Thoughts+Prayers

4LAKids: Sunday 6•Dec•2015 In This Issue:  •  SUPE SEARCH UPDATE: 3 Stories  •  L.A. SCHOOL BOARD TO CONSIDER REVISED MOTION AGAINST RAPID CHARTER EXPANSION  •  PAC SHIELDED $2.3 MILLION IN DONATIONS BY CHARTER SCHOOL BACKERS IN L.A. SCHOOL BOARD ELECTIONS + BEING WEALTHY DOESN'T MAKE YOU AN EDUCATION EXPERT  •  ESEA REAUTHORIZATION COASTS THROUGH HOUSE; NEXT STOP: U.S. SENATE  •  HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources  •  EVENTS: Coming up next week...  •  What can YOU do? Featured Links:  •  ► Friends4smf :: The GoFundMe campaign  •  Follow 4 LAKids on Twitter - or get instant updates via text message by texting  •  4LAKids Anthology: All the Past Issues, solved, resolved and unsolved!  •  4LAKidsNews: a compendium of recent items of interest - news stories, scurrilous rumors, links, academic papers, rants and amusing anecdotes, etc. If you don’t know the numbers, you should: • UP UNTIL WEDNESDAY, HERE HAD BEEN 354 MASS SHOOTINGS IN THE U.S. SINCE JAN 1, 2015; the mass shooting in San Bernardino on Wednesday was #355. . A “mass shooting” is defined as a single shooting, which kills or injures four or more people, including the assailant. • Of the 355, two were perpetrated by Muslims. • SCHOOL SHOOTINGS: There have been 62 school shootings so far in 2015, and 161 since the massacre at Sandy Hook elementary school in Connecticut on 14 December 2012 - although those figures include occasions when a gun was fired but no-one was hurt. • ALL SHOOTINGS: The school shootings and other mass shootings dominate the headlines, but the vast majority of gun deaths in the US occur in smaller, often unreported incidents. Some 12,223 people have been killed in the US by firearms so far this year, and 24,722 people injured. Those familiar with these pages will expect a snippet from Bob Dylan and “Blowin’ in’ the Wind” here. Let’s give Bob a rest and Bruce a turn: “It ain't no secret (it ain't no secret) No secret my friend You can get killed just for living in your American skin.” The events of Wednesday continue to unravel. San Bernardino has ceased being a place and is suddenly an event. A hashtag. #SanBernardino … to join #SandyHook and #Charleston and #Roseburg and #ColoradoSprings …so three-years-ago/six-months-ago/two-months-ago/last week. The pundits and politicos and Eyewitness Newsies struggle to connect any and all of the dots in any way they may or may not fit. Is it about I.S. or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh or the Caliphate whatever we call them? Is it Islamic Terrorism or just our homegrown domestic T? An office holiday party gone as bad as can be? Or proof positive that too many guns are in too many of the wrong hands? Or a Kozmic Cocktail of all of the above? Who radicalized whom/when/where/why/how? What part of “a well-regulated militia, being the best security of a free state…” is evidenced by this madness? The New York Times put an editorial on their front page Saturday for the first time since 1920, bemoaning the inaction on assault weapon regulation. http://nyti.ms/1TsazFO (In 1920 they bemoaned the nomination of Warren Harding for president; one needs only look to history to see how that turned out.) “I would have thought after Sandy Hook, after seeing all those children massacred, that the Congress would need nothing more to do its job, but even after that horrific tragedy, we sat idle,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Burbank) said Thursday on CNN. “I’m tired of the moments of silence,” said Schiff. President Obama spoke about “My thoughts and prayers are with the families of the victims in San Bernardino” – and the Chorus o’ Candidates (R) tweeted in echo: (Duck’s quacks DO Echo!) about their Thoughts+Prayers – and no less an Ethical+Moral Compass than the New York Daily News turned on them with the headline: “GOD ISN’T FIXING THIS: As latest batch of innocent Americans are left lying in pools of blood, cowards who could end gun scourge continue to hide behind meaningless platitudes”. A bit over-the-top perhaps …but one suspects that the Shaper and Ruler of the Universe doesn’t give all that much weight to the tweeted thoughts+prayers of candidates from either party. Or the agenda of the National Rifle Association. MEANWHILE, IN THE WORLD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION, THE PLOT THICKENS. THE LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION is actually considering the names of superintendent candidates – including this very (Sunday) morning at a meeting that begins at 8:30 AM, when they will call the roll, recite the Pledge of Allegiance and retire into secret closed session …unless a public speaker or two seeking their three minutes o’ fame on their way to church shows up at Beaudry! A list of rumored candidates seeps into my e-mail – I’m not going to name any names other than to say some are preposterous and some are curious and others are curiouser still. I do understand that the deal is far, far from done among the board. They might not even be agreed upon the preposterousness! • ELI BROAD’S PLAN TO CHARTERIZE HALF OF LAUSD continues to draw fire. Eli’s plan to “save” the LA Times draws tweets+denials. Denial is the longest river. • …and the source of political donations to previous pro-charter political campaigns become a little clearer. Kinda. Sorta. PAC SHIELDED $2.3 MILLION IN DONATIONS BY CHARTER SCHOOL BACKERS IN LAUSD SCHOOL BOARD ELECTIONS • An L.A. Times Letter-to-the-Editor writer wrote: “Being a wealthy businessman doesn't make you an education expert” …and The Times – independent of Broad’s influence – printed it! • And charter school advocates bragged/whined about how compliant+transparent they are. Because we have no shame, laundering campaign contributions in ‘a common and fully legal electoral practice’ we have nothing to be ashamed of. The Times printed that too! THE GAS LEAK IN PORTER RANCH LOOKED LIKE A STRETCH FOR THIS BLOG – but the Daily News obliged with “Porter Ranch schools working to protect students from leaking gas, LAUSD says” http://bit.ly/1HNA7wC. Perhaps the Global Warming Summiteers in Paris would like to contemplate that that leak constitutes 25% of California greenhouse gas emissions every day! [also see: SCHOOLS, CHILDREN AND CLIMATE CHANGE | http://bit.ly/1OuwFbr ] AND IN CONGRESS the seven-year-plus overdue reauthorization of the lamentable-but-unlamented federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) /aka/ Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) is suddenly on a fast track for passage …in the end a another piece of legislation we will have to deconstruct and figure out after it passes. ¡Happy Hanukkah/Hanukkah Sameach! There were miracles in those days. ¡Onward/Adelante! - smf SUPE SEARCH UPDATE: 3 Stories ►LA UNIFIED BOARD SCHEDULES START OF INTERVIEWS FOR NEXT SUPERINTENDENT by Mike Szymanski | LA School Report | http://bit.ly/1SFwmd7 Posted on December 2, 2015 2:45 pm :: The LA Unified school board said today it will begin the first round of interviews of candidates for superintendent at 8:30 Sunday morning. It’s the start of the endgame for the seven board members, who are seeking to find a successor to Ramon Cortines before he steps down at the end of the year. In the first round of interviews, the board members will be guided by information and concerns that its search firm collected from interviews and community forums. The second round of interviews will be conducted in a less formal setting and allow for more of a dialogue with board members. The entire interview process is planned as confidential, and no candidate’s name will be released before the final decision — unless, of course, somebody leaks a name or two. The next regularly-scheduled school board meeting is planned for Tuesday, Dec. 8, with an agenda that will include a vote on Scott Schmerelson’s resolution against the Eli Broad Foundation’s plan to increase charter schools in the district. Also up for a vote is a measure from Mónica Ratliff that seeks greater transparency from charter schools and charter school compliance with state guidelines for open meetings. ________________ ►BOARD GETS FIRST NAMES OF SUPERINTENDENT CANDIDATES Adolfo Guzman-Lopez | KPCC | http://bit.ly/1O3Z7MD December 01, 05:14 PM :: On Tuesday L.A. Unified’s school board got a first look at a list of people who want to be the school district’s next superintendent. Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates, the firm hired by the school board to search for superintendent candidates, gave the board a binder full of names. The names are confidential, but a source involved in the search process tells KPCC the school board will begin “three to four days” of first round interviews with top candidates starting this Sunday. The school board had agreed to a list of nearly two dozen desired characteristics that the search firm would use to find candidates. The traits include having been a teacher and principal in an urban environment, and possessing a drive to address the struggles and challenges facing students of color and in poverty. The source said the candidates given to the board meet the criteria. In the first round, school board members will ask scripted questions from a list they agreed to last month. (As with the names of candidates, the questions are confidential.) The second round of interviews will be less structured, involving discussion and dialogue between board members and the candidate on a wide range of topics. This could happen over dinner. The pace of the search is speeding up. The school board has promised to find a replacement for Superintendent Ramon Cortines this month. Cortines has said he wants to retire in January. ___________________ ►L.A. SCHOOL BOARD TAKES FIRST LOOK AT CANDIDATES FOR SUPERINTENDENT Howard Blume | LA Times | http://lat.ms/1l8gKEC Dec 1, 2015 | 8:30AM :: The Los Angeles Board of Education on Tuesday is expected to move from the theoretical to the nitty-gritty in its search for the next leader of the nation’s second-largest school system. After a brief session in public, the seven-member board plans to go behind closed doors to review questions for superintendent candidates, discuss its overall approach to interviews and take a first look at a binder of possible choices assembled by the search firm Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates. Interviews are expected to begin on Sunday in an all-day private meeting, said sources close to the process who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to comment. The mission is to find a replacement for Supt. Ramon C. Cortines, 83, who hopes to retire by the end of 2015. He appears to mean it, talking about next week’s school board meeting as the last in which he will play a leading role. Cortines has headed the L.A. Unified School District three times, returning most recently after Supt. John Deasy resigned under pressure in October 2014. The next schools chief will oversee the education of 650,000 students: most from low-income families; most of whom also fall short of state academic standards. There’s also a looming budget deficit and the challenge of an outside, privately funded plan to expand rapidly the number of students enrolled in charter schools. Charters, which are publicly funded, are independently managed and exempt from some rules that govern traditional schools. The board’s closed-door proceedings on Tuesday and Sunday are expected to last hours, possibly all day, and no announcements are anticipated at the conclusion of either gathering. The candidate screening and interviews follow two months of build-up that often resembled pageantry. First, a team of consultants, through a survey and more than 100 meetings, gathered input from the general public and specific segments of the community, including teachers, clergy, parents and civic leaders. Then, the consultants unveiled a leadership profile compiled from this input and the board debated it. Board members acknowledged during a November meeting that they have significant disagreements over the future direction of L.A. Unified. “We have real tensions,” board member Monica Garcia said about how to help the under-served youth of Los Angeles. “We need to find that common ground where at least four board members can agree to trust a person.” So far, there appear to be no front-runners for the job. Even when they emerge, the board members intend to keep the process confidential until a choice is made. L.A. SCHOOL BOARD TO CONSIDER REVISED MOTION AGAINST RAPID CHARTER EXPANSION By Howard Blume L.A. Times | http://lat.ms/1NzQ8Co Dec 3, 2015 2:50 PM :: Los Angeles school board member Scott Schmerelson, who recently urged his colleagues to oppose a massive charter school expansion plan, has revised a proposal to make it more general — opposing market-driven education reforms. Schmerelson's amended version has moved away from asking the board to vote to take a stand against efforts by the locally based Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation, which had been spearheading the charter plan. As his motion is now written, Schmerelson criticizes the Broad plan but asks the Board of Education to oppose “external initiatives that seek to reduce public education in Los Angeles to an educational marketplace and our children to market shares.” A confidential draft of the charter proposal, obtained by the Los Angeles Times, called for half of district students to enroll in charters over the next eight years. The plan was developed without input from the L.A. Unified School District and could be pursued whether the district likes it or not. Since then, the Broad Foundation has characterized the leaked plan, which called for raising $490 million, as a “preliminary discussion draft” rather than a call to action. And last month, two charter advocates formed a nonprofit organization that they said would be the next step in the effort. They insisted that the new entity would be devoted to creating superior public schools of any model, charter or otherwise, although documentation they provided mostly touted the benefits of charters. Amid acclaimed teacher's firing, LAUSD faces test over how it handles misconduct allegations Amid acclaimed teacher's firing, LAUSD faces test over how it handles misconduct allegations Charter schools are publicly funded and independently managed; they are exempt from some rules that govern traditional campuses. Most are nonunion. The nonprofit, called Great Public Schools Now, will include Broad as a board member, but he would not be in charge, according to former banker William E.B. Siart, who will chair the governing board. Schmerelson modified his motion to move away from Broad as the central focus after the nonprofit was created. But he has not diverged from his publicly stated concerns that some charters don’t serve all students and that the growth of charters could limit L.A. Unified's ability to provide adequate resources to district-operated campuses. Nonprofit is formed to advance charter-school plan in Los Angeles area Nonprofit is formed to advance charter-school plan in Los Angeles area The motion criticizes external efforts that fail to support “districtwide programs and strategies that benefit every student whom we are sworn to serve.” Charter advocates said such criticisms are unfair and inaccurate. The schools have proved popular with many parents and currently enroll about 16% of district students. L.A. Unified has the most charter schools of any district in the nation. Schmerelson also added to his resolution a recognition of efforts that could be expanded to serve, recruit and retain more students. They include expanding early learning opportunities, holding school leaders more accountable, better involving parents in their children’s learning, improving student and staff attendance, and advocating for increased state and federal funding. “He decided that the resolution also needed to include language that speaks to the accountability of the board and their commitment to attract and retain students,” said Arlene Irlando, Schmerelson’s chief of staff. "He felt that it's not enough to speak about what is opposed without some language affirming the need to improve outcomes for all LAUSD students.” Consideration of a separate, charter-related motion, requiring more disclosures from these schools, is being postponed, according to an agenda posted on the district's website Wednesday. The board could vote on Schmerelson's motion at its regular meeting on Tuesday. CAVEAT: The Times receives funding for its digital initiative, Education Matters, from the California Endowment, the Wasserman Foundation and the Baxter Family Foundation. The California Community Foundation and United Way of Greater Los Angeles administer grants from the Broad Foundation to support this effort. Under terms of the grants, The Times retains complete control over editorial content. PAC SHIELDED $2.3 MILLION IN DONATIONS BY CHARTER SCHOOL BACKERS IN L.A. SCHOOL BOARD ELECTIONS + BEING WEALTHY DOESN'T MAKE YOU AN EDUCATION EXPERT ►POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE SHIELDED $2.3 MILLION IN DONATIONS BY L.A. CHARTER SCHOOL BACKERS by Howard Blume, LA Times | http://lat.ms/1TkVSEt Dec 1, 2015 | 6:24pm :: Nearly $2.3 million in donations made by charter school supporters during this year's Los Angeles school board races were shielded from disclosure until after the election was over, a review of records shows. Those contributions — from philanthropist Eli Broad, heirs to the Wal-Mart fortune, former New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and others — were made prior to the May 19 election to California Charter Schools Assn. Advocates, a political action committee in Sacramento. That group then forwarded campaign funds to a local affiliated committee. ------------ FOR THE RECORD An earlier version of this post stated that Wal-Mart Corp. heirs Carrie W. Penner gave a combined $620,000 in 2014. They gave $720,000. ------------ The Los Angeles-based PAC was required by campaign laws only to identify the state charter group as the source of the funding, not the individual donors. As a result, the donors remained anonymous in Los Angeles campaign filings. In September, the state charter group filed a required state report listing all its contributors. While the practice appears to be within the law, state campaign regulators said they are concerned about how the contributions remained unreported for so long. Jay Wierenga, a spokesman for the California state Fair Political Practices Commission, said the goal of state law is "to elicit and promote meaningful disclosure to the public when it counts — before an election." A state charter association spokesman said the group did nothing wrong in the way it handled the contributions. He emphasized that the group's objective is to improve education opportunities for families. The donors "see the value in our goals and mission to provide a high-quality educational option to parents and students," said Richard Garcia, director of elections communications for the California Charter Schools Assn. Garcia noted that charter advocates lack the extensive financial base of dues-paying members that unions can rely on. The L.A. teachers union was the main force opposing charter-backed candidates in school board elections that are widely recognized as the costliest in the nation. Charters are independently managed, publicly funded schools that are exempt from some rules that govern traditional campuses. Most are nonunion. Earlier this year, The Times asked the charter group for a list of donations made in 2015 in advance of the election. The group declined. But Garcia said in a recent interview that it was not trying to hide anything in setting up the local PAC to receive money from the state PAC. "Local committees are established across the state to give a local flavor to each race, including [a] local name on disclaimers for campaign materials," he said. "This is a common practice as campaign consultants believe it best to maintain local name ID." Voters following the election in Los Angeles knew only that the money flowing into the campaign during 2015 came from the state charter PAC. While the names of the donors were absent from L.A. records, some did appear in campaign reporting documents related to a state Senate race in the San Francisco Bay Area. In that contest, the state charter group had not created a local PAC to channel the funding through. As a result, some contributors were revealed. The name the charter group gave its Los Angeles PAC was Parent Teacher Alliance in Support of Rodriguez, Galatzan, and Vladovic for School Board 2015. Incumbent Tamar Galatzan lost despite charter support, while Richard Vladovic, who was supported by unions and charters, was reelected. The charter PAC was the biggest money player in these contests, spending about $2.7 million. The teachers union spent about $1.6 million, according to state and local records. Among the charter donors not disclosed in L.A. filings was Bloomberg, who gave $350,000 in 2015. Bloomberg already had contributed $250,000 in 2014, an amount that was disclosed prior to the election because the funds arrived before the end of 2014. Other donors from 2015 who were disclosed after the election included: • Gap clothing co-founder Doris Fisher ($750,000). The longtime charter supporter also gave $550,000 in 2014. • Wal-Mart Corp. heirs Carrie W. Penner ($150,000) and Jim Walton ($225,000). The two also gave a combined $720,000 in 2014. • Grower Barbara Grimm ($500,000), owner of one of California's largest farming operations, who started a charter school near Bakersfield. Grimm also gave $586,400 in 2014. • Emerson Collective ($150,000), a corporation under the control of Laurene Powell Jobs, the widow of Apple founder Steve Jobs, which supports charitable and political causes. • Investor John H. Scully ($100,000). He and his wife also gave $400,000 in 2014. • Philanthropist Eli Broad ($50,000). He also gave $305,000 to the state charter PAC in 2014. Broad contributed to the state charter PAC not to delay disclosure but "because he supported the organization's statewide election strategy," said Karen Denne, chief communications officer for the Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation. Recently, the Broad Foundation spearheaded a proposal to enroll half of Los Angeles students in charters over the next eight years. Potential funders listed in a confidential June draft, obtained by The Times, included key donors to the charter PAC or the affiliated state charter association, which is a nonprofit. The issue of so-called "dark money" has touched Broad and the Fisher family before. In the 2012 election, the Fishers gave $9 million and Broad, $1 million, to groups that concealed the sources of these donations. The money was used to oppose a tax increase to fund education and in support of a ballot measure to limit union participation in political campaigns. The tax increase passed, the anti-union measure failed and the dark money maneuvering led to fines for some of the participants, although not the donors. Under election law, donors cannot direct a PAC to spend money in a particular election, and the charter group said it followed these rules. About three-quarters of its reported 2015 spending was in the L.A. board races. Nearly all the rest went to the Bay Area state Senate race. Garcia likened the charter group's donations to funding that the local teachers union received from the California Teachers Assn. and the American Federation of Teachers. Donations from those unions and others were disclosed prior to the election. Combined, the PACs from four statewide and national teachers unions provided $390,000, according to records filed with the L.A. Ethics Commission. The union also assembled its war chest through a $400,000 loan from the union's strike fund and $40,900 a month that is collected from voluntary contributions to the United Teachers Los Angeles PAC, which is called Political Action Council of Educators, the union said. "In UTLA's case, many members voluntarily give $8.33 per month to our PAC," union President Alex Caputo-Pearl said. As in this year's elections, the mega-donors have not always carried the day. In the 2013 elections, candidates backed by wealthy donors lost two of three contests, including one in which incumbent Steve Zimmer prevailed. He used the identity of the donors as an effective counterpunch to their resources. "They're truly funded by and accountable to the 1%," Zimmer said of the charter advocacy group. But that issue was not the linchpin of this year's election. The two defeated incumbents were successfully targeted for being in office during L.A. Unified's failed and costly effort to provide every student, teacher and campus administrator with an iPad. The charter group spent its money to use the iPad debacle against incumbent Bennett Kayser, who lost to Rodriguez. The teachers union used its dollars to do the same to Galatzan, who lost to challenger Scott Schmerelson. Recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions have presumed that voters would have full knowledge of who was contributing to campaigns when it struck down many limits on the amount of donations, said Jessica Levinson, a Loyola Law School professor who specializes in election law and heads the L.A. City Ethics Commission. "The purposes of the disclosure laws are to give the public information, which is much more useful the faster it comes," said Levinson. "The concern is that you can use an intermediary and, essentially, legally mask who is behind a donation." _______________ CAVEAT: The Times receives funding for its digital initiative, Education Matters, from the California Endowment, the Wasserman Foundation and the Baxter Family Foundation. The California Community Foundation and United Way of Greater Los Angeles administer grants from the Broad Foundation to support this effort. Under terms of the grants, The Times retains complete control over editorial content. _______________ ►Readers React: BEING A WEALTHY BUSINESSMAN DOESN'T MAKE YOU AN EDUCATION EXPERT Letters to the Editor of the L.A. Times | http://lat.ms/1QmHs7I Dec 4, 2015 :: To the editor: The inundation of a local school race with money from billionaires is just another example of how the 1% seek to control government. We see this in efforts to privatize Social Security, Medicare, the U.S. Post Service, schools and prisons. ("PAC shielded $2.3 million in donations by L.A. charter school backers," Dec. 2) The wealthy donors to Sacramento political action committee California Charter Schools Assn. Advocates may be motivated by good intentions, but they have biases ingrained by their milieu of wealth, self-importance and association with those who believe that capitalism can do no wrong. The Walton heirs have succeeded by paying Wal-Mart workers wages so miserly that they qualify for welfare. These 1% believe that, since they have succeeded in business, they can provide better answers to educational problems than people who work in the field. Campaign financing must be reformed. A first step would be the enactment of the Voters' Right to Know Act. Lloyd A. Dent, Northridge .. Dec 4, 2015 :: To the editor: This article takes common and fully legal electoral practice and turns it into “gotcha” politics. California Charter Schools Assn. Advocates is very proud of its compliance and transparency record. The Fair Political Practices Commission and our independent auditors have consistently found our reporting to be fully compliant. Our donors are longtime education reformers who want nothing more than to see children receive better educational opportunities. They, and we, are certainly accustomed to having that support be a matter of public record. We have never tried to shield anyone from anything. We have worked tirelessly to build political will for positive changes in public education and we will continue to do so. Furthermore, we believe readers are more interested in examining the creative ideas and educational models, such as charter schools, that are delivering much-needed results and have the power to transform the L.A. public education system. Gary Borden, Los Angeles The writer is executive director of California Charter Schools Assn. Advocates. ESEA REAUTHORIZATION COASTS THROUGH HOUSE; NEXT STOP: U.S. SENATE By Alyson Klein | EdWeek | http://bit.ly/1TLTQ16 December 2, 2015 7:15 PM :: Washington :: Almost 14 years ago, the U.S. House of Representatives voted by a huge, bipartisan margin to pass the No Child Left Behind Act, which put the federal government front and center when it came to how K-12 schools measured student performance and fixed struggling schools. But on Wednesday, the House almost as overwhelmingly approved the Every Student Succeeds Act, 359 to 64. The bill would scale back the federal role in education for the first time since the early 1980s, handing greater control over accountability and school improvement back to states. It also would keep in place the NCLB law's signature transparency requirements—including annual testing—and focus on helping traditionally overlooked groups of students and flailing schools. ESSA's political prospects appear rosy from here on out. A similar piece of legislation passed with big bipartisan support in the Senate earlier this year, and the bill is expected to sail through that chamber in coming days. And the White House has said it strongly supports the bill. The bill would direct states and districts to turn around their lowest-performing schools, schools with high dropout rates, and schools where so called "subgroups" of students—like English-language learners, students in special education, and racial minorities—are struggling. It would consolidate some 50 programs into a big block grant and seriously curtail the U.S. Secretary of Education's authority, while maintaining the Education Department's important enforcement protections, one sponsor says. And, in a nod to concerns that the NCLB law placed too much emphasis on a single test score in rating schools, the measure calls for states to consider other factors in gauging school performance, such as school climate and teacher engagement. (Lots more on the ins-and-outs of the bill in this cheat sheet.) The debate on the House floor Wednesday was full of bipartisan backslapping and a sense from lawmakers across the political spectrum that ESSA strikes the right balance between flexibility for states and civil rights protections. "Parents, teachers, superintendents, and other education leaders have been telling us for years that the top-down approach to education isn't working," Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., the chairman of the House education committee, and a co-author of the bill said during the debate. "Yet some still believe that more programs, more mandates, and more bureaucrats will help get this right. Well, those days will soon be over." For his part, Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., another architect of the legislation, said the bill offers much-needed leeway, while maintaining the civil rights legacy of the underlying law, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. "It maintains high standards for all children, and requires states to put into place locally designed evidence-based strategies that meet the unique needs of schools," he said. The tone was a big departure from July's debate over a version of the bill backed only by Republicans that barely squeaked through. And a similar bill was pulled from consideration when it failed to garner sufficient support among Republicans back in February—in part because of opposition from the conservative Heritage Action fund. (Heritage is also not a fan of ESSA.) Since then, however, the legislation has been merged with a bipartisan Senate bill, sponsored by Sens. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and Patty Murray, D-Wash. And U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan issued a sunny statement after the passage of a bill that many say would cut his successors off at the knees. "We are encouraged that the bill passed by the House today would codify the vision that we have long advocated for giving a fair shot at a great education to every child in America - regardless of ZIP code," he said. "The bill that the House passed today reflects more of that vision than nearly any observer expected." A broad coalition of civil rights, education redesign, and disability groups said in a statement Tuesday that the legislation isn't exactly the bill that they would have written. But overall, they offered a measured endorsement. And the groups made it clear they see the legislation as an improvement over the Obama administration's temporary NCLB waivers. Civil rights advocates in particular are heartened by the bill's call to get rid of so-called "supersubgroups," which allow states to combine subgroups of students, including English-language learners, students in special education, racial minorities, and low-income children for accountability purposes. For their part, state chiefs are jubilant—and clear that they won't drop the ball when it comes to ensuring progress for disadvantaged students. "We welcome accountability," said Thomas Bice, Alabama's state superintendent in a recent interview. "We believe in assessment. But one size doesn't fit all. What we need in Alabama may look different than what they need in Montana." (Teachers' unions and school administrators are also big fans of the bill. More on reaction here.) For his part, Duncan said the administration got a lot of its wish list, including a requirement that states turn around their lowest-performing schools, annual assessments, an investment in early education, and a program that mirrors Investing in Innovation, and Promise Neighborhoods. (He forgot to mention that it doesn't include a requirement for teacher evaluation through student outcomes, the continuation of the administration's dramatic turnaround remedies, or an authorization for Race to the Top, all of which were part of the administration's initial reauthorization vision. What's more, the bill seeks to stamp out so-called supersubgroups and conditional waivers like the Obama administration's, two other policies closely associated with Duncan and company.) If all goes as expected, the bill will make it to the president's desk by the end of the year. If so, the rest of this school year—and next school year—will help provide a transition between NCLB and the Obama administration's waivers to the new law. And schools will be fully under ESSA in the 2017-18 school year, when a new president and education secretary will be in place. It's been an open question how the limits on the secretary's power would square with the accountability provisions in the bill. Ahead of the vote, Scott told reporters he's not worried about how those prohibitions will impact regulation and implementation of the legislation, in part because the bill doesn't make changes to the secretary's enforcement authority. "It would have been nice if there was more explicit authority" for the secretary, he said. "But I think they have enough to get the job done." And in a wonky, but important twist, when asked if the secretary will be able to regulate on a key word in one part of the bill—"much"—Scott said he hadn't read anything in the legislation that would appear to prohibit that. Some background on why that matters: The legislation says that academic factors (like test scores, graduation rates, and English-language proficiency) have to weigh "much" more as a group than new indicators that get more at whether students have the opportunity to learn and are ready for college (like school climate, success in advanced course work, and student engagement). So it sounds like the secretary could be able to help states pinpoint the right mix. (The word "much" was traded for other language that could have allowed the secretary to pinpoint a range for each indicator. The wonky backstory here.) Staff Writer Daarel Burnette contributed to this report. HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources DUNCAN’S LEGACY UNDERCUT AS ESEA REWRITE ADVANCES http://bit.ly/1OMXrdi ESEA REAUTHORIZATION COASTS THROUGH HOUSE; NEXT STOP: U.S. SENATE http://bit.ly/1NA25Im The Supe Search Continues: SPECIAL SECRET MEETING OF THE LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION ON SUNDAY MORNING http://bit.ly/1NaD7Qn Educators Survey: USING TECHNOLOGY IN OUR SCHOOLS + a Lexicon of Buzzwords from the reauthorization of ESEA/NCLB http://bit.ly/1OLQ1He Tweets and #thoughtsandprayers are not enough ESEA & NCLB GO TO CONGRESS AND BECOME ESSA …and pardoning Jack Johnson http://bit.ly/1XDAjWl WILL ELI BROAD “SAVE” THE L.A. TIMES? http://bit.ly/1XHUo8G LIFT KIDS OUT OF POVERTY BEFORE EXPECTING HIGHER TEST SCORES http://bit.ly/1LOQvIb 1st Look: LAUSD BOARD GETS FIRST NAMES OF SUPERINTENDENT CANDIDATES …do they get the last names next Sunday? http://bit.ly/1Pw5Ipp MYSTERY MONEY: Donors behind LAUSD election unmasked - LA Times http://lat.ms/1NoF0bs CHARTER SCHOOL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE SHIELDED $2.3 MILLION IN DONATIONS IN L.A. SCHOOL BOARD ELECTION http://bit.ly/1Q0S8Ku SCHOOLS, CHILDREN AND CLIMATE CHANGE http://bit.ly/1OuwFbr CALIFORNIA SHOULD PROVIDE FINANCIAL INCENTIVES TO ALLEVIATE TEACHER SHORTAGE http://bit.ly/1IigTPO EVENTS: Coming up next week... ● SUNDAY DECEMBER 6, 2015 - 8:30 a.m. Special Board Meeting - - Including Closed Session Items ● TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2015 - 9:00 a.m. Regular Board Meeting - - Including Closed Session Items ● TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2015 - 11:30 a.m. Regular Board Meeting - *Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________ • SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE: http://www.laschools.org/bond/ Phone: 213-241-5183 ____________________________________________________ • LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR: http://www.laschools.org/happenings/ Phone: 213-241.8700 • LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION & COMMITTEES MEETING CALENDAR What can YOU do? • E-mail, call or write your school board member: Scott.Schmerelson@lausd.net • 213-241-8333 Monica.Garcia@lausd.net • 213-241-6180 Ref.Rodriguez@lausd.net • 213-241-5555 George.McKenna@lausd.net • 213-241-6382 Monica.Ratliff@lausd.net • 213-241-6388 Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net • 213-241-6385 Steve.Zimmer@lausd.net • 213-241-6387 ...or your city councilperson, mayor, county supervisor, state legislator, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think! • Find your state legislator based on your home address. Just go to: http://bit.ly/dqFdq2 • There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org • 213.978.0600 • Call or e-mail Governor Brown: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/ • Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school. • Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it! • Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child. • If you are eligible to become a citizen, BECOME ONE. • If you a a citizen, REGISTER TO VOTE at http://registertovote.ca.gov/ • If you are registered, VOTE LIKE THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT. THEY DO! Who are your elected federal & state representatives? How do you contact them? Scott Folsom is a parent leader in LAUSD and was Parent/Volunteer of the Year for 2010-11 for Los Angeles County. • He is Past President of Los Angeles Tenth District PTSA and has represented PTA on the LAUSD Construction Bond Citizen's Oversight Committee for over 12 years. He is Vice President for Health, Legislation Action Committee member and a member of the Board of Directors of the California State PTA. He serves on numerous school district advisory and policy committees and has served as a PTA officer and governance council member at three LAUSD schools. He is the recipient of the UTLA/AFT "WHO" Gold Award and the ACSA Regional Ferd Kiesel Memorial Distinguished Service Award - honors he hopes to someday deserve. • In this forum his opinions are his own and your opinions and feedback are invited. Quoted and/or cited content copyright © the original author and/or publisher. All other material copyright © 4LAKids. • FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 4LAKids makes such material available in an effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to parents, teachers, students and community members in a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. • To SUBSCRIBE e-mail: 4LAKids-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com - or -TO ADD YOUR OR ANOTHER'S NAME TO THE 4LAKids SUBSCRIPTION LIST E-mail smfolsom@aol.com with "SUBSCRIBE" AS THE SUBJECT. Thank you.

Springing Forward. Falling Up.

4LAKids: Sunday 8•March•2015

In This Issue:  •  MORE ADVICE FOR BOSTON’S NEW SUPERINTENDENT  •  GAUCHOS WEAR PINK? SOMEONE MUST BE PUNISHED! – 3 stories +smf’s 2¢  •  CRIME IS AT ITS LOWEST LEVELS SINCE THE 1950's, BUT EVERYWHERE YOU LOOK, FEAR OF THE WORLD OUTSIDE OUR DOOR NARROWS THE CIRCLE OF OUR LIVES. WHY?  •  CANOGA PARK HIGH SCHOOL WITHDRAWS PETITION TO BREAK AWAY FROM LAUSD: Educators have abandoned their effort to make the 100-year-old school an “Indepen  •  HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources  •  EVENTS: Coming up next week...  •  What can YOU do? Featured Links:  •  Give the gift of a 4LAKids Subscription to a friend or colleague!  •  Follow 4 LAKids on Twitter - or get instant updates via text message by texting "Follow 4LAKids" to 40404  •  4LAKids Anthology: All the Past Issues, solved, resolved and unsolved!  •  4LAKidsNews: a compendium of recent items of interest - news stories, scurrilous rumors, links, academic papers, rants and amusing anecdotes, etc.

What if they gave an election and only 8% of the voters came? We just had this election in L.A. – our home town – and now the question is: What Does It All Mean? Did Charter School Promoters triumph, as they claim? Did the Teachers Union triumph, as they claim? No and no. What we did learn was the power of running unopposed: George McKenna got 100% of the vote in District #1. Woo-woo! – these pages supported and endorsed Dr. George. The LA Times endorsed George. The charter folk endorsed George. Everybody loves a winner and George has won 3 elections in 9 months …give that man another 18 months in office! We learned another thing. The question was asked: “Do we have too many piddly little elections in L.A.?” And 77% of the most hard core, “we-vote-in-every-election-no-matter-how-piddly” voters [The few/The obsessed/The 8%] turned out and voted YES! That, ladies+gentlemen/boys+girls decided that. Decisively! The rest of it? Pretty ambiguous. In my council district they haven’t even narrowed it down to the top two finishers. The Community College District? Who knows? In LAUSD the Charter Proponents almost won. The Teachers Union almost won. It was close-but-no-cigar in Districts 3, 5 and 7. Incumbents were bruised and challengers were bloodied. The cut-men are working feverishly in the corners. The whole thing will be decided later, in the next round. On May 19th. Stay tuned. It’s back to walking precincts. Back to making calls. Back to mailing mailers. Back to tiptoeing around the rules and pretending your right hand doesn’t know what your left hand is doing. Back to being shocked – ¡shocked! – at what your unaffiliated supporters are up to. Back to raising money. But of course it isn’t about the money; it’s about the kids. And remembering that when it isn’t about the money ….that’s when it’s MOST about the money! So the special interests and the especially interested will mobilize and fill mailboxes with mailers and there will be lies and half-truths and truth squads and half-truth squads. Bogus statistics will be employed to prove falsehood. The boogeymen of Dr. Deasy+iPads+MiSiS will be used by both sides to abuse the other. Hopefully a lot of parents and community members will turn out on May 19th for what will be the last odd-year general election in L.A. history. And they/we will decide the issue based on what’s best for our 650,000 special interests – because the school board member sitting in that chair in districts 1, 3, 5 and 7 next August when new kindergarteners enroll – will still be in that chair when that class prepares to matriculate to middle school. This coming term is the moment to do some long-term-planning and set a course. As the editorial in today’s LA Times says: 5½ Years To Get It Right | http://lat.ms/1FuOyzu. This Board of Ed, these four plus the serving three, will pick the next superintendent. They will set five annual budgets –hopefully not five stop-the-bleeding reactive Band-Aids – but a five year cycle of proactive educational+fiscal reform. Not Disruptive Reform but Authentic Reform. (School Reform, like change, is a constant – we have been practicing it since at least 1830 and Horace Mann …and this leaves Plato, Joseph Lancaster and J.J. Rousseau wondering: “Were we just chopped liver?’) Because what’s best for kids and teachers and parents and voters and taxpayers is ultimately a single thing. FALLING UP: The rumors have been swirling since the return of Mr. Cortines: How will he reorganize the District? It was pretty well accepted that one of the first things to go would be the ISIC ESC (Intensive Support and Innovation Center Education Service Center).Alert the Dept. of Redundancy Dept.: How central can one be while decentralizing centrality? In many urban school districts in thrall with ©orporate $chool ®eform, placing underperforming/low-scoring (unpopularly called ‘failing’) schools into their own mini-district is called ‘Superintendent’s Districts’ in EdReform jargon. Dr. Deasy created ISIC in this/his-own image –but decided not to affix his title to it. (This may be unkindly likened to wiping the fingerprints off the candlestick/revolver/knife/rope/poison.) It is pretty well conceded by the unknown knowledgeable who gather around water coolers in break rooms and the Beaudry Cafe that Supt. Cortines is not a fan of the “superintendent’s district” concept+practice …and that ISIC would be soon to go. Other strikes against the ISIC program: • ISIC schools (¿why is one is tempted to write iSiC?) are spread across the 720 square miles of LAUSD; everyplace is too far from everywhere else. The chain of supply+command is overextended. Logistics are untenable. Distance disconnects. • The expected rapid turnaround of programs wasn’t. • The MiSiS Crisis hammered ISIC especially hard. Jefferson High School, an ISIC school, became the MiSiS poster child and Crisis ground zero. – and the intensive innovation and support never materialized. The Courts and California Dept. of Education got involved. The quick fix cost $1.1 million. Dr. Deasy left town, never to return. Last week it was announced that the ISIC superintendent, Tommy Chang, had been named superintendent of Boston Schools [http://bit.ly/1FruwWF] and 4LAKids wishes Dr. Chang and Boston well. Both are going to need it. See MORE ADVICE FOR BOSTON’S NEW SUPERINTENDENT [following]. I have always found Tommy Chang to be personable and forthcoming and much more accessible than others in Deasy’s inner circle – but I also remember what Casey Stengel said about nice guys. Chang didn’t last long enough at ISIC to really prove himself and the ISIC program was Deasy’s baby. The Boston Globe heaps praise on Chang [http://bit.ly/1wPq4S9]. Sorry Tommy, 4LAKids isn’t about to go that far! Plus I’ve received angry email from the Jefferson community who choose to disagree with my praise for (and your handling of) the Nava College Prep Academy last week At least one person views it as Us v. Them, with NCPA as an unwelcome co-locator on the Jefferson campus. I suspect that you’re looking forward to working in Massachusetts, #11 in per pupil funding at $13,361 per student. But I note the Boston media gives you credit (and sets expectations) for achieving success with less money! Based on the way that Dr. Deasy catastrophically mishandled the MiSiS Crisis at Jefferson once it was his problem I hold him ultimately responsible there. His “non mea culpa” letter to the court was a confession of gross incompetence, total disconnect, utter cluelessness and worse. John Deasy, the master of “Falling (or Failing) Up”, whose best practice has always been in dropping-the-bread and having it always land ‘butter-side-up’, originally came from Boston. Maybe LAUSD, in sending Chang to Boston returns the favor. Or maybe it’s all just a revolution of the Great Mandala. To go all biblical, in Leviticus two goats are selected for sacrifice to the Lord. One is deemed to be pure and sacrificed. The priests assign all the sins of the community to the other – the scapegoat – and set it free wander to in the wilderness. It’s a lovely metaphor; feel free to cast the roles however you wish. “We're not guilty, he was crazy And it's been going on for ten thousand years.” THIS WEEKEND is not just the 50th anniversary of that Bloody Sunday in Selma; it is also the 50th anniversary of the landing of the first US ground forces in Viet Nam. And the 50th anniversary of the death of silent screen star Harold Lloyd. IN OTHER SPECULATION ABOUT THE CHANGES TO COME: Apparently ESC North (The San Fernando Valley) will be split into two ESCs. For all the logistical reasons this makes sense – but one would hope that it’s not divided in such a way that one of the new ESCs is overwhelmingly in Board District #3 (currently Galatzan) and the other in the other in Board District 6 (Ratliff). School Board members are accountable for policy, budgets and superintendents, not turf. “CALIFORNIA SCHOOL DISTRICTS once viewed lifetime healthcare coverage for employees as a cheap alternative to pay raises. That decision is coming back to haunt school leaders…” - http://lat.ms/1A8EbxP “SOME THINGS HAVE CHANGED since that awful day two years ago when a gunman walked into Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., and killed 20 first-graders and six employees. “But some things have not changed, including the problem of gun violence in schools, members of an advisory commission established after the shootings said Friday as they wrapped up two years of work and presented their final report to Connecticut Gov. Dannel P. Malloy.” | http://lat.ms/1E3Oo2l GODSPEED: JOHN MOCKLER (1941-2015) – It has been said again+again that there are only one or two people in Sacramento who truly understand Public Education Finance. If there was one it was Mockler. As the Sac Bee says, "He left deep footprints".| http://bit.ly/1zY8JCn LAUSD HAD ITS FIRST MEASLES CASE ON FRIDAY. The student attends Cal Burke High School, an alternative school on the campus of Panorama City High School. The initial data shows that the school has a very high vaccination rate – within the numbers that create community or “herd immunity” – so at the school this case should be an isolated instance, not an outbreak. Hopefully the infected student has not exposed siblings or other children to the disease outside the school setting. Again, Measles is extremely contagious but usually not dangerous except in infants+toddlers too young to be immunized (under one year old) – or anyone with naturally or medically compromised immunity. Pertussis (whooping cough) – which is prevented by the same vaccine – is nearing epidemic proportions in LA County because not enough people have been vaccinated. Let’s get those shots everyone! ¡Onward/Adelante! – smf …and you did set your clock ahead for Daylight Savings Time, right? MORE ADVICE FOR BOSTON’S NEW SUPERINTENDENT By Yvonne Abraham, Boston Globe Columnist | http://bit.ly/1wPsb8O March 05, 2015 :: Congrats, Tommy Chang! Being superintendent of Boston’s public schools is a wonderful, maddening rollercoaster of a job. You’re probably feeling pretty nervous today, as the reality of your new responsibilities — not to mention the prospect of moving from sunny LA to this frozen hell — sinks in. But take comfort in this: No matter how great your achievements here, boatloads of Bostonians will inevitably deride you. You can’t make one of this city’s many constituencies happy without ticking off another. They’re all probably lavishing you with (conflicting) advice right now. Might I add my own? If you want a grasp of the problems you need to solve here, look not just to the system’s failing schools, but to some of its brightest stars, too. There, you’ll see success met not with rewards, but with bureaucratic and budgetary roadblocks. You’ve no doubt heard of the Orchard Gardens K-8 School in Roxbury. After all, it’s a national model for improving the educations of the poor city kids a lot of people assume are beyond help. Under visionary head Andrew Bott, that failing school — avoided by families and teachers despite a sparkling new facility — transformed itself into a mecca for dedicated staffers, and for parents desperate to give their kids chances they never had. The school now offers kids art, and high expectations, and some of the biggest academic gains in the state (though many of its students still have a long way to go). Its reward? This year, funding that falls $700,000 — 10 percent — below its needs. The gap comes because of rising salaries, as the young teachers Bott recruited several years ago gain experience, and qualify for higher pay; because of a change in the way the district defines poverty, which determines how much money each student brings into the building; because of undersubscribed (so, underfunded) special programs for English language learners and others for which the school nevertheless has to provide teachers; and other bureaucratic peculiarities too Byzantine to bore you with before you get here. The Roxbury school’s current principal (Bott left for the saner Brookline system) is looking at eliminating ten staff positions, including six teachers. She’ll have to rethink the intensive literacy programs that have been keys to student success at Orchard Gardens. There will not be as many small-group learning sessions. For supporters, it’s death by a thousand cuts. “It is maddening and mind blowing to me that the district isn’t celebrating the success of Orchard Gardens, but instead proclaiming ‘Mission accomplished,’ ” said Michelle Boyers, an education reform specialist who is on the school’s board, and is convinced the city has turned its back on the school. Interim superintendent John McDonough vehemently disagrees. “Those who would say we are retreating from our commitment to Orchard Gardens are sorely mistaken,” said McDonough, whom you’ll succeed in July. He says the district has protected the longer days, the clear mission, and the partnerships responsible for the school’s success. He says the problems faced by Orchard Gardens beset all of the city’s schools, to some degree. We can’t let this happen anywhere. It’s your job to make Orchard Gardens whole, sir. And all of the other schools — successful and failing — where principals are being forced to make agonizing decisions that could endanger hard-won gains. You’ve got to find the money — control labor costs, rein in the most expensive school bus system in the nation, reform food services, and yes, shut down some schools and consolidate others. The good news is, McDonough and others have started on some of this, and they’ve got the bruises to prove it. Which brings us to the bad news: All of the things you need to do are going to inflict some pain. People will be very, very angry. But let’s think happy thoughts, shall we? It’s months till you have to deal with this stuff. Bask in the glow of your new appointment — and that California sunshine. By the time you start, we’ll have finally stopped complaining about the snow. Which will free us up to pummel you. Your new job will never be as much fun as it is right now. GAUCHOS WEAR PINK? SOMEONE MUST BE PUNISHED! – 3 stories +smf’s 2¢ ►NARBONNE GIRLS BASKETBALL TEAM BOOTED FROM CITY FINALS FOR THINKING PINK By Matt Lopez, Daily Breeze |http://bit.ly/1KDk1pY 3/02/15, 5:21 PM PST :: Narbonne High School’s girls basketball team won’t get its hard-earned shot at an L.A. City Section Open Division championship this weekend, all because it decided to “Think Pink” with its uniforms in its semifinal win. The L.A. City Section announced Monday that Narbonne would forfeit its 57-52 semifinal win Saturday over View Park and be immediately removed from the playoffs because the team wore pink letters and numbers on their jerseys. Narbonne had been scheduled to face Palisades in the City final on Saturday night. According to Article 1305 in the L.A. City Section Goldbook, “Uniform colors may only be a combination of the official school colors as listed in the Board of Managers Gold Book.” Penalties include probation and forfeiture of contests. Because pink is not a school color at Narbonne, the Gauchos needed to obtain a waiver to wear it. Narbonne coach Victoria Sanders said she didn’t realize the team needed to apply for a waiver, and that the pink numbers were simply to show solidarity with the Women’s Basketball Coaches Association, which hosts “Play 4 Kay” every February to raise money for the Kay Yow Cancer Fund for breast cancer research. Yow was a former North Carolina State women’s basketball coach who died in 2009. “Everybody’s baffled, it just doesn’t make sense,” Sanders said. “If you’re going to punish someone, punish me. I’ll take it. Tell me I can’t coach the game, but don’t take it away from the girls.” Even more confusing for Sanders and her team was that Narbonne wore the same jerseys in a 60-52 win over University High on Feb. 20 in the first round of the playoffs. “Nobody said a word about it then,” Sanders said. The City Section said in its ruling that Narbonne would not only be removed from the City finals, but would also not be allowed to participate in the CIF State playoffs. “I was outraged when I heard the news,” said Chris Cuaron, whose daughter, Nneka Anyaoha, is a senior on the team. “As I got a chance to read the rule I understood what it said, but what angered me even more is they allowed the girls to play in those uniforms in the first game. The officials had the opportunity to say, ‘Hey, you guys can’t wear that’ and they never did.” Narbonne players were struggling to come to grips with the ruling late Monday. “At first I thought it was a joke, but it’s completely devastating to have it end like this,” said Narbonne All-City guard Latecia Smith. “The punishment seems so harsh when it’s not the players’ fault. If we had known, we would have never disregarded the rules.” Sanders said the school tried to explain the situation to the City Section, but was unsuccessful, particularly because the program already was on probation after playing a playoff game last year with an ineligible player. That incident led to a similar ending to last season for Narbonne, which was booted from the second round of the Southern California Regionals. Narbonne will be replaced by View Park in the City final. Palisades coach Torino Johnson said he was “in disbelief” when he heard the news. “It has nothing to do with us, it’s nothing we did, but you feel torn apart for the young ladies who won’t be able to participate,” Johnson said. “But as a coach and leader we have rules and have to be held accountable to those rules.” L.A. City Section Commissioner John Aguirre did not return a call for comment Monday afternoon. _____________________________ ►NARBONNE GIRLS' BASKETBALL REINSTATED, COACH BARRED OVER PINK ON JERSEYS By Eric Sondheimer | Los Angeles Times | http://lat.ms/1weCzWN March 3, 509 PM :: Narbonne High girls' basketball team thought it was doing a nice thing, wearing uniforms with pink letters and pink numbers to acknowledge breast cancer awareness. Instead, their good deed got them punished — and nearly disqualified. The team was reinstated to the City Section basketball playoffs on Tuesday by a three-person appeals panel, a decision that came a day after City Section officials had bounced Narbonne from competition because it violated a rule that prohibits teams from wearing anything but their official school colors. Narbonne's are green, gold and black. Narbonne will face Palisades High in the section championship game Saturday at Cal State Dominguez Hills, but the Gauchos will be without Coach Victoria Sanders. Sanders has been suspended for the remainder of the season as part of a trade-off that allowed her team to continue. That means she cannot guide her team in the title game or in the state playoffs should Narbonne advance. Also, the girls' basketball program will remain on probation through next season and the school will not be allowed to host a girls' basketball playoff game at Narbonne's home court in 2016. "I can accept it," Sanders said of the punishment. In a statement, the appeals panel said it reinstated the team as an attempt "to meet the spirit of the rule and place kids first." High school competition in the state is governed by the California Interscholastic Federation. The City Section is the only one of the CIF's 10 sections that has a rule on uniform colors. Earlier in the school year, the North Hollywood High girls' volleyball team forfeited a match because it wore uniforms that were entirely black. At what point does it lessen the honor to dilute playoff competition? Roger Blake, executive director of the CIF, praised the appeals panel decision. In a statement, he said the original punishment was "not appropriate" and encouraged the section's leadership to review all of its bylaws and penalties to assure that any sanctions fit the infraction. The decision to disqualify Narbonne was made by City Section Commissioner John Aguirre, who said the school's athletic director and principal were informed of the uniform violation at halftime of last Saturday's semifinal game against View Park. The Gauchos, the top-seeded team in the playoffs, won that game, 57-52. Narbonne had worn the same uniforms in a quarterfinal win over University High and no one lodged a complaint. But an assistant section commissioner in attendance at the View Park game noted the violation there. Commissioner Aguirre felt his hands were tied. "This is what the rule tells me," he said of his decision to order a forfeit and Narbonne's elimination. "I'm going to be consistent." Coach Sanders said she was unaware Narbonne needed special permission to wear pink on its uniforms. "I was under the impression we were able to do it," she said. "I didn't know we had to fill out a waiver." Several players were attending the funeral of a teammate's grandmother Monday when told their team had been disqualified. Aguirre said Narbonne's "lack of communication to follow protocol" was a factor in his original decision. The school was already on probation because the girls' basketball team used an ineligible player during last year's state playoffs. That player received two technical fouls in a game, which automatically disqualified her from participation in the next game. Instead, she played. "Administrators are responsible for making sure their teams and kids are doing the right things," Aguirre said. Mark Pilon, executive director of the Los Angeles chapter of the Susan G. Komen Foundation, which raises funds for breast cancer research, was not aware of Narbonne's plight until he was told by a reporter. "It's very unfortunate," he said, "this happened to young girls in sports." Now, instead of Narbonne being disappointed, another team has had its championship hopes crushed. View Park, which was told Monday it would be playing for the City title, learned Tuesday it would not. Coach Corry Thomas said some of his players were upset. He was pragmatic. "We didn't have the right to be in the championship," he said. "They have to understand they had their chance." ________________ ►HIGH SCHOOL COACH TAKES THE HEAT, AND TEACHES HER TEAM ABOUT CHARACTER By Scott Simon | NPR Weekend Edition Saturday | http://n.pr/1EC84vv Listen to the Story | 2 min 35 sec | http://n.pr/1He8BmW March 07, 2015 8:25 AM ET :: Gauchos don't wear pink. The Narbonne Gauchos high school girls' basketball team in southern California will play for the section championship against the Palisades High School Dolphins tonight. But they began the week on the bench, tossed from the championships because in their slender victory last Saturday over the View Park High School Knights, the Gauchos wore pink. They put pink letters and numerals on their uniforms, as part of the Women's Basketball Coaches Association "Play 4 Kay" cancer awareness program. It's a pink thing they've seen pro athletes do. Narbonne had worn pink in their previous game, a win over the University High Wildcats; no one said pink was prohibited. But school conference rules require a team to wear only their official school colors: green, gold, and black for the Gauchos. Just last September, the North Hollywood High Huskies girls' volleyball team had to forfeit a victory for wearing black uniforms, when their school colors are blue, grey, and white. It is the kind of rule that may sound small-minded and senseless. Pink can't make a player run faster or jump higher. But high school districts these days have to worry that an athlete, even inadvertently, may display gang colors. LA City Section Commissioner John Aguirre disqualified the Gauchos from the playoffs. "This is what the rule tells me," Aguirre told the Los Angeles Times. "I'm going to be consistent." Such rules may often appear to be consistently ridiculous. But abiding by rules, even if you dispute them, is part of what high school sports is supposed to teach students. Just as the team's months of toil, tears, hopes and sweat were about to be dashed, the Gauchos' coach, Victoria Sanders, made a suggestion. "If you're going to punish someone, punish me," she told the conference appeals panel. "I'll take it. Tell me I can't coach the game, but don't take it away from the girls." And the panel thought that made sense — "to meet the spirit of the rule and place kids first," they said. They suspended coach Sanders for the rest of the season. But the Narbonne Gauchos will get to play on. Coach Sanders said, "I can accept it." In a time when sports often seem to show youngsters all the wrong things about life, this decision about the Gauchos seems to do something right. The rules are upheld. But youngsters won't have to pay for the mistakes of adults. And a coach showed her team how real men and women accept responsibility. ●●smf’s 2¢: “Such rules,” Scott Simon says, “may often appear to be consistently ridiculous. But abiding by rules, even if you dispute them, is part of what high school sports is supposed to teach students.” I might’ve bought that, begrudgingly, if it wasn’t for the “…but high school districts these days have to worry that an athlete, even inadvertently, may display gang colors”. Gang colors? Really? PINK? Would that gang we’re afraid of be the “Pink Ladies” in “Grease?” The team uniform color rule is only a rule in the City Section, not the Southern Section (all the area schools, public+private except LAUSD) or the California Interscholastic Federation. And the City Section is only LAUSD. Let the kids play! And rather than throwing her under the bus, let their coach coach ‘em. But alas, Cinderella was not to be. Congratulations to the City Champion Palisades Dolphins, who defeated the Narbonne Gauchos (in white and green) in an exciting and well-played game Saturday night: 60-56. Please read the article following. The gangs and the terrorists and the things that go bump in the light have won. The kids have lost. And small-minded+senseless/insensitive “the rules are the rules” adults like the “assistant section commissioner in attendance at the View Park game” are the ones enforcing the “peace”. CRIME IS AT ITS LOWEST LEVELS SINCE THE 1950's, BUT EVERYWHERE YOU LOOK, FEAR OF THE WORLD OUTSIDE OUR DOOR NARROWS THE CIRCLE OF OUR LIVES. WHY? Invisibilia: LEARNING FEAR :: From NPR: World With No Fear | originally broadcast January 15, 2015/Rebroadcast March 6, 2015 | http://n.pr/1BeQ0X6 ●●smf’s 2¢: The last couple of days I have been reading essays by middle schoolers (why are they not scholars?) about the effect of violence on their lives. What I am reading is that these sixth, seventh and eighth graders – 12, 13 and 14 year olds – are deeply touched by violence, not every day but nevertheless in their everyday lives. It is palpable. In school. In their neighborhoods. Sometimes in their homes. They see it, they feel it, and they fear it. Or they have been taught by others to fear it. The following is from transcript of a radio program that aired Friday night. Apropos of everything in particular. ______________ Listen 24:43 | http://n.pr/1EYj8U1 This is INVISIBILIA, stories about the invisible forces that shape human behavior. LULU MILLER, HOST: I'm Lulu Miller. SPIEGEL: And I'm Alix Spiegel. And today we are talking about fear, and like many stories that involve fear, this one begins in the woods. (SOUNDBITE OF ROGER HART FILM) SPIEGEL: This is tape from a film which shows two little children, ages 4 and 5, together in a clearing in the forest. They're alone, two tiny bodies dwarfed by tall, dark trees. Close by in the brush, a man is watching them. By his side, there's a camera. But really, the children don't even seem to notice the man. They're too busy, absorbed in one of the most central, sacred activities of human childhood... (SOUNDBITE OF ROGER HART FILM) UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: (Imitating fart noises). SPIEGEL: ...The production of fart noises. Now, this film is all about the fart noises, in a way. The man filming them from the trees was an environmental psychologist who was interested in what children do when they're alone because at that time - this film was taken in the 1970s - that work had literally never been done before. ROGER HART: They just hadn't been studying children in natural settings. SPIEGEL: This is Roger Hart, the environmental psychologist in the trees. HART: Almost nothing was known about how children even explored the world, and then I came across a book on baboons. And I realized that we knew more about baboons' everyday behavior than we did about children's behavior outside of school. SPIEGEL: And so you wanted to study children the way Jane Goodall studied baboons? HART: Precisely. SPIEGEL: So Roger found himself a small town in Vermont, set himself up there and started tracking all of the children in the town. HART: There were 86 children between 3 and 12 years of age, and I worked with all of them, all of the waking hours for two and a half years, I was with them. They were my life, these kids. SPIEGEL: Roger would follow the kids throughout the day, documenting everywhere the children went by themselves. HART: Show me the places that are dangerous. Show me the places that are scary. Take me to where you're not supposed to go, and show me where that is. SPIEGEL: He then took that information and literally made maps... HART: OK. Let me just find the chapter. SPIEGEL: ...Physical maps that measured the distance each child was allowed to go by themselves and what the average was for every age group. And what Roger discovered was that these kids had remarkable freedom. Even 4- or 5-year-olds, like the ones in the woods, traveled unsupervised throughout their neighborhoods, and by the time they were 10, most of the kids had the run of the entire town. HART: They had more than the run of the town. Some of them would go to the lake, which would be on the edge of town, and the lake, you'd think, would be a place that would be out of bounds. SPIEGEL: But the parents weren't worried about the lake or their kids being abducted. HART: Abduction wasn't something I ever heard anybody talk about then. SPIEGEL: So there was no stranger danger? HART: No. SPIEGEL: The point is that these parents weren't particularly motivated by fear. HART: No. SPIEGEL: Which brings us to today. See, several years ago, Roger went back to the exact same town to document the children of the children that he had originally tracked in the '70s, and when he asked the new generation of kids to show him where they played alone, what he found floored him. HART: They just didn't have very far to take me, just walking around their property, really. SPIEGEL: The huge circle of freedom on the maps had grown tiny. HART: There is no free range outdoors. Even when they're much, much older, parents now say, I need to know where you are. I need to know where you are at all times. SPIEGEL: What's odd about all of this, Roger says, is that the town is not more dangerous than it was before. There's literally no more crime today than there was 40 years ago. HART: You know, 35 years later, it's remarkably the same. SPIEGEL: Same physically? HART: Same physically and demographically, in terms of living in the town, very similar. SPIEGEL: So why has the invisible leash between parent and child tightened so much? Roger says it was absolutely clear from his interviews. The reason was fear. ANDREW COLE: You know, you just never know who's out there and what these crazy people are doing. MILLER: Now, this frightened parent is actually somebody you've already met before. (SOUNDBITE OF ROGER HART FILM) UNIDENTIFIED CHILD #1: (Imitating fart noises). MILLER: Andrew Cole, the very little boy playing unattended in the woods at age 4, all grown up. Even he told Roger he was too afraid to let his kids roam free. COLE: I think when we were children, you know, my parents wouldn't worry if I was gone for an hour, you know, or up in the woods. But here, if my girls are gone for five minutes, I start to, you know, think, OK somebody could be turning around at the end of the road and - or, you know, whatever. So that makes a big difference. SPIEGEL: And what Roger found in this small town, you see it again and again across America. Crime is at its lowest levels nationally since the 1950s, but everywhere you look, fear of the world outside our door narrows the circle of our lives. Why? RALPH ADOLPHS: Are you rolling? Yeah. He's rolling. So I guess we're ready. SPIEGEL: This is Ralph Adolphs, a professor at Caltech who spent decades studying fear in the human brain. And when we were talking, he said something that really struck me. He said our overall fear threshold - that is what triggers our fear - is something that evolution has set and set at a high level for a very good reason. ADOLPHS: You know, if I just hear a slight creak in my house at night, I feel fear, and 99.9 percent of the time, there's no burglar in the house. And it's all safe. But nonetheless, I felt fear. So you have a lot of false positives. But that's as it should be because you don't want to miss any. SPIEGEL: The problem, Adolphs says, is just that modern life - it's constantly triggering our fear in all kinds of ways that our natural world didn't. (SOUNDBITE OF GUNSHOTS) SPIEGEL: This is the sound of the first mass murder captured on film in American history. It was recorded in Austin, Texas, in 1966 after a lone shooter named Charles Whitman stormed the balcony of the clock tower in the middle of the University of Texas campus and started firing at random. (SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING) UNIDENTIFIED MAN #1: There must have been a hit that last time. We hear people outside of our building in an area where we can't now look safely saying, let's help that boy. Does he need help? Someone must be down. (SOUNDBITE OF GUNSHOTS) UNIDENTIFIED MAN #1: Ricochet bullets bouncing off the top of the... (SOUNDBITE OF GUNSHOTS) SPIEGEL: It is chilling to see this footage - the puffs of gun smoke floating from the deck of the clock tower, the people falling to the sidewalk in the hot Texas sun and not getting up. It's terrible. But today, of course, it's not exactly novel. (SOUNDBITE OF NEWS REPORT) UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER #1: This morning in Michigan, police have arrested a man who's suspected of chopping off up his wife. (SOUNDBITE OF NEWS REPORT) UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER #2: A stranger seized a child. (SOUNDBITE OF NEWS REPORT) UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER #3: Three men accused of abducting and holding the women hostage. SPIEGEL: Horror inflicted on other people surrounds us. And Adolphs argues that because of our wiring, we are just not set up to ignore it. (SOUNDBITE OF NEWS REPORT) UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER #4: A serial killer... SPIEGEL: And so it distorts our experience of the world, activating our fear when we don't need it. (SOUNDBITE OF NEWS REPORT) UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER #4: And police say it's only a matter of time before he strikes again. SPIEGEL: Essentially, Adolphs is saying that a lot of our modern First World fear is totally unnecessary. ADOLPHS: I think not being able to experience fear is mostly lethal if you're in the wild. But in today's world, I mean, I'm sitting here in my office, and, you know, other than a microphone in my face, there's not a particular threat going on. So our environment, which of course isn't the environment in which we evolved, you know, there just aren't that many hazards around. SPIEGEL: Which got Lulu and I thinking. What would happen to us if we somehow disappeared our fear? This is INVISIBILIA. MILLER: I'm Lulu Miller. SPIEGEL: And I'm Alix Spiegel The show continues…. CANOGA PARK HIGH SCHOOL WITHDRAWS PETITION TO BREAK AWAY FROM LAUSD: Educators have abandoned their effort to make the 100-year-old school an “Indepen By Thomas Himes, Los Angeles Daily News | http://bit.ly/1EDpR5v Posted: 03/06/15, 12:14 PM PST :: Days before a vote that would have allowed the Western San Fernando Valley’s oldest high school to leave Los Angeles Unified after 100 years together, backers pulled their petition. Canoga Park High School educators behind the effort to break away in favor of forming an independent charter with another ex-LAUSD school, El Camino Real Charter High School, have withdrawn their petition, district officials said Friday. Teacher Dennis Clancy said the petition was withdrawn because district staff recommended board members vote to deny the effort at their meeting next Tuesday. Clancy said educators will re-tool their proposal, addressing concerns raised by district staff, and return to the district for approval. A time frame, he said, has yet to be set. “We’re not defeated, we’re not bitter,” Clancy said. “We still want to create the best Canoga Park High School we can, and we want to continue that effort.” Late last year, 73 percent of the campus’ 71 educators voted to leave LAUSD control. Canoga Park High has 1,693 students. School district staff cited insufficient planning in their recommendation the school board stop Canoga Park from becoming a charter. Among other problems highlighted by district staff, the petition did not adequately specify how groups of students would be served, including English-language learners. Additionally, governance of the proposed charter was questioned by LAUSD staff, who faulted plans for El Camino’s board to represent parents and educators of Canoga Park High. “In summary, petitioners have not yet laid the solid foundation necessary to develop and present a fully formed and comprehensive proposal to convert Canoga Park High School into an independent charter school operated by El Camino Real Charter High School that is ready to be implemented and is custom-designed to meet the specific needs and interests of the students, families, and community of Canoga Park,” according to documents drafted by LAUSD staff for the school board’s vote Tuesday. Canoga Park High educators spoke passionately last month about the need to break away from LAUSD as a means to improve learning at the first of two public hearings in front of the school board. The second of two public meetings, and first and only vote, was scheduled for Tuesday. By forming an independent charter separate from LAUSD, Canoga Park High would have more control over its budget, receiving revenue directly from the state of California. Canoga Park would have become the 18th independent charter in LAUSD and 11th in the San Fernando Valley. ________ ●●smf’s 2¢: Also see the “Here We Go Again” heading in the Feb 8 4LAKids [http://bit.ly/1ErqLna] wherein the independence of an independent charter totally run by another charter school was questioned. Though it needs to be remembered that in 2011 former (now current) Superintendent Ramon Cortines told the Associated Press that he expects the charter conversion trend to continue and foresees the day when the district's enrollment of 650,000 will plummet to 400,000.| http://huff.to/1Bjq5fD HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources SANDY HOOK GROUP'S FINAL REPORT CALLS FOR CHANGE: 'We must do something' - LA Times http://lat.ms/1E3Oo2l UH-OH! “School districts once viewed lifetime healthcare coverage for employees as a cheap alternative to pay raises" http://lat.ms/1A8EbxP Geronimo: A CALL TO ARMS http://bit.ly/1BaNuzR DID MONEY BUY ELECTORAL LOVE IN LAUSD BOARD RACES? Kinda/Sorta (3 stories) | http://bit.ly/1wY1BVh ELECTION SETS STAGE FOR L.A. UNIFIED BATTLE BETWEEN CHARTER SUPPORTERS AND TEACHER’S UNION | http://bit.ly/1GZwbE4 TEACHER UNION WILL CONSIDER SUPPORTING GALATZAN’S OPPONENT IN LAUSD RUNOFF ELECTION | http://bit.ly/1CBoVzh Federal Court Rules That Principal Might Have Reported Parents for Child Abuse as Retaliation | http://www.realcleareducation.com/articles/2015/03/03/principal_reported_parents_for_child_abuse_as_retaliation_1164.html … Chris Christie vowed to remake Newark’s schools. That hasn’t happened. | http://wapo.st/1NdaSDa Narbonne girls' basketball reinstated, coach barred over pink on jerseys | http://fw.to/CD7hhDH LAUSD's ISIC Supe Tommy Chang named Boston Superintendent | http://fw.to/cszmOaZ LAUSD Board Election Results: What does it mean? | http://lat.ms/1BSErY1 smf/4LAKids: It means there's lots o' work to do! OBIT+GODSPEED: JOHN MOCKLER – Premier Education Consultant, dead at 73 http://bit.ly/1zY8JCn It is said that there was only 1 or 2 people in Sacramento who understood Ed Finance. If there was 1 it was Mockler.http://bit.ly/1M423rY JOHN MOCKLER, SACRAMENTO’S TOP EDUCATION FINANCE GURU, DIES AT 73 | http://bit.ly/1M423rY WHEN IS A TEACHER A COP? + IT WAS ALL ABOUT A CHILD AT RISK | http://bit.ly/1GgzJEo GLIMMER OF HOPE FOR NCLB REAUTHORIZATION? | http://bit.ly/1F5SMNU STATE LABOR BOARD SETS DATES TO MEDIATE BETWEEN L.A. UNIFIED AND TEACHER’S UNION + smf’s 2¢ | http://bit.ly/1CqRj7l NARBONNE GIRLS BASKETBALL TEAM KICKED OUT OF PLAYOFFS FOR “ANTI-CANCER” PINK ON UNIFORMS | http://bit.ly/1FSmWV5 "L.A. SCHOOL BOARD EXPANDING ROLE BEYOND EDUCATION INTO 'SOCIAL JUSTICE'” - a turf war Bd of Ed v. Times Ed Board? http://lat.ms/18iid3D Scott Folsom @4LAKids - Mar 3: BE AMONG THE FEW, THE PROUD, THE VOTERS: Today's the Day to vote in L.A. VOTE EARLY+OFTEN McKENNA KAYSER SCHMERELSON VLADOVIC ¡OMG! - A typo in Sunday's 4LAKids blogpost. VOTE FOR SCOTT SCHMERELSON IN LAUSD DISTRICT 3 (not 2!) EVENTS: Coming up next week... • REGULAR BOARD MEETING INCLUDING CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – Tues. March 10, 2015 - 10:00 a.m. - • REGULAR BOARD MEETING – Tues. March 10, 2015 - 1:00 p.m. • BUDGET, FACILITIES, AUDIT COMMITTEE – Thurs. March 12, 2015 - 11 a.m. ^ all above in the Boardroom at 333 S. Beaudry ^ • DIANE E. WATSON CAREER TRAINING CENTER RIBBON-CUTTING CEREMONY Thursday Mar 12, 2015 - Time: 1:00 p.m. Location: Diane E. Watson Career Training Center 3833 S. Crenshaw Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90008 *Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________ • SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE: http://www.laschools.org/bond/ Phone: 213-241-5183 ____________________________________________________ • LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR: http://www.laschools.org/happenings/ Phone: 213-241.8700 • LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION & COMMITTEES MEETING CALENDAR What can YOU do? • E-mail, call or write your school board member: Tamar.Galatzan@lausd.net • 213-241-6386 Monica.Garcia@lausd.net • 213-241-6180 Bennett.Kayser@lausd.net • 213-241-5555 George.McKenna@lausd.net • 213-241-6382 Monica.Ratliff@lausd.net • 213-241-6388 Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net • 213-241-6385 Steve.Zimmer@lausd.net • 213-241-6387 ...or your city councilperson, mayor, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think! • Find your state legislator based on your home address. Just go to: http://bit.ly/dqFdq2 • There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org • 213.978.0600 • Call or e-mail Governor Brown: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/ • Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school. • Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it! • Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child. • If you are eligible to become a citizen, BECOME ONE. • If you a a citizen, REGISTER TO VOTE. • If you are registered, VOTE LIKE THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT. THEY DO! Who are your elected federal & state representatives? How do you contact them?

Scott Folsom is a parent leader in LAUSD and was Parent/Volunteer of the Year for 2010-11 for Los Angeles County. • He is Past President of Los Angeles Tenth District PTSA and has represented PTA on the LAUSD Construction Bond Citizen's Oversight Committee for over 12 years. He is a Health Commissioner, Legislation Team member and a member of the Board of Managers of the California State PTA. He serves on numerous school district advisory and policy committees and has served as a PTA officer and governance council member at three LAUSD schools. He is the recipient of the UTLA/AFT "WHO" Gold Award and the ACSA Regional Ferd Kiesel Memorial Distinguished Service Award - honors he hopes to someday deserve. • In this forum his opinions are his own and your opinions and feedback are invited. Quoted and/or cited content copyright © the original author and/or publisher. All other material copyright © 4LAKids. • FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 4LAKids makes such material available in an effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to parents, teachers, students and community members in a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. • To SUBSCRIBE e-mail: 4LAKids-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com - or -TO ADD YOUR OR ANOTHER'S NAME TO THE 4LAKids SUBSCRIPTION LIST E-mail smfolsom@aol.com with "SUBSCRIBE" AS THE SUBJECT. Thank you.