Showing posts with label School Choice Resolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label School Choice Resolution. Show all posts

Sunday, September 27, 2015

The tune will come to you at last....



4LAKids: Sunday 27•Sept•2015
In This Issue:
 •  L.A. UNIFIED TO GET $6.4 MILLION IN SETTLEMENT OVER IPAD SOFTWARE
 •  CHARTER SCHOOLS’ TEST SCORES: THE REAL STORY
 •  CAMPAIGN ADDRESSES CONSEQUENCES OF SEXTING: L.A Unified takes on sexting with education campaign, not punishment
 •  WHY HUNDREDS OF STUDENTS DROPPED EVERYTHING TO PAY TRIBUTE TO A HAMILTON HIGH TEACHER
 •  HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources
 •  EVENTS: Coming up next week...
 •  What can YOU do?


Featured Links:
 •  Give the gift of a 4LAKids Subscription to a friend or colleague!
 •  Follow 4 LAKids on Twitter - or get instant updates via text message by texting "Follow 4LAKids" to 40404
 •  4LAKids Anthology: All the Past Issues, solved, resolved and unsolved!
 •  4LAKidsNews: a compendium of recent items of interest - news stories, scurrilous rumors, links, academic papers, rants and amusing anecdotes, etc.


“Listen Up. I’ve got nothing to say …and I’m only going to say it once!”

- attributed to Yogi Berra (1925-2015)
___________
NEWS STORY: The mayor and city council propose to spend $100 million to address homelessness in Los Angeles. | http://nyti.ms/1LDxBcc

NEWS STORY: Eli Broad and others propose to spend $490 million to convert half of LAUSD schools to charter schools. | http://bit.ly/1gVuqQ3

That’s a lot of money either way. What exactly is the Return on Investment? How does either impact us now and moving forward? Is one for the greater glory of The City of Our Lady Queen of the Angels …and the other for the greater of glory of Eli Broad+Friends?

WWPFD? What would Pope Francis do?

“Education cannot be neutral. It is either positive or negative; either it enriches or it impoverishes; either it enables a person to grow or it lessens, even corrupts him. The mission of schools is to develop a sense of truth, of what is good and beautiful. And this occurs through a rich path made up of many ingredients. This is why there are so many subjects — because development is the results of different elements that act together and stimulate intelligence, knowledge, the emotions, the body, and so on.”

“If something is true, it is good and beautiful; if it is beautiful; it is good and true; if it is good, it is true and it is beautiful. And together, these elements enable us to grow and help us to love life, even when we are not well, even in the midst of many problems. True education enables us to love life and opens us to the fullness of life.” - Pope Francis: Address with Italian school teachers, parents, educators, pupils and other workers, May 10, 2014


I AM NOT JEWISH, but my wife is. I was raised a Unitarian …and I’m not sure if even that stuck. For a while we were members of a Jewish congregation and we raised a Jewish child. On that clear September eleventh day, my sixth-grader daughter’s second day in middle school, she and I ate Apple-Cinnamon Cheerios and watched on TV and as the second plane flew into the second tower.

On Friday I watched the interfaith prayer service conducted with Pope Francis from the Ground Zero/911 site. When the cantor sang the Mourner’s Kaddish I found myself in tears. Maybe it’s the chemotherapy …but I think not.
“By the rivers of Babylon,
There we sat down,
Yea, we wept,
When we remembered Zion.”


ON FRIDAY the District announced a tentative settlement in its dispute with Apple over the Pearson content in the Common Core Technology Project (iPads for All) fiasco. L.A. UNIFIED TO GET $6.4 MILLION IN SETTLEMENT OVER IPAD SOFTWARE (follows). I am already on record about my concerns over the misbegotten CCTP and this woebegone settlement. However, IF the District was a party to alleged shady-dealing and contract-fixing (“The bidding process that led to the original contract is the subject of an FBI investigation”) then this settlement may be the best LAUSD can expect. If there was mal-or-misfeasance at Beaudry I don’t see how LAUSD has much of a leg to stand on against Apple and Pearson.


GODSPEED MR. KAPLAN (1955-2015): "People don't show up 20 and 30 years later to pay tribute to teachers who helped them do better on standardized tests. We are here because Alan Kaplan did what all great teachers do. He clarified, he inspired, he awakened; he worked in ways that are unquantifiable.”


I TOUCHED ON THIS LAST WEEK, but this week it became manifest. As charter proponents claimed otherwise the truth came out in a Board Informative from Superintendent Cortines and a data spreadsheet: CORTINES SAYS (+ THE DATA PROVES): “OUR LAUSD MAGNET SCHOOLS OUT-PERFORMED CHARTER SCHOOLS AT ALL GRADE LEVELS” http://bit.ly/1L77M5s + L.A. UNIFIED HIGHLIGHTS MAGNET SCHOOL PERFORMANCE COMPARED WITH CHARTERS | http://lat.ms/1iDd3ov + CHARTER SCHOOLS’ TEST SCORES: THE REAL STORY [following]

I think we all know by now that testing isn’t everything and that we are being data-driven to distraction. All these children in our schools - traditional, magnet or charter - are not data-points or cells-on-a-spreadsheet; they are the living/evolving future …and nothing is as anecdotal as the future when children are involved.

There is a hierarchy to information. It goes Data > Information > Knowledge.
And sometimes, when the stars shine just right (or there are that magic number of slides in the PowerPoint) > Wisdom.

Numbers under pressure can be forced to admit anything – as evidenced by charter schools claim to success – but as you read on you will see what the data proves and the information evidences: LAUSD magnet schools out-performed charter schools at all grade levels. That is the knowledge.

But “Wait!” you say. “Magnet Schools are special schools for special kids!”

All kids are special, but that argument is, politely: Balderdash. While there are magnet programs for gifted+highly-gifted kids – the majority of magnet programs and magnet schools are not for gifted students!

Magnet Schools require that parents take an extra step, fill out some extra forms, do some homework, and apply.

But that is exactly what Charter Schools require also!

When we compare magnet schools to charter schools we compare apples-to-apples; both are schools of choice that attract families who are looking for what they perceive to be a better option for their children’s education. OK, non-union apples to union apples or privatized unaccountable apples to traditional accountable apples.

LAUSD’s Magnet Schools outperform Charter Schools. At all grade levels and in almost all subgroups.

LAUSD’S MAGNET PROGRAM ROCKS!
"And if you listen very hard
The tune will come to you at last.
When all are one and one is all
To be a rock and not to roll."

Before we get too excited, let me pick on LAUSD’s data analysis a wee bit.
• When comparing High Schools, we need to consider that students are only tested in the eleventh grade. Only 25% of high school kids at any school get tested in a given year. Kids in High School get tested once in their high school career; there is no way to measure individual progress over time.
• In Elementary only second through fifth graders are tested, 2/3rds of the kids.
• In Middle School, everyone gets tested.

For this reason, a statistical anomaly is created for span schools – and schools like LACES and SOCES (grades 4-12) get really high scores. (I have two nieces at SOCES; that is why that school rocks over all!)

My point is that it would be helpful if the data were disaggregated by individual grade level …and then sliced+diced every which way from Sunday.
And some of the data – especially when crunching numbers involving Free+Reduced Meals and English Language Learners and Special Ed seems a bit suspect – things like meal programs don’t really differentiate between magnet and non-magnet students on a shared campus. And Special Ed students run the gamut from mobility and vision impaired through ADD to profoundly challenged Down Syndrome.

And, of course, charter schools – when they share data – might not compile it in the same way.

Superintendent Cortines is absolutely right. While this data shows that Magnet Programs outperform Charter Schools – we need to be applying the best-practices+lessons-learned from both to general population traditional schools. Standard-issue kids need to benefit from all the wonderfulness!

And I submit that the best way to do this is to expand LAUSD’s time-proven, successful and popular Magnet Program so that it can serve more kids in their neighborhood schools. We got kids off of the bus and the year-round calendar; now we need to get the kids off of wait-lists for magnet schools and charter schools and into attractive+effective local Magnet Programs.

And if the billionaire philanthropists want to help us they are welcome.

¡Onward/Adelante! - smf


L.A. UNIFIED TO GET $6.4 MILLION IN SETTLEMENT OVER IPAD SOFTWARE
By Howard Blume, LA Times | http://lat.ms/1YHO9VL

Sept 25, 2015 8:05PM :: The Los Angeles Unified School District has reached a tentative $6.4-million settlement over curriculum from education software giant Pearson that the school system said its teachers barely used.

The pact is the latest fallout from an aborted $1.3-billion plan to provide an iPad to every student, teacher and campus administrator in the nation’s second-largest school district.

The Board of Education is expected to vote on the settlement in October. The bidding process that led to the original contract is the subject of an FBI investigation.

Under that contract, Apple agreed to provide iPads to L.A. Unified while Pearson provided curriculum on the devices as a subcontractor. As a result, the settlement was with Apple, even though the dispute concerned the Pearson product.

Under the agreement, Apple will pay the district $4.2 million. Another computer company, Lenovo, also had charged the district for Pearson curriculum. The district won’t have to pay $2.2 million for laptops recently purchased, according to the settlement.

“That amount of money doesn’t make up for the damage to the district’s reputation or compensate for the amount of time lost by students and educators in this misbegotten project,” said Scott Folsom, a member of the independent committee that oversees school modernization and construction bonds.

The deal avoids protracted, costly legal wrangling with Apple and Pearson.

L.A. Unified bought more than 40,000 iPads with the Pearson curriculum at a cost of $768 apiece. The district used bond funds to make the purchases.

Nearly all the money from the settlement will be used to buy computers through a competitive district grant program.

“There are many schools that have not received devices, but that nonetheless have a need for instructional technology and innovative ideas for how to use it,” said Supt. Ramon C. Cortines in a memo this week to the Board of Education. “The $6.4 million in proceeds represents an exciting opportunity to invest in such schools and to promote collaboration among campuses.”

The deal with Apple, reached in June 2013, was part of a bold initiative — and an exclusive deal with the company — to use school bonds to pay for industry-leading tablets. The deal with Lenovo came later, after the district decided to include devices from other manufacturers and to slow down a technology rollout that was beset with problems.

At the time of the pact with Apple, Pearson was supposed to provide all the math and English curriculum for the school system. The contract with Apple included a three-year license for the Pearson curriculum that added about $200 to the cost of each computer.

During the first year of the license, Pearson provided only sample units of curriculum, rather than a finished product. The contract allowed for the partial curriculum.
Teachers received limited training on the devices. The district later accused Pearson of providing an underwhelming product beset by technical glitches. Consultants concluded that few teachers even used the Pearson software.

Pearson has defended the quality of its work, noting that other school systems continue to use its online courses.

The district had threatened to sue over the Apple/Pearson contract. A district spokesman on Friday praised the work of all involved in the negotiations.

Representatives of Apple and Pearson could not be reached late Friday.

L.A. Unified, which has about 1,000 schools, has provided computers for every student at about 100 campuses. At others, students are getting by with fewer devices.

To win the technology grants, schools must submit proposals showing they are ready to use computers and they also must set aside some of their own funds to pay for a portion of their plan. The school’s funds could pay for software or extra staffing, for example.

A proposal is more likely to win funding if it has the potential to yield academic gains. Schools that collaborate with others are eligible for more generous grants. The district wants to encourage elementary campuses to coordinate with middle and high schools to improve instruction.

Gregory L. McNair, a senior attorney with L.A. Unified, said one goal is to make sure schools are ready to use technology before they receive it.

Cortines first mentioned the broad outlines of the settlement at a recent public meeting of a technology task force, which was reported on by L.A. School Report.


CHARTER SCHOOLS’ TEST SCORES: THE REAL STORY
From the Associated Administrators of Los Angeles Weekly Update Week of September 28, 2015
AALA (+4LAKids) thanks Alan Warhaftig, Fairfax HS Magnet Coordinator, for providing this analysis.

Sept 24, 2015 :: On September 9, 2015, the California Charter Schools Association (CCSA) issued a press release [CCSA Press Release | http://bit.ly/1FmqAvt], comparing the performance of charter schools and traditional schools on the 2015 Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) Common Core Math and English Language Arts Assessments.

The press release begins by stating, “Charter public schools performed better than the state averages on math and English language arts while serving a diverse population of students.” The second table indicates that charter schools and traditional schools tied in the percentage of students who met or exceeded the SBAC math standard but that 46% of charter school students met or exceeded the SBAC ELA standard compared to 43% of traditional school students.


The press release claims, “Charter schools accomplish these results while continuing to serve a highly diverse student population,” and it follows with a chart that demonstrates this diversity:

The chart compares 2014-15 Charter Enrollment as a percentage to 2014-15 Traditional School Enrollment as a percentage:
• African American Students are 9% in Charters/6% in Traditional
• Latino Students are 49% in Charters/54% in Traditional.
• Asian Students are 5% in Charters/9% in Traditional.
• White Students are 30% in Charters/24% in Traditional.
• Other Students are 7% in Charters/7% in Traditional.
• English Learner Students are 17% in Charters/23% in Traditional.
• Free+Reduced Lunch are 56% in Charters/59% in Traditional.

The significance of a 46% to 43% “win” diminishes when one considers that the enrollment of traditional schools includes 6% more English learners, who presumably would be at a disadvantage on the SBAC English language arts assessment (though they were apparently not at the same disadvantage on the SBAC math assessment). In addition, the traditional schools have a slightly higher percentage of students who qualify for the federal free or reduced-price lunch program. Finally, the chart DOES NOT include the percentages of special education students—who would have difficulty with both SBAC assessments—enrolled at charter and traditional schools.

The reality is that LAUSD magnet schools out-performed charter schools at all grade levels.

In fact, in a memo to the Board of Education, Superintendent Cortines pointed out that fifteen LAUSD schools and magnet centers had 90 percent or more of their students meeting or exceeding standards in ELA, higher than any charter school.

Given this, the analysis presented in the CCSA press release is sophomoric–advocacy at the expense of rigor. Serious comparisons may only be made between schools with similar socio-economic status. For example, it might be appropriate to compare Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies (SOCES), a LAUSD magnet school, with Granada Hills Charter High School because the percentages of their students that qualify for the federal free and reduced-price lunch program are approximately the same (53% for SOCES and 52% for Granada Hills Charter). While Granada Hills Charter is, no doubt, a fine school, it comes off badly in the comparison: 58% of the students at both schools met or exceeded the SBAC math standard, but 87% of SOCES students met or exceeded the SBAC ELA standard compared to 76% of Granada Hills Charter students.

It would not, however, be appropriate to compare Granada Hills Charter with LAUSD’s Francisco Bravo Medical Magnet or Fairfax Visual Arts Magnet, 82% of whose students qualify for the federal free and reduced-price lunch program (compared to 52% at Granada Hills Charter). The comparison wouldn’t work well for CCSA, as Bravo Medical Magnet outscored Granada Hills Charter on the SBAC ELA by 87%-76% and Fairfax Visual Arts Magnet outscored Granada Hills Charter by 84%-76%. Granada Hills Charter prevailed on the SBAC Math, however, outscoring Bravo Medical Magnet by 58%-52% and Fairfax Visual Arts Magnet by 58%-38%.

In addition to matching for demographic/socioeconomic factors, it really only makes sense to compare charters with magnets, as both are schools of choice and attract families who are looking for what they perceive to be a better option for their children’s education. This might backfire for the CCSA, as close examination of the SBAC magnet and charter scores might result in a call for more LAUSD magnets, not more charters.

Please follow this link, [SBAC-Comparative | http://bit.ly/1Ve0q4O] to see a chart that shows rankings of LAUSD magnet schools, LAUSD charter schools, and high schools in neighboring districts, such as Glendale, Culver City, Pasadena, Beverly Hills, among others.


CAMPAIGN ADDRESSES CONSEQUENCES OF SEXTING: L.A Unified takes on sexting with education campaign, not punishment
By Teresa Watanabe | LA Times | http://lat.ms/1iCePpZ

Sept 22, 2015 :: Two Los Angeles high school students are hanging out when a friend arrives with gossip: Someone texted a naked picture to a classmate and it was soon forwarded "all over the place."

When one of the students expresses skepticism, another takes her friends on a journey of discovery about "sexting." Educators, an attorney and a police officer lay out the consequences of sexting – public humiliation, loss of educational and job opportunities, possible criminal violations -- and hammer home a message:

“THINK TWICE. WHAT YOU DO NOW MATTERS LATER.”

The scenario is featured in a video unveiled Tuesday as part of the Los Angeles Unified School District’s new campaign against sexting. Officials have asked principals at about 900 elementary, middle and high schools to incorporate information from its "Now Matters Later" website page, which offers the video, lesson plans, posters, bilingual tip sheets for parents and other resources. [http://bit.ly/1OZ1If6]

"What we're trying to accomplish is to educate kids today so they have a clear understanding that sexting is against the law," L.A. Unified Police Chief Steven Zipperman said at the school police headquarters Tuesday. "This program will reach out to our students, our parents, our staff and our community...and hopefully eradicate this dangerous trend."

Zipperman has said the campaign was not directly sparked by the Venice High case this year in which 15 boys were arrested on suspicion of sexual assault after a sexually explicit photo of at least one of the two suspected female victims was widely circulated on social media. Prosecutors ultimately declined to file charges against the boys, based on insufficient evidence.

But Zipperman said that sexting is "serious stuff" that students and their families should understand.

A 2012 study of more than 1,800 L.A. Unified high school students found that 15% of those with cell phone access surveyed said they had texted a sexually explicit message or photo of themselves and 54% knew someone who had. The study by researchers from USC, Clark University and elsewhere found that those who sexted were more likely to be sexually active. Non-heterosexual students were more likely to sext and have unprotected sex.

As teens' access to social media grows – 92% report going online daily and three-quarters have access to smartphones, according to a 2015 Pew Research Center report – sexting has proliferated. Across the nation, police and prosecutors have charged teens with criminal offenses and more than 20 states have enacted legislation to deal with sexting.

In the L.A. Unified video, a school police officer tells students that sexting sexually explicit photos of those under 18 – even themselves – is considered child pornography. City Atty. Mike Feuer also appears in the video, saying that sending, forwarding or possessing child pornography could result in a criminal record and lifelong registration as a sex offender.

But Zipperman said school police have handled only a "handful" of cases so far.
Deputy City Atty. Tracy Webb, who speaks about cyber safety to as many as 20 schools a month, said the vast majority of students she encounters say they sext to "goof around" or as part of a romantic relationship, often involving breakups. She said Los Angeles prosecutors generally try to handle cases with education.

"We can't arrest and we can't prosecute our way out of this problem," Webb said.

Mileidy Maldonado and Alexandra Hernandez, high school students at the Roybal Learning Complex, said sexting wasn't that widespread - but both knew girls who had been victimized by it. In one case two year ago, Alexandra said, a boy texted nude photos of his then 15-year-old girlfriend that went viral, following the victim from one school to another until she finally had to be home-schooled.

"She was bullied and called names," Alexandra said. "It was horrible."

Holly Priebe-Sotelo, the district's intervention coordinator, said educators will be asked to incorporate the new materials into the current required lessons on bullying and sexual harassment. Lessons in cybersafety will be offered to younger children, with middle school students taught about safe online chatting. More explicit material on sexting will be presented to high school students.

Bilingual materials for parents, such as cybersafety tips and suggested questions to start conversations about the topic, are also available on the website.

Much of the material was provided by Common Sense Education, a nonprofit focused on media and technology, and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.


"NOW MATTERS LATER" website page



WHY HUNDREDS OF STUDENTS DROPPED EVERYTHING TO PAY TRIBUTE TO A HAMILTON HIGH TEACHER
by Steve Lopez, Los Angeles Times | http://t.co/Y0n4UJ05Na

27 Sept 2015 :: One week ago, very early Sunday morning, Harvard University graduate student Jimmy Biblarz boarded a plane and flew from Boston to Los Angeles to attend a memorial service.

He knew he would have to fly back to Boston later that evening, which made for a grueling day, but Biblarz never had a second thought about making the trip.

The provocative, maddening, abrasive, endearing, passionate, controversial Hamilton High School teacher who tormented, challenged and ultimately inspired him, had died. So Biblarz and hundreds of other students who got the same treatment from history and philosophy teacher Alan Kaplan crowded into the un-air-conditioned school auditorium on a blistering afternoon to pay their respects.

"Each of us spends our time on this Earth trying to ensure we are remembered in death. Mr. Kaplan, you won," Biblarz said in his eulogy. "You produced hundreds of activists, organizers, scholars, therapists, teachers and thinkers. Your effects are exponential."

I never met Kaplan, 60, who became ill this summer and died Aug. 29. But from everything I've heard about him and his work in Hamilton's humanities magnet, I wish I had a teacher like him when I was in school.

"People don't show up 20 and 30 years later to pay tribute to teachers who helped them do better on standardized tests," fellow Hamilton High teacher Barry Smolin said at the service, a tape of which was made available to me. "We are here because Alan Kaplan did what all great teachers do. He clarified, he inspired, he awakened, he worked in ways that are unquantifiable."

As I watched the tributes, I was reminded that from Los Angeles to New York, we have endured years of bare-knuckle battles but reached no consensus on how to improve public schools. Public education is shamefully underfunded, some say, while others insist money is not the answer. You can find equally rabid supporters and critics of charter schools, and the new Common Core curriculum is either a breakthrough or a curse.

But wherever you stand on any of that, we can all go to school on how a teacher managed to touch so many lives in such profound ways, loyal to both his convictions and his students even as his stubborn independence drew critics and even landed him in trouble at times.

Some students were intimidated by Kaplan. Some administrators and fellow teachers found him irritating.

He flat-out refused to teach Advanced Placement history, arguing that the curriculum was a memorization drill that allowed for neither true teaching nor learning.
I'm not as brave as my father, who died in misery
His text was a manifesto — Howard Zinn's "A People's History of the United States," a fist to the face of robber barons and exploitative institutions.

And some black parents thought he was out of line with his provocations on race, so much so that they wanted something done about it.

And yet when Kaplan passed away, more than 500 students — from classes dating back to at least 1999 — dropped what they were doing. They came from near and far to pay tribute in the auditorium of the school where Kaplan implored them not to believe everything they thought they knew about one another, the world or themselves.

"I knew he was a force to be reckoned with," said Camila Lacques-Zapien, whose older brother warned her there was no sliding and no hiding in Mr. Kaplan's classroom. The guy was dead serious.

But even that didn't prepare her. Kaplan confronted and cajoled. He knocked students off-balance, forcing them to find some truth to hold onto. He called on students randomly and put them on the spot, all the while holding forth, part preacher and part performer, on race, class, power and justice.

"It's hard to articulate," said Lacques-Zapien, a UCLA graduate, "but there was a sense of purpose and high stakes in his class because there was no B.S.… You better show up and be honest and be yourself or you might get called out. He will recognize you and you will be seen."

Lacques-Zapien set up a tribute page on Facebook and it drew hundreds of mournful comments and fond reminiscences from former students, some of whom became teachers because of him.

He had been their confidant, their rabbi, their therapist. He taught critical thinking. He demanded conceptual clarity. You needed a seat belt in his class because he might jerk you from the American Revolution to President Obama to Vietnam and back again.

"You were and still are my hero."

"I live my life according to, 'What would Kaplan say.'"

"A man that intimidated me so much … also pushed me to be better than I expected."

The comments were from students of all colors, which is worth noting because in 1999, administrators and the media investigated claims by some black parents that Kaplan was a racist. They said he degraded black students by asking why no one sympathized with the slave masters.

The L.A. Weekly assigned a young African American reporter to check out this menace to public education, and she found an entirely different man than the one described by critics.

"Alan was teaching in his own way, very in your face, challenging everybody — black and white," says the reporter.

She understood the concerns among parents, because Kaplan was blunt about race. He would tell students, for instance, that statistically speaking, "All you black kids are going to do worse than white kids."

But the reporter, who went by the name Erin Aubry at the time, reported the story deeply enough to understand what Kaplan, a Jewish kid from the San Fernando Valley, was doing.

He was challenging students of all colors to be honest and open about race and about history itself. He had been shocked into a permanent state of moral outrage by the inequalities he witnessed in his first job at a middle school in a poor neighborhood, Kaplan said, and he taught with urgency and conviction.

That reporter not only understood Kaplan, she married him, and Erin Aubry Kaplan was with her husband to the end. In an essay after his death, she wrote that while they knew love across the color line, "race was always present," and getting along sometimes meant negotiating with history.

Back when he was a student in Mr. Kaplan's class, Biblarz was negotiating with his own identity.

"I was a kid trapped in the closet in high school," Biblarz said in his eulogy. He recalled that when California's proposition to ban same-sex marriage was in the news, Kaplan talked about how he had nervously visited a gay bar, only to be welcomed and made comfortable.

"He told us that experience made him check his own homophobia and that the more seemingly uncomfortable situations we put ourselves in, of being the minority, the more empathy and understanding we would gain," Biblarz said. "Nothing could have made me feel better or more loved."

If there is one last lesson from Mr. Kaplan, for all of us, it's that in the end, the type of school doesn't matter, the curriculum is but a guide and students are hungry to learn.

It's the teaching that makes the difference and there is no higher order of business than to recruit and nurture talented and passionate instructors, give them the freedom to challenge themselves and their students, and let creativity and imagination run wild.


HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources
A PARENTS GUIDE TO AP CLASSES
http://lat.ms/1Jx1IMc

THE L.A. PLAN TO CRUSH PUBLIC EDUCATION
http://bit.ly/1iz99wS

Cortines says (+ the data proves): “OUR LAUSD MAGNET SCHOOLS OUT-PERFORMED CHARTER SCHOOLS AT ALL GRADE LEVELS”
http://bit.ly/1L77M5s

L.A. UNIFIED’S BULLYING TACTICS WOUND ABUSE VICTIMS AGAIN
http://bit.ly/1NRKOjj

Updated: $490-MILLION PLAN WOULD PUT HALF OF LAUSD STUDENTS IN CHARTER SCHOOLS
http://bit.ly/1PpAP1O

X minus 10: FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN WATCH
http://bit.ly/1NI9xEW

SEATTLE TEACHERS APPROVE NEW CONTRACT
http://bit.ly/1OMkMgC

"THE GREAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS NOW INITIATIVE" sounds like something embroidered on Donald Trump's hat!
http://bit.ly/1FbM1z5

From the folks who brought you Deasy, iPads+FBI hauling off boxes of files: THE GREAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS NOW INITIATIVE
http://bit.ly/1FbM1z5

NY Times/Page One: A FIRING AT THE LOS ANGELES TIMES FOCUSES DISCONTENT
http://bit.ly/1L1pzLj

The Great Public Schools Now Initiative: WE WANT ½ OF LAUSD STUDENTS IN CHARTERS IN 8 YRS REPORT SAYS + full report
http://bit.ly/1FbM1z5


EVENTS: Coming up next week...
Nothing scheduled this week

Upcoming Events:

CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND EDUCATIONAL EQUITY COMMITTEE MEETING – Tues. October 6, 2015 - 10:00 a.m.
EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND PARENT ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE - Tues. October 6, 2015- 2:00 p.m.
REGULAR BOARD MEETING - Tues. October 6, 2015 - Williams Valenzuela Textbook Sufficiency - 4:00 p.m.
REGULAR BOARD MEETING - Tues. October 13, 2015 - 10:00 a.m. - Including Closed Session Items


*Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________
• SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
http://www.laschools.org/bond/
Phone: 213-241-5183
____________________________________________________
• LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
Phone: 213-241.8700


• LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION & COMMITTEES MEETING CALENDAR



What can YOU do?
• E-mail, call or write your school board member:
Scott.Schmerelson@lausd.net • 213-241-8333
Monica.Garcia@lausd.net • 213-241-6180
Ref.Rodriguez@lausd.net • 213-241-5555
George.McKenna@lausd.net • 213-241-6382
Monica.Ratliff@lausd.net • 213-241-6388
Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net • 213-241-6385
Steve.Zimmer@lausd.net • 213-241-6387
...or your city councilperson, mayor, county supervisor, state legislator, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think! • Find your state legislator based on your home address. Just go to: http://bit.ly/dqFdq2 • There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org • 213.978.0600
• Call or e-mail Governor Brown: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
• Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
• Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
• Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
• If you are eligible to become a citizen, BECOME ONE.
• If you a a citizen, REGISTER TO VOTE at http://registertovote.ca.gov/
• If you are registered, VOTE LIKE THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT. THEY DO!


Who are your elected federal & state representatives? How do you contact them?




Scott Folsom is a parent leader in LAUSD and was Parent/Volunteer of the Year for 2010-11 for Los Angeles County. • He is Past President of Los Angeles Tenth District PTSA and has represented PTA on the LAUSD Construction Bond Citizen's Oversight Committee for over 12 years. He is Vice President for Health, Legislation Action Committee member and a member of the Board of Directors of the California State PTA. He serves on numerous school district advisory and policy committees and has served as a PTA officer and governance council member at three LAUSD schools. He is the recipient of the UTLA/AFT "WHO" Gold Award and the ACSA Regional Ferd Kiesel Memorial Distinguished Service Award - honors he hopes to someday deserve. • In this forum his opinions are his own and your opinions and feedback are invited. Quoted and/or cited content copyright © the original author and/or publisher. All other material copyright © 4LAKids.
• FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 4LAKids makes such material available in an effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to parents, teachers, students and community members in a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
• To SUBSCRIBE e-mail: 4LAKids-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com - or -TO ADD YOUR OR ANOTHER'S NAME TO THE 4LAKids SUBSCRIPTION LIST E-mail smfolsom@aol.com with "SUBSCRIBE" AS THE SUBJECT. Thank you.


Sunday, July 12, 2015

El canto de los grillos



4LAKids: Sunday 11•July•2015
In This Issue:
 •  LAUSD MiSiS PROBLEMS PERSIST, some graduating seniors caught in transcript hell
 •  Rafe Equith+’Teacher Jail’: HAS LAUSD’s APPROACH TO TEACHER DISCIPLINE GONE TO FAR?
 •  Friedrichs v. CTA: CALIFORNIA TEACHERS’ UNION CASE MOVES TO U.S. SUPREME COURT
 •  Vivian Ekchian: NEW LOCAL DISTRICT NORTHWEST SUPERINTENDENT PLANS APPRENTICESHIPS, COLLEGE PREP COURSES AT LAUSD
 •  HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources
 •  EVENTS: Coming up next week...
 •  What can YOU do?


Featured Links:
 •  Give the gift of a 4LAKids Subscription to a friend or colleague!
 •  Follow 4 LAKids on Twitter - or get instant updates via text message by texting "Follow 4LAKids" to 40404
 •  4LAKids Anthology: All the Past Issues, solved, resolved and unsolved!
 •  4LAKidsNews: a compendium of recent items of interest - news stories, scurrilous rumors, links, academic papers, rants and amusing anecdotes, etc.
Political satirist/cartoonist Lalo Alcaraz created Votería! – a cartoon panel based on the popular Mexican "Lotería" or Lottery, a bingo type game which uses tickets with pictograms of iconic Mexican images – to satirize norteamercano politics in 2004.| http://bit.ly/1Jb7rrH

Americans mistake satire (Daily Show/Last Week Tonight/Colbert Report) for the news. The difference between Truth and Reality is elusive – especially if you are a political consultant and/or targeted communications director chasing after ‘el soft money’.

Votería!, ladies+gentlemen/boys+girls, was a panel in a cartoon: A joke. Lest we lose track of this: Alacaraz is a satirist and satire is not reality! (But neither is Reality Television …but don’t tell Donald Trump or any of the 12-15% of marginally-erroneous Republican poll-takers who seem to agree with him.)

This year, in a moment much like opening a Monty Python Pet Shop or forming a Spinal Tap Tribute Band, actual political activists with an actual agenda of actually increasing voter turnout in the Hispanic community [http://svrep.org] actually ran VOTERÍA! in the LAUSD School Board Election in District 5 and announced a $25,000 prize to be awarded to a randomly selected voter who turned up and voted! [http://bit.ly/1dSt336]

The voter turnout was abysmal across the city, with the percentage turnout in District 5 (with Votería) about ½ percent LESS than District 3 (without Votería).

Nevertheless, shortly after the election Votería! sponsors Southwest Voter Registration Education Project breathlessly (two exclamation points) announced on their website voter participation had increased [HALT IN DECLINING PARTICIPATION IN LAUSD DIST 5!! - http://bit.ly/1HlIedK] – using a graph that tracks visitors to their website to prove their dubious claim.

"We know this because, for example, unique visits to votería.com doubled during Election week and tripled on Election Day. And we have lots of anecdotal stories about people young and old asking about Votería at polling places." Website visits and anecdotal stories!

And SVREP announced they had selected a $25,000 winner. Their website said: “Breaking News: Votería Drawing has Picked a $25,000 Winner - Details to Follow” [http://bit.ly/1fy3iqK].

Their website still says that. The Election was Tuesday May 19th, 8 weeks ago. No details have followed. The sound you hear is crickets. Los grillos.

Who won the Votería! prize money? ¡Muéstranos el ganador!


BACK WHEN I WAS IN SCHOOL schools and school districts raised their own money, accessed their own taxes, set their curriculum and budgeted accordingly. We didn’t call it that, but it was local control. Sure there was state support, but it was support, not command+control. California at that time collectively had the best public schools in the nation. We didn’t spend the most money or the have highest paid teachers and we didn’t have the highest test scores – but we were the gold standard.

The Wilson brothers+cousins went to Hawthorne High. We wish they all could be California Schools.

Then in 1978 a big errant asteroid crashed into the Yucatan and wiped out the dinosaurs. We called it Proposition 13.

Because of Prop 13 the purse strings for public education moved up to Sacramento from where they used to be at the school board and county tax collector’s office. And in that same Capitol building the legislators …seeing as how they’re writing the checks anyway - began to run school districts, legislatively. Sometimes with a little help from their friends in the lobbies – or pouring the drinks at Frank Fats.

Four-days-a-week the poor legislator is away from hearth+home and the scrutiny of his/her constituents. Accountability shifts and transparency clouds when the guy who is buying you dinner and contributing to your reelection needs help with a textbook deal or an intro to someone who knows someone down at the pension plan. That guy over there’s from the teacher’s union …and who knows more about schools than the 325K teachers he represents? And this guy’s minister from the big megachurch down by the mall really isn’t comfortable having teachers teach what kids should have learned at home. Plus we all know kids learn that stuff on the playground. Or work out the mysteries without any clues.

So we have 120 state legislators and 1 governor dabbling in the running of over 1000 school districts and we are shocked that it isn’t a smooth running machine producing perfect outcomes. I found a listing in the UCLA Library for the 1978 (pre Prop 13) edition of the California Ed Code [http://bit.ly/1HlRSgs]; it’s 28 pages long. The current 2015 Ed Code is 2524 pages. http://tmsnrt.rs/1HveE4K

They have been busy up there in Sacramento.

There is a great tendency among the special interests and the especially interested to go around the legislature, either directly – though the Initiative+Referendum Process – (like Prop 98 – which sets a minimum level for school funding [The legislature and the governor must live in the apartment below, they consider that floor a ceiling]) and most recently: The Courts. i.e.: Vergara v. California …and (in this edition of 4LAKids) Friedrichs v. CTA.

• Initiatives are very expensive, labor intensive and time consuming.
• The courts are less expensive, less labor intensive and just as time consuming.
• Initiatives are democratic. Complete with mass mailers and TV ads.
• The courts are anti-democratic in that they only require that your attorney convince a probably unelected judge that you are right in such a way that a couple of panels of probably unelected appeals court judges will agree. Or not agree if the first judge turns out to be disagreeable – it’s only the last verdict that matters!
• Vergara is one judges' opinion. One judge. Judge Rolf M. Treu was first appointed to the West Covina Municipal Court in 1995 by Governor Pete Wilson. He became a judge of the superior court after the state's superior+municipal courts were unified. In 2014 Treu ran for re-election. As an unopposed incumbent, he was automatically re-elected without appearing on the ballot.
• In Friedrichs v. CTA they shopped the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court – where they are asking that court to reverse a supposedly final decision from 1977.

While there they should review Prop 13!


MEANWHILE THE US SENATE & HOUSE OF REPS do battle over the poor desiccated corpse of NCLB. Take it down, fold it up and send it to the Confederate Soldiers Museum already.

¡Onward/Adelante! - smf


LAUSD MiSiS PROBLEMS PERSIST, some graduating seniors caught in transcript hell
Mary Plummer | KPCC 89.3 | http://bit.ly/1JUAXHT

July 9, 5:30 AM :: Problems with Los Angeles Unified’s student data tracking system known as MiSiS continue to haunt the district and the latest issue is plaguing graduating seniors.

The $133 million MiSiS system is still coughing out transcripts that inaccurately report whether students have met their graduation requirements, according to officials familiar with the district's recent problems.

UTLA Secondary Vice President Colleen Schwab said up to 7,500 students may be affected.

"I understand that they have been working diligently day in and day out to try and fix the problem, but the result is that kids culminated [graduated] that may or may not really have qualified," she said.

Schwab said she spoke with counselors who report that they are being unfairly blamed for signing off on graduating students who hadn’t met the requirements needed to graduate.

Jefferson High School and Hamilton High School are among the schools whose students are affected by transcript problems. Other schools may also be impacted.

LAUSD acknowledged the latest problems with MiSiS, but declined to comment on the number of students affected or the scope of the issues.

In a written statement issued to KPCC on Tuesday, Superintendent Ramon Cortines said the district was taking steps to solve the problems:

“The District’s My Integrated Student Information System (MiSiS) recently identified reporting issues with graduation requirements for students in the Class of 2015.

“Local district superintendents, along with their secondary principals, assistant principals, counselors and central office staff, have been working hard to address these issues. Through this collaboration, the number of student records with discrepancies has been greatly reduced.

“In addition, the District has implemented a multi-step strategy going forward:

1. Principals and school site staff continue to verify all information in each student’s individual file. Central office staff is validating this information, as well.

2. Each local district has developed a plan to monitor students from 9th to 12th grades. Each local district will institute a process with checks and balances that work for their students.

3. Each local district has put a plan together – using MiSiS – to go back into all records for current high school students to verify that the existing information is accurate.

4. Each local district has developed a plan to ensure our incoming class of seniors (2015-16) will meet graduation requirements.

“All local district plans will require a mid-year report and a timeline for reaching specific goals and milestones.

“I am confident the District has the proper tools in place to ensure accurate record-keeping going forward.

“Graduates who have questions may call: 213.241.7510.”

A spokeswoman for the Cal State University system said officials there know of no recent problems related to transcripts from incoming LAUSD students or applicants. In October, Cortines sent a letter to various university leaders apologizing for data problems related to GPA, transcript errors and class rank. Cal State LA and Cal State University Northridge were among those that received the letter.

The district initially spent $29 million for the student data tracking system, which was designed to replace an earlier system that proved unsatisfactory. Since then it has spent an additional $100 million on the system, including expenditures meant to fix issues from a year ago.

Major problems with MiSiS emerged as soon as it rolled out last summer. Students' class schedules were fraught with issues; the system failed to record grades or attendance. About 600 students at Jefferson High ended up spending their days in the auditorium because the school lacked academic classes for them.

In August, frustrated Jefferson High students walked out of the school in protest. Two months later, Alameda Superior Court Judge George Hernandez ruled the loss in class time caused by the scheduling problems was so egregious that the rights of the Jefferson students were being violated.

He ordered school officials to immediately fix the problems. The district brought in more teachers, expanded the school day to provide more class time, and hired retired educators to help address inaccuracies in student transcripts.

The problems with MiSiS, along with the district's problem-plagued iPad program, contributed to the resignation of former Superintendent John Deasy in October. A month later, a consultant group hired to review the MiSiS problems said in a report that top district administrators ignored warnings the data system was not ready for launch.

In February of this year, Jefferson High school officials reported repairs to MiSiS were taking hold and class scheduling problems were being resolved.

But the district’s logs for known issues with MiSiS show 355 problems as of Wednesday, including pending problems with student transcripts.

In December, Cortines defended the MiSiS system. “With these improvements, I am confident that MiSiS will prove to be a landmark achievement for LAUSD," he told board members by email. Earlier that same month, the superintendent estimated it would take another year to resolve problems with the data system.


Rafe Equith+’Teacher Jail’: HAS LAUSD’s APPROACH TO TEACHER DISCIPLINE GONE TO FAR?
By Howard Blume | L.A. Times | http://lat.ms/1dSnQbJ

11July2015 :: In the wake of the Miramonte child abuse scandal, the Los Angeles school district took unprecedented steps to better protect students: Hundreds of teachers were removed from classrooms, an investigative team took over probes from principals and officials lobbied for state laws to make it easier to fire instructors.

School officials scoured personnel records and reported far more cases of potential misconduct to law enforcement authorities and the state teachers credentialing agency.

But the removal of a renowned educator from his classroom in April has raised questions about whether the new approach to teacher discipline has gone too far. It also overshadowed recent efforts to treat accused instructors more humanely.

Supporters of fifth-grade teacher Rafe Esquith say the investigation has been unreasonably secretive and more of a fishing expedition than a focused probe.

L.A. Unified School District officials, however, defend their efforts in this case and others, saying these investigations can take time and that Esquith's suspension from school was appropriate, regardless of the outcome. The officials said the inquiry began after Esquith made a reference to nudity in class.

School board president Steve Zimmer, a teachers union ally, said he couldn't comment on the ongoing Esquith case but did say that the district has worked to find the best approach to investigations and, along the way, had to err on the side of caution.

"I'm proud of the fact that we're doing a better job of protecting students, but I'm not proud that the rights of employees suffered in that pendulum swing," Zimmer said last week. "This is tough stuff and now we're attempting to rebalance post-Miramonte."

In January 2012, Miramonte third-grade teacher Mark Berndt was arrested on suspicion of lewd acts with dozens of children. He was sentenced to 25 years in prison. The district paid out record settlements — nearly $170 million — to alleged victims and their families.

Shortly after the arrest, then-Supt. John Deasy instituted changes in the handling of misconduct allegations. He removed the staff at Miramonte for the remainder of the school year and launched the comprehensive review of employee files. That survey uncovered a small number of employees who, like Berndt, had escaped close scrutiny despite warning signs or earlier allegations of abuse.

Meanwhile, teachers complained that the district had become overzealous, or worse. Some administrators, they said, were using any allegation to get rid of instructors they disliked. Minor infractions, they said, suddenly became grounds for dismissal and unproven allegations were enough to keep a teacher from ever returning to work.

This is tough stuff and now we're attempting to rebalance post-Miramonte. - Steve Zimmer, L.A. Unified school board

"It's been an ongoing concern that often the people who have been caught up in these investigations are people who we think are being targeted for something other than what is stated, if anything is stated, such as union activity or teacher-performance issues," said Alex Caputo-Pearl, president of United Teachers Los Angeles.

Many teachers under a cloud were fired or pressured to retire. Of the 359 who were suspended after Berndt's arrest, many remained in limbo for months or longer — including some who were cleared of wrongdoing or disciplined for minor violations of district rules.

Employees who were removed from their schools typically reported to district administrative offices where they waited out the school day, which they referred to as teacher jail. Most continued to be paid.

"The most important thing is not the length of the investigation, but that we get it right," said Gregory L. McNair, a senior attorney with L.A. Unified.

The district wasn't prepared for the post-Miramonte deluge, officials said.

After Berndt's arrest, the number of employees pulled from classrooms soared; more than a third of the allegations involved sexual abuse or harassment.

On the day of Berndt's arrest, 161 teachers and other staff had been removed. By June 2012, that number was 284. Nearly a year later, it was 322.

L.A. Unified had long relied on principals to conduct internal inquiries, but officials concluded that these administrators frequently lacked the time and expertise.

As a result, the district last year assembled an 11-member Student Safety Investigation Team, at a cost of $1.8 million annually.

The team has opened 219 investigations, including Esquith's case, and completed 180, according to the district. Of those, 30 resulted in dismissal proceedings, 34 returned to work without discipline and five employees resigned; the unit didn't track the resolutions of many of the cases.

●●smf: Excuse my math, but of 180 completed investigations, 30 resulted in dismissal proceedings, 34 returned to work and 5 employees resigned? That accounts for 69. What happened to the other 111?

The number of employees removed from classrooms — or "housed," as the district calls it — has dropped to 174.

Union leaders, however, said the district hasn't followed its own policies on disclosing information to accused teachers and closing cases quickly.

Under the teachers contract approved in April, the union and district will meet monthly for a status report on suspended employees. There also are firmer timelines for conducting investigations and providing information.

"We're encouraged there is the potential to move to a better system that protects student safety, but also honors due process and classroom stability," Caputo-Pearl said.

The district already had reconsidered some practices. A year ago, teachers were allowed to wait out their suspensions at home. And more teachers were permitted to continue teaching while an inquiry proceeded, provided that student safety was not an issue.

In Esquith's case, the district initially looked into a joke he had told about nudity — a reference to a passage in "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn." Investigators then turned to his nonprofit foundation, which pays for an annual play, field trips and tutoring. Later, they learned about an abuse allegation from 40 years earlier, which became part of the inquiry.

Esquith has defended the joke as a literary reference that his students at Hobart Boulevard Elementary were knowledgeable enough to understand. Through his attorneys, he denied any wrongdoing related to other topics of the inquiry that have come to light.

Esquith attorney Ben Meiselas said his team is considering a class-action suit against L.A. Unified over the treatment of teachers because, "what's happened to Rafe is completely consistent with dozens of calls and emails we get from teachers every day — all with horror stories that are eerily similar."


Friedrichs v. CTA: CALIFORNIA TEACHERS’ UNION CASE MOVES TO U.S. SUPREME COURT
From the Associated Administrators of Los Angeles Weekly Update of July 13 | http://bit.ly/1Cxok2s

9 July 2015: : Over the written objection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association (CTA) case sometime during its next session which begins in October 2015. In this case, ten public school teachers from different districts around the state (not LAUSD) are challenging a 1977 decision (Abood v. Detroit Board of Education) that permits public-sector unions to compel those employees who do not wish to join to pay what is commonly known as an agency or fair share fee. The plaintiffs in the case say that requiring them to pay dues and join the union or pay the agency fee is a violation of their right to free speech. They also object to having to go through the opt-out process every year. CTA says that the fees cover the administrative costs of collective bargaining that benefits all teachers, such as salary increases and working conditions, and eliminating those fees would be a significant loss of revenue. Harvard Law School professor Benjamin Sachs says that the Supreme Court decision, “…may well be life or death for the unions.”

If the court rules against the union, public employees would neither have to pay dues nor the agency fee, but still benefit from the union-negotiated contracts. Since unions are required to represent everyone, the loss of the fees collected from those who are considered nonmembers would be significant, but more importantly, it would open the floodgates for many others to decide not to be members. Unions generally see the case as an attempt by conservatives to weaken public-sector unions and have reacted with alarm and anger to the decision by the Court to hear the case. The leaders of the NEA, AFT, CTA, SEIU and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, who, combined represent more than 8 million California employees, issued a joint statement critical of the decision and promise a fight when the case is being heard in the fall.

Former Assembly Speaker John Perez was quoted in the Los Angeles Times (follows) saying, “This is part of an ongoing, concerted effort to undermine the existence of unions and weaken them.”
______________

▲LABOR FEARS SETBACK AS SUPREME COURT HEARS CASE ON UNION DUES, FEES
By Michael Finnegan | L.A. Times | http://lat.ms/1HmU3Tb

30 June 2015 :: The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear a California challenge to the financing of public-sector unions sent fear through organized labor Tuesday, with the threat that the justices could blunt one of the state's most powerful political forces.

If Orange County teacher Rebecca Friedrichs wins her case against the California Teachers Assn., it could prompt an exodus of members and lead thousands of the state's public workers to stop paying union dues or fees.

Labor leaders and their allies said dwindling membership rolls — and shrinking treasuries — would undercut unions' strength in collective bargaining.

"This is part of an ongoing, concerted effort to undermine the existence of unions and weaken them," said former state Assembly Speaker John Pérez, a longtime labor leader who argued that labor is crucial to fight growing income inequality.

Unions in California give millions of dollars in campaign contributions to Democrats who dominate both houses of the Legislature and hold every statewide elective office.

Their influence is unrivaled in healthcare, education and other policy areas. No voice is louder on protecting retirement benefits for the government workforce.
"The public employee unions make the robber barons and the railroad barons of 100 years ago look like small potatoes," said Republican campaign consultant Kevin Spillane.

Under state law, government workers covered by collective bargaining agreements are not required to join a union and pay dues. But they must pay a fee — a bit less than dues — to cover the union's cost of representing their interests, for example in negotiating higher wages.

If the court rules against the teachers union, public employees could pay neither the fee nor the dues, but still benefit from union-negotiated contracts.

"It would bankrupt the union," said Scott Mandel, a Pacoima Middle School teacher and representative of United Teachers Los Angeles in the eastern San Fernando Valley.

Mandel, who does not speak officially for the union, said atrophy of the membership rolls would pose a serious threat if unions lose the case.

"We wouldn't have the resources to protect our teachers," he said.

For unions, the immediate challenge would be to persuade the public employees they represent that it serves their interests to be dues-paying members, a potentially tough task with workers struggling to pay monthly bills.

Lou Paulson, president of the 30,000-member California Professional Firefighters, raised the specter of divided workplaces, with those paying their share of union costs looking upon those who pay nothing as freeloaders.

He used the scenario of 10 people dining together every night, with eight of them required to pick up the tab for the two who refuse to pay for meals.

"That's going to create problems," he said. "That's just human nature."

Of 169,765 California state government workers represented by unions in December, 47,805, or 28%, were paying what the unions call "fair share" fees rather than full-scale member dues, according to the state controller's office.

For many of those who opt to pay fees instead of joining a union, it's a means of avoiding putting personal money into political causes they don't support, such as labor's campaign donations to Democrats.

Republican leaders and business groups have put multiple ballot measures before California voters in recent years to curb union spending on politics, but voters in the heavily Democratic state have rejected them.

A longtime supporter of such measures is Larry Sand, a retired Los Angeles teacher who declined to join UTLA and paid the fees instead.

"We get to have choices in everything else we do in life — the restaurants where we eat, the clothes we buy, the cars we drive," said Sand, now president of the California Teachers Empowerment Network, a group that opposes teachers unions. "Why not union participation?"

Sand hopes the court case will diminish teachers unions' clout in Sacramento.

"Without teachers paying," he said, "they just won't have enough money to force their work rules down everyone's throat."

______________


Also see: TO DO OR NOT TO DO AWAY WITH MANDATORY UNION DUES By Lauren Foreman | The Bakersfield Californian



Vivian Ekchian: NEW LOCAL DISTRICT NORTHWEST SUPERINTENDENT PLANS APPRENTICESHIPS, COLLEGE PREP COURSES AT LAUSD
By Thomas Himes, Los Angeles Daily News | http://bit.ly/1HgcPJL

Posted: 07/08/15, 6:59 PM PDT | The new local superintendent in charge of schools in the northwest San Fernando Valley plans to create an apprenticeship program that will help Los Angeles Unified students land jobs in skilled trades when they graduate.

Before taking charge of 127 schools from North Hollywood to Chatsworth, Local Superintendent Vivian Ekchian had already started laying the groundwork in her previous position heading up contract negotiations with the district’s labor unions.

The deal she struck with the school district’s building and construction trade union provides for a partnership to train and employ students. Ekchian said the initiative will be rolled out to high schools in the northwest San Fernando Valley this year.

“I would like our students to have access to an apprentice program so they can come back and work for this district or any other place,” Ekchian said.

New superintendent for LAUSD San Fernando Valley Vivian Ekchian at Daniel Pearl Magnet School in Van Nuys on Wednesday, July 8 2015. (Photo by David Crane/Los Angeles Daily News) >>

Students are rarely offered training in skilled trades, because LAUSD began eliminating vocational classes in the 1980s.

In all of Los Angeles Unified and charter schools in its territory, only 31 campuses offered classes in auto repair and building trades, according to the most recently available state records for the 2013-14 school year.

Ekchian said the program’s details will be worked out with principals after they return from summer break July 23.

“I have meetings set up to discuss which high schools would like to dive in immediately and which ones would plan accordingly,” Ekchian said.

Ekchian started her new position July 1, which was 30 years after she began working for LAUSD as a teacher at Union Avenue Elementary in the city’s Pico Union neighborhood.

In subsequent years, she served as director of instruction to San Fernando Valley schools and the district’s chief human resource officer.

Ekchian’s current job and district were created by Superintendent Ramon Cortines, who re-drew the boundaries of local districts as part of a reorganization earlier this year. Cortines has said one of his top priorities is to give more control to local districts and the superintendents who run them.

Ekchian has her work cut out for her, as LAUSD prepares for the first time to require students pass college prep courses needed to attend state universities before they can graduate high school.

More than half of LAUSD’s incoming seniors, 15,099 students, will need to make up courses if they are to graduate under the new rule.

Ekchian said students will need a coordinated effort by educators and parents. To that end, educators will need to very carefully plot course schedules. Workshops will also be held to inform parents about the requirements.

Additionally, students who are falling behind in classes will need early interventions to ensure they pass.

“That’s really important, not just being placed in a class, but successfully completing it,” Ekchian said.


People interested in learning more about Ekchian’s vision, the northwest district and its schools CLICK HERE



HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest (but not necessarily the best) of the Stories from Other Sources
Quote o' th' Week: "There was absolutely no reason to host our largest fundraiser at a Trump facility after Donald Trump shared negative immigration comments,” said Alvaro Cortés, who heads LAUSD's Beyond the Bell Program.
_______

“… this week is the closest Congress has come to rewriting the federal rules of education in more than thirteen years. The changes in the legislation could have a profound effect on every school in the country. Stay tuned.”
- Hechinger Report :: http://bit.ly/1K2hims

WHY LAUSD WANTS EXEMPTION FROM LOW-BIDDER LAW FOR $2 BILLION IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
http://bit.ly/1Sh5sXC

CSBA, Bay Area school trustees urge Legislature: REPEAL CAP ON RESERVES
http://bayareane.ws/1JYTQcD

Rafe Equith+’Teacher Jail’: HAS LAUSD’s APPROACH TO TEACHER DISCIPLINE GONE TO FAR? http://bit.ly/1GeufV6

WETZEL’S PRETZELS, RICK CARUSO DONATE $7,500 TO COVER LAUSD DEPOSIT AT TRUMP CLUB

CORTINES SAVES SOME LIBRARY AIDE JOBS, TRYING TO SAVE MORE
http://bit.ly/1eNI4UJ

LAUSD MiSiS PROBLEMS PERSIST, some graduating seniors caught in transcript hell
http://bit.ly/1eNHTIW

HOUSE THREADS NCLB NEEDLE – Leaders eke out passage of education bill
http://bit.ly/1JSQh7K

L.A. UNIFIED TAKES ON SEXTING WITH EDUCATION CAMPAIGN, NOT PUNISHMENT

Vivian Ekchian: NEW LOCAL DISTRICT NORTHWEST SUPERINTENDENT PLANS APPRENTICESHIPS, COLLEGE PREP COURSES AT LAUSD
http://bit.ly/1D48Oq0

TO DO OR NOT TO DO AWAY WITH MANDATORY UNION DUES
http://bit.ly/1RmY8OW

Editorial: MUST THE COURTS IMPROVE CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS? + smf’s 2¢ http://bit.ly/1NPxR5F

L.A. UNIFIED CANCELS FUNDRAISER AT TRUMP GOLF COURSE, BILLIONAIRE WON’T RETURN $7,500 http://bit.ly/1RloaSC

LAUSD CANCELS CHARITY EVENT AT TRUMP GOLF COURSE, TRUMP REFUSES TO REFUND DEPOSIT http://bit.ly/1UBYS1R

INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENT TO STOP THE PEARSON OCTOPUS
http://bit.ly/1LSHYIt

FINALLY, CONGRESS TO START DEBATE ON NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND REWRITE
http://bit.ly/1MaSo46

Opinion: POLITICS, SELF-INTEREST INFEST CONSTRUCTION OF CALIFORNIA’S SCHOOLS + smf’s 2¢ I+II
http://bit.ly/1Th2dld

LAUSD STUDENTS DOING THE SUMMER SCHOOL SCRAMBLE TO CATCH UP http://bit.ly/1fhk1yh

Politico says this week is the charm!: CONGRESS TO TAKE UP NCLB/ESEA
bit.ly/1S33o5r


EVENTS: Coming up next week...
No upcoming events available

*Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________
• SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
http://www.laschools.org/bond/
Phone: 213-241-5183
____________________________________________________
• LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
Phone: 213-241.8700


• LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION & COMMITTEES MEETING CALENDAR



What can YOU do?
• E-mail, call or write your school board member:
Scott.Schmerelson@lausd.net • 213-241-6386
Monica.Garcia@lausd.net • 213-241-6180
Ref.Rodriguez@lausd.net • 213-241-5555
George.McKenna@lausd.net • 213-241-6382
Monica.Ratliff@lausd.net • 213-241-6388
Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net • 213-241-6385
Steve.Zimmer@lausd.net • 213-241-6387
...or your city councilperson, mayor, county supervisor, state legislator, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think! • Find your state legislator based on your home address. Just go to: http://bit.ly/dqFdq2 • There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org • 213.978.0600
• Call or e-mail Governor Brown: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
• Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
• Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
• Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
• If you are eligible to become a citizen, BECOME ONE.
• If you a a citizen, REGISTER TO VOTE at http://registertovote.ca.gov/
• If you are registered, VOTE LIKE THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT. THEY DO!


Who are your elected federal & state representatives? How do you contact them?




Scott Folsom is a parent leader in LAUSD and was Parent/Volunteer of the Year for 2010-11 for Los Angeles County. • He is Past President of Los Angeles Tenth District PTSA and has represented PTA on the LAUSD Construction Bond Citizen's Oversight Committee for over 12 years. He is Vice President for Health, Legislation Action Committee member and a member of the Board of Directors of the California State PTA. He serves on numerous school district advisory and policy committees and has served as a PTA officer and governance council member at three LAUSD schools. He is the recipient of the UTLA/AFT "WHO" Gold Award and the ACSA Regional Ferd Kiesel Memorial Distinguished Service Award - honors he hopes to someday deserve. • In this forum his opinions are his own and your opinions and feedback are invited. Quoted and/or cited content copyright © the original author and/or publisher. All other material copyright © 4LAKids.
• FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 4LAKids makes such material available in an effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to parents, teachers, students and community members in a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
• To SUBSCRIBE e-mail: 4LAKids-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com - or -TO ADD YOUR OR ANOTHER'S NAME TO THE 4LAKids SUBSCRIPTION LIST E-mail smfolsom@aol.com with "SUBSCRIBE" AS THE SUBJECT. Thank you.