Sunday, March 14, 2010

Choice: a cut of meat or a cut above?


4LAKids: Sunday 14•March•2010 Daylight Savings
In This Issue:
FRANKLIN HIGH'S ACADEMIC DECATHLON TEAM IS FIRST TO COMPETE AT STATE TOURNAMENT
LAUSD PLANS TO STOP MOST INTER-DISTRICT STUDENT TRANSFERS NEXT YEAR
Welcome to St. Anne's: THE COMMUNITY MEETING OF THE US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS RE: COMPLIANCE REVIEW OF ELL PROGRAM IN LAUSD
BERLIN'S CHILDREN GET REPRIEVE FROM NOISE POLICE: Children can now be legally noisy in Berlin, prompting comparison of childhood rules in major cities
HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest of the Stories from Other Sources
EVENTS: Coming up next week...
What can YOU do?


Featured Links:
4 LAKids on Twitter
PUBLIC SCHOOLS: an investment we can't afford to cut! - The Education Coalition Website
4LAKids Anthology: All the Past Issues, solved, resolved and unsolved!
4LAKidsNews: a compendium of recent items of interest - news stories, scurrilous rumors, links, academic papers, rants and amusing anecdotes, etc.
IF ONE WERE TO LIVE UP TO THUMPER'S FATHER'S EXCELLENT ADVICE: "If you don't have something nice to say don't say anything at all" – one would write short unread blogs about public education in L.A.

That said, 4LAKids leads with the story of Franklin High School's Academic Decathlon Team. Franklin was my daughter's home high school. It's a school that tries hard and is getting better, but she and her parents exercised our choice to go elsewhere. Despite what everyone says there has always been choice – though following stories will describe how the current LAUSD regime is decreasing rather than increasing the options. Luck will have nothing to do with Franklin's chances in AcaDeca – but we wish Franklin and all the other teams great skill and success in this weekend's competition.

IN THE CONTINUED INTEREST OF KINDNESS I point out the photograph of UTLA President A.J. Duffy by Times photographer Jay Clendenin from Saturday's Patt Morrison's interview. The picture (not yet online) is Annie Liebowitz quality; warts-and-all, compelling, biographical - 1000 words – only two of which are pugnacious and dapper. The interview [http://bit.ly/dijoUJ] is good too. Duffy accepts the challenge undertaken by teachers in their operation of so-called Public School Choice schools as being "put up or shut up time": They've got what they wished for - now its up to them to transform public education in L.A. Duffy – usually portrayed as combative – comes across as introspective and well in touch with his "Well, that's just Duffy" persona. Who knew he came from a well-off family? ...or that he was a heroin addict for years?

Duffy's repeating of AFT's Randi Weingarten's "Good for teachers, good for kids" is worrisome. It reminds meof of the 50's Secretary of Defense/former GM CEO Edwin Wilson's infamous "What's good for General Motors is good for the country.". Wilson [http://bit.ly/9LsSSE] thought he could hold on to his GM stock and still serve in government; it may be Wilson whom Eisenhower had in mind in his farewell when he warned of the Military Industrial Complex. Today the GM/USA polarity is reversed, but the irony is magnetic.

NOT ASKED AND OR ANSWERED: Does the victory of teachers mean UTLA's legal challenge of the PSC giveaway is off? Was giving up those schools to teachers rather than charter operators what it took?

THE JURY IS NOT YET EMPANELED on the US Department of Ed/Office of Civil Rights Compliance Review/Investigation/Witch Hunt of English Language Learner programs in LAUSD. Stay tuned while the OCR takes a remedial history course.

THE MONTH-OLD DUMB MOVE OF THE WEEK: LAUSD's bully-boy inter-district permit attendance policy. In the interest of saving money the district has pulled the rug out from under:

1.10,000 children
2.…their parents...
3....and the Santa Monica-Malibu School District and many more neighboring small school districts.


Whatever happened to the pretense of parental school choice, so important as recently as last week?

And how can this policy possibly be justified as being what's best for kids? Unless one is to subscribe to "What's best for LAUSD is what's best for kids."

Onward?

- smf



LAUSD SHOULDN'T FORCE IT

Daily Breeze Editorial | http://bit.ly/bcZkYC

March 14, 2010 – With its decision to stop offering most inter-district transfers, the Los Angeles Unified School District has essentially decided to hold students hostage.

The ransom: The average daily attendance money that will be injected into the district when the 10,000 students affected - more than a third of them at South Bay schools - enroll at LAUSD campuses.

The board's decision is an urgent measure for an urgent time. The move could provide the LAUSD with an additional $51million as it faces a $640million budget deficit in the next school year. Early this month it approved nearly 5,200 layoffs.

But that urgency can also be applied to parents' decisions to enroll their children elsewhere. And if those districts will have them, that should be a parent's prerogative.

The transfer ban won't be easy on those other districts, either. South Bay districts, also struggling to bridge multimillion-dollar deficits, have approved layoffs for hundreds of employees in recent weeks and could be hard-pressed when the ADA money they receive for LAUSD-zoned students is redirected. If it seems unfair that they can enroll them and collect that money in the first place, consider that ADA money is allocated by student - it is for them.

Pulling these students back will also strain an already contentious relationship with a frustrated community. That could be catastrophic as schools become more and more reliant on the community and parents to help make up for
Advertisement
the services schools can't afford to provide, whether it be supply donations, parcel taxes (L.A. voters will consider another one in June) or tutoring.

We hope the LAUSD can use any new resources from this decision to make a noticeable difference in its schools. Though that still won't make it right. Families should be able to make their own decisions about the best schools for their lifestyles, and as a result, where they want the money invested in their children's educations to go. And that's through ADA funds or tuition, to public schools, charters or private institutions. It's a choice open to students at the community-college level; there's no reason younger students shouldn't have it as well.

Force isn't the answer. If the LAUSD wants to boost enrollment, funding and community support, it should work on its powers of persuasion and convince parents that it can provide what their children need.


The memo: CHANGE IN DISTRICT'S INTERDISTRICT ATTENDANCE POLICY (2/16/02)



FRANKLIN HIGH'S ACADEMIC DECATHLON TEAM IS FIRST TO COMPETE AT STATE TOURNAMENT
THE NINE-MEMBER TEAM, WHICH REPRESENTS A SCHOOL THAT HAS STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY AND FACED GANG PROBLEMS, SURPRISED MANY WITH ITS SUCCESS AT THE LAUSD COMPETITION IN FEBRUARY.

By Nicole Santa Cruz | LA Times | http://bit.ly/diQigy

March 14, 2010 – People around school think of them as the smart kids, but they never thought they'd be known for that. Thanks to photos of their faces plastered on the walls of Franklin High School, members of the nine-member Academic Decathlon team are being recognized by their peers and teachers.

And for good reason: This is the first group in school history to make it to the state competition that began Saturday and continues Sunday.

They are competing against 61 other teams in the grueling contest that tests students' knowledge in 10 areas, including language, literature, economics, art and science -- with a focus on the French Revolution .

"This is huge for them," said Samuel Kullens, the Franklin coach. In recent years, Kullens has had to beg students to join the team. He doesn't have to do that anymore.

Students have been studying since last May, giving up summer and winter breaks to do so.

It has paid off.

Accustomed to the same schools winning again and again (Marshall High and El Camino Real), coaches and students were surprised when Franklin placed first in speech, second in essay, third in music and third in the popular Super Quiz portion of the Los Angeles Unified School District competition.

Coaches and students could be heard asking "Who's Franklin?" at the competition awards in February.

"It's about time that we can be at the table with the big boys," said Principal Luis Lopez, a 1984 graduate of the Highland Park school.

Franklin isn't known for academics. It has a decades-long gang problem, and last March fewer than three-quarters of its students passed the California High School Exit Exam. In 2008, the four-year dropout rate was almost one in five, according to state data.

The school's Academic Performance Index, which rates schools on a scale of 200 to 1,000, was 640 this year. The state's target score is 800.

Although the team members are solid, hardworking students, many have never accomplished anything like this before. Most said they couldn't speak in front of a class before joining the team. Now they're confidently giving speeches.

Some will be the first in their families to attend college, and others balance school with part-time jobs. Many speak a language other than English at home. When they flew to Sacramento, four had never before been on an airplane.

Raymond Rivera, 17, joined the Academic Decathlon team as a freshman. He quit the same day, overwhelmed by the demands. He was sure he couldn't learn seven subjects cold, give a speech, keep his cool during an interview and write a coherent essay.

"I thought I couldn't do it," Raymond said.

But he rejoined.

"Now, to be one of the smart people," said Raymond, who will be the first in his family to attend college, "I guess it's kind of special."

But Mayra Fuentes of South Los Angeles said the team's performance doesn't come down to brains. "It's not because we're smart," said the 16-year-old junior. "It's more about time and dedication."

Mayra is no stranger to dedication: She is bused in each morning to Franklin, a magnet school, and has a two-hour Metro train and bus ride after decathlon practice.

For the team's top scorer, Juan Cuadra, the regional competition was one he'll never forget.

"That was the first time my father told me he was proud of me," said the 17-year-old junior.

When the team read Charles Dickens and William Blake, Kullens said, the works were culturally foreign to the students and had to be deciphered.

Most of the students had never analyzed art, so Kullens took them to the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.

Some had never listened to classical music.

"They said 'This all sounds the same,' " Kullens said.

During practice Monday, however, Omar Carrillo could not only pick out Beethoven's "Gott! Welch Dunkel hier!" but also declared it his favorite, bobbing his head along with the music.

"After doing decathlon, every class seems so much easier," said Omar, 16, who said he's stunned when students or teachers praise him.

"You realize, 'Wow, I'm doing something for this school,' " he said.

On Tuesday, the team was comfortably sitting at desks, some clad in their signature blue decathlete T-shirts with yellow lettering. Many wrote notes and ate vanilla creme cookies that Kullens distributed. French classical music played while Andy Vuong, 16, a football-turned-intellectual athlete, guided the study session.

"Know the difference between a homogenous and heterogenous solution," he said.

No matter what happens at the state competition, team members said they will do their best. They include Jossue Vega, 18, Ruby Escalante, 17, Klariobaldo Zavala, 18, and Richard Cao, 17.

Some of the boys will be wearing suits for the first time. But they're bent on looking classy -- ready to compete in crisp navy suits with gold ties -- Franklin's school colors.


LAUSD PLANS TO STOP MOST INTER-DISTRICT STUDENT TRANSFERS NEXT YEAR
By Melissa Pamer and Douglas Morino Staff Writers | Daily Breeze

03/12/2010 -- Thousands of children attending South Bay schools on special permits face the prospect of returning to their neighborhood campuses in the Los Angeles Unified School District under a policy change quietly approved by board members.

The financially beleaguered Los Angeles district says it plans to stop offering about 80 percent of its inter-district transfers next year, a move expected to affect nearly 10,000 students, more than a third of whom attend South Bay schools.

The Board of Education approved the policy change at a meeting last month, but the action drew no public comment and generated only a brief discussion among members, who were largely enthusiastic about welcoming students back to LAUSD.

In an internal memo sent last month, Superintendent Ramon Cortines estimated the resulting enrollment boost could bring the district $51 million in new funds next year. The 618,000-student district, already reeling from funding cuts over the last two years, is facing a $640 million shortfall.

The new revenue for LAUSD will mean lost income for nearby school districts, which are likewise struggling with massive state budget cuts and declining enrollment.

On average, about two-thirds of school districts' budgets come from enrollment-based state funds, which are based on average daily attendance or ADA.

South Bay districts - which are surrounded by Los Angeles Unified territory from Westchester to Gardena, Carson, Lomita and down to the Harbor Area - could have a lot to lose.

Torrance Unified accepts more LAUSD students than any other district in the county. According to LAUSD's figures, almost 2,200 of its students transfer to Torrance schools, accounting for nearly a tenth of the South Bay district's enrollment.

Torrance school board President Mark Steffen said the loss of those students could end up costing the district up to $9 million.

"It's really concerning," Steffen said. "Permit kids bring dollars into our schools. It just means more cuts, higher class sizes and less teachers."

Other South Bay districts that could potentially lose a substantial number of students are Manhattan Beach Unified, El Segundo Unified and Wiseburn.

LAUSD has not yet made an official notification of the new policy to other districts. Neither has it told parents, some of whom are bound to panic.

But the news is starting to get out on Internet message boards and by word of mouth.

"I'm sick to my stomach," said Susie Rhodes, a Playa del Rey resident with an 8-year-old son in his third year at Anza Elementary in the tiny, Hawthorne-based Wiseburn School District.

"If I have to tell him he has to go back to an L.A. Unified school, he'll be devastated," Rhodes said. "I just didn't like what I saw there. There's a huge difference in the care he receives now."

LAUSD officials argue the district has recently improved its educational offerings and academic achievement. And they said parents should be attracted to pristine new schools provided by the district's $20 billion construction program - though there's only one new campus open and just four planned in the South Bay and Harbor Area.

"The superintendent's position is: We have a variety of programs in this district. He's made a concerted effort to improve the quality of our schools and offer options," said Rene Gonzalez, assistant superintendent of student health and human services.

"He believes that students who reside in the Los Angeles Unified area should be attending our public schools," said Gonzalez, who oversees transfer operations.

There will be some exceptions to the policy change.

Children who have "senior status" - meaning they will be in fifth, eighth or 12th grade next year - will still be issued permits. Another exception is students whose parents work in other school districts; they'll still be allowed to continue to attend those districts.

A provision of state Education Code that is set to expire in 2012 attempts to make it easier for children to attend schools in the area where their parents work, in certain circumstances.

At the same time, complicated portions of the code allow most districts the ability to limit the number of outgoing transfer students.

Districts may cap the number of permits that they give out to 1 percent of their enrollment. But the law says districts are generally required to offer permits up to that cap, according to Bill Lucia, policy director for Sacramento-based education reform advocacy group EdVoice.

"It's questionable whether LAUSD can apply these restrictions, unless these caps specifically apply," Lucia said.

Furthermore, a provision of recently enacted Race to the Top legislation - which introduced reforms so California would be eligible for new federal funds - will make it easier for parents to transfer out of the state's 1,000 lowest-performing schools, Lucia said. That list, which is sure to include plenty of LAUSD campuses, has yet to be issued.

"It'll be a game changer - by putting parents in charge of finding the best public school for kids, instead of school bureaucrats or ZIP codes making that determination," Lucia said.

LAUSD officials said their new policy would remain in line with state law.

"This is in alignment with our policy change. We will continue to grant permits that are employment related," Gonzalez said in a brief e-mail.

Parents will be able to appeal initial decisions to LAUSD officials. If turned down, they can then appeal to the seven-member Los Angeles County Board of Education, which is preparing for a significant increase in such cases.

Still, LAUSD officials expect to bring back four-fifths of the 12,249 students that are out on inter-district permits this year.

The move comes on the heels of an attention-generating decision by Beverly Hills Unified School District to curtail a long-standing program that lets outsiders attend its high-achieving campuses.

Nearly 950 Beverly Hills students come from Los Angeles schools, according to LAUSD records.

At the Feb. 9 meeting where the LAUSD board approved the policy change - obscurely labeled on the agenda as "delegation of authority for inter-district attendance agreements" - the Beverly Hills situation came up.

"They're going to chase everyone out. I would certainly hope they chase everyone to L.A. We'd love them," said board member Richard Vladovic, who represents the Harbor Area and part of the South Bay.

"They're certainly welcome," Cortines responded.

Unlike Beverly Hills, other school districts that accept LAUSD transfers may not be so willing to part with those students, who bring in significant attendance-based revenue from the state. (Beverly Hills Unified has planned to change its funding strategy and will soon be less dependent on enrollment-based state dollars.)

More than 4,000 students from Los Angeles Unified attend South Bay districts, with another 1,667 going to Culver City schools, according to LAUSD data.

LAUSD's figures show that almost 2,200 of its students transfer to Torrance schools, accounting for about 8.5 percent of enrollment at the South Bay district. Torrance officials put the figure at fewer than 2,000.

(Other districts likewise reported some discrepancy in the numbers of transfer students that LAUSD data showed.)

A spokeswoman for Torrance Unified said the impact would be small, and Superintendent George Mannon declined an interview request through her.

"The effects of LAUSD's decision will be minimal to our district," wrote spokeswoman Tammy Khan in an e-mail.

But Julie Shankle, president of the Torrance Teachers Association, said she's worried about the new policy. She suspects North and Torrance high schools will be especially hard hit, as they're relatively close to LAUSD territory.

"If we don't get the permit kids, we're going to have a greatly reduced student population. That will affect the number of teachers," said Shankle, who at one time obtained a permit for her child to attend school outside LAUSD. "School districts are so desperate for money they're going to do whatever they can, even if it means flaunting the spirit of choice."

Last year, the Hawthorne School District took a course similar to LAUSD's by barring most outgoing transfers. Superintendent Donald Carrington said the backlash from parents was palpable. The county Board of Education sided with about 85 percent of parents who filed an appeal, he said.

"In these economic times every child matters in a variety of ways," said Carrington, who was not surprised by LAUSD's decision. "We believe our programs are good, if not better than most. But parents have the right to place their children anywhere they choose, based on their needs."

Hawthorne's transfer policy remains in effect.

Other local school officials said they were concerned about the loss of students and subsequent financial hit, but expressed optimism that a majority of appeals would be upheld.

In the 2,300-student Wiseburn School District, nearly a third of the district's transfer students come from LAUSD.

"We're getting calls from our parents - they're nervous," said Alicia Galindo, Wiseburn's permit coordinator.

Charter campuses, including Wiseburn's new Da Vinci high schools, will not be affected by LAUSD's decision.

Parents living in LAUSD boundaries with children in South Bay schools this week voiced frustration about the decision.

"It's frightening for us because we feel El Segundo is our home away from home," said Westchester resident Cathy Lindsay, whose eighth-grade daughter is on a permit and hopes to attend El Segundo High School next year. "The loss of money for the school district will be even more of a lurch. It's an upheaval on many levels."

Lindsay, whose husband works in El Segundo, said she hopes her permit will not be affected by the decision.

Some parents take a different view of Los Angeles schools.

Kelly Kane, who co-founded the Westchester/Playa Education Foundation in 2004 to help improve local schools and try to persuade more parents to send their children to them, said many residents are unnecessarily scared off by Los Angeles Unified's poor reputation.

"Every parent should check out their local district school. That should be their first option," Kane said. "There's a lot of bad news about LAUSD. But it doesn't affect every school, particularly at the elementary level."

With the advent of Kane's foundation and the rise of an innovative Loyola Marymount University partnership with seven local schools, more parents are interested in sending their children to Westchester's public campuses, Kane said.

Though she's been a booster for local schools, she said she recognizes plenty of parents may want other options.

"Having gone and visited your public school and feeling it's not right for your child, that's different," Kane said. "Then you should look for other schools. There are lots of other choices. There are magnets within the district; there are charters."

LAUSD's Gonzalez said the district would seek to provide information about alternatives within LAUSD.

"We'll certainly educate them on the options that might be available to them. We can't guarantee a program to be there," he said.

The district is expecting a good number of appeals to be filed, Gonzalez said.

LAUSD will officially communicate the policy change to school districts this month. But Los Angeles school officials have not yet decided how to tell parents, a notification that Gonzalez said is not required.

Parents can begin filing permit requests after May 1, and they'll get answers within three to four weeks, he said.

After internal appeals are exhausted, parents have 30 days to ask for a review by the county Office of Education.

Last year, officials there reviewed about 200 cases, with about half getting resolved at a meeting between the parties involved. The other half were heard before the county Board of Education, said Victor Thompson, director of the county's division of student support services.

More districts are limiting outgoing transfers in the past two years because of the state budget climate, he said. This spring and summer, the county plans to double the number of staff working on appeals, as an influx is expected.

Thompson stressed that each case was decided individually on its merits, based on a variety of criteria such as student interest in a particular program, or a transportation-related hardship.

He said the hearings can be trying for both parents and students.

"Parents commit themselves to the process because they're trying to do what's best for their child," Thompson said. "It's an emotional time."


Welcome to St. Anne's: THE COMMUNITY MEETING OF THE US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS RE: COMPLIANCE REVIEW OF ELL PROGRAM IN LAUSD
by smf for 4LAKids

Founded in 1908, and officially sponsored in 1941 by the Franciscan Sisters of the Sacred Heart, St. Anne's first opened its doors as a maternity hospital for pregnant, unwed, young mothers. At that time St. Anne's was regarded as a hiding place for young women to come in secrecy and to conceal their pregnancies from the community and their families. - from http://www.stannes.org


March 10, 2009 – Tonight's community meeting at St. Anne's Conference center was an interesting event. St. Anne's is an interesting place. A century ago ...and half a century ...and even recently: a place for young women and their families to hide themselves and their shame away. Now St. Anne's has reinvented itself for the twenty-first century: a residence hotel and school for that same clientele – who check in and out of the dorm rooms and eat in the pleasant little cafe. There's the crucifix here and there, a statue of St. Francis in the courtyard – but the gates are open – the hiding and the shame are gone; the habits and the wimples are few and far between. And the big conference room is a money making attraction.

I spoke to a youngish political consultant at the meeting (at my age everyone not an AARP member is youngish) – who confessed his mixed feelings. This was his first visit to St. Anne's since he was born there.

The "New Village Charter High School" seems to be a continuation of the old Franciscan Sisters' girls school. But charter schools cannot be denominational or parochial ...so it isn't!

Others have questioned the propriety of the School District and/or The US Department of Ed renting – or even meeting – in Catholic space; we try to be original here at 4LAKids so I'll leave that argument to them. There was no praying – and no pledge of allegiance either – so church and state were kept separated. ...but dating.


THE EVENING BEGAN HALF AN HOUR LATE (but ended on time) with the usual self-interested activist organizations represented and introduced: Alliance for a Better Community (ABC - which has an office at St. Anne's), Inner City Struggle, MALDEF, Families in Schools, UTLA – leading to the main event: A speech by Assistant Secretary of Education for Civil Rights Russlynn Ali. And her speech was a masterpiece of the "We're not here to attack, or allege or even point the finger, we're just here to find The Truth" genre ...followed by the soft attack, mild allegation and crooked if not pointed finger. Her words led one to believe she and Secretary Duncan picked poor LAUSD for scrutiny from a hat in a lottery.

But the meeting handouts told a different story: brochures in English, Spanish, Korean, Armenian and Tagalog: HOW TO FILE A DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT WITH THE OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS – inviting complaints based on discrimination or failure to provide access on the basis of race, color,national origin, sex, disability and age ...or (I'm not making this up) violations of the Boy Scouts of America Equal Access Act. I was one once, the BSA enjoy special protection – they can discriminate against gays but no public school or public agency can discriminate against them! It's a federal crime.

LAUSD IS THE SECOND LARGEST SCHOOL DISTRICT IT THE COUNTRY, it has the largest number of English Language Learners. I saw a statistic that said 10% of the ELL students in the nation are in LAUSD – and 4LAKids is living proof that the can't uit on the internet if it isn't true! That - the fact they were looking for a stage ...and Superintendent Cortines let them in – is why they're here. They've come to L.A. to take names, assign blame and kick butt. And it may be a good thing they are.

Secretary Ali seized the teachable moment and made the most of it, just as Duncan did on Monday when kicking off this crusade at the Edmund Pettis Bridge in Selma Alabama – where better to talk about Education Being the Civil Rights Issue of the Twenty-first Century? Ali said she was at Duncan's side when he kicked off the English Language Learner campaign on the bridge 45 years after Bloody Sunday – and then went into a passionate description of the horrors of Bloody Sunday on March 9, 1965 when, she said with quiet resolve and hushed determination: "... people died on that bridge.that day"

The world changed, but nobody died on The Edmund Pettis Bridge on Bloody Sunday in 1965. Look it up. Mistelling the story belittles the event.

Ali hadn't been born yet on March 9, 1965, Duncan was three months old; they crossed the bridge in 2010 in a photo op. They cannot be blamed or faulted for their youth ...but they are – or present themselves as - educators.



THAT SAID, we dispersed for breakout sessions with the real investigators, not their political leaders. There some real dialog happened, real thoughts and experience were shared. Oh sure – there was the usual bombast about billions in waste fraud and abuse, documented in spreadsheets that don't add up – but actual English Language Learners shared ...and actual parents and actual teachers shared actual experiences,

It also turns out that this great proactive compliance review by the Civil Rights Office will only focus on Local Districts 1 (West Valley) and Local District 6 (The cities of the Southeast) – both areas not really representative of Los Angeles and spectacularly underrepresented tonight.

This school district doesn't serve its ELL population very well and it should. It doesn't serve its Special Ed population very well and it should. It doesn't serve its African-American population very well and it should. It doesn't serve its Disabled population very well and it should. It doesn't serve its Gifted population very well and it should. It doesn't serve its Parent population very well and it should.

This is a subject and a conversation that continues. Maybe we are well begun. Hopefully.


HERE IS AN ISSUE FOR THE OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS: In Southern San Diego County Minutemen routinely patrol PTA Meetings ...to be sure only citizens get in.


BERLIN'S CHILDREN GET REPRIEVE FROM NOISE POLICE: Children can now be legally noisy in Berlin, prompting comparison of childhood rules in major cities
BERLIN RECENTLY BECAME THE FIRST OF GERMANY'S 16 FEDERAL STATES TO ALLOW CHILDREN TO LEGALLY MAKE A NOISE. BBC'S JOANNA ROBERTSON, CURRENTLY BASED IN BERLIN WITH TWO DAUGHTERS, COMPARES THE VARYING ATTITUDES TO CHILDREN SHE HAS ENCOUNTERED IN BERLIN, PARIS, NEW YORK CITY AND ROME.

By Joanna Robertson | BBC News | http://bit.ly/dzIQjx

March 4, 2010 – In the beginning, it was the telephone.

"Frau Robertson?" "Yes?"

"I know your daughter's up there. She's playing, isn't she?"

Then came the doorbell.

Neglecting, for once, to peep through the spy-hole I opened the door, all unawares.

There she stood, square in the hallway, the neighbour from the third floor.

A successful detective novelist with a penchant for Parisian murders, she muscled her way in and could not be muscled-out again for quite some time.

The problem? My three-year-old daughter, Miranda - weight: under three stone; footwear: soft bedroom slippers - was allegedly making a noise. Only she was not.

For my own and other families in our quiet, solid apartment building, Berlin's concession to the sounds of childhood comes as an immense relief.
“ The reward for keeping quiet in class? The teacher gives out a balloon filled with freezing water, to burst upon the head of a fellow pupil of one's choice ”

Children may now officially be children at least from Monday to Saturday, 0900 to 1900.

For parents, there will at last be some protection from harassing neighbours.

"Excessive child noise," warranted a police call-out to our building for the crying of a newborn baby and, one Saturday afternoon, a group of cheerful 12-year-olds playing a game of Monopoly.

Berlin leaves me baffled. True to the spirit of the Brothers Grimm, childhood here is filled with wonders, but is unexpectedly grim.

TWO-FACED

There are toyshops by the hundreds. And puppet theatres. Sweetshops. Playgrounds with terrific slides. Ice creams scattered with gummi-bear jelly sweets. Sledging in winter, cycling in summer, tree-climbing and swimming in lakes.

But should a little child fall off her bike, passers-by will laugh out loud.

No mercy will be shown to a young child who has lost his ticket on the train, and beware like Hansel and Gretel children, those tempting German sweets.

Your teeth must be brushed three times a day, or Croko the Tooth Cleaning Crocodile might just gobble you up.

Take my elder daughter, Lilli's, junior school. The reward for keeping quiet in class?

The teacher gives out a balloon filled with freezing water, to burst upon the head of a fellow pupil of one's choice.

An ancient history lesson included a film so gorily violent that even the toughest 10-year-olds covered their eyes.

"That's what life is like," they were told.

There is the science mistress who carries a long cane to "tap" wayward pupils.

Recent school outings have included an unscheduled visit to a nuclear bunker, and a film about the struggles of an abandoned girl given up for international adoption.

CHILDHOOD CONTROLS

Back in middle-class Paris, such issues were censored. Childhood was strictly controlled.

Small playgrounds, kept neat. Climbing frames with minimum age restrictions.

Parks with formal lawns and avenues of white gravel, perfect for grazing children's knees.

The school system drilled the nation. From kindergarten upwards, Lilli was told when to sit, when to stand, when to go to the toilet.

She practiced, with her pen, curls and loops and has handwriting the same as everyone else in France.

There was speech therapy to perfect French children's French vowels. Lilli struggled home under the weight of her book-brimming schoolbag, sat almost daily tests and three times a year brought-in a school report that said little about her, but listed her marks and her position in class to the second decimal place.

In the two-hour lunch break in a small, bleak courtyard no books were allowed, and there was certainly no playing football with the boys.

PARENTAL ANGST

Life in Manhattan was all "developmental milestones".

By the sandpit (or "sandbox"), parents' talk was anxious.

Would Maxwell master his pencil-hold, and get into that preschool?

Why was two-year-old Ashley not doing better at maths?

On the health front, the obsessions were hyper-activity, attention deficit disorder, dyslexia, and dyspraxia, all largely ignored in France, where all anyone talked about was bronchitis.
“ In Rome, it was paramount to cover one's child, even in hot weather, in case a breeze or a sweat should lead to a sudden chill ”

Here in Germany, I have discovered it is bowels, whereas back in Italy, it was chills.

In Rome, it was paramount to cover one's child, even in hot weather, in case a breeze or a sweat should lead to a sudden chill.

Ice-cream was never eaten on a cold day (something German children would find extraordinary), and never in one's Sunday best clothes, in case of spills.

In a culture where the child was so often the centre of attention, it seemed that messy clothes were the only taboo.

Lilli would happily rebel, making mud-pies, and fishing for tadpoles on the banks of the River Tiber.

Confused by so many conflicting cultures the other day, I booked a telephone appointment with an international parenting counsellor from Washington State in the US, and obediently got up at 0400 GMT to talk.

A soothing, disembodied voice from the Pacific North West recommended I immediately remove my children from school, that we all sleep together on cushions on the floor and switch to unpasteurised milk.

I rang off, and remembered my sensible, Scottish roots.

When it comes to one's children, I reminded myself, mother always knows best.


HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest of the Stories from Other Sources
SANTA MONICA-MALIBU SCHOOL DISTRICT TO FACE ANOTHER BUDGET CHALLENGE …due to LAUSD policy change: from the Santa ... http://bit.ly/dDuuaV

Memo: CHANGE IN DISTRICT’S INTER-DISTRICT PERMIT POLICY: http://bit.ly/9enAXU

LAUSD PLANS TO STOP MOST INTER-DISTRICT STUDENT TRANSFERS NEXT YEAR: By Melissa Pamer and Douglas Morino Staff Wri... http://bit.ly/bff9vs

FUNDING SQUEEZE SPURS STUDENT BACKLASH: By Matthew Garrahan in Los Angeles | Financial Times of London March 12 2... http://bit.ly/bvH4QC

10 LAUSD TEAMS PARTICIPATE IN STATE ACADEMIC DECATHLON CHAMPIONSHIP: 6:09 a.m. | KPCC Wire Services | KPCC 12 Ma... http://bit.ly/bKkfYv

SOUTHEAST CITIES SCHOOLS COALITION, AKA SAN ANTONIO USD: George Cole's dirty fat hands now in the cookie jar of c... http://bit.ly/cU4hKu

Free UCLA IDEA Workshop - EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES: ACCESSING DATA FOR DEMOCRACY: http://bit.ly/aPioB7

NEW LAUSD PERMIT POLICY COULD HURT SANTA MONICA SCHOOLS: by Nick Taborek | Santa Monica Daily Press | Marc... http://bit.ly/bxohNg

STATE BOARD OF ED FINALIZES LOW-PERFORMING SCHOOLS LIST: Some Administrators Say Process Of Making List Unfair: K... http://bit.ly/deuSJf

CONTROVERSIAL SCHOOL LIST LINKED TO STATE’S QUEST FOR FEDERAL FUNDS: Corey G. Johnson | California Watch Blog M... http://bit.ly/9u0m5q

U.S. PUBLIC EDUCATION NEEDS A BAILOUT: Robert Reich says deciding who studies what and in what grade is well wort... http://bit.ly/aiqdiV

Maintenance of Effort: $200 MILLION IN STIMULUS ON HOLD: By John Fensterwald in The Educated Guess March 9th, 20... http://bit.ly/9tBBPz

Note from the Board Member: MONEY IN, MONEY OUT: from Galatzan Gazette -the weekly e-newsletter of School Board M... http://bit.ly/aOiPLP

IN KANSAS CITY, SCHOOL’S OUT: The closure of almost half of Kansas City's schools shows what can happen when the ... http://bit.ly/dwjqs4

L.A. COLLEGE BOARD TO NAME INSPECTOR GENERAL: The decision is reached after the disclosure of misspending on the ... http://bit.ly/cF2t5D 7

PANEL RELEASES PROPOSAL TO SET U.S. STANDARDS FOR EDUCATION: By Sam Dillon/New York Times 03-10-2010 - Culminat... http://bit.ly/arzPwd

11●Mar●10: THIS MORNING’S LAUSD NEWS: Federal probe, Charters vs. Insiders, The list of failing schools: from ... http://bit.ly/aGpr8B

Welcome to St. Anne's: THE COMMUNITY MEETING OF THE US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS CONCERNIN... http://bit.ly/ay0Zkp

PTA SACRAMENTO UPDATE Match 2010: Volume 34, Number 4 http://bit.ly/cKt79h ... http://bit.ly/cfxd88

US DEPT OF ED PRESS RELEASE: U.S. Education Department Announces Civil Rights Review of English Learner Students ... http://bit.ly/bphiP2

RAE BELISLE: Schwarzenegger withdraws nomination to state school board: posted to CapitolAlert, the SacBee blog b... http://bit.ly/cuysco

SUPERINTENDENT'S WEEKLY UPDATE 3/5/10: LAUSD Superintendent's Weekly Update Ltr 030510 http://bit.ly/9w7TcC

CGCS: CUTTING FUNDS FOR URBAN SCHOOLS + URBAN DISTRICTS USE STIMULUS FUNDS TO ENGAGE PARENTS + NEW STEM SCHOLARSH... http://bit.ly/9zvDRz

FEDS EXAMINE LA SCHOOLS’ ENGLISH LEARNER PROGRAM: By The Associated Press from the San Jose Mercury News Posted: ... http://bit.ly/aImmMt

LAUSD: PAY CUTS OR 6300 LAYOFFS: LAUSD expects to lay off 6300 workers this summer Contra Costa Times - Connie Ll... http://bit.ly/baoZOf

'RACE’ MONEY: letters to the LA Times| Re “State out of running for school funds,” March 5 3/9/10 -- AIG gets... http://bit.ly/b13uz3

SANTA MONICA-MALIBU SCHOOLS GOING MAIL-IN ROUTE FOR PARCEL TAX ELECTION: By Nicole Santa Cruz | LA Times ... http://tinyurl.com/ybnhprr

Persistently Lowest-Achieving Schools: STATE RELEASES LIST OF ‘WORST’ SCHOOLS + Addl. Coverage, LAUSD List & CDE P... http://bit.ly/bWpDkc

Final Report: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF LOS ANGELES | LAUSD PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE ADVISORY VOTE: prepared by nancy ... http://bit.ly/a3Z1Kq

PROPOSITION 98 FIGHT AT CORE OF STATE BUDGET DEBATE: By Capitol Weekly Staff 3/04/10 12:00 AM PST | When Californ... http://bit.ly/ayEaXy

Compliance Review?: COMMUNITY MEETING IN L.A. ON WEDNESDAY W/ ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF EDUCATION FOR CIVIL RIGHTS RE... http://bit.ly/9HHueQ


EVENTS: Coming up next week...
*Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________
• SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
http://www.laschools.org/bond/
Phone: 213-241-5183
____________________________________________________
• LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
Phone: 213-241.8700


• LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION & COMMITTEES MEETING CALENDAR



What can YOU do?
• E-mail, call or write your school board member:
Yolie.Flores.Aguilar@lausd.net • 213-241-6383
Tamar.Galatzan@lausd.net • 213-241-6386
Monica.Garcia@lausd.net • 213-241-6180
Marguerite.LaMotte@lausd.net • 213-241-6382
Nury.Martinez@lausd.net • 213-241-6388
Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net • 213-241-6385
Steve.Zimmer@lausd.net • 213-241-6387
...or your city councilperson, mayor, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think! • There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org • 213.978.0600
• Call or e-mail Governor Schwarzenegger: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
• Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
• Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
• Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
• If you are eligible to become a citizen, BECOME ONE.
• If you a a citizen, REGISTER TO VOTE.
• If you are registered, VOTE LIKE THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT.


Who are your elected federal & state representatives? How do you contact them?




Scott Folsom is a parent leader in LAUSD. He is Past President of Los Angeles Tenth District PTSA and represents PTA on the LAUSD Construction Bond Citizen's Oversight Committee. He is an elected Representative on his neighborhood council. He is a Health Commissioner, Legislation Team member and a member of the Board of Managers of the California State PTA. He serves on numerous school district advisory and policy committees and has served as a PTA officer and governance council member at three LAUSD schools. He is the recipient of the UTLA/AFT 2009 "WHO" Gold Award for his support of education and public schools - an honor he hopes to someday deserve. • In this forum his opinions are his own and your opinions and feedback are invited. Quoted and/or cited content copyright © the original author and/or publisher. All other material copyright © 4LAKids.
• FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 4LAKids makes such material available in an effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to parents, teachers, students and community members in a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
• To SUBSCRIBE e-mail: 4LAKids-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com - or -TO ADD YOUR OR ANOTHER'S NAME TO THE 4LAKids SUBSCRIPTION LIST E-MAIL smfolsom@aol.com with "SUBSCRIBE" AS THE SUBJECT. Thank you.


Saturday, March 06, 2010

Saying it all...


4LAKids: Sunday 7•March•2010
In This Issue:
TEACHERS AS REFORMERS: L.A. Unified teachers won the right to run several new or underperforming schools. Can they pull it off? +smf's 2¢
SCHWARZENEGGER SEEKS BOLDER ACTION AS STATE LOSES OUT ON FEDERAL SCHOOLS FUNDS +Dan Walters: DID SCHWARZENEGGER SNOOKER LEGISLATURE ON RttT CHANGES?
AS LAUSD TIGHTENS BELT, 'GREEN' RESOLUTION HELPS TRIM WATER, ENERGY COSTS: The 3-year-old program has been carving away at future utility expenses
SCHOLAR’S SCHOOL REFORM U-TURN SHAKES UP DEBATE
HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest of the Stories from Other Sources
EVENTS: Coming up next week...
What can YOU do?


Featured Links:
4 LAKids on Twitter
PUBLIC SCHOOLS: an investment we can't afford to cut! - The Education Coalition Website
4LAKids Anthology: All the Past Issues, solved, resolved and unsolved!
4LAKidsNews: a compendium of recent items of interest - news stories, scurrilous rumors, links, academic papers, rants and amusing anecdotes, etc.
THE HEADLINE in The Helena (Montana) Independent Record says it all: UP TO 5,200 LA SCHOOLS WORKERS FACE LAYOFFS. http://bit.ly/9Ka8jt

THE SIGN in the photograph of teachers protesting in Glendale says it all: NOT ENOUGH BOOKS IN OUR CLASSROOMS – JUST LIKE L.A. UNIFIED. http://bit.ly/9TG7fb

Helena has problems of it's own http://bit.ly/cC7yCX. Glendale Unified is budget and resource challenged like every school district in California. But LAUSD defines the challenge and presents the problem at a whole new and incomprehensible order of magnitude. We are like the photograph pasted on the wall of a PTA workshop about the school funding crisis ...a car hanging precipitously over a cliff: Things could always be worse!

By illogical extension: they are in LA.

The city of Glendale is eight times larger than Helena;
LAUSD has 3 times as many students as Glendale has residents.

Neither Glendale nor Helena's school district has 5200 employees to lay off. The truth is most school districts in the nation have less than 5000 students, let alone employees. LAUSD has schools larger than that!

Things are worse in LA ...or are they? Is the problem bigger or greater ...or are the statistics just made up of bigger numbers? A good teacher laid off is a bad thing in Glendale or Helena or LA. A child without a book in Glendale or Helena or LA is dreadful. A student whose future is compromised by budget cuts is a tragedy wherever: Haiti, Helena, Glendale, LA or Beverly Hills.

None of these are excuses, they are simply reality.

We -- you and I and all these kids and the good citizens of Helena and Glendale are in the middle of the biggest mass lay-off of public sector workers since the Great Depression. School employees are the biggest group of public workers in Helena, Glendale, LA, California and the nation.

The mayor of LA has proposed to lay off all city daycare and preschool employees, eliminating preschool programs (see below).

IN THE GREAT DEPRESSION funding to public education was cut by 25% in the decade of the Thirties. Funding to public education has already been reduced by 18% since this recession began in '07 – and California had been systemically reducing education funding in the decade previous.

"Food Insecurity" is a new phrase coined by demographers, statisticians and counters-of-things to define populations that don't know where the next meal is coming from ...whether they are kids on free-and-reduced-lunch-programs looking from Friday afternoon into the weekend ...or residents of Port Au Prince or Concepcion looking at the shattered ruins of their lives. The crafters of bureaucrat-speak are torturing the language while searching for a politically correct euphemism for hunger.

In LA and Helena and Glendale we are staring into the vacuum of Education Insecurity. We are feeling the potential emptiness growing. We are not alone; but we are no more secure.

¡Onward/Adelante!

-smf

A CALL TO ACTION

QUALITY CHILD CARE SERVICES AND PRESCHOOL are critical components in the success of young people in education. The City of Los Angeles is proposing to eliminate city run child care and preschool programs, putting child care workers first on the mayor's list for layoffs.

Under the City Charter, the mayor doesn't run the City of LA; the city council does.


MAKE YOURSELF HEARD: A PETITION TO SAVE LA CITY CHILDCARE SERVICES
forwarded to 4LAKids by Susannah Scott

To: LA City Councilmembers

As the Mayor has put child care workers first on his list for layoffs, Los Angeles' city child care services are on the verge of complete shut-down.

City Councilmembers must reject the Mayor's proposal that includes such layoffs.

Child care is as important to public safety as fire and police as it keeps children safe, juvenile & gang crime down, community order intact, property values stable and allows police to stay focused on serious crime.

Eliminating child care services will create a systemic problem that will generate far more problems and expense in the long term than can be justified by any short term budget savings.

City child care services can be improved by restructuring budget and operations to create a self-sustaining system. A successful program and infrastructure exists already; it just needs an overhaul to become more streamlined and efficient.

This is an issue that impacts every city resident in some way. For the benefit of the entire city, I urge you to invest your time and support to save child care services and overturn the Mayor's proposal to lay off child care services workers.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned


To Sign the Petition Click Here



TEACHERS AS REFORMERS: L.A. Unified teachers won the right to run several new or underperforming schools. Can they pull it off? +smf's 2¢
LA Times Editorial

March 6, 2010 -- Los Angeles schools did not undergo the transformation we had expected from the Public School Choice initiative, which in its first year opened more than 30 new or underperforming public schools to outside management. Top-notch charter operators applied for relatively few schools and then were removed from the running at the last minute. The school board once again mired itself in political maneuvers instead of putting students first.

What transformation there was came, more surprisingly, from the teachers. They agreed to allow and create more pilot schools, which are similar to charter schools but employ district personnel. They formed partnerships and, with the help of their union, United Teachers Los Angeles, drew up their own, often strong applications for revamping schools. It would be wrong to underestimate the effort and skills needed to pull this off. The time frame was short and the list of requirements long. Unlike charter operators, which submit such applications as a matter of course, the teachers had no particular background for this work. They met with parents who have long fumed that the schools discourage their participation. They listened. They responded.

This is a tremendous step in a school district where, too often, teachers and their union have not been the agents of change but impediments to it. In fact, had the process worked as it was supposed to, the reform initiative would have served as a much stronger application for federal Race to the Top funds than anything the Legislature came up with.

Pulling together the applications was an intense but short-term task for the teachers, born of a desperate attempt to preserve jobs in Los Angeles Unified, which this week sent out thousands more layoff notices. The harder task lies ahead: carrying out those plans for the next several years. The applications promise radically new efforts at the same time that the district lacks the money to support those efforts. And now, much of the pressure is off. The main competition came from charter operators, which aren't sure whether they want to be full participants in the future. And the board has shown a clear unwillingness to go against the wishes of union lobbyists.

If the district leaders want a worthwhile outcome from this initiative, there are several steps they must take in coming years: Do a better job of educating parents, many of whom didn't fully understand what the options were. Do away with the obnoxious "advisory" votes, which were riddled with misleading campaign tactics and ballot boxes weighted by groups on both sides that brought in their own supporters to vote. And most important, hold all of the new operators -- whether charters, teachers or Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's Partnership for Los Angeles Schools -- to their promises of meaningful progress for students.

__________________


smf's 2¢: Sometimes the Times Editorial Board gets it right: "This is a tremendous step in a school district where, too often, teachers and their union have not been the agents of change but impediments to it. In fact, had the process worked as it was supposed to, the reform initiative would have served as a much stronger application for federal Race to the Top funds than anything the Legislature came up with."

...And sometimes they channel the ghost of Harry Chandler that haunts their board room: "Do away with the obnoxious "advisory" votes..."

What does 'obnoxious' modify? Do we 'do away with' the "advisory" part and make them actual elections? Or 'do away with' the votes themselves?

Democracy can be so messy! it would be so much easier if just we let responsible adults make all the choices rather than parents or teachers - as advised by the sages of the LA Times editorial board, hizzonner the mayor and the likes of Eli Broad, Bill Gates and Arne Duncan - guided, of course, by Harry's Ghost.

Lest we forget, the school board generally followed the advice of parents and the community in the advisory votes. Parents didn't want charters and they didn't vote for them - even though they were lobbied, cajoled and bused in by charter operators.

MAKE NO MISTAKE, THE VOTING PROCESS WAS FLAWED.

• The rules, when and if there were rules, were made up at the last minute.
• The District did a poor job of notifying potential voters in advance ...probably because it didn't know and/or couldn't make up its mind who they were!
• Parties of Interest (Applicants) were not so constrained, their Get Out The Vote efforts were pretty good.
• Despite the above 40,000 voters cast their votes -in the rain - in an election where 40,000 students were affected. (4000 voters had been expected in the sunshine!)
• The League of Women Voters post-election report [http://bit.ly/aW9Kxr] goes into depth and detail about the shortcomings of the process. But the league ultimately glows: New first time voters were empowered. People who had never voted before - often because they are denied the franchise because of their immigration status - turned out and voted. I'm not sure the LWV went this far but I will - let us praise small but famous victories: This Obnoxious Vote Was a Triumph of Democracy!

• THE BIG UNANSWERED QUESTION: WHO SHOULD GET TO VOTE?

The obnoxious (using a good word where it belongs!) "Parent Trigger" - shoehorned into state law to qualify California for a contest ["Race to the Top"] in which it won't compete (Chicago Cubs Fans: repeat after the Governator: 'Wait'll next year!' But wait ...he won't be The Governator next year!) - gives a lot of power to 50%+1 of parents ...but neglects to clearly identify who the parent voter/petitioners itchy-trigger-finger trigger-persons are.

THE TARGETS GIVEN A RUNNING START: The state will disclose the list of potential target schools on Monday. Target principals at these 'persistently lowest achieving schools' were notified in a conference call Thursday afternoon at 2PM ...giving them time to deputize a posse - or catch the 2:10 to Yuma.

• State law says that signatures on petitions are valid only if the signator is a registered voter in the county where the petition is circulated. Are unregistered citizens, legal and undocumented aliens disenfranchised even when they have children in the system?
• Does the Parent Trigger create a new class of petitioner/voter? If so, who verifies the the signatures?… the same person who verifies parent signatures on report cards and absence notices? ….the Florida Secretary of State?
• How many votes does a parent have? One per child? One per parent? Do mother and father each have a vote ...or a vote per child ...or one each per child?
• If a child has parents with divided custody - (mom during the week, dad on the weekends) and the vote is on the weekend - can only dad vote?
• The law says parents from feeder schools can vote ...potentially giving parents not at a school determination over those that are. Who identifies/qualifies/verifies them? School attendance areas and feeder patterns shift constantly – LAUSD has not yet set the attendance areas for next year.
• Do students have a vote? Does a teen mom attending high school have two votes?

The "Parent Trigger" is a device from the charter school promoter/operators to remove the teachers at a school from the decision process in charter formation - masquerading as parent empowerment.

I BELIEVE IN PARENT EMPOWERMENT ...and I resent Steve Barr, Michael Piscal, Ben Austin* and their like co-opting the words and twisting them to their shallow self-serving ends in this Karl Rovain/George Orwellian fashion.

But how do I really feel? - smf

* ...not exactly the go-to authority on petition gathering! [http://bit.ly/czWcVY]


SCHWARZENEGGER SEEKS BOLDER ACTION AS STATE LOSES OUT ON FEDERAL SCHOOLS FUNDS +Dan Walters: DID SCHWARZENEGGER SNOOKER LEGISLATURE ON RttT CHANGES?
● SCHWARZENEGGER SEEKS BOLDER ACTION AS STATE LOSES OUT ON FEDERAL SCHOOLS FUNDS

by Rob Hotakainen | Sacramento Bee

Friday, Mar. 05, 2010 -- WASHINGTON – Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said Thursday that California must be "more aggressive and bolder" in changing its education system after losing out in a highly competitive national contest for federal money.

Federal officials rejected California's application for a share of $4.35 billion in Race to the Top funding, part of President Barack Obama's effort to overhaul public schools.

The news came in a letter to governors, in which U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said that "only the very best proposals" would get money. Fifteen states and the District of Columbia were announced as finalists.

It's a setback for Schwarzenegger and the Legislature, which met in special session in January to change state education laws in an attempt to win the money.

"While the reforms we passed did move our state forward, they did not go far enough because other states were more competitive," Schwarzenegger said.

Jed Wallace, president of the California Charter Schools Association, called California's loss "a negative blow to public education, and a step backward in the need for reform."

"This is deeply disappointing for the children of California, particularly after Gov. Schwarzenegger and the Legislature acted to ensure California would meet the federal government's eligibility requirements," Wallace said.

It's yet another blow to the state's budget, too. State officials estimated that California could have won as much as $700 million had it been selected.

"We were talking about hundreds of millions of dollars that would have helped in the toughest budget year that we've had probably since the Great Depression," said Assemblyman Ted Gaines, R-Roseville.

Forty states and the District of Columbia applied for the money, Duncan said in his letter. He said the money is for the first phase of the program, and he encouraged states that did not win this time to apply for the second phase. The deadline is June 1.

The states' applications were judged by five independent reviewers, whose individual scores were averaged to give the state its final score. Duncan said winners in the competition will be announced in early April.

State officials said they had no idea why California's application was rejected. "I hope we'll qualify for something in the second round," said Assemblyman Tom Torlakson, D- Antioch, a candidate for state superintendent of public instruction. "It was always in doubt whether we would get funds in the first round."

To compete for the money, states had to promise to improve teacher effectiveness, make changes in failing schools, improve academic standards and student testing,and use data to become more accountable to the public.

At the governor's urging, state lawmakers approved a plan to empower parents to force changes in failing campuses through signature-gathering drives, and to allow students in 1,000 of the worst-scoring campuses to enroll elsewhere.

In January, the governor called the state's action "sweeping education reforms" that would "make sure California is highly competitive for hundreds of millions in federal dollars for our schools."

In a statement Thursday, Schwarzenegger said he would continue to fight for more education changes "to make California truly competitive for the billions of dollars our students desperately need – the people of California expect nothing less.

"The decision by the Obama administration demonstrates that we need to be more aggressive and bolder in reforming our education system," the governor said.

Arun Ramanathan, executive director of The Education Trust-West, said California lost out because state officials decided to play it safe and not enact enough changes to satisfy the Obama administration.

"Giving someone an exit strategy from a low-performing school is not the same as improving the learning conditions inside of those schools," Ramanathan said.


● Dan Walters: DID SCHWARZENEGGER SNOOKER LEGISLATURE ON 'RACE TO THE TOP' CHANGES?

By Dan Walters | The Sacramento Bee

Friday, Mar. 5, 2010 - It's not often that California's educational establishment – led by the very powerful California Teachers Association – loses a Capitol battle, especially when it's pitted against its archenemies in the school reform movement.

That's what made the approval in January of two major education reform measures, targeting low-performing schools and empowering parents to force school site change, so striking.

Reformers, led by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and EdVoice, an advocacy group financed by a few wealthy civic leaders, and the CTA-led establishment have been jousting for years over whether schools must have more money to get better, or could and should be improved without extra funds.

The reform faction, however, gained a powerful ally in President Barack Obama, who offered $4.35 billion to states that met his Race to the Top criteria.

Obama's education secretary, Arne Duncan, singled out California as he pressed states to adopt reforms that unions dislike, such as increasing charter schools and using student test data for teacher evaluations.

It put Democratic legislators, who usually march to the CTA drumbeat, in a bind. If they refused to do what Schwarzenegger and Obama demanded, they'd look like obstructionists who were sacrificing children's education by ignoring as much as $700 million from the feds, even though it's scarcely 1 percent of school spending. But if they enacted the reforms, they'd be alienating powerful allies.

As the deadline for application loomed, the Legislature passed the two bills, somewhat watered down from the original versions but still opposed by big education groups. Republicans embraced them overwhelmingly and Democrats were divided. Sen. Gloria Romero, D-Los Angeles, the EdVoice candidate for state schools superintendent, carried one.

"In the past, parents had no power to bring about change in their children's schools, but that will now change," Schwarzenegger crowed during his State of the State address. "Parents will now have the means to get rid of incompetent principals and take other necessary steps to improve their children's education."

On Thursday, Duncan announced 16 finalist states. California was noticeably absent. While the state may apply in future rounds, it could be compelled to make even more changes of the sort that the CTA and its allies dislike to have a chance of winning a grant.

Schwarzenegger clearly wants more, saying, "This decision ... demonstrates that we need to be more aggressive and bolder in reforming our education system. While the reforms we passed did move our state forward, they did not go far enough because other states were more competitive."

So was the Legislature snookered? Perhaps so. But perhaps what it did under duress will improve a very troubled system regardless of whether the state receives any Obamabucks.


AS LAUSD TIGHTENS BELT, 'GREEN' RESOLUTION HELPS TRIM WATER, ENERGY COSTS: The 3-year-old program has been carving away at future utility expenses
● 'OUR MISSION IS TO BE THE GREENEST SCHOOL DISTRICT IN THE COUNTRY,' SAYS SCHOOL BOARD PRESIDENT.

By Susan Carpenter | LA Times

March 7, 2010 | While the Los Angeles Unified School District grapples with budget slashing, teacher layoffs, program cuts and increasing class sizes, a 3-year-old program has been steadily carving away at future water and electricity costs for the 14,000 buildings in the sprawling system.

Since passage in 2007 of the Green LAUSD resolution, the district has been working to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and its energy and water use by 10% from 2007 levels by 2013. It also will install 50 megawatts of solar photovoltaic arrays, a move that could save the district more than $20 million annually on an electricity bill that normally costs $85 million.

In March, hundreds of decades-old buses will be upgraded to less-polluting, more energy-efficient propane models. Eight of a planned 250 schools will have solar power installations. Still others will be outfitted with "smart" irrigation systems to reduce the millions of gallons of imported water the district guzzles each day, more than half of which is used for outdoor watering.

"Our mission is to be the greenest school district in the country," said L.A. Board of Education President Monica Garcia, one of three board members who presented the Green LAUSD resolution in late 2007 to outline specific goals for water and energy conservation. "It's good for the students, good for the planet, good for the neighborhoods."

Most of the changes have been funded with voter-approved state bond measures, utility incentives and grants from agencies including the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Southern California Edison and the L.A. Department of Water and Power. An additional $120 million in federal Clean Renewable Energy Bonds may also be available to LAUSD to help it go solar.

"If we can demonstrate that it's possible to be green in a cost-effective manner in a school district as large as L.A., it can be done almost anywhere," said Randy Britt, director of sustainability initiatives for LAUSD. "All this is part of an investment plan that will help build assets that will then be able to generate savings in the general fund."

Under a program unveiled for this school year, a portion of water and energy savings are being returned to schools that institute conservation measures, such as fixing leaky faucets or turning off lights in empty rooms.

The 44 campuses the district plans to build by 2013 will be designed in compliance with the standards of the Collaborative for High Performance Schools, which sets water- and energy-efficiency standards and encourages better classroom acoustics and air quality, mold prevention and natural lighting.

"People think of the whole green issue as focusing on energy, but it's actually only one-fifth energy. It's also focused on air quality, land use and human comfort," said Vivian Loftness, professor of architecture at Carnegie Mellon University and co-chair of a 2008 National Research Council report on green schools. "There's a much broader set of issues."

The report found that many green building practices also aided learning.

For instance, insulated walls and double-pane windows also reduce noise pollution that affects students. Increasing the amount of natural light in classrooms also triggers melatonin production that leads to healthy sleep cycles and makes textbooks and other materials more colorful and compelling to students, Loftness said. Using paints without volatile organic compounds, or VOCs, reduces respiratory problems such as asthma, the No. 1 cause of absenteeism in schools.

The combination of green architectural practices and improved learning and teaching opportunities led to Project Frog, a San Francisco firm that designs and manufactures zero-energy classrooms and portable trailers, such as the one at an LAUSD charter school opening this fall.

In addition to featuring recycled denim insulation, low- and no-VOC interiors and a tall, pitched roof allowing so much natural light that overhead lighting may not be necessary, the Vaughn Next Century Learning Center in San Fernando will be used as a training center to prepare high school students for careers in California's budding green economy.

Jay Gonzales, an advisor in LAUSD's Office of Curriculum and Instruction, is working to infuse core math, science, language arts and social studies curricula with hands-on learning opportunities resulting from the district's sustainability initiatives. "My mantra is, 'Use what you have in the house,' " Gonzales said.

This spring, Gonzales is piloting a project that will get students involved in mapping out more water-efficient irrigation systems at their schools.

"LAUSD's mandate is to educate, so everything we do should somehow be connected," said Gonzales.

"Kids like to do things," Gonzales added. "If we give them all this knowledge and we don't give them an opportunity to use the knowledge to see how it works in practice, we're short-circuiting something that's naturally going for us with children, and that is their innate curiosity."


SCHOLAR’S SCHOOL REFORM U-TURN SHAKES UP DEBATE
By SAM DILLON | NEW YORK TIMES

March 2, 2010 -- Diane Ravitch, the education historian who built her intellectual reputation battling progressive educators and served in the first Bush administration’s Education Department, is in the final stages of an astonishing, slow-motion about-face on almost every stand she once took on American schooling.

Once outspoken about the power of standardized testing, charter schools and free markets to improve schools, Dr. Ravitch is now caustically critical. She underwent an intellectual crisis, she says, discovering that these strategies, which she now calls faddish trends, were undermining public education. She resigned last year from the boards of two conservative research groups.

“School reform today is like a freight train, and I’m out on the tracks saying, ‘You’re going the wrong way!’ ” Dr. Ravitch said in an interview.

Dr. Ravitch is one of the most influential education scholars of recent decades, and her turnaround has become the buzz of school policy circles.

“What’s Diane up to? That’s what people are asking.” said Grover J. Whitehurst, who was the director of the Department of Education’s research arm in the second Bush administration and is now Dr. Ravitch’s colleague at the Brookings Institution.

Among the topics on which Dr. Ravitch has reversed her views is the main federal law on public schools, No Child Left Behind, which is up for a rewrite in coming weeks in Congress. She once supported it, but now says its requirements for testing in math and reading have squeezed vital subjects like history and art out of classrooms.

Dr. Ravitch’s new posture has angered critics.

“She has done more than any one I can think of in America to drive home the message of accountability and charters and testing,” said Arthur E. Levine, a former president of Teachers College, where Dr. Ravitch got her doctorate and began her teaching career in the 1970s. “Now for her to suddenly conclude that she’s been all wrong is extraordinary — and not very helpful.”

Admirers say she is returning to her roots as an advocate for public education. She rose to prominence in the 1970s with books defending the civic value of public schools from attacks by left-wing detractors, who were calling them capitalist tools to indoctrinate working-class children.

“First she angered the Marxist historians, and later the fans of progressive education and the multiculturalists,” said Jeffrey E. Mirel, a professor of education and history at the University of Michigan. “But she’s always defended public schools and a robust traditional curriculum, because she believes they’ve been a ladder of social mobility.”

Dr. Ravitch was born in Texas and graduated from Wellesley. She gained formidable influence during the Republican-dominated 1980s. In her meticulous office on the top floor of a 19th-century Brooklyn brownstone hangs a photograph of herself, seated next to Vice President Bush during a visit to the White House, directly across from President Ronald Reagan.

In 1991, Lamar Alexander, the first President Bush’s secretary of education, made her an assistant secretary, a post she used to lead a federal effort to promote the creation of state and national academic standards.

Since leaving government in 1993, Dr. Ravitch has been a much-sought-after policy analyst and research scholar, quoted in hundreds of articles on American education. And she has written five books, including “Left Back: A Century of Battles Over School Reform” (2001) and “The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Students Learn” (2003), an influential examination of the censorship of school books by left- and right-wing pressure groups.

In her new book, “The Death and Life of the Great American School System,” she describes the bipartisan consensus that took root in the early 1990s, with her support, and has held sway since.

“The new thinking saw the public school system as obsolete, because it is controlled by the government,” she writes. “I argued that certain managerial and structural changes — that is, choice, charters, merit pay and accountability — would help to reform our schools.”

In January 2001, Dr. Ravitch was at the White House to hear President George W. Bush outline his vision for No Child Left Behind, which Congress approved with bipartisan majorities and which became law in 2002.

“It sounded terrific,” she recalled in the interview.

There were signs soon after, however, that her views were changing. She had endorsed mayoral control of New York City schools before Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg obtained it in 2002, but by 2004 she had emerged as a fierce critic. Some said she was nursing a grudge because close friends had lost jobs in the mayor’s shake-up of the schools’ bureaucracy.

In 2005, she said, a study she undertook of Pakistan’s weak and inequitable education system, dominated by private and religious institutions, convinced her that protecting the United States’ public schools was important to democracy.

She remembers another date, Nov. 30, 2006, when at a Washington conference she heard a dozen experts conclude that the No Child law was not raising student achievement.

These and other experiences left her increasingly disaffected from the choice and accountability movements. Charter schools, she concluded, were proving to be no better on average than regular schools, but in many cities were bleeding resources from the public system. Testing had become not just a way to measure student learning, but an end in itself.

“Accountability, as written into federal law, was not raising standards but dumbing down the schools,” she writes. “The effort to upend American public education and replace it with something that was market-based began to feel too radical for me.”

She said she began to feel estranged intellectually from close colleagues.

One she heard criticize the No Child law was Chester E. Finn Jr., a former assistant secretary of education with whom she had written a book and worked at two conservative research groups, the Thomas B. Fordham Institute and the Koret Task Force at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.

They were ideological soul mates and just plain chums. Often over the last decade, they were on the phone together or exchanging e-mail messages half a dozen times a day. But although Mr. Finn had become critical of the No Child law, he remained an advocate of charter schools and school choice.

By 2008, Mr. Finn said, “there were more and more issues where the staff and everybody else on the Fordham board would say, ‘Let’s do A,’ and Diane would say, ‘Let’s do B.’ ”

Finally, she recalled, “I told everybody at a dinner meeting at Koret that I was going to resign, and they all said, ‘Come on, stay — we need somebody to argue with us.” Dr. Ravitch stayed on for a time, but left both organizations last spring.

Mr. Finn has done his own rethinking, and he said he shared many of her disappointments.

“Standards, in many places, have proven nebulous and low,” he writes in a coming essay. “ ‘Accountability’ has turned to test-cramming and bean-counting, often limited to basic reading and math skills.”

But Mr. Finn has reached sharply different conclusions from Dr. Ravitch.

“Diane says, ‘Let’s return to the old public school system,’ ” he said. “I say let’s blow it up.”

But Dr. Ravitch is finding many supporters. She told school superintendents at a convention in Phoenix last month that the United States’ educational policies were ill-conceived, compared with those in nations with the best-performing schools.

“Nations like Finland and Japan seek out the best college graduates for teaching positions, prepare them well, pay them well and treat them with respect,” she said. “They make sure that all their students study the arts, history, literature, geography, civics, foreign languages, the sciences and other subjects. They do this because this is the way to ensure good education. We’re on the wrong track.”

The superintendents gave Dr. Ravitch a standing ovation.

“We totally agreed with what she had to say,” said Eugene G. White, superintendent of the Indianapolis Public Schools. “We were amazed to see that she’d changed her tune.”


HIGHLIGHTS, LOWLIGHTS & THE NEWS THAT DOESN'T FIT: The Rest of the Stories from Other Sources
LAUSD SUPERINTENDENT CORTINES CELEBRATES THE ARTS ON SUNDAY FEB 28, 2010 AT LOS ANGELES TENTH DISTRICT PTSA: 1oth ... http://bit.ly/cPVqd3

Themes in the News: I’M WORRIED ABOUT …THE WHOLE SYSTEM: Themes in the News for the week of March 1-5, 2010 By UCL... http://bit.ly/9Od2BV

SCHWARZENEGGER SEEKS BOLDER ACTION AS STATE LOSES OUT ON FEDERAL SCHOOLS FUNDS: by Rob Hotakainen | Sacramento Bee... http://bit.ly/avtSyD

FAILING SCHOOLS LIST ON MONDAY, STATE BOARD VOT

DAY OF ACTION: March 4, 2010 - Media coverage of the March 4 "Day of Action": from the utla Website Television... http://bit.ly/c7ZrzZ 7

UNION VICTORY IN L.A. SCHOOLS SHOWDOWN UPS ANTE: By Lesli A. Maxwell | EdWeek | Vol. 29, Issue 24 March 3, 2010 -... http://bit.ly/dnh0lg

San Francisco D.A.’s study: HOW REDUCING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRUA

‘DAY OF ACTION’ HIGHLIGHTS EDUCATION WOES: In California and across the US, students and faculty protest tuition h... http://bit.ly/dgerNJ

CA DOESN’T MAKE THE RACE TO THE TOP CUT: March 4, 2010 SacBee CapitolAlert: California doesn't make final cut for... http://bit.ly/8XCKBU

Thurs., March 4: HEADLINES @ THE CRACK OF DAWN: from Google News LAUSD division charged with assisting transition... http://bit.ly/9DXPNu

LEARNING A LESSON: Mostly frozen out of L.A. Unified’s latest reform effort, charter school operators debate thei... http://bit.ly/bCcXP7

SAVE THE DATE/HELP SAVE EDUCATION: March 4th, 2010 is a National Day of Action to Defend Education: http://bit.ly/azPtWB

PARENTS CAN’T RELY ON POLITICIANS + smf's 2¢: By Ben Austin in Fox & Hounds DAILY -- austin is Executive Director o... http://bit.ly/cQOOJA

UP TO 5,200 LA SCHOOLS WORKERS COULD FACE LAYOFFS + LAUSD: UP TO 4,700 LAYOFFS: Up to 5,200 LA schools workers cou... http://bit.ly/b87r9s

SOME QUESTION NEW POWER HELD BY SCHOOL SITE COUNCILS: BY JORGE BARRIENTOS, Bakersfield Californian staff writer S... http://bit.ly/9p9GZH

5:10 with Diane Ravitch: FORMER NCLB ADVOCATE TURNS CRITIC: by Steve Inskeep | National Public Radio Morning Editi... http://bit.ly/db3g9q

Briefly: BRAVO MAGNET BUILDS A BRIDGE, HOLMES MS IS A SCHOOL TO WATCH, CORTINES ON THE LAWSUIT: Press Releases fro... http://bit.ly/94W6Ao

Study: ELIMINATION JUNK FOODS AT SCHOOLS MAY HELP PREVENT CHILDHOOD OBESITY – LAUSD cited: SFSU Press Release from... http://bit.ly/9lpiPb


THE THE SIGN IN THE PHOTO WITH THE HEADLINE ‘TEACHERS PROTEST AT GLENDALE HIGH SCHOOL’ SAYS IT ALL: “Not enough bo... http://bit.ly/cwm5YD

“THE YEAR OF THE PINK SLIP”: At a Watts school, layoffs take a heavy toll: Markham Middle School has been making d... http://bit.ly/cJZuU5

LAUSD BOARD’S SO-CALLED REFORM: In choosing who will run 30 new or underperforming schools, the board showed that ... http://bit.ly/aKBFiu 6

Charter CEO: FOR LAUSD. IT’S BUSINESS AS USUAL IN ‘REFORMING’ SCHOOLS: By Mike Piscal -- Mike Piscal is the founde... http://bit.ly/aJaRDB

THE DEATH OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE: By Charles Taylor Kerchner and Dominic J. Brewer in The Huffington Post March ... http://bit.ly/bl0E5f 3

READ THE NEXT THREE STORIES, CONNECT THE DOTS + DO THE MATH: http://bit.ly/bQFYAUhttp://bit.ly/ai5KKlhttp://... http://bit.ly/bH6cfX

K-12 CUTS LOOM AGAIN AS STATES’ FISCAL WOES CONTINUE: With Budget Gaps Growing, About Half Expect K-12 Cuts: Prote... http://bit.ly/bQFYAU

Colin Powell: HELPING AMERICA BECOME A GRAD NATION: Posted on The White House Blog by General Colin Powell on Marc... http://bit.ly/ai5KKl

Book Review: THE DEATH AND LIFE OF THE GREAT AMERICAN SCHOOL SYSTEM by Diane Ravitch: The educational conservative... http://bit.ly/bp9nWu


EVENTS: Coming up next week...
*Dates and times subject to change. ________________________________________
• SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
http://www.laschools.org/bond/
Phone: 213-241-5183
____________________________________________________
• LAUSD FACILITIES COMMUNITY OUTREACH CALENDAR:
http://www.laschools.org/happenings/
Phone: 213-241.8700


• LAUSD BOARD OF EDUCATION & COMMITTEES MEETING CALENDAR



What can YOU do?
• E-mail, call or write your school board member:
Yolie.Flores.Aguilar@lausd.net • 213-241-6383
Tamar.Galatzan@lausd.net • 213-241-6386
Monica.Garcia@lausd.net • 213-241-6180
Marguerite.LaMotte@lausd.net • 213-241-6382
Nury.Martinez@lausd.net • 213-241-6388
Richard.Vladovic@lausd.net • 213-241-6385
Steve.Zimmer@lausd.net • 213-241-6387
...or your city councilperson, mayor, the governor, member of congress, senator - or the president. Tell them what you really think! • There are 26 mayors and five county supervisors representing jurisdictions within LAUSD, the mayor of LA can be reached at mayor@lacity.org • 213.978.0600
• Call or e-mail Governor Schwarzenegger: 213-897-0322 e-mail: http://www.govmail.ca.gov/
• Open the dialogue. Write a letter to the editor. Circulate these thoughts. Talk to the principal and teachers at your local school.
• Speak with your friends, neighbors and coworkers. Stay on top of education issues. Don't take my word for it!
• Get involved at your neighborhood school. Join your PTA. Serve on a School Site Council. Be there for a child.
• If you are eligible to become a citizen, BECOME ONE.
• If you a a citizen, REGISTER TO VOTE.
• If you are registered, VOTE LIKE THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT.


Who are your elected federal & state representatives? How do you contact them?




Scott Folsom is a parent leader in LAUSD. He is Past President of Los Angeles Tenth District PTSA and represents PTA on the LAUSD Construction Bond Citizen's Oversight Committee. He is an elected Representative on his neighborhood council. He is a Health Commissioner, Legislation Team member and a member of the Board of Managers of the California State PTA. He serves on numerous school district advisory and policy committees and has served as a PTA officer and governance council member at three LAUSD schools. He is the recipient of the UTLA/AFT 2009 "WHO" Gold Award for his support of education and public schools - an honor he hopes to someday deserve. • In this forum his opinions are his own and your opinions and feedback are invited. Quoted and/or cited content copyright © the original author and/or publisher. All other material copyright © 4LAKids.
• FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 4LAKids makes such material available in an effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to parents, teachers, students and community members in a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
• To SUBSCRIBE e-mail: 4LAKids-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com - or -TO ADD YOUR OR ANOTHER'S NAME TO THE 4LAKids SUBSCRIPTION LIST E-MAIL smfolsom@aol.com with "SUBSCRIBE" AS THE SUBJECT. Thank you.