| In This Issue: 
                
|  |  
                 | • | ARE LOCAL SCHOOLS’ ARTS PROGRAMS MAKING THE GRADE? + smf’s 2¢ |  |  |  
                 | • | ELECTRONICS AND KIDS' BRAINS DON'T MIX |  |  |  
                 | • | Charter Wars: THE BILLIONAIRE vs. THE LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT |  |  |  
                 | • | DO
 WE REALLY WANT TEACH FOR AMERICA INTERNS TEACHING SPECIAL ED IN LAUSD? A
 letter from a TFA Special Ed alum and a petition to sign if you choose |  |  |  
                 | • | HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but 
not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources |  |  |  
                 | • | EVENTS: Coming up next week... |  |  |  
                 | • | What can YOU do? |  |  |  
 Featured Links:
 |  |  |  | “I can no other answer make but thanks, And thanks, and ever thanks”
 – Twelfth Night, Act 3, Sc. 3 by Wm. Shakespeare
 
 
 The holiday past, celebrated on the fourth Thursday of November, is 
uniquely and secularly American. (Yes, Canadians have Thanksgiving as a 
national holiday – but it’s the second Monday in October!)
 
 American Thanksgiving comes wrapped in legends of Pilgrims and Indians 
eating turkey (or venison or lobster or Boston Cream Pies) after the 
Harvest of 1621.  The extent of truth or falsehood or imaginary spin by 
storytellers and textbook illustrators is dependent on one’s skepticism 
about the European/Native American Experience. It is widely believed (or
 wildly reported) that the native tribes  helped the Pilgrims recover 
from an extremely hard first winter by teaching them the native method 
of maize cultivation, burying local fish (menhaden) in the soil to 
fertilize crops.
 
 At a remove of 384 years it’s easy be cynical about exactly what it was the parties at Plymouth Colony had to be thankful for:
 • The Pilgrims were originally bound for Virginia …but landed in 
Massachusetts because they ran low on shipboard supplies (including 
beer!)  “We could not now take time for further search or consideration;
 our victuals being much spent, especially our beer.” - Mayflower diary 
of Wm. Bradford, 1620
 • And I’m sure the Wampanoag people – already nearly wiped out by 
what-we-now believe-was -smallpox – would’ve been better-off without the
 Pilgrims …and their not enough beer!
 
 We Americans observe the holiday by traveling an average round-trip 
holiday drive of 549 miles, saying a prayer, giving thanks, and 
overindulging in food, football+beer commercials – pretty much denying 
the self-denial+moderation-in-all-things-teachings of the Calvinist 
Pilgrims. (I traveled 21.8 miles …but I'm pretty sure the Plymouth 
Pilgrims and their Wampanoag guests didn't feast on Turducken and 
Brussels' sprouts and roasted grapes!)
 
 
 But let us look about and identify the things for which we can+should be truly thankful.
 
 In my e-mail signature I include a quote by Garrison Keillor "Nothing 
you do for children is ever wasted. They seem not to notice us, 
hovering, averting our eyes, and they seldom offer thanks, but what we 
do for them is never wasted."  I am truly thankful for children even 
though (or maybe because) they don’t give thanks. There is great honesty
 (and no false sincerity) in thanks neither offered nor given!
 
 I am thankful for a wonderful daughter who makes my heart+soul sing. I 
am thankful for family and friends: threads in a glorious tapestry.
 
 I am thankful for the health of others – and appreciate good health all 
the more now that I don’t have it myself. I am ever thankful for the 
help and care of those who help+support me in the fight.
 
 When I struggle with the little things, the things that used to be easy -
  putting out the trash and getting in+out of the car and just walking 
down the street - I appreciate the friends+neighbors+strangers who try 
to help – even as I reject the assistance. Shakespeare’s Lady Macbeth 
fears that the Thane is “too full o’ th’ Milk of Human Kindness”…I can’t
 help but be thankful for the fount of it see every day.
 
 I am thankful that well-meaning friends+acquaintances ignored my wishes 
and started a GoFundMe Campaign to help me with my struggle. | http://bit.ly/1jqlzal
 
 I am thankful for the good work of Ray Cortines in turning the District 
around – and for all folks who struggled and struggle still to keep the 
ship afloat and the morale up and the good work done day-in-and-day-out;
 it was dark+strange there for awhile.
 
 I am thankful that there are teachers and administrators and school 
staff at all, doing their work with+for children in classrooms, 
libraries, playgrounds, cafeterias, buses and offices.
 
 I am thankful that there are school nurses and librarians and counselors
 and arts+music teachers …I’m not sure if there ever were or will be 
enough of you – but I promise there will be more of you!
 
 I am thankful that there are parents who do the parent thing seemingly 
effortlessly – and I am even more thankful there are parents who 
struggle with the job and do the best they can.
 
 I don’t know who Robert Brault is, but he said: “Enjoy the little 
things, for one day you will look back and realize they were the big 
things.”
 
 
     Not because of victoriesI sing,
 having none,
 but for the common sunshine,
 the breeze,
 the largess of the spring.
 
 Not for victory
 but for the day’s work done
 as well as I was able;
 not for a seat upon the dais
 but at the common table.
 
- "Te Deum” by Charles Reznikoff’" 
 And let us all be thankful that the kids go back to school on Monday.
 
 …and thank you, Gentle Reader, for considering these cranky periodic rants by an occasional madman.
 
 ¡Onward/Adelante! - smf
 
 ARE LOCAL SCHOOLS’ ARTS PROGRAMS MAKING THE GRADE? + smf’s 2¢
 by Erin Hickey, Los Feliz Ledger Contributing Writer | http://bit.ly/1Rf3tpJ
 
 November 27, 2015  ::  When it comes to arts education, Los Angeles 
Unified School District (LAUSD) has a long way to go, according to a 
November analysis by the Los Angeles Times.
 
 Although California has one of the healthiest arts education policies in
 the country, the Times’ analysis revealed many schools are falling far 
short of state requirements.
 
 The Times used data from surveys conducted by LAUSD to create an arts 
education report card, assigning letter grades to more than 700 LAUSD 
arts programs, only 35 of which received “A” grades.
 
 Grades were based on an 83-point system, with points awarded based on 
the number of art classes offered, percentage of students served and 
availability of equipment, among other factors.
 
 The Times’ analysis also revealed a negative correlation between 
schools’ percentage of low-income students and the quality of their art 
programming, a correlation which they attributed to the advantage that 
schools in more affluent areas have when trying to obtain outside 
funding.
 
 Overall, elementary schools ranked higher than secondary schools, with 
27 elementary schools receiving “A”s, compared with only eight middle or
 high schools.
 
 Los Feliz’s Franklin Avenue Elementary is one of those 27, ranking 11th 
out of 507 elementary schools in the district. According to Times data, 
they receive supplementary funding from parent groups.
 
 Meanwhile, nearby Cheremoya Avenue Elementary earned a “B.”
 
 Principal Stephen Salva said the school uses a combination of district 
funding and supplementary funding from the Hollywood Arts Council—an 
arts advocacy group—and their school parents group.
 
 According to Salva, the district gives each school an allotment for 
enrichment education based on enrollment, economic hardship of students 
and other factors. Based on that funding, the district allows each 
school to choose from a list of art subjects, for which the district 
provides teachers.
 
 Cheremoya is allotted three subjects through the district—visual arts, 
dance and theater—and they use outside funding to enhance those classes,
 rather than to add additional subjects, as some other schools have 
done.
 
 According to Salva, the school would like to add an instrumental music 
class next year, but because the district limits them to three subjects,
 they would have to temporarily replace one of the existing art options 
to do so.
 
 According to Salva, some parents have suggested bringing in a paid after
 school music program, which he said the school will consider as a last 
resort if they are unable to make music part of the official curriculum.
 
 “Ultimately, our biggest goal is that we don’t want it to be a privilege. We want every kid to enjoy it,” said Salva.
 
 Silver Lake’s John Marshall High School ranked 9th among all high 
schools in the district with a “B.” They offer ceramics, visual arts, 
dance and a comprehensive music program, which includes jazz, symphonic 
orchestra, rock band and songwriting classes, as part of their 
curriculum.
 
 But, according to Brett Boyd, who teaches guitar and Theater Design at 
Marshall, the program relies heavily on outside donations.
 
 Boyd said he taught guitar for four years before the school had to 
discontinue the class for lack of funding. However, thanks to a 
fundraiser thrown by Los Angeles indie rock band Warpaint, Boyd was able
 to resume teaching the class this year.
 
 According to Boyd, songwriting teacher Mike Finn also had to secure his own funding through a foundation out of UCLA.
 
 “I wouldn’t be available without [outside funding],” said Boyd. “Mike 
Finn as well. We’re constantly struggling to get enough supplies and 
resources.”
 
 The Los Feliz Improvement Assoc. also contributes to Marshall’s arts programming fund, according to Boyd.
 
 A few blocks away, Ivanhoe Elementary, who scored a “C,” also receives 
supplementary arts funding, according to Principal Lynda Rescia.
 
 According to Rescia, district funding allows Ivanhoe to offer two 
semesters of vocal music for grades kindergarten through 2nd and one 
semester of dance for grades kindergarten through 5th. The rest of their
 programming—vocal music for the upper grades, visual arts, 12 
additional weeks of dance for kindergarteners and 1st graders, ballroom 
dancing for 5th graders and six weeks of international dance 
instruction—is funded by the school’s parent group “Friends of Ivanhoe.”
 
 Ivanhoe also offers choir, theater and ceramics as part of a fee-based 
after school program, but scholarships for the extracurricular program 
are available to students who need them, according to Rescia.
 
 Atwater Elementary scored a “D,” ranking 494 out of 507 elementary 
schools in LAUSD. According to Times data, Atwater offers only one arts 
course, provides arts education to fewer than 25% of their student body 
and receives no outside funding.
 
 “The school district’s budget is just beginning to be restored to the 
level it was at ten years ago,” said LAUSD Executive Director of Arts 
Education Rory Pullens.
 
 According to Pullens, it is the district’s hope to bring all schools up to standard within the next five years.
 
 But, he said, the 2008 recession and the expiration of a 3-year 
government grant hit LAUSD’s budget hard. And the arts are often the 
first place budget cuts are made.
 
 “There is a belief that arts are not considered core curriculum…they are
 still considered by many to be an elective…that’s why they are 
sometimes first on the chopping block,” said Pullens. “But the arts are 
so important to development. They should never be considered for 
reduction.”
 
 Requests for comment from Atwater Elementary and Franklin Avenue Elementary were not returned on deadline.
 
 
 ●●smf’s 2¢: I am glad California has a healthy Arts Ed policy; I am hoping we also have an artful Health Education policy!
 
 I am not a big fan of one paper’s re-reporting of another’s story, 
especially when I’m not a fan of the original “grading-the-schools” 
story. But here the Los Feliz Ledger drills down a little deeper and 
gets closer to the real story in real schools.
 
 I worry that parent+community involvement in arts education is 
“checkbook participation”, limited to programs parents and the community
 (or local indie rock band) are willing to pay for. How do we explain 
that to communities who cannot afford to pay? How do we even explain 
‘checkbooks’ to communities that don’t have them – ether because that 
banking technology is a forgotten one …or because the community members 
lack the wherewithal and/or documentation and/or access to banking to 
qualify for them?
 
 And I am hoping someone is misunderstanding policy and/or misquoting 
someone with the quote attributed to Cheremoya Principal Steve Salva: 
“the school would like to add an instrumental music class next year, but
 because the district limits them to three subjects, they would have to 
temporarily replace one of the existing art options to do so.”  There 
are FOUR disciplines in Visual and Performing Arts (VAPA) Education: 
THEATER, VISUAL ARTS, MUSIC and DANCE. Who the hell decided/where in 
hell is it written that students are limited to only three?
 ELECTRONICS AND KIDS' BRAINS DON'T MIX                   
                    
                                                                                   
                   THE TECH INDUSTRY HAS PROFITED FROM THE "EVERY CHILD 
MUST HAVE A LAPTOP IN THE CLASSROOM" PUSH, BUT EDUCATION HASN'T
 
 By Paula Poundstone | CBS Sunday Morning/CBS News | http://cbsn.ws/1Q6Cpbi
 
 ● Are we all spending too much time looking at screens? A question for CBS Sunday Morning contributor Paula Poundstone
 
 November 29, 2015  ::  Almost everyone in our country is addicted to electronics, and riddled with denial.
 
 When I talk to people about it, they get defensive. They say it's not addiction, it's just something they enjoy.
 
 I love to play ping-pong, I love to practice the drums, I love to tap 
dance. But I have never, even once, tried to figure out how to do any 
one of those things, while driving, in such a way that the cops couldn't
 see. Because I am not addicted to those activities, I just enjoy them, 
and there's a huge difference.
 
 Screen devices wreak havoc with the brain's frontal lobe. Diagnosis of 
ADHD in our children has taken a steep rise since the proliferation of 
screen devices.
 
 Yet, even when presented with that information, parents often won't hear
 of protecting their kids from the harmful effects of screen devices. 
"Kids love them!" they say. Yes, they do, and kids would love heroin if 
we gave it to them. I'm told that after the initial vomiting stage it 
can be a hoot!
 
 We didn't know this when we first brought these shiny new toys into 
homes. But, now, we do know. Still, adults aren't doing anything about 
it. Why? Because we're addicted. Addiction hampers judgment.
 
 You see it. Everywhere you look people are staring at their flat things.
 We're terrified of being bored. No one drifts or wonders. If Robert 
Frost had lived today he would have written, "Whose woods are these? I 
think I'll Google it."
 
 Screens are tearing away our real connections. Ads for "family cars" 
show every family member on a different device. Applebees, Chili's, 
Olive Garden and some IHOPs are putting tablets on their tables. These 
restaurants claim they are providing tablets just to make ordering 
easier. Well, gee, if saying, "May I please have chicken fingers?" is 
too difficult for our young ones, wouldn't we want to work on that?
 
 The tech industry has profited from the "Every child must have a laptop 
in the classroom" push, but education hasn't. Research shows that the 
brain retains information better read from paper than from a screen, and
 students who take notes by hand are more successful on tests than those
 who type their notes on a computer.
 
 Yet, art, music, sports, play, healthy meals and green space -- things 
we know help the developing brain -- are on the chopping block of school
 districts' budgets annually.
 
 Even knowing this, at the suggestion that we get screen devices out of 
our classrooms and away from our children, people gasp, "But they'll 
need them for the world of the future!"
 
 Our children will need fully-functioning brains for the world of the future. Let's put that first.
 
 Charter Wars: THE BILLIONAIRE vs. THE LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
 Written by Beth Cone Kramer | CityWatch | http://bit.ly/1Xj2s4M
 
 20 Nov 2015  ::  EDUCATION POLITICS ::  As the country’s second largest 
school district seeks a new superintendent, the LA Unified School Board 
is exploring The Broad Foundation’s proposal to move half of the 
district’s students into charter schools. LA Unified Board Member Mónica
 Ratliff (photo), chair of the District’s Budget, Facilities and Audit 
Committee, is exploring the possibility of converting all District 
schools into charters, according to the agenda of the committee’s 
November 17 meeting. This move would, in effect, dissolve LAUSD, 
creating the country’s largest charter district.
 
 The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation proposal aims to fast-track the 
expansion of charter schools, which currently serve 16% of the 
district’s students, channeling $490M into the proposal over the next 
eight years. (An ambitious proposal presumably would require additional 
funding so the proposal includes a list of potential sources that 
includes names like Gates, Bloomberg, Annenberg, and Hewlett.)
 
 If the Broad Foundation proposal seems formidable, the all or nothing 
plan explored by Ratliff et al. is like fixing a small dent in the 
bumper by buying a new Tesla. Establishing a charter district or even 
moving half of its students into charter schools isn’t some magic 
elixir.
 
 Education has long been the path out of poverty. A college education is,
 in most cases, a determinant in upward mobility. As cited in a New York
 Times article by Eduardo Porter, male high school graduates who don’t 
attend college earn a fifth less than they did 35 years ago. The gap 
between college grads and those without degrees has widened.
 
 When I taught in LAUSD, the motto was “From Kindergarten to College.” We
 worked to get every student prepared to achieve a college degree. 
Despite our efforts, a divide remains. Students with college-educated 
parents are more than twice as likely to pursue higher education. 
Children with parents who dropped out of high school are seven times 
less likely attend college.
 
 Certainly, there are exceptions. We shouldn’t give up on our efforts to 
provide all students with a quality education, which also helps our 
economy and society at large. However, educating a diverse, urban 
student body requires addressing a broad range of challenges, not just 
handing over the keys to a charter system. Instead of funneling over 
$20M to address “legislative interference” and to convince parents to 
apply to charter schools, why not address issues like teacher/student 
ratio or provide teachers with better resources?
 
 In the New Orleans Recovery School District, in which charter schools 
serve over 90 percent of the city’s students, 79 percent of the charter 
schools held a D or F rating by the Louisiana Department of Education 
eight years after Katrina, according to The Investigative Fund, charter 
schools, like traditional schools, well-run, successful schools, as well
 as failing ones. However, transferring to a charter-only model 
certainly does not remove the existence of underperforming schools.
 
 California currently has eight all-charter districts, four of which only
 have one school. The largest of these districts has seven schools, 
serving 2,400 students. In comparison, LAUSD has 1,274 schools.
 
 Expanding the number of charter schools would require substantial 
funding. Just this year, the U.S. Department of Education announced 
California will receive none of the $125 million allocated for the next 
funding round. The state had received $250M in federal funds over the 
past five years.
 
 Converting LAUSD to a charter-only district would require a number of 
conditions, including at least 50 percent approval of teachers, finding 
teachers to employ during an existing teacher shortage, and securing 
facilities.
 
 If only half of LAUSD’s students were moved to charter schools, per the 
Broad Foundation proposal, per pupil funding for the public schools left
 holding the bag would be decimated.
 
 According to the LA Times, the other dirty little secret of the Broad 
proposal is the allocation of $43.1M for a “teacher pipeline” to recruit
 young, inexperienced teachers from Teach for America. Research from UC 
Berkeley and a 2015 analysis from the National Bureau of Economic 
Research show that TFA participants tend to remain in the classroom for 
shorter periods of time than traditionally credentialed teachers.
 
 Should LA residents be wary of the Broad Foundation mission or transition to a charter district?
 
 An aggressive undertaking to move a majority of LAUSD’s students to 
charter schools would likely bring an educational landscape of 
short-term inexperienced and overworked teachers, as well as fewer 
resources for the remaining students.
 
 • Beth Cone Kramer is a Los Angeles-based writer and CityWatch contributor. Prepped for CityWatch by Linda Abrams.
 DO WE REALLY WANT TEACH FOR AMERICA INTERNS TEACHING 
SPECIAL ED IN LAUSD? A letter from a TFA Special Ed alum and a petition 
to sign if you choose                   
                    
                                                                                   
                   smf writes:
 
 This open letter to the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) from
 a Teach For America alum was posted on the Cloaking Inequity website | http://bit.ly/1TdAWzT. The author was assigned to teach special education in California for 2014.
 
 ______________
 
 
 Dear LAUSD Board,
 
 As you move forward with your plan to hire more Teach For America 
special Education corps members, I would like to urge you to think very 
critically about the effects of putting these teachers in classrooms.
 
 As a ’14 Special Education corps member, I am well aware of the 
ineffective training that TFA and LMU provides, and how that deeply 
affects our students in the classroom. I am ashamed of my naivety in 
thinking that five weeks would be enough time to even remotely prepare 
me for my position as a special educator.
 
 I understand the need for teachers, especially special educators and
 know that this is a nationwide crisis that needs to be addressed, but 
Teach For America is not the answer. They are a Band-Aid fix that is 
quick to fall off, leaving our young people even more vulnerable and 
underserved. Teach For America places unprepared, untrained, and 
overwhelmed teachers into special education classrooms and the only 
thing it causes is more harm and a larger education gap.
 
 The education we received during summer institute around actually 
working with and providing services for diverse learners was sub-par at 
best. We didn’t even see an IEP until the last week of institute, let 
alone receive instruction on how to write these legal documents. In a 
district where special education students are already underserved, what 
does it look like to send someone with four to five weeks of teacher 
“training” into the classroom? How can we truly believe that we are 
providing adequate support for our special education students?
 
 On my first day in the classroom I was provided with copies of all 
30 (above the legal limit) of my students’ IEPs and was expected to 
coordinate with their general education teaches how we would work 
together to provide them with all of the services they had a legal right
 to as per their IEPs. How was I to work on reading comprehension goals 
with students when I hadn’t learned proper intervention strategies? How 
was I to work on extensive social/emotional/behavioral goals when I had 
no experience either learning about or working with students who 
qualified for special education under Emotional Disturbance?
 
 TFA corps members are notoriously underprepared, and most will 
willingly admit this. It is no secret within my corps year, however, 
that Special Education corps members were the least prepared. With 
university courses that were irrelevant to our positions (elementary 
reading lesson planning for teachers placed in high school resource 
positions, etc.) and minimal support from TFA themselves (Special 
Education leads who had only 2 years of experience, “cram sessions” that
 completely disregarded our immediate needs in the classroom), we were 
set up to fail.
 
 What we need are quality teachers who understand the diverse needs 
of our students. We need teachers who have been extensively trained, not
 thrown into a five-week crash course of lesson planning and behavior 
management. We need to think about how to retain current special 
educators and how to develop real and effective teacher training 
programs. We do not need TFA.
 __________________
 
 Teach For America has about 80 new TFA teachers in LAUSD.
 
 They recently received mid-year LAUSD board approval for a 31% (25 
position) increase in the size of their corps specifically to “teach” 
special education. The Board of Ed approved the contract with TFA 
without debate or discussion as an item on the Consent Agenda at the 
November 10 board meeting, Report 101-15/16 of Contract #4400003941.
 
 The Board Informative [bit.ly/1PUJcGC] is on Page 66 of the electronic 
document/meeting materials (although it's labeled page 53) in a process 
described by others as “…hidden in the consent calendar with attachments
 of attachments buried deep”.
 
 Colorful language for a bit of the old “ignore the man behind the curtain” monochromatic opaque transparency.
 
 Similar efforts to place TFA corps members in Special Ed classrooms in 
Chula Vista and Santa Ana Unified School Districts failed earlier this 
year after public outcry. But those districts held actual public 
discussions about the controversial contracts with TFA.
 
 
 
 The question becomes: Do we really want well-meaning but undertrained 
amateurs (being paid doesn’t make one qualified or a “professional”) 
teaching our most vulnerable students?
 
 If you think the answer is NO, maybe you want to sign the petition following.
 
 The pro-charter/pro-®eform media (LA School Report) says: “A group of 
anti-charter school activists is circulating an online petition that 
calls for LA Unified to rescind a contract with Teach for America 
(TFA)…”
 
 Gentle readers, this has nothing whatsoever to do with charter schools. Nada, Zero, Zilch.
 
 
 
 HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T 
FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other 
Sources                   
                    
                                                                                   
                   PROJECT-BASED LEARNING ON THE RISE IN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
 http://bit.ly/1NawaxV
 
 Charter Wars: THE BILLIONAIRE vs. THE LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
 http://bit.ly/1SmXD3V
 
 THANK YOU! : http://bit.ly/1XtMHmh
 
 Bureau of Indian Education schools: HOW WASHINGTON CREATED SOME OF THE WORST SCHOOLS IN AMERICA
 http://bit.ly/1PaFqc5
 
 YES, THERE IS A LIMIT TO HOW MUCH HOMEWORK YOUR CHILD SHOULD DO + various 2¢
 http://bit.ly/1kTWUN5
 
 A CENTURY AGO TODAY EINSTEIN’S THEORY OF RELATIVITY CHANGED EVERYTHING
 http://bit.ly/1XrsTjF
 
 Rethinking the Test: NY GOV CUOMO, IN SHIFT, IS SAID TO BACK REDUCING/ELIMINATING TEST SCORES IN TEACHER EVALUATIONS http://bit.ly/1OgQlQ2
 
 The rhetoric of failure …or ‘How can we miss you if you won’t go away?’: ARNE DUNCAN PINPOINTS WHERE SCHOOLS FAIL
 http://bit.ly/1Xrh8tv
 
 DO WE WANT TFA INTERNS TEACHING SPECIAL ED  IN LAUSD? A letter from a TFA Special Ed alum …and a petition to sign
 http://bit.ly/1T23Kul
 
 CLINTON, SANDERS & O’MALLEY: The Democratic candidates respond on Education Issues
 http://bit.ly/1LwE57t
 
 GROWING ANXIETY ON ‘LEFT OVER’ NCLB DEAL: “Significantly worse than No Child Left Behind?”
 http://bit.ly/1SX851V
 
 REPORT PRAISES LAUSD'S SPECIAL ED INTEGRATION, MISIS PROGRESS - LA School Report
 http://bit.ly/1SSSxfD
 
 COURT MONITOR ATTACKS LAUSD'S EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH ADA - LA School Report
 http://bit.ly/1P0RHzI
 EVENTS: Coming up next week...
 
 *Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________
 •  SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
 http://www.laschools.org/bond/
 Phone: 213-241-5183
 ____________________________________________________
 •  LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
 http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
 Phone: 213-241.8700
 
 
 What can YOU do?                   
                    
                                                                                   
                   •  E-mail, call or write your school board member:
 Scott.Schmerelson@lausd.net •  213-241-8333
 Monica.Garcia@lausd.net  •  213-241-6180
 Ref.Rodriguez@lausd.net •  213-241-5555
 George.McKenna@lausd.net •  213-241-6382
 Monica.Ratliff@lausd.net •  213-241-6388
 Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net •  213-241-6385
 Steve.Zimmer@lausd.net •  213-241-6387
 ...or your city councilperson, mayor,  county supervisor, state 
legislator, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the 
president. Tell them what you really think!  •  Find your state 
legislator based on your home address. Just go to: http://bit.ly/dqFdq2 •  There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org •   213.978.0600
 •  Call or e-mail Governor Brown: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
 •  Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these 
thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
 •  Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
 •  Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
 •  If you are eligible to become a citizen, BECOME ONE.
 •  If you a a citizen, REGISTER TO VOTE at http://registertovote.ca.gov/
 •  If you are registered, VOTE LIKE THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT.  THEY DO!
 
 
 
 |