/ for the agenda - which includes a Common Core Technology Project update and Prop 39 Charter Colocation issues plus an opportunity to meet+greet the new LAUSD Inspector General.
Phone: 213-241-5183
____________________________________________________
• LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
Phone: 213-241.8700


• LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION & COMMITTEES MEETING CALENDAR



What can YOU do?
• E-mail, call or write your school board member:
Tamar.Galatzan@lausd.net • 213-241-6386
Monica.Garcia@lausd.net • 213-241-6180
Bennett.Kayser@lausd.net • 213-241-5555
Marguerite.LaMotte@lausd.net • 213-241-6382
Monica.Ratliff@lausd.net • 213-241-6388
Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net • 213-241-6385
Steve.Zimmer@lausd.net • 213-241-6387
...or your city councilperson, mayor, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think! • Find your state legislator based on your home address. Just go to: http://bit.ly/dqFdq2 • There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org • 213.978.0600
• Call or e-mail Governor Brown: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
• Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
• Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
• Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
• If you are eligible to become a citizen, BECOME ONE.
• If you a a citizen, REGISTER TO VOTE.
• If you are registered, VOTE LIKE THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT. THEY DO!.


Who are your elected federal & state representatives? How do you contact them?




Scott Folsom is a parent leader in LAUSD and is Parent/Volunteer of the Year for 2010-11 for Los Angeles County. • He is Past President of Los Angeles Tenth District PTSA and represented PTA on the LAUSD Construction Bond Citizen's Oversight Committee for ten years. He is a Health Commissioner, Legislation Team member and a member of the Board of Managers of the California State PTA. He serves on numerous school district advisory and policy committees and has served as a PTA officer and governance council member at three LAUSD schools. He is the recipient of the UTLA/AFT 2009 "WHO" Gold Award for his support of education and public schools - an honor he hopes to someday deserve. • In this forum his opinions are his own and your opinions and feedback are invited. Quoted and/or cited content copyright © the original author and/or publisher. All other material copyright © 4LAKids.
• FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 4LAKids makes such material available in an effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to parents, teachers, students and community members in a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
• To SUBSCRIBE e-mail: 4LAKids-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com - or -TO ADD YOUR OR ANOTHER'S NAME TO THE 4LAKids SUBSCRIPTION LIST E-MAIL smfolsom@aol.com with "SUBSCRIBE" AS THE SUBJECT. Thank you.