| In This Issue: 
                
|  |  
                 | • | BILL SEEKS TO BAN USE OF SCHOOL BOND MONEY FOR iPADS |  |  |  
                 | • | BREAKING BREAD …OR BREAKING FAITH? |  |  |  
                 | • | THE
 LAUSD BOARD’S TURF WAR:  Its decision to close two excellent charter 
schools is a reminder of what prompted school reform + smf’s 2¢ |  |  |  
                 | • | REPAIRS NOT iPADS? The world is watching …and there’s an app for that! |  |  |  
                 | • | HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but 
not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources |  |  |  
                 | • | EVENTS: Coming up next week... |  |  |  
                 | • | What can YOU do? |  |  |  
 Featured Links:
 |  |  |  | This marks the 500th weekly edition of 4LAKids. 
 I have written this puppy from five or six different desks and/or 
kitchen tables in four different houses; from hotel rooms all over the 
place, from accommodations above the pub in Scotland and from buses in 
Spain, from aircraft tray tables and from ships at sea.  If there was 
something you really liked please let me know; or if something provoked 
action or disgust or offense or outrage. There’s a ten year anniversary 
coming up in a few months – an excellent opportunity to get all 
maudlin+retrospective.
 
 Writing and editing 4LAKids is a pleasure and an obsession. I hope my 
sharing has been thought provoking.  I try to shine a light, not to be 
enlightening or even illuminating but to selfishly connect my own 
thoughts to what I see in those moments when I’m paying attention. To 
those who stop me and say thank you I can only say thank you for 
reading. To those who don’t stop and thank me I still say thank you for 
reading thus far and not stopping me!
 
 A teacher told me that FDR said: “We cannot always build the future for our youth, but we can build our youth for the future.”
 
 Folsom’s First Law of Communications says you can always find a snappy 
quotation by some famous bozo to justify any preposterous position you 
care to defend …but I think they should put FDR on the dime and elect 
him president four times over for saying that. I thank the teacher who 
told me that and I thank all the other teachers for all the other stuff 
they told me – even the ones that said “Just say no” when I already knew
 “yes” was my last-and-final answer.
 
 I thank Mrs. Robertson who taught third grade in Greenfield, Mo. for 
teaching me the importance of The Story – you were my Joseph Campbell. I
 thank Mr. Schaeffer, sixth grade teacher at Prince’s Gate American 
School for teaching me that education is too important to be taken 
seriously.  We Americans are Mark Twain’s children; the Brits are 
Rudyard Kipling’s and that’s all you need to know about that.   Thank 
you Miss Hamm (who wasn’t a Ms. yet in 1961) at Le Conte Jr. High – not 
for teaching me how to write, but to write.
 
 Building youth is like herding cats, organizing parents or educating educators. Or teaching an apocryphal pig to dance.
 
 Our children in the end are our hopes and dreams made flesh and blood 
and run completely amok – our best laid schemes gang agley – all 
complicated and confusing and unexpected and funny. “What were any of us
 thinking?” we laugh.
 
 Thank you gentle readers for everything you do for children every day.
 
 
 THE LESS SAID ABOUT LAST WEEK’S BOARD OF ED MEETING the better. (see 
"TUESDAY’S BOARD MEETING: Six votes in search of a censensus"  in 
Highlights/Lowlights below)
 
 ON FRIDAY THE APPLE COMPANY and the Common Core Technology Project 
invited me and some others down to Fullerton to visit Robert C. Fisler 
Elementary School – an Apple Distinguished School. Fisler is a K-8 ten 
years into a 1-to-1 computing  program (all Apple laptops)  a school 
master-planned into a master-planned affluent community with free 
universal Wi-Fi and a pair of Lexi, Audi, Mercedes or somesuch  in every
 garage. The work done by teachers, staff and students at Fisler is 
extraordinary …but so are the demographics.
 
 First they eliminated poverty and then they gave every child a laptop.
 
 In the debrief we were asked to address+enumerate the barriers to that 
level of success in LAUSD. A teacher long ago taught me to avoid 
'laundry lists'. Friday was Valentine's Day - so let me simply allude to
 Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s exquisite list in Portuguese Sonnet 43:  
“Let me Count the ways…”
 
 ¡Onward/Adelante! - smf
 
 BILL SEEKS TO BAN USE OF SCHOOL BOND MONEY FOR iPADS
 
 By Stephen Ceasar, Los Angeles Times | http://lat.ms/1j29fZh
 
 February 14, 2014, 5:40 p.m. :: A new bill introduced Friday would 
prohibit California school districts from using voter-approved 
construction bonds for non-facility related items -- a move spurred by 
the Los Angeles Unified School District’s $1-billion plan to purchase 
iPads for every student, teacher and administrator.
 
 L.A. Unified’s iPad project, launched last year, is funded with 
one-time, school construction bonds paid back over about 25 years. The 
plan, which includes network upgrades at schools, is expected to consume
 all the technology funds available though the bonds.
 
 Assemblyman Curt Hagman (R-Chino Hills), who authored the bill and has 
been vocal in his opposition to the iPad program, said the public is led
 to believe that bond money will be used to build new schools or 
refurbish aging ones and not for other, unrelated purposes.
 
 “It is important that construction bond money be used for school facilities, and not for things like iPads,” Hagman said.
 
 Los Angeles Unified Supt. John Deasy has been steadfast in asserting 
that the technology upgrade is an essential academic initiative.
 
 Deasy could not be reached for comment.
 
 The bill would prohibit districts from purchasing “instructional 
materials” – including “textbooks, technology-based materials and other 
non-facility related items with a short usable life.”
 
 Those items should be purchased with money allocated from the state for 
those purposes. “That’s what they should be buying this stuff with – not
 long-term debt money,” he said.
 ____________________
 
 BILL NUMBER: AB 1754
 INTRODUCED BILL TEXT
 
 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Hagman
 
 FEBRUARY 14, 2014
 
 An act to add Section 15267 to the Education Code, relating to school bonds.
 
 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
 
 AB 1754, as introduced, Hagman. School bonds: instructional materials.
 
 The California Constitution limits the maximum amount of any ad valorem
 tax on real property to 1% of the full cash value of the property 
except for ad valorem taxes or special assessments that pay the interest
 and redemption charges on certain bonded indebtedness, including bonded
 indebtedness incurred by a school district, community college district,
 or county office of education for the construction, reconstruction, 
rehabilitation, or replacement of school facilities, including the 
furnishing and equipping of school facilities, or the acquisition or 
lease of real property for school facilities, approved by 55% of the 
voters if the proposition includes specified accountability 
requirements. This bill would prohibit proceeds from the sale of bonds 
authorized and issued pursuant to the exception described above to be 
used to purchase instructional materials, as defined.
 
 Vote: majority.
 Appropriation: no.
 Fiscal committee: no.
 State-mandated local program: no.
 
 
 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
 SECTION 1. Section 15267 is added to the Education Code, to read:
 15267. Proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized and issued pursuant 
to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 1 of Article XIII A and 
subdivision (b) of Section 18 of Article XVI of the California 
Constitution shall not be used to purchase instructional materials, as 
defined in subdivision (h) of Section 60010.
 
 
 BREAKING BREAD …OR BREAKING FAITH?
 ●● Somewhere between OUR DINNER WITH DR. DEASY from 
AALA  and LAUSD DISRESPECTS OUR SACRIFICES from UTLA lies the truth of 
union solidarity in LAUSD. There is an unfortunate tendency in the 
office of the superintendent (“Management”) to approach any-and-all 
communications, accountability or community outreach/engagement – 
whether with the Board of Ed or Parents – whether about LCFF, LCAP, The 
CORE Waiver, The Common Core Technology Project, the Budget  or Whom to 
appoint to fill the District One Vacancy as a adversarial negotiation  –
 to be contained in a Cone of Silence  and discussed in orchestrated 
meetings.  Data is unquestioned and Information is a one way street.
 
 ►OUR DINNER WITH DR. DEASY
 From the Associated Administrators of Los Angeles Weekly Update Week of February 17, 2014 |
 http://bit.ly/1g9Y1PG
 
 13 Feb 2014  ::  On Monday evening, February 10, 2014, Superintendent 
John Deasy hosted a dinner meeting with leaders of all LAUSD unions. 
This was a first. While this event was nothing like the memorable meal 
portrayed in the film, My Dinner with Andre, it did provide the 
opportunity for the Superintendent to share some important 
budget-related information with the union leaders, while allowing us to 
offer our candid views and ask some critical questions. We look forward 
to a continuing conversation with the Superintendent on this and other 
matters of importance to union members.
 
 MORE BOARD COMMENTS
 
 At the Board of Education meeting on Tuesday immediately following Dr. 
Deasy’s dinner, the LAUSD union coalition, this time represented by 
CSEA’s Letetsia Fox, again made comments regarding our unions’ shared 
priorities. Following is our joint statement which we also shared the 
previous evening with Dr. Deasy:
 
 Recent budget reports from the Governor show promise that the California
 economy will continue its rebound, and that school districts stand to 
receive increased funding overall. Particularly, with the implementation
 of the Local Control Funding Formula, LAUSD will receive much needed 
supplemental and concentration grants in addition to the base grant. 
This boost to LAUSD funding is critical to improving the quality of 
services and programs to our students and communities.
 
 As the District begins its development of the Local Control 
Accountability Plan (LCAP), input from all stakeholders must be 
meaningful, and the process must be transparent. As stakeholders, 
employees play a vital role in the delivery of services in the District.
 As such, LAUSD unions must play a critical role in the development of 
the LCAP. Our unions have a united viewpoint as to what the LCAP should 
look like, and we intend to jointly express this in any LCAP development
 meeting.
 
 We ask that the leadership from all our unions, certificated and 
classified, be invited to participate jointly in any future meetings 
scheduled to receive input from employees on the development of the 
LCAP. Together let’s develop a plan that addresses all eight priority 
areas of the LCAP to make our schools:
 
 • Safer
 • Cleaner
 • Better supervised with improved delivery of essential services such as
 instructional support, school to home communication and involvement of 
parents, students, staff and community members.
 
 We believe a service and program restoration plan must include the 
restoration of its service providers—the hardworking men and women of 
LAUSD. Let’s also repay these hardworking men and women for their years 
of sacrifice which kept the District afloat. The coalition of LAUSD 
unions concurs that a balanced approach for salary and staffing 
restorations should be a high priority in the LCAP’s implementation of 
the LCFF.
 
 ________________________________________
 
 ►LAUSD DISRESPECTS OUR SACRIFICES:  We saved the day, and we're being stiffed
 UTLA President’s Perspective | http://bit.ly/1f8cU7n
 
 Jan 31, 2014  ::  "We are angry that the same people who came to us 
during the recession, hat in hand, expecting us to essentially bail out 
the District by taking pay cuts, have now conveniently forgotten those 
hard sacrifices and are ready to embark on half-baked spending sprees 
for things like iPads."
 
 Last week, I sent the following letter to Superintendent John Deasy, with copies to the members of the Board of Education:
 
 
 
Dear Superintendent Deasy:
 On January 15, the UTLA House of Representatives, by a near-unanimous 
vote, directed me to communicate to you, and to the School Board, UTLA’s
 salary negotiations demand for immediate bargaining and for 
implementation retroactive to the beginning of the 2013-14 school year.
 
 UTLA’s demand is for an increase in salary of 17.6%.
 
 This demand reflects the undisputed fact that, since the beginning of 
the recession, L.A.’s teachers and health and human services 
professionals have, again and again, voluntarily made deep financial 
sacrifices in order to keep the District afloat. We have made these 
sacrifices even as workloads have greatly increased, and while the cost 
of living has continued to rise. Simple equity demands that these 
sacrifices be repaid.
 
 This demand also reflects a new economic reality. In light of both the 
passage of Proposition 30 and the steadily improving California economy,
 the governor and the Legislature have made it clear that it is their 
intent to fully fund schools and to repair the damage done to schools by
 the recession, including a commitment to making teacher salaries 
competitive. It would be a travesty if these statewide commitments to 
our schools and our children were not translated to reality in Los 
Angeles, where the children’s needs are the greatest, and where the 
sacrifices by educators were the deepest.
 
 I look forward to your response.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Warren Fletcher
 UTLA President
 
 cc: Members, LAUSD Board of Education
 
 Under our union constitution, the UTLA House of Representatives acts as 
the elected voice of the teachers and health and human services 
professionals of Los Angeles. And there can be no question that, when 
the House spoke on that January evening, they were giving voice to the 
feelings and frustrations of the credentialed professionals at every 
school in the District.
 
 Put simply, L.A.’s educators are tired and angry.
 
 We are tired of ballooning class sizes. We are tired of seeing hundreds 
of our dedicated colleagues remain in laid-off status, living 
month-to-month without permanent contracts, more than a year after the 
passage of Proposition 30. We are tired of seeing vital services for our
 students (like libraries and student mental health) slashed during the 
recession, but not restored as funding now becomes available.
 
 And we are angry. We are angry that the superintendent and his Beaudry 
staff (and even some of our supposedly “friendly” School Board members) 
have decided that restoring teacher pay is simply not a priority. We are
 angry that the same people who came to us during the recession, hat in 
hand, expecting us to essentially bail out the District by taking pay 
cuts, have now conveniently forgotten those hard sacrifices and are 
ready to embark on half-baked spending sprees for things like iPads. 
Most of all, we are angry at the sheer disrespect that all of this shows
 toward us and toward our profession.
 Turning anger into action
 
 Some of the greatest triumphs in our union’s history had their genesis 
in righteous indignation. It’s important to remember that even our 1989 
strike was less about salaries and benefits than it was an expression of
 professional anger and frustration at the District’s upside-down 
spending priorities and top-down directives.
 
 The District was rescued from the fiscal abyss by our sacrifices and by 
Proposition 30. And make no mistake about it, Prop. 30 would not have 
passed without the hard work of L.A.’s teachers and health and human 
services professionals. We saved the day, and we’re being stiffed. But 
it’s not enough for us to be angry alone. We need to make sure that 
parents and the community are angry as well. They need to know that the 
clear intent of Prop. 30 is being ignored in LAUSD.
 
 That is why I have reactivated the UTLA Crisis Committee. Throughout our
 history, UTLA presidents have called upon the Crisis Committee to plan 
and coordinate parent and community outreach and mobilizations, as well 
as member militancy activities. I have asked one UTLA officer and one of
 the UTLA Area chairs to co-chair the committee. The Crisis Committee 
will regularly report to me (and to the UTLA Board and the House of 
Representatives) on planned actions. Their first order of business will 
be to coordinate citywide informational picketing at every school site 
in the District. Parents and the community must be made aware of LAUSD’s
 refusal to fulfill the promise of Prop 30.
 A pro-active, pro-student vision
 
 It is important to remember that our message to parents and the 
community must be about more than just our salaries. Fortunately, UTLA’s
 bargaining demands are not limited to issues of pay and benefits.
 
 In April 2013, the UTLA membership overwhelmingly voted for the 
“Initiative for the Schools L.A. Students Deserve.” The initiative 
commits UTLA to a broad-based set of demands around the issues that 
teachers and parents truly care about, including smaller class size and 
full staffing, safe and clean schools, and adult ed and early ed 
restoration. At the same House of Representatives meeting at which our 
salary demand was adopted, dozens of proposals around these demands were
 also adopted. Parents can have confidence that our vision for repairing
 schools and keeping the promise of Prop. 30 is a vision that goes 
beyond simply our paychecks and that embraces better, safer, and 
healthier schools for their children.
 We mustn’t settle for crumbs
 
 In the end, our ability to secure our demands depends on our unity, our discipline, and our focus.
 
 Throughout the recession, Deasy and the District tried to divide us, to 
pit young teachers against experienced teachers, register-carrying 
teachers against health and human services professionals, and K-12 
people against adult ed and early ed. They thought that during times of 
cuts and scarcity, they could get us to turn on each other. It didn’t 
work. Throughout the trying times and the heartbreaking cuts, we stayed 
true to our students, true to our profession, and true to each other. We
 were a union in the best sense of the word.
 
 Going forward in our fight, we must continue to live and embody that 
same unity and solidarity and commonality of purpose. And we must not 
settle for less than we deserve. If we send a message of disunity to the
 District, they will respond by offering us crumbs, secure in the 
knowledge that they can get away cheaply by playing us off against each 
other. If that happened, it would be a tragedy. But I don’t think it’s 
going to happen.
 
 As it says in the Book of Job, “It was when we were tested most severely
 that we shone forth as gold.” We proved that during the recession, when
 we saved the schools for our students. Now we need to show that same 
resolve in order to secure the schools that our students deserve.
 
 We will be united. And we will win.
 
 
 THE LAUSD BOARD’S TURF WAR:  Its decision to close 
two excellent charter schools is a reminder of what prompted school 
reform + smf’s 2¢
 
 Editorial by The LA Times editorial board | http://lat.ms/1hnjslE
 
 February 16, 2014  ::  It was just like old times at the Los Angeles 
Unified school board meeting last week. The board voted to close two 
excellent charter schools for reasons that had nothing to do with the 
quality of education they are providing to students but rather over 
provincial concerns about turf.
 
 This was the kind of board behavior — common a decade ago — that drove 
so many frustrated parents and policymakers into the arms of the school 
reform movement. We had hoped those days were over.
 
 At issue were charter renewals for two Huntington Park schools run by 
Aspire Public Schools, one of the most highly regarded charter operators
 in California. At both schools, more than 90% of the students are poor 
enough to qualify for subsidized lunches and at least half are not 
fluent in English. Despite student demographics that are usually 
associated with low performance, these schools' Academic Performance 
Index scores are above 800, which the state has set as the target for a 
school's proficiency.
 
 What riled the majority on the board was that the schools had contracted
 outside the district for state-required special-education services. All
 schools must sign up for such services, which provide professional 
development and oversight to ensure that special-ed students are 
receiving a sound education. Most schools must do this through their 
regional special-ed agency, but charter schools are allowed to go 
elsewhere for cheaper or more helpful services.
 
 This would be a problem if there were any evidence that Aspire's 
students were suffering as a result. But parents whose children have 
severe disabilities — traumatic brain injury or autism, for example — 
praised the schools to the board. Even the district's head of special 
education said that from everything she's seen, the schools are doing 
well with their learning-impaired students.
 
 Regardless of the quality of education, board members Steve Zimmer and 
Monica Ratliff said they want to ensure that all charter schools 
contract with L.A. Unified for special-ed services.
 
 Not only is that wrong thinking, it flouts state regulations. L.A. 
Unified has gone to pains to lower the prices — and improve the services
 — of its special-education wing, but that doesn't give it the right to 
look askance at those who make other choices. Aspire contends that the 
agency it uses in El Dorado County provides the same amount of oversight
 and better data services for less money.
 
 Aspire will appeal to the county Department of Education, which should 
quickly and enthusiastically approve the charter renewals. As for the 
school board, what it should do is feel ashamed for once again putting 
students, families and educational achievement at the bottom of its 
priority list.
 
 ●●smf’s 2¢: “In 1974, the California State Board of Education adopted the California Master Plan for Special Education.
 “This statewide plan to equalize educational opportunities outlined the 
process of developing a quality educational program for the disabled 
students of California.
 “The Master Plan required that all school districts and County Offices 
of Education join together in geographical regions in order to develop a
 regional special education service delivery system. A region might be a
 group of many small districts or a large single district, but each 
region must be of sufficient size and scope to provide the full 
continuum of services for children and youth residing within the region 
boundaries.
 “The service regions were named Special Education Local Plan Areas 
(SELPAs).” – from the California Charter School Association Website: http://bit.ly/1mllncR
 • SELPAs do not provide Special Education services; they are planning 
areas that provide program support and oversee that the services take 
place.
 • THE TIMES IS RIGHT, Aspire’s performance in handling Special Education
 needs at these two schools is exemplary – not “just for a charter 
school” but truly outstanding.
 • THE BOARD OF EDUCATION IS RIGHT: SELPAs are “geographic planning 
areas” serving “children and youth residing within the region 
boundaries”. Aspire is affiliated with the El Dorado County Charter 
SELPA headquartered in Placerville, CA, 423 miles from Huntington Park.
 
 Call me cynical; I’m not the only one. The reality is that years ago 
charter schools banded together and cultivated the El Dorado County 
Office of Education Charter SELPA to avoid local 
accountability+oversight of their programs by electing to keep the 
overseers as far away from the parents, meddlesome school boards and 
questioning+scrutiny  of stakeholders.
 
 There are ten charter schools in El Dorado County; there are 190+ 
charter schools in the County Charter SELPA. Aspire’s success in doing 
it their own way creates a mythology that the El Dorado Charter SELPA is
 effective …when Aspire is an outlier in a very sketchy scheme.
 
 Should Special Ed parents wish to challenge Aspire’s process or the 
SELPA’s decisions – or just attend a meeting of the Community Advisory 
Committee (CAC) the legally mandated group formed to advise local 
governing bodies about issues which affect children in special 
education. - they must travel 423 miles to Placerville. If The Times 
wants to cover a meeting of the SELPA they must travel to Placerville. 
Neither happens. 4LAKids believes that charters should be able to select
 their SELPA partner …but it should at least be in the same county as 
the school!
 
 ...and what part of serving “children and youth residing within the region boundaries” is so difficult to understand?
 
 
 REPAIRS NOT iPADS? The world is watching …and there’s an app for that!
 by smf for 4LAKids
 
 16 Feb 2014  ::  The Repairs Not iPads Facebook Page  [http://on.fb.me/1gr3YtW]
  has grabbed the notice of the powers-that-be at a Beaudry; folks in 
the Facilities Services Division and LAUSD Maintenance & Operations 
are watching. Folks in Superintendent’s office and the boardmember’s 
offices are watching. The Bond Oversight Committee is watching.  The 
local and national media are watching.
 
 SAFETY TRUMPS POLITICS
 
 As a political animal I recognize that the intent is to question the 
superintendent’s commitment to technology (and Breakfast in the 
Classroom) at the expense of maintenance and operations/safety and 
repairs. I cannot report that the folks on the 24th floor have given up 
on iPads and BiC to fix and maintain plumbing in LAUSD. That’s probably 
not going to happen as long is this regime is the regime  - but the 
attention is paying off …and increased attention and effort and 
commitment and hopefully funding is going into the M&O effort.
 
 It’s working!
 
 One complaint that the Facilities bigwigs make is that problems and 
photos on the Repairs Not iPads Facebook Page do not identify – or 
misidentify - locations of the problems.
 
 4LAKID’S SUGGESTION IS THIS:
 
 • Download the LAUSD Service Calls App (see following) to your 
smartphone and use the reporting function when you encounter graffiti, 
vandalism or the need for repair.  Take pictures. It is possible to 
report anonymously [in Settings] if you so desire – but be sure to 
correctly report the location of the problem. Use the phone’s location 
function if you can.  And yes, it is possible to track the results of 
your service call.
 • Then post the same photo on the Repairs Not iPads page if that is your desire – the public pressure helps!
 
 The Service Calls App was created before the District’s iPad initiative 
so the App is not available for iPads at this time – but I will advocate
 that iPads be added to the platform base – which will add students to 
the reporter base!
 
 from LAUSD FSD |http://bit.ly/NUF6Rv
 
 Are you tired of seeing graffiti, vandalism, and repairs needed in our 
schools? Ever wondered how you can report these issues? We have an App 
for that! Introducing LAUSD Service Calls.
 
 LAUSD Service Calls is a free and easy to use mobile service that allows
 anyone within the LAUSD boundaries to report maintenance service calls 
using their mobile phone. Principals, Teachers, Students, Parents, and 
the public as a whole will be able to easily report issues to 
maintenance services (Graffiti, Vandalism, Repairs) for quick 
resolution.
 
 LAUSD Service Calls support three major mobile application platforms: 
iTunes, Blackberry, and Android. LAUSD Service Calls will be available 
in the Windows Mobile and Palm platform later this year.
 
 
 
 
 
 HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T 
FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other 
Sources
 REPAIRS NOT iPADS? The world is watching …and there’s an app for that! by smf for 4LAKids 16 Feb 2014  ::... http://bit.ly/1gr5lca
 
 L.A. UNIFIED HAD REQUESTED GUARD AT CROSSWALK WHERE WOMAN WAS FATALLY HIT. But its request was denied, officia... http://bit.ly/1gL0Qrc
 
 THE VIRAL PHOTO OF THE FRUSTRATED GIRL: Don’t blame it on Common Core …It’s the Worst Job in the World!: This... http://bit.ly/1iXO5vk
 
 AB 1432: SPI TORLAKSON ANNOUNCES SUPPORT FOR BILL TO REQUIRE FORMAL TRAINING FOR ALL SCHOOL EMPLOYEES ON ID AN... http://bit.ly/1gvuQY2
 
 UPDATED: TUESDAY’S BOARD MEETING: Six votes in search of a consensus. Now with more stories …and less consensus! | http://bit.ly/1aVQdUh
 
 TUESDAY’S BOARD MEETING: Six votes in search of a censensus: I watched Tuesday’s festivities from the comfort ... http://bit.ly/ML3TpV
 
 CALIF RANKS 6th IN US ON AP EXAM PARTICIPATION + smf’s 2¢: The Associated Press FROM The Sacramento Bee | http... http://bit.ly/1iLGPCH
 
 ZIMMER’S PLAN FOR LAUSD DISTRICT 1 VACANCY FACING BIG VOTE: by LA School Report | http://bit.ly/1glP5Ze  Poste... http://bit.ly/1lwcvNI
 
 from KPCC: LAUSD WI-FI UPGRADE TO COST $800 MILLION, VERGARA UPDATE + DEASY TO ANNOUNCE ARTS+MUSIC PLAN: Pass ... http://bit.ly/1aRoPH5
 
 AB 1442: CA BILL AMONG MANY PROPOSALS TO PROTECT STUDENT DATA: by Kimberly Beltran, SI&A Cabinet Report :: The... http://bit.ly/1iLiTQ0
 
 Q&A: PUBLICLY FUNDED PRESCHOOL ‘TOP PRIORITY’ FOR U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION: By Lillian Mongeau, EdSource Today ... http://bit.ly/1aRkF1L
 
 LAUSD RESPONDS TO CRONYISM ALLEGATIONS IN MIRAMONTE ABUSE LAWSUITS: Previous information from an LAUSD whistle... http://bit.ly/1lvAs7H
 
 THE iPAD IS NOT A LAPTOP: iPad Be Nimble, iPad Be Quick: Technology Integration from Edutopia | http:... http://bit.ly/1iHikqp
 
 pic.twitter.com/RZnWakCjut
 
 KEEP CALM AND KEEP MAKING A PROFIT FOR PEARSON: An Interview with Alan J. Singer by Michael Shaughnessy Edu... http://bit.ly/M5XKVi
 
 
 EVENTS: Coming up next week...
 
 
 *Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________
 •  SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
 http://www.laschools.org/bond/
 Phone: 213-241-5183
 ____________________________________________________
 •  LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
 http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
 Phone: 213-241.8700
 
 
 
 
 What can YOU do?
 •  E-mail, call or write your school board member:
 Tamar.Galatzan@lausd.net •  213-241-6386
 Monica.Garcia@lausd.net  •  213-241-6180
 Bennett.Kayser@lausd.net •  213-241-5555
 Marguerite.LaMotte@lausd.net •  213-241-6382
 Monica.Ratliff@lausd.net •  213-241-6388
 Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net •  213-241-6385
 Steve.Zimmer@lausd.net •  213-241-6387
 ...or your city councilperson, mayor,  the governor, member of congress,
 senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think!  •  Find 
your state legislator based on your home address. Just go to: http://bit.ly/dqFdq2 •  There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org •   213.978.0600
 •  Call or e-mail Governor Brown: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
 •  Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these 
thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
 •  Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
 •  Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
 •  If you are eligible to become a citizen, BECOME ONE.
 •  If you a a citizen, REGISTER TO VOTE.
 •  If you are registered, VOTE LIKE THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT.  THEY DO!.
 
 
 
 
 
 |