Sunday, September 29, 2013

Questionable content.



4LAKids: Sunday 29•Sept•2013
In This Issue:
 •  Steve Lopez: “WhyPads?/GoodbiPads?” - NEW PROBLEMS SURFACE IN L.A. UNIFIED’S BRAND NAME HANDHELD TABLET COMPUTER PROGRAM
 •  IPADS BRING MORE UNRESOLVED ISSUES
 •  LA UNIFIED BUDGET WARS RETURN WITH THE USUAL COMPETING VISIONS
 •  FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS, SEGREGATION THE, SEGREGATION SINCE: Education and the Unfinished March
 •  HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources
 •  EVENTS: Coming up next week...
 •  What can YOU do?


Featured Links:
 •  Follow 4 LAKids on Twitter - or get instant updates via text message by texting
 •  4LAKids Anthology: All the Past Issues, solved, resolved and unsolved!
 •  4LAKidsNews: a compendium of recent items of interest - news stories, scurrilous rumors, links, academic papers, rants and amusing anecdotes, etc.
In the Rialto school district there is a scandal unfolding over the superintendent allegedly having had an inappropriate relationship with the District accountant who was allegedly ‘stuffed her bra’ with the lunch money. Stories like that make you miss Andy and Aunt Bea and Opie ….living just 55 miles East on the I-10.

In LAUSD we misspend the meal money on the wrong things – like kids buying candy instead of lunch.| http://bit.ly/1dQpqWT

A GOOGLE NEWS SEARCH Saturday afternoon produced 178 stories on the LAUSD iPad debacle.

(FYI: Fewer than 100 stories is a ‘kerfuffle’. Over 200 stories is a ‘disaster’.)

Moving into Sunday I do not doubt that the story count and level-of-mishap will increase. These are national, international and local stories, from the local Patch to The Huffington Post; London Daily Mail and Washington Post. The first listed of the 178 labeled the debacle a “train wreck”.

Before I get all hyperbolic about damage done to public education and whatever scraps of LAUSD’s reputation remains let me state right off: All these concerns about students gaining access to questionable content on Facebook+Twitter – or naughty lyrics on Pandora or even full blown porn – this is a tempest in a teapot. Misdirection from the actual skullduggery. The access to questionable content isn’t the issue because at least the students were using the iPads to do something the iPads were capable of doing!

Because the content in question isn’t questionable content or (anti)social media. The content in question is the (lack of) educational/curricular content.

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls: the Pearson Common Core System of Courses is not educational content – it is what is known in software developer parlance as “Vaporware”.

va•por•ware [vey-per-wair]
noun: Computer Slang. a product, especially software, that is promoted or marketed while it is still in development and that may never be produced. | http://bit.ly/15BOKjh


To mix, shake and stir the metaphor: When LAUSD was continually failing at improving educational outcomes the complaisant apologists could find solace that other school districts were doing even worse: “Be thankful we are not Oakland!”

The iPads are Gertrude Steins’ Oakland: “There is no ‘there’ there”

If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, the iPad to hell is loaded with Pearson software.

How we got here is requires a real enquiry from the Board of Education ….or from a Grand Jury. Or a full-hour Sixty Minutes expose. Where’s Mike Wallace when we need him?

Question One: What did John Deasy know and when did he know it?

Remember Jack Nicholson in ‘A Few Good Men?: “ You can’t handle the truth?”

The voters and taxpayers, parents and students and stakeholders of LAUSD – The Board of Education and the Bond Oversight Committee – having been denied it for so long may be strangers to the truth – but I think we can handle it.

Steve Lopez poses questions, below. “We’ll have to get back to you on that” won’t answer them.

Valerie Straus in the Washington Post asks “Will they be held accountable?”| http://wapo.st/1fRQOWs

She’s not wondering about sixteen-year-olds misbehaving with school iPads on the internet. She’s wondering about school district officials and their contract with Apple, Inc. and Pearson LLC and the $1 billion initiative that they didn’t really think through before implementing.

….or just maybe they thought it through long before they implemented it? …or even put it out to bid?

“We’re respected educators. Apple is the number one brand and the world's second-largest information technology company. Pearson is the world’s leading learning company. What could possibly go wrong?”

¡Onward/Adelante! - smf


Steve Lopez: “WhyPads?/GoodbiPads?” - NEW PROBLEMS SURFACE IN L.A. UNIFIED’S BRAND NAME HANDHELD TABLET COMPUTER PROGRAM
HACKING BY STUDENTS AND MISSING iPADS ARE ONLY PART OF THE PROBLEM. DID ANYONE ASK IF THE TEACHING SOFTWARE IS ANY GOOD?

By Steve Lopez, L.A. Times Columnist | http://lat.ms/15Cp9kV

September 28, 2013, 12:00 p.m. :: Don't worry, L.A. Unified officials keep telling us. The $1-billion program to give iPads to more than 600,000 K-12 students is going to work out fine.

Maybe. But so far, nobody at district headquarters gets any gold stars for the rollout.

Last week, students at Roosevelt High were almost instantly able to breach the wall intended to keep them from using the iPads as toys rather than tools. They simply deleted the personal profiles on their tablets and presto! A free pass to YouTube and Facebook.

As my colleague Howard Blume reported, the district initially said 185 students had broken through the wall, but soon the number was adjusted up to 260. Then an additional 80 students at two other high schools made monkeys of the L.A. Unified geniuses who approved the setup.

As one Roosevelt student explained, they had to do something. The problem with the iPads, as issued?

"You can't do nothing with them. You just carry them around."

Where do I begin?

Is that a case of lousy students, bad teaching, uninspired software or a failure to fully appreciate the challenge of convincing students the tablets are for education rather than recreation?

The Roosevelt story was followed by another Blume report that 71 iPads were "missing" from an early implementation program last year.

Let's just call them goodbiPads.

And speaking of what happens when the tablets leave campus, Board of Education member Monica Ratliff called it "extremely disconcerting that the parent and student responsibility issue has not been hammered out" when it comes to damaged or lost iPads, which cost almost $700 apiece. (Keyboards, an apparent afterthought, will cost the district an additional $38 million).

L.A. Unified Supt. John Deasy has a lot to answer for. But these little snafus may be distracting everyone from bigger concerns about Deasy's determination to move faster than any other large district in getting every student wired.

One question is whether the educational software is any good, or whether everyone was so focused on the hardware that they forgot to scrutinize the separately purchased content?

Steve Zimmer, a board member, said he isn't ready to judge the software, but he agreed that he and other district officials may have had their eye on the wrong ball in making a huge financial commitment without more discussion.

There was "a lot of talk about the machine and…very little talk about software," said Zimmer, who was motivated in part by his conviction that tablets can serve as an equalizer in a district with so many disadvantaged students. He said he put faith in Deasy and the procurement process because "frankly we are not equipped as board members to micromanage."

I'd have to disagree with him there.

We're talking about a superintendent who's in a race to spend $1 billion, counting bringing Wi-Fi to classrooms. And let's not forget that Deasy was featured as a pitchman in a commercial for iPads, and Deputy Supt. Jaime Aquino (who just resigned in a snit over the tech implementation) once worked for the parent company of Pearson, the firm hired to provide curriculum for the iPads.

So, yeah, do some micromanaging. Hold people accountable. Ask questions.

As in, what was so compelling about the Pearson proposal that L.A. Unified bought a product sight unseen?

Did the district do a thorough job of evaluating other software options, and is it too late to change course before committing millions on the next phase of the rollout?

Shouldn't there have been more public discussion, more teacher training and more information for parents, given that we're in the midst of a dramatic shift to digital material and an entirely new set of learning standards called Common Core?

I know teachers who believe the kinks will be worked out and the tablets will be an engaging and effective teaching tool. And earlier this year, I visited a Granada Hills high school where teachers and students in a pilot program were giving high marks to iPad instruction. (Of course, 69 of those iPads are now missing.)

But I got a closer look at the content on one of the iPads last week, and for all the hype about students taking a magic carpet ride into the future on these tablets, I missed the wow factor. One eighth-grade math lesson included a video of some guy on a treadmill going faster and faster, with a question about how to graph his movement. But no matter how you answered, there was no feedback, and no right or wrong answer.

"I wasn't that impressed," said Marina del Rey resident Karen Wolfe, parent of two L.A. Unified students. "I didn't think it was very engaging."

"A mediocre teacher with little training, and with a shiny new textbook, could do better than what I saw," said former teacher and school board member David Tokofsky.

Scott Folsom, a member of the oversight committee that supported using bond money for the technology despite reservations, now has concerns that extend beyond content.

"I remember Deasy said … last week that it was only 20% ready … and yet the contract called for it to be ready in September," Folsom said of the software. "We've only got a couple of days to go and it's not going to be ready. That's what really concerns me."

I'm with him after looking at another eighth-grade math lesson on one of the district-issued iPads that involves graphing a roller coaster's movement. Just when it might get interesting from an interactive standpoint, a message pops up:

"This digital manipulative (interactive) is not playable in this version of the Pearson Common Core System of Courses."

That'll get the kids excited, won't it?


IPADS BRING MORE UNRESOLVED ISSUES

$30 MILLION HAS BEEN EXPENDED IN THIS ROLLOUT OF WHAT SEEMS TO BE AN INITIATIVE THAT HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED WITHOUT SUFFICIENT THOUGHT AND PREPARATION.

AALA Update Week of September 30, 2013 | http://bit.ly/19eTx50

26 September 2013 :: On Tuesday, September 24, 2013, Superintendent John Deasy temporarily reversed his initial directive to have all students take their recently distributed iPads home until the District can be 100 percent certain the problem has been resolved and students are using the devices safely and appropriately. This decision was in response to students at Westchester and Roosevelt High Schools and Valley Academy of Arts and Sciences hacking into the security system of the District-issued iPad and accessing various and sundry websites on the Internet at will. The schools are among the first to distribute the iPads as part of a yearlong project to put them in the hands of every student in the District. This breach has caused additional concern for what is already a controversial project that uses $1 billion in construction funds to buy the devices and the required hard- and software. Ron Chandler, Chief Information Officer, said that the District was immediately alerted that students were accessing unauthorized sites and the iPads were locked down.

Thirty million dollars has been expended in this first phase of the rollout of what seems to be an initiative that has been implemented without sufficient thought and preparation. While reasonable people agree that students need access to technology as a tool, opinions vary greatly whether the second largest district in the nation should spend construction money on iPads for every student when so many schools sorely need improvement of their infrastructure, in addition to facilities maintenance, safety and basic repairs.

Yet, in what are still difficult economic times for many, parents are being required to accept responsibility for an approximately $700 instructional item without their input. As parent Sara Roos said in her blog, “I do not WANT to be responsible for this much money. If I felt comfortable letting my child be responsible for that much money, I might perhaps have bought her one of these machines already.” But inasmuch as the iPads replace the traditional textbook and are, therefore, mandatory instructional materials, parents really have no choice. In fact, according to the Los Angeles Times (September 26, 2013), Gerardo Loera, Executive Director of Curriculum and Instruction, said that parents cannot opt out.

The form that parents must sign just for the students to use the iPad is probably mind-boggling for many. They and the student must agree to a variety of guidelines and restrictions—and this form only addresses in-school use. While we understand that there is a separate form if students are allowed to take them home, it was not part of the public documents shared at the Board meeting on September 17. And to make matters worse, different schools have used different forms. These inconsistencies are troubling.

Mr. Chandler reportedly told the LAUSD Technology Committee that there would be no cost to students if something happened to the tablet because the District has the capability to “kill” a tablet, making it useless to thieves. Even Board Member Monica Ratliff said that she had been told that students were not being held responsible for the device. But, how can that be, when parents must sign a form accepting financial responsibility? Another issue which no one seems to have really addressed is that of the potential physical danger to students as they carry these devices back and forth to school. But that’s a topic for another article.

According to Mr. Chandler, when Dr. Deasy’s temporary moratorium is lifted, it is going to be up to individual principals whether the devices are allowed to leave the campus.

As has frequently happened in the past, when the District is not sure how to proceed, leadership delegates the tough decision to the local school site

However AALA believes that with an investment of this magnitude, there should be one standard District policy

Individual site administrators should not have the burden of making that decision

Further, we are concerned about the equity issue that Dr. Deasy has spoken about.

Is it fair for students at some schools to get to take the iPads home when others cannot? What about access to the Internet at home?

That certainly is a concern for many families.

As more and more questions arise about the use of the iPads, prudent minds may want to delay their distribution until, at least, the security issues can be worked out, a more coherent use policy is developed and District leadership is on the same page with their expectations.


LA UNIFIED BUDGET WARS RETURN WITH THE USUAL COMPETING VISIONS
by Hillel Aron, LA School Report | http://bit.ly/1bTdqWu

Posted on September 27, 2013 :: Competing visions for future spending will be on grand display again Tuesday when the LA Unified Board of Education meets to put Superintendent John Deasy’s budget plan to a vote (or not) and consider a competing resolution (or not) that would tell him how to spend the money.

Confusing? Welcome to Budgeting 101, LAUSD style.

Deasy’s presentation prioritizes addressing the debt, giving new money to campuses with high concentrations of low-income and English language learning students and raising the salaries of all LAUSD employees. It’s largely an update of the version he proposed back in June.

But the board voted 5-2 to send him back to the drawing board to put re-hiring teachers and staff – an idea backed by the teachers union – at the top of the list, along with a laundry list of its own wants and needs. Deasy effectively said, well, OK, but it’ll cost you something in the $1.2 billion to $1.4 billion range. And that includes expunging a $341 million deficit.

The board has twice postponed voting on his proposal, and it’s entirely possible it will be postponed again, inasmuch as Deasy has scheduled five public hearings in October, and a sixth with union members, to get feedback on his proposal.

Then there’s board member Steve Zimmer’s proposal (No. 14 on your agenda scorecard), that essentially ignores Deasy’s approach and recommends that the superintendent fund things closer to the way the board asked him to back in June.

Zimmer would have the superintendent be “guided” by various “principles,” such as “[b]ringing LAUSD in line with national averages for class size, counselor ratios, administrator ratios, and clerical and classified ratios.” It would return all employees that have been placed on temporary status to permanent status (primarily substitute teachers).

It’s doubtful the board will take action on either plan, given the intensity of the debate.

A Problem for President Vladovic?

And here’s another mystery: What will the board do in the aftermath of the investigation into harassment allegations against Board President Richard Vladovic?

Members were individually briefed this week on what investigators concluded. So far, the nothing has not been released to the public, and — shockingly — there have been no leaks.

If the result was bad for Vladovic, the board could choose to censure him or even remove him as president, the type of thing would most likely be done in closed session – and the Board doesn’t have one of those scheduled until October 15.

Or, there’s an outside chance a Board member, or even Vladovic himself, could bring the matter up.

But with this board, well, you never know.


See the Oct 1 Board of Ed meeting agenda here.



FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS, SEGREGATION THE, SEGREGATION SINCE: Education and the Unfinished March
By Richard Rothstein | The Economic Policy Institute

Press Release | http://bit.ly/16AGPDL

News from EPI: EDUCATION GOALS OF THE MARCH ON WASHINGTON NOT YET MET - PROPOSALS THAT IGNORE SEGREGATION AND INEQUALITY ARE DOOMED TO FAIL

August 27, 2013

The goal of racially integrated schools of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom has yet to be met. As a result, national efforts to raise the achievement of the most disadvantaged African American students have been impeded. In For Public Schools, Segregation Then, Segregation Since: Education and the Unfinished March, EPI Research Associate Richard Rothstein observes that the isolation of socially and economically disadvantaged African American students is increasing. Yet policymakers, Rothstein said, “have abandoned integration as a goal despite abundant evidence that it continues to be essential for closing the gap between white and black student achievement.”

As of 2010, African American students typically attend schools that are only 29 percent white, a decline from 1970 when African American students typically attended schools that were 32 percent white. As more lower-middle-class and middle-class African Americans move to suburbs, low-income African Americans are more likely to attend heavily African American and low-income schools, with damaging consequences for their lifelong opportunities. On average, African American students in segregated cities perform below nearly two-thirds of African American students nationwide and below nearly all white students nationwide.

Despite continued school segregation, African American student achievement has been rising steadily over the last 40 years, according to data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. The achievement gap persists because the same social and instructional forces that have caused black student achievement to rise have apparently also caused white student achievement to rise.

The striking and steady improvement in disadvantaged students’ performance is inconsistent with the conventional claims of reformers that teachers of such students are poorly trained, have low expectations, and fail to exert their best efforts. However, Rothstein argues, African American children will never achieve educational equality unless we remedy their economic inequality and segregation. Attempting to substantially improve achievement, without economic equality and integration, is an impossible task.

“Organizers of the March on Washington were correct to stress how critical integration was to education improvement,” said Rothstein. “It is tragic that education reformers fail to see the disastrous impact school isolation is having on African American students, while they persist in futile denunciations of failing schools.”

______________________________________

RICHARD ROTHSTEIN – PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE STILL SEGREGATED
Interview on The Tavis Smiley Show | http://bit.ly/1fSmXNw

A study published by the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, DC indicates that public schools in the United States are more segregated for African Americans today than they were 40 years ago. Richard Rothstein, a senior fellow at the UC Berkeley School of Law and the author of the report, explains how education policy undermined integration efforts.

HEAR THE INTERVIEW: http://bit.ly/1fSmXNw




Economic Policy Institute Report: FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS, SEGREGATION THEN, SEGREGATION SINCE Education and the Unfinished March



HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources
“We’ll have to get back to you on that.”: QUESTIONS ASKED AND NOT ANSWERED AT THE CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION + COMMON CORE TECH COMMITTEES ... http://bit.ly/167tRuI

SAT SCORES STAGNANT, MANY UNPREPARED FOR COLLEGE, OFFICIALS SAY: A College Board report finds that scores rema... http://bit.ly/18BVr1F

►@EDactivistNH: remember who runs @CollegeBoard & his ideological biases @4LAKids

TOP CHEF MASTERS SEASON 5 EPISODE 9: The chefs honor teachers from LAUSD with meals prepared especially for them. | http://bit.ly/15CYWrN

COMMON CORE CORRUPTION: Pearson Publishing Investigated for Payoffs http://bit.ly/1aCc3rd

NYT: Arne Duncan and the Business Roundtable write their own ®EPORT CARD ON EDUCATION ®EFORM | http://nyti.ms/166dvCB

FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS, SEGREGATION THE, SEGREGATION SINCE: Education and the Unfinished March: By Richard Rothste... http://bit.ly/1bScVfj

UTLA President’s Perspective: VAM/AGT – STILL A MEANINGLESS, DANGEROUS NUMBER: "It doesn’t matter whether the ... http://bit.ly/18AnWia

STUDENT HACKERS LEAD L.A. SCHOOLS TO HALT MAJOR iPAD INITIATIVE: By Valerie Strauss, Washington Post/Answer Sh... http://bit.ly/16Uks6m

Steve Lopez: GoodbiPad? - NEW PROBLEMS SURFACE IN L.A.UNIFIED’s iPAD PROGRAM: Hacking by students and missing ... http://bit.ly/16U1T2b

iPad fallout continues: FROM THE HUFF POST + MORE MAIL TO THE LA TIMES: LA Students Outfox Apple, Pearson and ... http://bit.ly/18cZHpf

RIALTO UNIFIED SUPERINTENDENT NEITHER CONFIRMS NOR DENIES A PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH "BRA STUFFING" ACCOUNTANT — http://bit.ly/18uKAYY

RIALTO USD ACCOUNTANT ACCUSED OF STUFFING HER BRA AND MAKING OFF WITH $2M IN SCHOOL LUNCH MONEY | http://cbsloc.al/198ixuG

BROWN VETOES SB 344 (Padilla) TO ADD MORE ACCOUNTABILITY TO LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA: By Kimberly Beltran... http://bit.ly/15ZemEZ

Photo: ¿AN EMPTY BAG?: http://bit.ly/16P34jx

NEW SURVEY SHOWS THOSE WITH HIGHER EDUCATION WERE MORE LIKELY TO RECEIVE ARTS EDUCATION IN K-12 : Mary Plummer | | Pass ... http://bit.ly/188NFx9

Editorial+Letters: L.A. UNIFIED’S iPAD PLAN DOESN’T COMPUTE: L.A. TIMES EDITORIAL: The district's failure to r... http://bit.ly/177GNRe

L,A. UNIFIED REPORTS 71 iPADS ARE MISSING: The lost iPads [71 of 1,200 = a loss rate of 17%] are from a trial... http://bit.ly/18v3L2Z

HOW DID LA STUDENTS BYPASS iPAD SECURITY? Board members ask tough questions + smf’s 2¢: Annie Gilbertson | Pas... http://bit.ly/1fJtl9V

WHO PAYS IF L.A. UNIFIED STUDENTS LOSE OR BREAK iPADS?: L.A. Unified board grapples with the question of wheth... http://bit.ly/1h5MlNy

LAUSD REVIEWING iPAD POLICIES AFTER STUDENT SECURITY BREACH: Boardmember Ratliff concerned that the school boa... http://bit.ly/19Jt54m

2 PICTURES WORTH 2000 WORDS: from Hemlock on the rocks |http://bit.ly/1840FEi http://bit.ly/14JgxMa

PARENTAL ADVISORY/CONTAINS EXPLICIT IMAGES: An actual screen capture of an actual Facebook Page from an actual LAUSD iPAD... http://bit.ly/1h2JbtZ

¿iPADS HACKED? ‘Surprised it Took This Long,’ Says Zimmer http://bit.ly/15u9jJ7

FEDS COME UP WITH WORKAROUND FOR “DOUBLE TESTING” … but No Help for California!: By Catherine Gewertz, EDUCATI... http://bit.ly/1fEOuSm

NO MORE FUN-FUN-FUN AS DADDY DEASY TAKES THE iPADS AWAY! + comments from the peanut gallery: L.A. School Dis... http://bit.ly/14IxVR2

‘PRIORITY SCHOOLS’ PLAN IS THE LATEST TO REMAKE FAILING L.A. UNIFIED SCHOOLS: Annie Gilbertson | Pass /Fail http://bit.ly/19Djw78

LAUSD COMPLETES HARASSMENT PROBE OF RICHARD VLADOVIC, RESULTS TO REMAIN SECRET: By Barbara Jones, Los Angeles ... http://bit.ly/1gZ5P6A

STUDENTS HACK NEW LAUSD iPADS, VISIT YOU TUBE & (OMG!) FACEBOOK: Roosevelt students get access to unauthorized... http://bit.ly/19DdjZ1

WILL LAUSD’s iPAD UPGRADE WORK?: By Sam Gliksman, Los Angeles Jewish Journal |
http://bit.ly/18Y4acs


EVENTS: Coming up next week...


*Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________
• SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
http://www.laschools.org/bond/
Phone: 213-241-5183
____________________________________________________
• LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
Phone: 213-241.8700


• LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION & COMMITTEES MEETING CALENDAR



What can YOU do?
• E-mail, call or write your school board member:
Tamar.Galatzan@lausd.net • 213-241-6386
Monica.Garcia@lausd.net • 213-241-6180
Bennett.Kayser@lausd.net • 213-241-5555
Marguerite.LaMotte@lausd.net • 213-241-6382
Monica.Ratliff@lausd.net • 213-241-6388
Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net • 213-241-6385
Steve.Zimmer@lausd.net • 213-241-6387
...or your city councilperson, mayor, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think! • Find your state legislator based on your home address. Just go to: http://bit.ly/dqFdq2 • There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org • 213.978.0600
• Call or e-mail Governor Brown: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
• Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
• Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
• Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
• If you are eligible to become a citizen, BECOME ONE.
• If you a a citizen, REGISTER TO VOTE.
• If you are registered, VOTE LIKE THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT. THEY DO!.


Who are your elected federal & state representatives? How do you contact them?




Scott Folsom is a parent leader in LAUSD and is Parent/Volunteer of the Year for 2010-11 for Los Angeles County. • He is Past President of Los Angeles Tenth District PTSA and represented PTA on the LAUSD Construction Bond Citizen's Oversight Committee for ten years. He is a Health Commissioner, Legislation Team member and a member of the Board of Managers of the California State PTA. He serves on numerous school district advisory and policy committees and has served as a PTA officer and governance council member at three LAUSD schools. He is the recipient of the UTLA/AFT 2009 "WHO" Gold Award for his support of education and public schools - an honor he hopes to someday deserve. • In this forum his opinions are his own and your opinions and feedback are invited. Quoted and/or cited content copyright © the original author and/or publisher. All other material copyright © 4LAKids.
• FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 4LAKids makes such material available in an effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to parents, teachers, students and community members in a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
• To SUBSCRIBE e-mail: 4LAKids-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com - or -TO ADD YOUR OR ANOTHER'S NAME TO THE 4LAKids SUBSCRIPTION LIST E-MAIL smfolsom@aol.com with "SUBSCRIBE" AS THE SUBJECT. Thank you.